You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
seemed a legit question to me, one a few of us have made, so far there has been no answer.....
only indignation from the shires....
seemed a legit question to me, one a few of us have made, so far there has been no answer.....only indignation from the shires....
That's a very TJ or Fred style response. Interesting.
Oh dear god please make them stop!
How do you manage to find things to get offended about when you can't even use Google?
If any aspect of this causes offense dear readers, please forgive me, but I'm just not used to thinking down to some people's level
first, type www.google.com in that little box near the top of the screen. With me so far? Good. It might take a few goes, but I'm sure someone will help if you ask nicely. Remember to press the enter key - again, ask for help if you need it, there should be an adult around someplace.
In the box near the middle of the screen, next to where it says Google, type chav
Click on the word Images up near the top of the screen.
Lookit all the lovely boys and girls - notice any features that seem to appear a lot? Maybe not, so here's some clues - baseball caps, tracksuits and burberry. Also note the moronic hand gestures, extra clue for the clueless.
Standard chav uniform
finally as at least one of you seems to have basic literacy issues, here's some pictures
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
EDIT - I bet that one in yellow is about to launch that cat through someone's window
[quote=rudebwoy].....your political stance on a number of issues does give rise to a 'social attitude'
[quote=nealglover]Would you like to be more specific ?
Rudebwoy, I was wondering which issues I had made a "Political Stance" on ?
You decided that I had, and judged me on it.
But ignored me when I asked you for more info ?
Are chavs an effnik minority now? Like gypos and pikeys?
It was probably pikeys. I ****ing hate pikeys.
😉
[i]EDIT - I bet that one in yellow is about to launch that cat through someone's window[/i]
Reminds me of the lad that tried to steal my neighbour's bull terrier a few years back. We looked after it when it ran away and he came round saying "I fink ya'v got me dog".
Obviously he wasn't a chav. Just an unfortunate fellow too poor to buy his own dog.
I lied. He was a scummy chav scumbag.
Ewan-- unless you have giant gravel, that would not break a double glazed unit, two 6 ft doors -- not going to get much change out of £200 i would reckon-- sorry.
Yeah expect min 200 quid. Def gravel that did it. Nothing else to hand. I guess it depends how hard you hit it? The only other thing could be an air pistol? But no evidence of that.
takes a bit of force to break a dg window- hammers sometimes dont- but the windows were broke by person/s unknown-- that is shit--FWIW it is unlikely to happen again,unless it is targeted, which sounds unlikely, unless there is something you haven't told us 😉
nealglover, i have read your posts on a number of issues, like you have of mine maybe, there is a consistency, which is good, shows a sound mind,but i don't think it fair on everyone else to go through word for word, as is your want, like a twisted ethnomethodologist. Maybe pm is the way , if you have no objections,my email is in profile-- no reason to hide.
Who was this Fred guy that keeps being used as some benchmark ? i see a few of us recent posters have attracted comparisions ....
In the box near the middle of the screen, next to where it says Google, type chav
I asked you to describe the appearance of someone you would call "scum". You responded by posting pictures of people you describe as "chavs".
Are the two words synonyms?
(Synonyms are words with the same meaning. Just in case you're having difficulty).
Once we've cleared that up, we can move on to establishing a causal relationship between appearance, and propensity to break windows.
It might be a long process this, trying to drag some sense out of nonsense..pob llwc
jeeso you really are hard of thinking aren't you?
I'll give it one last go, then I'm off - i've got better things to do than try explaining things to politically correct wind up toys, but thanks for the entertainment this afternoon, almost as funny as watching some burberry clad clown being savaged b a staffie.
chavs are subsets of scum. scum are supersets of chav. scum includes, but is not limited to, chavs.
hope that clears it up for you.
grum - MemberOh wow, BBSB, it just gets better.
doesn't it? it's been keeping me entertained
Nothing like a mind set against itself is there BBSB ?
You sound like your blood pressure is high, for your own health ease up man .
BigButSlimmerBloke - Memberchavs are subsets of scum. scum are supersets of chav. scum includes, but is not limited to, chavs. hope that clears it up for you.
Well it pretty much clears it up nicely for me thanks. But just so that I can get a complete picture ....... how would you describe yourself ?
the description is in the name....was fat now slim..
chavs are subsets of scum. scum are supersets of chav. scum includes, but is not limited to, chavs.
hope that clears it up for you.
Interesting. So if people who break windows are scum, and chavs are scum, you'd say that the wearing of a burberry cap equals a fondness for vandalism, then?
On the subject of appearances. If a burberry cap = broken window, does a BBSB = broken mirror? We need photos.
You sound like your blood pressure is high, for your own health ease up man .
He claims to find us all entertaining, yet does seem rather wound up, doesn't he?
its a common feature, without the means to think laterally it all goes vertical, and in the end something has to blow--
I struggle with long sentences
but those *** ** **** * *** should be * in the face.
EDIT - added smilies to avoid the ban hammer... 😕 😉 😐 🙄
EDIT 2 - added '*'s to further avoid ban hammer...
Deliberate attempt to get the thread closed? Probably for the best I suppose.
its a common feature, without the means to think laterally it all goes vertical, and in the end something has to blow--
It is really necessary to resort to insulting people's intelligence, just because they have a different opinion to you ?
Thats a slippery slope.
Next thing you know, you will be making judgments about people you have never met 🙄
(Still none the wiser about my "political" statements I've made on here btw)
Blimey...you lot still arguing about what a Chav is?
Good God.... get lives will ya!
nealglover - this is the [s]troll[/s] person who's side you appear to be on in this argument. Maybe you'd like to have another think about that.
jeeso you really are hard of thinking aren't you?
I'll give it one last go, then I'm off - i've got better things to do than try explaining things to politically correct wind up toys, but thanks for the entertainment this afternoon, [b]almost as funny as watching some burberry clad clown being savaged b a staffie.[/b]
He seems like a real charmer.
rudebwoy - is this you on [url= https://plus.google.com/113085721540719000581/posts ]google[/url] + ?
nealglover - this is the troll person who's side you appear to be on in this argument. Maybe you'd like to have another think about that.
So because my opinion is different to yours, [b]it must be the same as His ? [/b]
Nothing in between black and white with you then eh ? 🙄
So because my opinion is different to yours, it must be the same as His ?Nothing in between black and white with you then eh ?
Where did I say that? I just suggested that coming to the defence of someone who thinks it's funny to watch people being savaged by dogs is a little strange.
And IMO insulting the intelligence of such a person seems like a fairly reasonable thing to do.
I just suggested that coming to the defence of someone who thinks it's funny to watch people being savaged by dogs is a little strange.
If you can point out to me where I "came to his defence", I would be grateful.
Other than saying that insulting someone for having a different opinion seems like a poor way to debate anything.
Interesting that you highlighted a fairly innocuous comment about lacking the means for lateral thinking, while passing no comment on this though......
jeeso you really are hard of thinking aren't you?
I'll give it one last go, then I'm off - i've got better things to do than try explaining things to politically correct wind up toys
I wonder why? TBH when someone comes out with stuff like that it's pretty clear they don't want to 'debate' anything and insulting them seems fairly legitimate.
Fair comment. I didn't spot that to be honest.
If I had, I would have commented on that too (or not bothered with either ?)
Woody, wrong name, not moi
nealglover, for someone as forensic as yourself, wordwise, am suprised you missed that, as for your other comments, i did reply on the sister thread to this.
for someone as forensic as yourself, wordwise
Not sure what that means.
But if you can't resist having another pop even after I've admitted I was wrong, then I don't really care what it means.
sister thread to this.
Not really sure what that means either.
nealglover, your fault, my mistake 😉 page 5 of this thread, halfway down, you did not reply, so .......sister thread--similar discussion,behavioural insights its called....
Thanks, folks, this thread has been most amusing. When I get home to my (ex) council house, I'll have to ask the chavs down the road what they think. If they can actually read it.
Speaking as someone brought up working class, not a whiney, middle-class, Grauniad-reading liberal.
fire away CZ -i'm no ffriggin liberal
Speaking as someone brought up working class, not a whiney, middle-class, Grauniad-reading liberal.
Well if you don't know what a chav is then I don't know who does CountZero, you great big rufty tufty salt-of-the-earth geezer.
Fair comment. I didn't spot that to be honest.If I had, I would have commented on that too (or not bothered with either ?)
Fairy nuff.
Speaking as someone brought up working class, not a whiney, middle-class, Grauniad-reading liberal.
Oh I'm sorry, can you just let me know exactly what your opinions are on this, as with your background/status you seem to be a real authority. I'll just fit in with whatever you say.
Rudebwoy, all I asked was when have made a "political stance"
You claimed that I have, and made a point regarding it in this thread (judged me based on it)
your political stance on a number of issues
I wondered if you could justify that with anything.
NG-- you will have to read what i said on page 2- your stance on this forum- not thread,although on this thread you have been very revealing, but as you wish to go elsewhere, it would not be fair on other people on here to have to suffer the deconstruction of word/phrase that you specialise in-- you do comment on other topics, i do read, i can only form opinions based on what you say-- its a two way street