does lily allen hav...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] does lily allen have any talent?

204 Posts
82 Users
0 Reactions
1,109 Views
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

As above, I dont see the similarity in the photos, other than hair colour.

She didn't become famous because of her musical talent though did she? She became famous as Keith Allen's singing daughter.

As far as I know she did, I had no idea who he was or how they were related for ages. It was only when I saw her on TV talkign about her father that I made the link. none of her tracks were introduced as "daughter of..." when I heard them. Just because some people are "up" on who;s who in the media doesnt mean everyone listening is. Not everyone reads Heat and gossips about celebrities during lunch?

And if she is going to appear in ridiculous photos like the ones above which have no relevance to her music at all then she can expect to be ridiculed.

Its called publicity. Most artists do it. If you have "talents" flaunt them to get sales, its common sense.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:29 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

The millions of people who've bought her records have bought them because she's Keith Allens' daughter?


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:32 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Yep. all the people who buy Coldplay albums also want something recorded by Gwyneth Paltrow's husband. Stands to reason. 🙂


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:36 am
Posts: 12072
Full Member
 

Ok, I'm wrong. I thought they looked quite similar, same shape face. Perhaps being surrounded by Spanish all day has ruined my visual acuity.

I've never heard of her father, he hasn't made it over here. Has he done anything good?


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:40 am
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

I was aware of her being Keith's daughter before I'd heard any of her music. (And I'm far from being 'up' on who's who). Maybe she really didn't use him as a way into stardom, but I find that hard to believe. And of course, if she did use his contacts as a way in then:

Bimbler - Member
The millions of people who've bought her records have bought them because she's Keith Allens' daughter?

Yes Bimbler, indirectly they did.

regardless, if you are a better musician than her, link to some of your stuff so people can judge for themselves if you are better than her, or [b]STFU[/b]

Nice sensible sixth form style post there.

There was me thinking that this is a forum for debate.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:41 am
Posts: 3598
Full Member
 

I doubt that most of the people buying Lily Allen's records would even know who Keith Allen is. I only know him as someone who has been in a few TV programmes and brit films from years back, and a Fulham fan who co-wrote Vindaloo with the bassist from Blur.

I remember hearing her 1st album when my daughter got it and thinking alot of the songs lyrics were very different. Her songs were about her life I suppose, and not typical Simon Cowell pop formula love songs.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

most days it seems like a forum for whiners, and bitter old men who think life is so unfair.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:42 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Yes Bimbler, indirectly they did.

Dont be so ****ing daft. People buy records because they like the music.

I can't even carry this on, your point of view is so rediculous and based on total lack of logic.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:49 am
Posts: 12072
Full Member
 

The logic being she only got a break because of her father, I suppose?


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:51 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Coffeeking - isn't the point that there are probably quite literally thousands of people with similar amounts of talent who never get a break, and when someone does who happens to have pretty good connections there is inevitably a suspicion that there is a causal relationship? The process of getting a pop album to the top of the charts is about a good deal more than the quality of the music, so almost the fact that an album is available to buy and being talked about on radio and TV is crucial.

I have absolutely no clue whether this is true in her case, likewise I do not have much grasp of who Keith Allen is.

EDIT: Morgrim was rather swifter... 🙂


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:55 am
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

mogrim - Member
The logic being she only got a break because of her father, I suppose?

Exactly, mogrim, not a difficult thing for coffeeking to work out.

Now lets go on to why do witches float?


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:56 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Easy. They are made of wood.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 10:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

richc - Member

most days it seems like a forum for whiners, and bitter old men who think life is so unfair.

Is that a line from one of her songs? 😉


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:00 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

The logic being she only got a break because of her father, I suppose?

IdleJon proposes that she is only famous as a singer because she has a famous father with contacts. This is a flawed logic because it suggests that a total lack of musical talent can be over-ridden by having famous parents and that all of her music sales are based on her fathers fame. Regardless of his fame, if she had produced bad/unpopular music she would not still be selling albums and across the charts. How she entered the industry is not important in the determination of whether she has talent.

Most (all?) bands are talent-scouted by record companies with plenty of connections and finance - by extending his logic to others, all musical artists are talentless publicity whores, pimped by people with contacts. 🙄


Exactly, mogrim, not a difficult thing for coffeeking to work out.

No, thats not what you suggested, you suggested people only bought records because of who her father was. Suggesting that she would otherwise have never been introduced to the business or that she has no talent, neither is the case.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:00 am
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

BigDummy - Member
Coffeeking - isn't the point that there are probably quite literally thousands of people with similar amounts of talent who never get a break, and when someone does who happens to have pretty good connections there is inevitably a suspicion that there is a causal relationship? The process of getting a pop album to the top of the charts is about a good deal more than the quality of the music, so almost the fact that an album is available to buy and being talked about on radio and TV is crucial.

And if she uses those connections then fair enough, happens all the time. But lets not pretend that it was all about her limited talented, her limited sex appeal. Would that have been enough to propel her to her current position if she was Lily Jones, daughter of a plumber from Southend?


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is that a line from one of her songs?

could be, but it would need a innit on the end to be authentic.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:03 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Jon - no-one buys a record they don't like, do they? Regardless of how the record came to be available to buy, the fact that it was purchased in millions suggests she has more than "limited" talent, unless of course her father is buying millions of copies with his connections and cash, then I would conclude you have a point. Whether there are other people deserving a break or not is irrelevant.

Take, for instance, The Verve. They have winey voices and their songs are mostly depressing (though I quite like them and their music was very good). They came from a workign class background and were talent scouted, from where they used rich and famous companies to market themselves and sold tens of millions of records, being far more famous than lilly allen. They had no famous parents, they came from my home town - my brother knew them. To suggest that she couldnt have made it as big without her father is stupidity.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:05 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Tomorrow, can we discuss Lady Gaga? 8)

She is clearly a superb songwriter. I was almost moved to tears by the line "this beat is sick/I wanna take a ride on your disco stick".


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

richc - Member

oh I forgot, she does whine like only a Londoner can, which is annoying, but then again she doesn't whine nearly as much as RB which is a small mercy

See, you were doing ok, but then you went and let yourself down, and revealed your whinging old bitterness.

Do any of you lot who are singing her praises, actually listen to owt outside of the Pop Charts? I've heard better singers at a karaoke night. I've heard bands/acts with better songwriters in the back rooms of tatty pubs. There are probbly people on here, who are musically more talented than Lily Allen.

She is a mediocre pop tart, with some very slick production and marketing behind her. Nowt special at all. Trouble is, there's so much commercial junk around, that she stands out. Mind, anything's got to be better than Crazy Frog, I spose...


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:15 am
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

CK, you seem to be misreading me or misquoting me, I didn't say that others deserved a break.

But you seem to be suggesting that just because an act sells records, they must have more than a limited talent, whoever they are? Have you not noticed how the music industry works?

X-factor records are bought in their millions. Do the acts have above average talent?

edit - and what have the Verve got to do with the price of fish?


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

First album stood our from the crowd for me. Fun, catchy and still enjoyable today. Cue an influx of Lily Allen wannabies (Kate Nash anyone?)that means she no longer stands out as anything special. That and the fact her current single has the kind of lyrics any of us on here could better means she's definitely gone downhill recently. Shame really, I always used to be able to ignore lyrical content.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:22 am
Posts: 12072
Full Member
 

X-factor records are bought in their millions. Do the acts have above average talent?

I'd suggest that yes, they do. You may not like how they sing, but the people in the music industry know what sells, and choose that. There's more than enough competition that they don't have to choose average or below average acts.

Lily Allen's dad may have got her noticed by the right people, but if she'd been completely talentless they wouldn't have risked money on her.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

X-factor records are bought in their millions. Do the acts have above average talent?

Er, yes. Even if you're not a fan I think it is difficult to ignore that Leona Lewis, that funny looking dude who sings Opera, Alexandra Burke (the last winner) and many others from X Factor/Britain's Got Talent etc genuinely do have talent.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:25 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

CK, you seem to be misreading me or misquoting me, I didn't say that others deserved a break.

Correct, sorry I mis-quoted, BigDummy mentioned it. Was only a side-point anyway.

But you seem to be suggesting that just because an act sells records, they must have more than a limited talent, whoever they are? Have you not noticed how the music industry works?

X-factor records are bought in their millions. Do the acts have above average talent?

One would suggest that the acts that sell ONE or TWO singles after weeks of TV exposure and then vanish have average or below average talent. One who has no prior TV coverage and sells several albums over the course of a couple of years, in numbers in the millions would be a totally different situation suggesting more than just connections and meagre talent. Even so, some of those really DO have talent, plenty.

The verve being an example of ordinary people who have made it without famous fathers, pointing out that while it may help to start a career it doesnt actually make a difference to the LENGTH of the career or the quantity of records sold ultimately. While obviously it's not black and white, its certainly not as greyscale as you are suggesting when you say people are buying records because of who her father is. Name me an act that has absolutely zero talent but has a long standing continuing career - and taste does not count.

I'm not arguing anymore, we're going round in circles. I just totally disagree with your logic, regardless of whether I like her music or not.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...and to bring this back to Dylan, they can sing better than him 😀


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but if she'd been completely talentless they wouldn't have risked money on her.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Milli Vanilli:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:27 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I can't see what the difference between Lily Allen and the other pop tarts from the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's (e.g Cilla Black, Banarama, Spice Girls) is?

AFAIK Lily Allen became popular from her MySpace pages
- from a group of people who wouldn't have known who her father was.
It's probably fair to suggest that he only got the role in Robin Hood off the back of his daughters fame.

She produces good, catchy pop records and doesn't take herself too seriously - whilst still managing to be pretty cute.
Works for me....


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:29 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

People here are also letting their taste get in the way of the argument. Talent is not the same as taste. I hate football of any kind, but realise that the players are talented (often!).


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:30 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

X-factor records are bought in their millions. Do the acts have above average talent?

On the strength of her voice alone, I personally don't think that Lily Allen would make it through to the later stages of X-factor.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One would suggest that the acts that sell ONE or TWO singles after weeks of TV exposure and then vanish have average or below average talent.

coffeeking, have I misunderstood? It seems like you've mistaken talent for success. You've no argument from me that TV exposure helps sell records or that many such acts eventually disappear, but assuming we're talking about SINGING talent then most of these TV "winners" are much more capable singers than average. Some can even - shock horror - write songs and play instruments.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:32 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

coffeeking, have I misunderstood? It seems like you've mistaken talent for success.

I can't see how you can realistically suggest the two are not linked unless you have some underlying grudge. If someone does not have a talent (a talent being someting that they can do well) then people would not make them a success. Her talent is creating catchy songs and singing them well, people buy them. If she didnt write catchy songs and sung them badly she would not sell them (over an extended period), regardless of cash pumped in. Her talents are not only SINGING. She may be only a mediocre singer, but she comes as a package. Most people dont value people for just one part of their person.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:36 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Irrespective of of paternity (I recall she was mainly brought up by mum + Harry Enfield anyway) not only has she had a hugely successful (more so than any of us on here I'd wager, although hard to quantify) first album, as X factor contestants have done, she has also released a hugely successful second album, which I believe no X factor contestant has done. (Don't hold me to that bit)

Talent or not she is part of the zeitgeist, she's also her own person far more so than the Leona' Lewis's of the world. Perhaps that's part of the problem to her decriers? She talks to a lot of teenage/twenties girls with her lyrics, she designs clothes etc and in twenty years they'll still be playing smile etc on the radio. Oh and bit of trivia she's got 3 nipples.

Christ I sound like a fan.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:37 am
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

coffeking you are rather naive to think that talent and success are related in anyway in the pop world

the charts have been a joke since forever, PR, marketing, record labels, radio 1 playlists, 'svengalis' like cowell, fuller, waterman etc have so distorted the music scene that talent isnt even 50% of the equation

half our charts are dominated by one slimy incredibly false guy called simon cowell whos tv shows shit out half the performers on there who instantly enter the top ten to add to his many millions of pounds

lilly didnt go via that channel she used her celeb father to get her foot in the door and let her labels pr people do the rest


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:42 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

svengalis' like

Joe Meek, Brian Epstein......


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:45 am
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

'Talent or not she is part of the zeitgeist, she's also her own person far more so than the Leona' Lewis's of the world. Perhaps that's part of the problem to her decriers? She talks to a lot of teenage/twenties girls with her lyrics, she designs clothes etc and in twenty years they'll still be playing smile etc on the radio. Oh and bit of trivia she's got 3 nipples.'

My grandfather had 3 nipples. So did Scaramanga. They would have been burnt as witches, which links nicely to my post above.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:46 am
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

come on bimbler i was born in 1976 not 1937

besides didnt epstein launch cilla blacks career!?!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:48 am
Posts: 13164
Full Member
 

Those nay saying the paternal influence, her USP at the start, as introduced by that arbiter of modern taste Radio One, was, "Lily is Keith Allen's daughter".
I don't like her music as it sounds over produced, some of the lyrics are clever but some are crude and lacking in imagination.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:49 am
 Rich
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

And they say girls are bitchy!

😆


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BigDummy don't forget my favourite ladygaga line; bluffin' with my muffin 😀

anyhow Lily Allen, quite like her songs, they make me laugh. can't stand her persona though.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

kimbers
I was grateful for you saying exactly what I was going to say to CoffeeKing until you ruined my argument by using Simon Cowell's TV shows as your example of talent not equating to success. Like it or not, these shows have unearthed genuine talent, whether it is to your taste or not.

Leona Lewis is a great example of this. Her singing talent - like it or not she can sing - was natural and "discovered" by the X Factor. Her "star quality" was non-existent and has been manufactured by Cowell's machine. She has sold millions of albums and is big in the State as well as here.

Success from little or no talent? I refer you to the pic of Milli Vanilli above and many others...


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 11:53 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

A lot of people have crap taste - doesn't make her great just because she sells records. Anyone still listen to Five Star of Bros? Indeed there are many great albums from the past that don't get heard by the majority of younger people because they're not pushed but they would sell - or maybe not as they're not cool? I dunno!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 12:38 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

YOU LEAVE FIVE STAR OUT OF THIS!!!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I saw her in the pub at Heathrow terminal 5 a few weeks ago. I couldn't help thinking that if she was really famous and talented, she'd have been in the VIP section...


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 12:48 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Personally don't think I'm naive - I am aware of the various influences (PR, cash, fame etc) but just dont think it explains this case. She has a marked ability to write songs that are catchy and sings those songs fairly well (how she sings them is personal taste). The fact that she appeals to enough people to sell the records gives her [b]a marked ability in an area[/b]. That is the definition of talent. People dont just go out and buy records because they're well marketed, they only buy records that they enjoy listening to. She has a talent for producing music that people like, this cannot be argued.

I saw her in the pub at Heathrow terminal 5 a few weeks ago. I couldn't help thinking that if she was really famous and talented, she'd have been in the VIP section...

Only if she let the fame go to her head.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I couldn't help thinking that if she was really famous and talented, she'd have been in the VIP section...

the famousest person I've ever met was Alan Bennett - but unfortunately Clapham (in Yorkshire) doesn't have a VIP lounge (or even pavements) so he had to walk on the road 🙁


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

People dont just go out and buy records because they're well marketed, they only buy records that they enjoy listening to

God Help Us. I thought that WAS the only reason we have so much rubbish in the charts


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:01 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

they only buy records that they enjoy listening to

Really? So many kids buy stuff because their friends do and the bands are deemed the ones to like. My sister years ago was a fan of the Spice Girls as were all her friends, but then they all decided they were rubbish at pretty much the same time.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:09 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Not fussed about her one way or the other - never was or will be the type of miusic I listen too...........

.....however, after seeing her 'livelounge' set at the R1 Big weekend on tv, I would like to pay tribute to the highly talented producers/engineers who make her recordings sound like she hasn't caught her fanny climbing over a gate !


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

coffeking you are digging yourself in deeper

simon cowell is sooo fake it calls into question any of his protege's actual talent or genuine ability in my opinion


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:20 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I think we are round in a circle on this. I am not sure that the OP's question was "does Lily sell numerous records?", I suspect it went to whether she [i]would[/i] sell lots of records if the record-buying public bought records on the basis of musical talent. That in itself carries the assumption that musical talent can be objectively separated from whether audiences like the music or its success, which is of course highly debatable. 🙂


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Doesn't really do much for me, lately she seems to be sounding axactly the same as kate nash, not only the voice but the music as well. Looks and sounds all right though if that's your thing. She looks and sounds a good laugh though and is harmless.

Bet she doesn't spend her days on a mountain bike website for men of a certain age though.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:24 pm
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

Anyone who can sing a little, and is reasonably good looking can be turned into a pop star. At least Lily Allen has bothered to be a little different - doing her own lyrics and being a bit more individual than the usual pop clones. Let's face it, pop music has never been about natural talent.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course Allen has 'talent' in the most abject sense of that word. That some find it acceptable to defend her as an [i]artist[/i] verges on the unutterably depressing. Worse, it also took an unreasonable amount of scrolling down to find the first post that even begins to gesture towards the depths of her inadequacy as a vehicle for anything remotely resembling pop music (thankyou Rusty Spanner for restoring my waning faith in humanity).

Allen stands for all that is lamentable in the world today.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

Allen stands for all that is lamentable in the world today.

That's what I love about STW - everyone's sense of perspective. 😉


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

crouch_potato, I think you'll find that would be ATILITWT and not ALLEN as suggested


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Allen stands for all that is lamentable in the world today.

Have to disagree with that one CP. At least she gets off her arse and actually does something to earn a living in a reasonably inoffensive way. There are numerous more deserving of the Rusty Spanner wrath.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Really? So many kids buy stuff because their friends do and the bands are deemed the ones to like.

I obviously skipped that fad then, as did most of my mates. We bought things that we heard and liked, if we heard it and didnt like it we laughed at it, regardless of what our mates thought. In fact we used it as ammo in insults, but we would certainly not have bought something we didn't like. If kids are THAT impressionble these days we have no hope.

Regardless, the OPs question was does LA have talent. Yes she does, as mentioned she can write catchy songs and get people to buy her albums. Those are talents. They may be scorned by musical purists but that is irrelevant. If the OP had asked if she had singing talent we could have come up with a more definitive answer..

Regardless I find her tunes catchy but not overly amazing. I'd not buy her tracks but I dont turn them off when they come on the radio.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

does lily allen have any singing talent?

and of we go again. Yay!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At least she gets off her arse and actually does something to earn a living in a reasonably inoffensive way.

Funny, that brings to mid a certain Ms Allen...

" I just want to make some money, yeah?... I'm gonna retire at 25, yeah?... Just 'cos your mum was too lazy to get her fat arse up off the sofa and make some cash..."

Even without such outbursts (after all remember, she has had a trying upbringing) her utterly glib, me-me-me emotional patois and musical paint-by-numbers is vacuous dross.

I'm not sure of the appropriate emoticon for slightly tongue in cheek hyperbole (see also previous post)/you get the gist of things... 😉


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 1:58 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know its against the rules to post 'would you' threads but can I just say Lilly Allen doesnt do anything for me (but I would still....flash grenades/Uzi etc)


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 2:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can't resist jumping back into this again. What I like about Lily Allen is the music. Not the lyrics, which are naff, not her voice (although I do find it quite endearing) and certainly not her personality. However the production is great. It reminds me of hip hop, where the producer is king and the artist incidental. Dr Dre? DJ Muggs? Anything they turned their hand to turned out great, regardless of who was actually rapping over the top.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Allen stands for all that is lamentable in the world today

hmmm, sense of proportion failure. Before I started getting my knickers in a twist over harmless musicians we'd have to have solved starvation, poverty, racism, genocide, totalitarianism, depletion of resources and planetary devastation.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 2:16 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Even without such outbursts (after all remember, she has had a trying upbringing) her utterly glib, me-me-me emotional patois and musical paint-by-numbers is vacuous dross.

Not disagreeing with you there CP but I can't work up any enthusiasm one way or the other.

For truly vacuous dross you need only look at the input from the poster immediately after your last post. 🙄


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 2:20 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Lordy, there's some jaded old moaners on here isn't there. You lot should listen to the blinkered crap you spout.

🙁


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Peter and Simon, relax, you appear to have missed the

I'm not sure of the appropriate emoticon for slightly tongue in cheek hyperbole.
What has happened to the stw of days of yore? Halcyon days descending into incendiary diatribe merging with reams of intolerant bickering, complete lack of perspective and self indulgent meanderings... Lily Allen of all subjects is surely ripe for this kind of thing.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[i]Before I started getting my knickers in a twist over harmless musicians we'd have to have solved starvation, poverty, racism, genocide, totalitarianism, depletion of resources and planetary devastation. [/i]

This is a noble ideal. However, you are not going to see any of those things solved in your lifetime. On the other hand, we can probably finish despairing of Lily Allen before tea-time, and do Kate Nash this evening, leaving tomorrow free to despair of Lady Gaga and Leona Lewis.

Go for the quick wins! 🙂


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 3:31 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I'm not sure of the appropriate emoticon for slightly tongue in cheek hyperbole.

Oh, I can work out who's tongue is in the ir cheek alright, but mention music on STW and you always get 2 types of people posting - Those whos musical taste ended in 1979 and only listen to crusty overblown rock bands and look down on everyone else, and those who only listen to stuff nobody else cares about just because it makes them look cool and alternative (FFS there's a thread going about Kraftwerk! They were talentless-electronic-dirge crap of the first order 20 years ago. Now just old talentless-electronic-dirge crap)

The very worst are New Order fans. Utter, utter bilge. And yes, I've had the misfortune to see them live. What a load of depressing tripe. They really have no talent, yet are worshipped by the indie masses. Why?

For the record, I like anything really. Rock, punk, ska, pop, female vocal, classical, proper rock'n'roll, some dance, hip-hop, new, old....Bluddy anyhthing.
What I don't like is people that stick their nose in the air and pretend that because they 'know what they are talking about', a certain artist is rubbish.

Rant over. As you were.

(And I didn't even mention Radiohead fans.....oops 😉 )

EDIT - This is what I'm talking about -

A lot of people have crap taste - doesn't make her great just because she sells records

Who the hell are YOU to tell me my taste is CRAP???!!!!
Stick your opinion where the sun don't shine, halfwit.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 3:42 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

PP

I was almost with you there until you mentioned thst you actually listened to that steaming pile of poo which makes the likes of Lily Allen et al look talented ie. C + W, then you went and rubbed it in by dissing Radiohead fans.................

I'm wounded ....................................deeply
-
😆


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

C&W is great fun, makes me laugh! Spent 2 weeks driving round the States singing along to it. Fantastic!
🙂

I once bought a Radiohead album (The Bends I think) Listend to it once and swapped it for a Paul Weller album. Much better!

P.S. - I never like Paul Weller, until I saw him live. Stone the crows, that man is good!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 3:54 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Peter and Rudeboy are stylistically very different, but many of their posts are very similar. 🙂


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 3:59 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Actually, the list of some of bands I've seen live is quite varied -

Status Quo
Green Day
Bjork
Fun Lovin Criminals
Chemical Brothers
Symposium
Prodigy
No Doubt
Travis
Save Ferris
Garbage
Skunk Anansie
Snuff
Eminem
Cypress Hill
The Selecta

Pick a musical taste out of that lot, if you can!
🙂


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

PP

Heavy'ish slant to those !

Fair enough, I'll confess to seeing Barclay James Harvest and The Stranglers (in their heyday) on the same night + cranking up Lady Gaga whenever she comes on the radio 😯


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 4:05 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

I'm sorry, I got to that picture on the first page, dribbled a bit and didnt read much after.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

[i]Pick a musical taste out of that lot, if you can![/i]

Dull, and a bit M.O.R ?

Sorry, you did ask.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

Allen stands for all that is lamentable in the world today.

So we have MP's screwing us from all sides, chavs making a career out of being on the dole, the banks bringing the worlds finance system to it's knee's, kids getting stabbed on the streets, illegal wars for oil and it's Lily Allen that stands for all that is lamentable in the world today?

FFS 🙄 Get a grip man!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 6:49 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Who the hell are YOU to tell me my taste is CRAP???!!!!
Stick your opinion where the sun don't shine, halfwit.

Did I say your taste is crap? I'm saying that just because something sells well doesn't make it great - the biggest selling papers are crap compared to some of the others.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 6:56 pm
Posts: 24332
Full Member
 

dunno if anyone has mentioned it but Lily is on the graham norton show tonight


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 8247
Free Member
 

Actually, the list of some of bands I've seen live is quite varied -

Status Quo
Green Day
Bjork
Fun Lovin Criminals
Chemical Brothers
Symposium
Prodigy
No Doubt
Travis
Save Ferris
Garbage
Skunk Anansie
Snuff
Eminem
Cypress Hill
The Selecta

In virtual terms, PP just walked into the room wearing a beige cardigan and slacks, said 'Hey kids, isn't Lily Allen great', and proceeded to dance in an embarrassing way. 😆


Pick a musical taste out of that lot, if you can!

And I agree with Nickc - definitely M.O.R.


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 7:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no she should be shot!


 
Posted : 14/05/2009 7:44 pm
Page 2 / 3

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!