[Closed] climbingtrackworld - advice on new shoes

When I bought my first shoes I followed the advice in the shop to buy a pair 126 sizes too small and just suffer.

After a few years of having painful toes, I then bought a pair that fit comfortably over a pair of socks and enjoyed climbing so much more, esp big multi-pitch routes. So I can't smear on E7 slabs, but I don't really care.

Boreal Jokers? Definitely at the 'comfy slipper'/all day end of the scale rather than 'claw-footed tech scalpels' but the people I know who wear them do rate them. As I say though, they're not the most technical shoe out there if that's a factor.

the guy in the shop tried that 12 years back when i bought my first set. I laughed and bought my normal shoe size instead.

Footflaps +1

If you're busting out moves at high grades indoors you might want something which is tight/aggressive, but for outdoor I'd just go for something you're comfortable being in all day.

On a 4+ pitch climb I probably spend less than 20% of my time actually climbing, the rest is constructing belays, belaying, faffing about on route etc. I've climbed Severe in my Nepals, so I don't think I'd gain much benefit from a tighter rock shoe, I don't climb anywhere near hard enough to "need" that extra.

That said, if you're climbing E9 on 12m gritstone routes, you'll probably want something different to me!

@boombip - i'm not the most technical climber so they could be along the right lines. Thanks

I've got Jokers, they are definitely a wear all day shoe. Mine are needing replaced and ill be buying another pair...

I'm just getting back into it and climb indoor at the moment. Mostly around the E2 (E3 at a push). Aiming to get outdoors again over the summer

just worked out i can get the jokers for £46 from cotswold using some discounts i have... trip there tomorrow lunchtime to try them on i think

Five 10 Anasazi in your normal shoe size. Really like them, like an old ninja but better rubber.

The jokers are fairly clumpy.

My index toes are a little bit longer than my big toes

People with feet like this tend to get on better with the more symmetric shaped shoes like Boreal, Evolv and some of the Scarpa ones. FiveTen and La Sportiva tend to have a more asymmetric shape that focuses power on the big toe.

Best bet is to go to a shop, work out what sort of shoe you want to match your normal climbing (steep/slabby, hard/easy, bouldering/long routes) and then try on that type of shoe from different makes. Shape is the most important thing.

if your foot was the right shape then
[img] [/img]
However no idea, fit is good, where do you live? Find a good shop and try on everything. Last time I had to choose I think I had Andy Kirkpatrick and Arlie Anderson in there to advise but that was Outside in Hathersage and a long time ago.

@timb34

i just spent my lunch in cotswold and have bought the jokers. I tried on a few other pairs as well but the jokers felt just right.
thanks for the advice people (and cotswold for the discount 😀 )

Really, the only advice worth a jot here is "go and try some on."

The last time I bought a pair, I did loads of research online, then found that what I was going to buy just didn't fit in any size. Tried on every pair in the shop practically, and ended up buying something that I'd never even considered prior to that.

The "x sizes too small" and "if it doesn't hurt then they're too big" adages get trotted out a lot and whilst there's a grain of truth in it, it's often very poor advice (and doubly so if you're just starting out). By the time you're in a position to benefit from a highly aggressive technical shoe you'll have a very good idea of exactly what you want, and until then the only thing an uncomfortable shoe is going to do is put you off climbing.

One other thing on that subject; different shoes stretch different amounts. A slip lasted shoe will stretch half a size or so, maybe more; a board lasted shoe won't stretch very much at all. I made this mistake with a pair of 5-10 Anasazi - fantastic shoe (as someone else mentioned earlier, and Mike's just posted a pic of), but utter bloody agony as I bought too small thinking they'd stretch out.

I love my La Sportiva Cliff 5's - but I have a different foot shape than you OP. I find them comfortable for an extended period of time and didn't size down...

yep right size works, had 5 pairs of those before moving on to the new white ones. got a pair of the slippers 1 size too small and wore them 3 times before flogging on

Boréal Firés. 😉

I'm intrigued by the E2/E3 indoor comment. Surely if it's indoor it's not dangerous or sustained. If it's not even a little bit dangerous then the most it can be is HVS.

If it's not even a little bit dangerous then the most it can be is HVS.

You don't know how grading works.

I used to, and boulders just get a technical grade. If they're boulder problems with a bit of a drop they get a low grade. If there are crash mats, bolts and top ropes I don't see that a route merits a grade.

Examples from Stanage; the plantation boulders just get technical grades but Suzanne gets HVS 6a because you could hurt yourself if you fell badly. Chameleon gets E3, 5c because by the time you find the gear placement you can see from the ground just pulls through you have made a move you can't reverse and have the option of jumping onto a very nasty landing or going for the top.

Indoor should only get technical grades.

Lemonysam my thoughts exactly HVS4b anyone?

HVS4b would be a route with no gear placements, enough height to kill yourself and 4b moves. Not the sort of thing you'll find on a climbing wall.

If there are crash mats, bolts and top ropes I don't see that a route merits a grade.

🙄 Indoor climbing doesn't necessarily mean bouldering or toproping, there are 25m indoor lead walls to climb at these days grandad.

What *is* unusual is applying E grades to indoor routes, most walls (and people climbing at them) would use sport grades for routes and Font or V grades for bouldering.

So just translate "E2 indoors" to something around 6a+/6b sport grade, and we're good to go, yep?

I don't really think it's worth arguing about.

Outdoor climbing, indoor climbing, bouldering etc are all graded differently as a) they present different challenges due to having to account for exposure (or not) and such, and b) no two organisations / countries can agree on anything.

However, if someone says they're climbing (for example) HVS's indoors, whilst it's an incorrect term it's still fairly readily obvious as to what they mean.

Cougar +1

So just translate "E2 indoors" to something around 6a+/6b sport grade, and we're good to go, yep?

That's what I was trying to say in essence, yes. (-:

I don't really think it's worth arguing about.

[img] [/img]

[img] https://www.thebmc.co.uk/Handlers/ArticleImageHandler.ashx?id=6110&index=0&w=605&h=434 [/img]

[img] [/img]

Back on topic, that's Wolfie on SR wearing Firés with socks! #thosewerethedays

spawnofyorkshire - Member
hey folks who finger the odd rock face

I'm after new shoes and need a bit of advice on which brands might be best suited.
I currently have an old set of red chilli's but i'm getting horrendous cramp in my toes. My index toes are a little bit longer than my big toes so they end up feeling really wedged in and i lose feeling after a bit.

Are there any shoe manufacturers who are more generous with the toe space?

I had a similar toe issue with Red Chili Durangos. I bought a pair of Scarpa Reflex and they are so much more comfortable - they are an 11 when i usually take a 12. The size 12 Durangos went to a mate who is a size 9 normally.

However, if someone says they're climbing (for example) HVS's indoors, whilst it's an incorrect term it's still fairly readily obvious as to what they mean.

I don't think it is obvious at all.

The adjectival part of the grade (e.g. HVS) denotes how sustained/strenuous it is, along with how well it is protected.

The adjectival part has no relevance in indoor climbing, hence it only gets a technical grade (e.g. 4b).

I climb 6a or 6b (on a good day!) indoors, but I don't think I've ever led a trad route which has above a 5a technical grade, it would most likely be way above my ability.

That said, the UK system for grading isn't exactly known for it's clarity!

So if I've correctly understood, English walls use French sport grades and if you assume that English technical grades are roughly the same as French bouldering grades and a full grade harder than French rock grades, a French sport 6a+/6b would be English 5a which if it were safe would be S or VS rather than E2.

If in doubt go and have a go at Flying Buttress Direct on Stanage which used to be HVS, 5b, and is now given E1. Then pop over to the Verdon and do ULA which gets French 6a (a bit more if you manage to do it without ever pulling on gear). When you get back from those two we'll repeat the discussion about giving anything more than a technical grade for the hardest move to anything indoors.

I climb 6a or 6b (on a good day!) indoors, but I don't think I've ever led a trad route which has above a 5a technical grade, it would most likely be way above my ability.

French grades are about the overall difficulty of getting up so you might get a long sustained route with easy moves graded the same as a short route with much harder moves. Climbing wall routes tend to be more sustained in nature and as such will usually have very positive holds, on a cliff this might be different and I am pretty sure I have climbed 6a/b (technical moves) on French 6b/+. I have also climbed 8as with no move harder than 6a but steep and sustained. Bouldering grades are just an extension of this as the difficulty is squeezed into even fewer moves.

English technical grades are roughly the same as French bouldering grades

So which is harder according to you? 6b in the plantation or or 6b in Fontainebleau? I reckon they're about the same.

ULA is 6a with plenty of 6a moves in most of the six rope lengths. It's not given 8a, it's given 6a.

Left wall on the Cromlech is E2. Can you really compare the commitment, difficulty and risk of Left wall with anything on a climbing wall? I think not hence my initial comment that E grades are inappropriate and meaningless for indoor.

If the OP does do Left Wall I suggest some properly painful shoes as the footwork is sometimes a bit thin.

The adjectival part of the grade (e.g. HVS) denotes how sustained/strenuous it is, along with how well it is protected.

IIRC, when I was learning, the adjectival part of the grade was the only part of the grade and encompassed everything. I don't remember ever seeing something referred to as "HVS 5b", it was just HVS. I'll concede though that it's entirely possible that I'm misremembering or just never noticed. Is it a relatively new thing?

Also, doesn't "5b" in that context simply refer to the crux move and has no bearing on the rest of the climb? Again, entirely possible that I'm misremembering, it's a bloody minefield and I'm very rusty.

Regardless, point still stands. People climbing E6 outdoors aren't going to be struggling indoors on a 3+. So a) it's fairly obvious roughly what is meant, given that it's subjective and woolly anyway, and b) it's really not worth arguing about. So I'm not going to any more.

When you get back from those two we'll repeat the discussion about giving anything more than a technical grade for the hardest move to anything indoors.

Bet you'd be good company on a long route 🙄

So the OP commits the heinous crime of referring to the adjectival rather than technical grade over indoor routes - so what? There's a general parity between the two and it's pretty obvious (if you're not trolling) what he means.

Either way, I hope he enjoys his new shoes 😀

the adjectival rather than technical grade over indoor routes - so what? There's a general parity between the two

No there isn't. E4, 5c is dangerous and E4, 6b isn't. IIRC correctly wolfie in the pic above fell off an E4, 5c on Stanage, Old Friends, and hit the deck.

I would say La Sportiva Mythos - ace comfy shoes but still able to deal with resonably high grades - spanish 6cs no problem (shoes that it not the pilot).

No there isn't.

So there are as many VS 5as as there are VS 4cs? No, in general most VSs are 4c as most HVSs are 5a - hence 'general parity'

And as for

E4, 5c is dangerous and E4, 6b isn't.

that's pure gold

Well a typical E4, 5c on grit has a few RPs or a loosely fitting rock to protect hard moves with a long fall to the ground if they pull out. A typical E4, 6b has a friend or bomb proof rock just below the crux or you could jump off without breaking anything.

If this general parity existed there would be no need for the two grading systems. I can think of examples of four different technical grades for most Es and five for E1.

So which is harder according to you? 6b in the plantation or or 6b in Fontainebleau? I reckon they're about the same.

Do you think a boulder problem like Gioia 8c+ has an 8c/9a move on it? Never 🙄

I'm sorry, I don't understand the question, unless it's a rhetorical question, and even then I still don't understand what you're getting at.

I boulder in France, I sometimes boulder in the UK, I find boulder problems with the same grade on them of similar difficultly. I must be expressing myself badly so will see if Google can help.

In Europe the Fontainebleau grading is the most widely used. The numerical system ranges from 1a to 8c+ (the equivalent of V16 or B16), but problems easier than 2b are rarely found. The adjectival system goes from F- (Facile Inf, easy inferior) to ED+ (Extrêmement Difficile Sup, Extremely Difficult Higher). The system was first devised to classify the sandstone climbing in the Fontainebleau area, but is now widely used also in other bouldering areas around the world.

The grades in this system are similar to the French route grades, but have different meaning. An 8a route is significantly easier than an 8a boulder problem. To reduce confusion, some people write the bouldering grades in upper-case letters (e.g. "8B+" vs. "8b+").

So to avoid confusion I'll write:

A Fontainebleau 6B is about the same difficulty as a 6b Stanage Plantation boulder.

http://www.ukclimbing.com/databases/crags/grades.html

Useful Glupton, but it fails to mention the fact that the Fontainebleau boulders themselves are graded "bloc" and someone who climbs French 6a easily will often fail to get off the ground on a 5a (or should that be 5A) Fontainebleau boulder.

The Spanish make interesting use of French grades too especially in Catalonia. Don't be surprised if you grind to a halt on something well within your grade.

Edukator - even on grit, you can't generalise too much about the nature of a route just from the grading. Your example, Old Friends, is fair enough at E4 5c because it is bold low down with shit RPs etc, but there is a cam before the 5c crux. Just around from that is No More Excuses E4 6b, which has a handplaced peg [i]after[/i] the 6b crux and is generally done as a highball boulder problem with mats, and is certainly not a safe as houses lead.

On longer routes, E4 6b can mean a safe as houses English 6b crux pitch accompanied by a terrifying poorly protected English 6a pitch.

I'm sorry, I don't understand the question, unless it's a rhetorical question, and even then I still don't understand what you're getting at.

OK, so if a boulder problem in the UK is given a Font grade then of course there is going to be a similarity. If this is what you meant then i dont know why you bothered as its obvious. However, if you are saying that a UK technical grade (for the hardest move) is likely to give a broadly similar level of difficulty to a problem with the same Font grade you are wrong. 8a moves are are rare or non existent yet there are loads of problems given higher Font grades, the Font 7c/8as that I have done probably never had moves harder than 7a.

Flying Buttress Direct on Stanage which used to be HVS, 5b, and is now given E1.

Can never see why, lots of protection which has got better over the years - Classic HVS 🙂 (from the done it and it wasn't that hard camp)

even on grit, you can't generalise too much about the nature of a route just from the grading.

Well a typical E4, 5c on grit has a few RPs or a loosely fitting rock to protect hard moves with a long fall to the ground if they pull out.

And to complicate matters I could tell you about a few E45c's that are well protected.

However, if you are saying that a UK technical grade (for the hardest move) is likely to give a broadly similar level of difficulty to a problem with the same Font grade you are wrong

I'm convinced (and I'm not alone) that many font 6a's in font are roughly british 6a regardless of what the comparison tables say. Obviously as you go up the grades it drifts away from parity.

And to complicate matters I could tell you about a few E45c's that are well protected.

Go on then, on grit of course so the length isn't the factor. Old friends was given E4, 5c before Friends when there was a rock on a sling below what you call the crux move though for me it was a relief to get to dry rock with big holds. IMO a lot of routes could have been downgraded when Friends appeared.

It's turned into UKC on here! 🙂

Go on then, on grit of course so the length isn't the factor

[url= http://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/c.php?i=28226 ]Wellington Crack[/url]

didn't the late 80s / early 90's Yorkshire Grit guide (the hardcover blue one) have 3 grades?
E for overall, UK technical and a P rating for protection?

The OP want some information on shoes - note this is different to 'discussions' on climbing grades...

He's bought his shoes now. (And has probably left the thread crying into his chalk bag)

jamj1974 - [s]Member[/s] Interpreter

ok will stop it now

shut up and enjoy the climbs

... yawn.

16m of sustained climbing on grit, there had to be one somewhere, Spin. Ta.

I thought the P in the Yorkshire guide was for "prang".

He's bought his shoes now. (And has probably left the thread crying into his chalk bag)

I have not got a blinking clue what you lot have been on about, and I have a potty mouth.

I only wanted to buy some new shoes 😥

spawn +1

I'm very sorry for swearing 😳

I'm a grown man and should know better