Decipher this cause...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

Decipher this cause of death for me?

18 Posts
13 Users
3 Reactions
1,140 Views
Posts: 8306
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm currently researching my family tree. It's a fascinating rabbit hole to go down.

The link below is from a relatives death certificate, who died in his 20's. 

I can make out 1.b. Chronic Nephritis but cannot work out the rest of it?

Can anyone help?

 

 

 

 


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:39 pm
 PJay
Posts: 4818
Free Member
 

Uremia possibly? It would seem to fit with nephritis. It seems to be written both as Uremia & Uraemia (which looks like 1a.).


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:42 pm
Posts: 282
Full Member
 

Chronic Nephritis certified by someone's name MD?


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:43 pm
Posts: 3007
Full Member
 

Anaemia? 


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:43 pm
Posts: 17779
Full Member
 

1a looks vaguely like like anaemia. The bottom bit is "certified by..." and the doctor's name.


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:44 pm
Posts: 8306
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all.

The bottom bit is clear now.

So it's between anaemia and Uremia.

I would of thought Chronic Nephritis would of been listed first as the cause of death?


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:48 pm
 PJay
Posts: 4818
Free Member
 

Chronic Nephritis certified by someone's name MD?

Possibly Mr <somebody> MB (I think Batchelor of Medicine).


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:50 pm
Posts: 1531
Full Member
 

W.Deshpande?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephritis


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:51 pm
Posts: 422
Full Member
 

W Deshpande MB. ?


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 12:52 pm
Posts: 2980
Full Member
 

That was the 20's and yet 100 yes later, just earlier this week I had to reject some sort of mucus because I couldn't read the hand writing on the request card explaining what they repair thought it was and what they wanted is to do with it. 

Also couldn't decipher who had sent it in order to contact them and ask them directly!


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 1:42 pm
Posts: 24498
Free Member
 

Looks like Uraemia to me

In respect of 1a vs 1b etc. according to Guidance for Practitioners

"

Part 1

The attending practitioner is asked to start with the immediate, direct cause of death on line a of part 1. Having started with the immediate, direct cause of death you should go back through the sequence of events or conditions that led to death on subsequent lines (lines b to d) of part 1, until you reach the condition that started the fatal sequence.

 

so eg (I know not real causes)

1a Hit by car

1b Crossing the road without looking

1c Urgently wanted an ice cream from van on other side of road


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 2:12 pm
Posts: 3636
Free Member
 

Posted by: richardkennerley

That was the 20's and yet 100 yes later, just earlier this week I had to reject some sort of mucus because I couldn't read the hand writing on the request card explaining what they repair thought it was and what they wanted is to do with it. 

The irony!

 


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 3:28 pm
Posts: 2980
Full Member
 

🤣 whoops!


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 4:04 pm
Posts: 60
Full Member
 
  • Most likely uraemia, which is excess of urea in thr blood, due to nephritis here (kidney inflammation). Chronic kidney disease also causes anaemia, and folks used to a large "a" as a capital, rather than "A". But essentially he died of kidney failure. Nephritis s bit vague, likely either chronic (long term) infection, or more likely glomerulonephritis, which has many causes, and often difficult to diagnose precisely, even nowadays. 

 
Posted : 28/02/2025 4:09 pm
Posts: 8612
Full Member
 

It's Uraemia, as this is a plausible 1a leading from 1b Chronic nephritis. Not something people tend to die of now due to the wonder of the PrisMAX

Looks like certified by Dr Deshpande MB


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 4:29 pm
Posts: 8306
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all. Uraemia it is.

Just to clarify, he was only in his 20's and he died in the 1950s.

 

Didn't realise we had Indian Doctor's even in the 1950s.

 


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 4:35 pm
 BigR
Posts: 191
Free Member
 

Basically Renal Failure caused by kidney disease - if in 20s could have been auto-immune glomerulonephritis although chronic infection is another possibility.

Uraemia - renal Failure

Chronic Nephritis - Kidney disease - not specific


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 4:40 pm
Posts: 8612
Full Member
 

Posted by: gobuchul

Didn't realise we had Indian Doctor's even in the 1950s.

Very much yes.

 


 
Posted : 28/02/2025 4:48 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!