You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Her Majesty the Queen today visited the under-construction Crossrail station at Bond Street as the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson MP, announced that the new railway will be known as the Elizabeth line in her honour.
...In 2013, the celebrations of London Underground’s 150th anniversary saw The Prince of Wales and Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cornwall take a trip on the Underground, and Her Majesty The Queen, His Royal Highness The Duke of Edinburgh and Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cambridge visit Baker Street station.
http://www.crossrail.co.uk/news/articles/crossrail-to-become-the-elizabeth-line-in-honour-of-her-majesty-the-queen#
Toadying sycophantic cobblers. Pass the sick bag. It is beyond parody that the fact that someone caught a tube three years ago is remarked upon in the context of trying to articulate a connection between the royal family and public transport. We rightly laugh at tinpot countries that pdefend their leaders cure cancer, wrestle bears and shoot holes in one all day, and then we go and do stuff like this.
Should have been the Crowe Line. 🙂
Yep. It's complete claptrap all right! Annoys the hell out of me.
Start a petition.
Would one to stop you going on about petitions work I wonder?
Couldn't give a toss really,not a bad name for it
shoulda been the charles line
coz we know them city boys all love a line of charlie 😉
until we can ditch the monarchy entirely ( along with the unelected upper house) well have to put up with this bullshit
vive la revolution!
To unashamedly steal from another thread.
It's in a hole, the coffees and food are sub par, the parking in expensive and the toilets aren't available for late night usage.
I, for one, am never setting foot in it.
Crowe line was rather funny
Couldn't give a toss really,not a bad name for it
Stupid name. Worse than just "crossrail". As bad as "Overground" but for different reasons.
Well, you can at least say you're going to ride Liz 😉
Not that it really affects the plebs much. It's primarily a direct line between Heathrow and Canary Wharf for rich bankers.
Most Bankers use East London Airport.
Direct to all the European Financial capitals, in comfort, on expenses. 😉
I'm still seething over the Jubilee Line.
And don't get me started about Victoria Station.
Not to mention Waterloo. Imperialist bollox the lot of it!
hurrah, hurrah and thrice hurrah
And nice purple livery too....
[quote=ernie_lynch ]And don't get me started about Victoria Station.Named after the sponge, surely?
I can't see a problem with it....but then I'm pro royalist unlike you lot of anti royalist, Corbyn loving lefties!
Very appropriate name tbh- it's expensive, it's been going for the best part of a century and still not done, and it's a way for money to flow from all round the country to pay for something in London.
Ah, my heart's not in it tbh.
and presumably the Victoria line, Victoria & Albert museum, Albert Hall, every Royal borough, Tower Hamlets, Regent street etc etc.I'm still seething over the Jubilee Line.And don't get me started about Victoria Station.
Mornington Crescent
Who actually cares...
CaptainFlashheart - Member
Start a petition.
That's a bit strong, maybe a facebook page to start with
I reckon you lot would be happier in the North East
[IMG] 
[/IMG]
They have a street named after a 2000AD character
(this joke is not likely to work, but **** it)
Who cares about the historic stuff - no need to change it. This is about today.
[quote=Northwind ](this joke is not likely to work, but **** it)
I had to google, but I did at least guess right first time 😉
Northwind - Member
They have a street named after a 2000AD character(this joke is not likely to work, but **** it)
Huh? I can't see Ukko Avenue anywhere on that map.
I assume this was the sensible compromise that emerged from a meeting where the name "Lady Thatcher Line" was seriously proposed by a patriotic young man in a pinstripe suit.
🙂
I'm with Konabunny on this one - Bloody Boris ( future PM 🙁 ) has already named the Olympic park after her...isn't that enough?
You'd think he was after a knighthood. Pah.
No doubt will affectionately be known as the Lizzie line by the readers of the M*il
It's in a hole, the coffees and food are sub par, the parking in expensive and the toilets aren't available for late night usage.
I, for one, am never setting foot in it.
Just you wait until the northern powerhouse is using the Sir David of Cameron motorway interchange.
Something In London named after Something Else In London shocker!
Like the rest of the country North of Watford I can barely care sufficiently to click Send.
We have 'Lara Croft Way' in Derby!
[img] 
[/img]
Mandela line FTW.
They have a street named after a 2000AD character
Thargg Crescent?
I'm going to put this on my 'essentially inconsequential things that people give far too much of f%£& about' list.
Presumably its named after her because she paid for it all, right? I mean it can't just be another example of London hoovering up massive transport subsidies while the rest of the country is left to rot surely?
It'll be named to appeal to the Asian Tourist market. They all love a bit of Liz and Pomp, this means when they all fly in from the long hauls, they'll hop on a heritage line all the way to Shiny Town. They'll then hop on the chug chug DLR to QEOP for a meander amongst John Lewis and M&S, buy up Burberry tat then head back into the Old Town on the Jubilee Line to the Mall at Green Park and soft foot it down the Mall to Buck Hse. Supper in Fortnums or SellFridges then Black Cab it back to Heathrow to another destination on their world tour.
You could do that in a day easy.
😆
Briliant name. Love the choice of Royal Purple too.
I mean it can't just be another example of London hoovering up massive transport subsidies while the rest of the country is left to rot surely?
London pays £32bn in taxes to the rest of country over and above what it receives in spending. What is it 10% of property stamp duty nationally comes from just two London Boroughs. We pay the bills for the rest of the UK which is quite normal for a capital city.
One day the ground you're standing on will be in another part of the planet and deep undersea...
It's a disgrace that so few things are named after our greatest ever monarch - everything should be named after her and we should put up with the practical difficulties of not being able to distinguish between things - it is the least she deserves for all her years of wonderful service.
We pay the bills for the rest of the UK which is quite normal for a capital
Not payed for the banking crisis it caused that's spread misery throughout the rest of the country under the guise of austerity tho !
Any source for the jambafacts? One might argue that it's easy for the capital to pay more tax when it receives such massive government spending. Transport spending per head in London IIRC is £2700 per person. In the NE it's a fiver. Most big PFI government contracts the money all flows to London. But yes of course you deserve it all.
I'm full of optimism about the northern powerhouse though.
Not payed for the banking crisis it caused that's spread misery throughout the rest of the country under the guise of austerity tho !
That's quite a combination of ideas 😯
Any source for the jambafacts?
What do you think? 😉
Its 10 boroughs that pay 25% iirc but we all know the high property prices are in london
IIRC on the rest its largely an artefact of Head offices being in london rather than the wealth EXCLUSIVELY being made in london its just registered there- take Banks for example.
Couldn't care less about the name, I've been staggered at the amount of money that is wasted down there. They have teams of operatives sanding down the concrete tunnel walls to [i]make them look nicer[/i]. ITS A TUNNEL FFS, IT WILL BE IN THE DARK, NOBODY WILL SEE THE F***ING WALLS. 👿
But they don't care, just throw some more public money at 👿
Every other railway tunnel in the UK is covered in soot and the sh*t that is sprayed up from the toliets emptying straight onto the line, but this one tunnel has to be immaculate, it wouldn't surprise me if they wallpapered it 🙄
Strontium Dog Avenue?
@grum various news reports and govt figures, from memory Westminster and Kensington & Chelsea provided 10% of stamp duty and that was before the recent doubling of top rate stamp duty which is highly applicable to central London (note it will be seen how effective it is as post the rise property market activity has fallen significNtly, you can now rent for 6 years before you match stamp duty cost). London has by far the highest concentration of high paid jobs so consistent with top 1% paying 27% of the taxes it makes a jumbo contribution. As is normal and as it should but it needs to be understood and recognised by those outside the South East.
Edit: whether its 2 boroughs or 10 in London the point is still the same. London pays the bills
I find it bizarre how much so many of you resent, and even despise, the Head of State. All democracies have one - often unelected - and as far as I can tell, pretty much only Brits actually get that bothered by it.
The alternative, of course, is a demagogue whom we can 'elect', and merely devolving the privilege to a different unelected elite - such as Hollywood stars and Wall Street moguls.
Rest assured that hierarchy and privilege will always exist. It just depends on who gets it.
I, for one, would rather have a family bound by constitutional responsibility than an unknown quantity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Assassinated_heads_of_state
A bit of moaning is the least of her worries.
What @Saxon says. France may be a republic but each town has a Mayor who have a town hall many of which look like a Palace. The President is treated like Royalty with no questions asked about his behaviour. We have far more scruitiny of our Royal family than do they of "theirs". Most bizarre.
pretty much only Brits actually get that bothered by it.
Statistics would suggest the opposite, it is just this site is full of republican misanthropes.
[quote=jambalaya ]London has by far the highest concentration of high paid jobs so consistent with top 1% paying 27% of the taxes it makes a jumbo contribution.
Sure, but how much of the spending does it take? Are you including the cost to the country of the financial crisis in that?
Are you including the cost to the country of the financial crisis in that?
How are you calculating that?
They did this with the New Southern General Hospital in Govan. The name was unexpectedly changed by a few senior NHS directors at a non-minuted meeting to the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. There was no wider Health Board or public consultation. Over 10,000 people signed a petition seeking reversal, over £50,000 had to be spent altering NHS signs, maps and stationery. Local bus and taxi companies were similarly affected.
No reason whatsoever, beyond some lickspittle sucking up to Lizzie Windsor.
The President is treated like Royalty with no questions asked about his behaviour.
Actually, the entire French nation asks about his behaviour, and he has to leave office if they say so.
Coronation Street? Albert Square?
Where will the madness end?
Will no-one think of the corgis?
All you anti-monarchists, would you really prefer President Blair?
"Are you including the cost to the country of the financial crisis in that?"
Want that caused by that rocky bank in Newcastle and them there dodgy Scottish banks?
Whats that got to do with them there London tax thieves.
Now if we had a Free Yorkshire (an it better be cheap), we'd not have to be concerned with Lizzie an your other offcumbners.
It's interesting that the same people who think we should have an elected head of state are often the same who bemoan the state of politics.
President Blair - yeah, right, he'd be a shoe in.
All you anti-monarchists, would you really prefer President Blair?
Do all you royalists have so little imagination?
Rest assured that hierarchy and privilege will always exist. It just depends on who gets it.
what a sad satement
I dont think you have to be a communist
to think that this is an insult to common decency
that the queen gets >£30 million a year from the taxpayer plus some lickspittle politicians naming a trainline after her
meanwhile in teh rest of mega rich london half a million children live below the poverty line and social care, libraries, councils schools etc have seen a sustained assault on their funding
IHN - Member
It's interesting that the same people who think we should have an elected head of state are often the same who bemoan the state of politics.
nah it should be a national lottery, everyone gets to a chance to live in the royal palaces for a year! 😆
Any Royal Scott biscuits to enjoy this one with.....?
they could make it free to travel, just a tug of the forelock lets you through.
[quote=IHN ]It's interesting that the same people who think we should have an elected head of state are often the same who bemoan the state of politics.
true but, for all its ill, an elected head of state TRUMPS all other options 😉
grum - MemberAny source for the jambafacts?
The source for the #grumfact in your post being?
Middenface McNulty Mews?
Here you go retro83.
Mind you unlike jamba I don't have a reputation for continually being wrong/making things up - and lo and behold he has 'his memory' as a source.
steady there Grum there is no place for a fact based evidence led approach to debate on STW.
I dont think you have to be a communist
to think that this is an insult to common decency
that the queen gets >£30 million a year from the taxpayer plus some lickspittle politicians naming a trainline after her
meanwhile in teh rest of mega rich london half a million children live below the poverty line and social care, libraries, councils schools etc have seen a sustained assault on their funding
I think you're right. EXCEPT...
while I wouldn't argue with the desirability of reform to how the Head of State gets remunerated, an extra £30 million in the government's coffers is hardly going to eliminate child poverty. But if it really did make a difference, then - as I say - by all means make cuts to pay.
That said, it's not like that £30 million is her personal fortune that she can use to buy gold-wrapped McLarens or anything. Whoever wears the crown is always on duty, even when on holiday, and knows nothing of privacy or even of private decisions. So the queen gets to shop at Fortnum and Mason's while the rest of go to Tesco. Big deal. What of all those wastrels whose only claim to fame and fortune is that they are the sons and daughters of celebs and socialites with shampoo advertising deals? They're also enjoying great privilege, and yet they are doing so with no constraints, in often the most vulgar ways.
It's no accident these people are often referred to as 'royalty':
[img] 
[/img]
I just find it ironic that we malign a pretty well-functioning political system for certain imperfections, when some of those same perceived imperfections are practically celebrated in other areas of society.
Eg, the regressive tax system that is Association Football!!
Bit of a gender biased pay gap there eh?
Whoever wears the crown is always on duty, even when on holiday, and knows nothing of privacy or even of private decisions.
No-one is forced to do it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finances_of_the_British_Royal_Family
It's not just the £38 million she gets, it's the nippers as well, plus the 1/2 Billion she's amassed as her "personal wealth".
it's not like that £30 million is her personal fortune that she can use to buy gold-wrapped McLarens or anything.
Agreed her personal wealth is way more than £30 million- Times has it at £340 for 2015
Whoever wears the crown is always on duty, even when on holiday, and knows nothing of privacy
I know those 6 weeks she just spent in Norfolk were so busy for her and so intrusive on that massive estate of hers where she knows nothing of privacy.
By all means say why you support them , and its fair to say she has strange life, is in the public eye and is often very busy but that is a bit OTT
As for the actors. I dont think they deserve what they get paid but the critical difference is they get it due to their own talents rather than because who their mum and dad are.
[quote=teamhurtmore ]Eg, the regressive tax system that is Association Football!!
Is it just snobbery of the working classes that makes you object to the market in this area?Clearly you dont GAS about high pay or talent getting what the market will support[ you love it ] so why do you keep bringing this up? and you say I troll 😕
yeah its a tough old life being royalty, I imagine Prince Geroge will be dead at 50 from miners lung 🙄
It's not just the £38 million she gets, it's the nippers as well, plus the 1/2 Billion she's amassed as her "personal wealth".
Quite.
Perhaps we could solve some of the housing crisis by building on some of the land that the royals "own".
Build a few schemes on Balmoral for starters... 🙂
my cousin and her husband live in Maidenhead. They're very excited about [s]crossrail[/s] The Queen Elizabeth Line, as it'll reduce their commuting time.
Which, at around 30mins currently, is considered a huge inconvenience. and thoroughly deserving of £15Billion.
Despite being an anti-royalist, this comes as a relief - I was expecting it to be called the Boris Line, in keeping with his campaign to take credit for improving the lives of Londoners while in fact screwing them over at every opportunity.