You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
I know there are a few fellow camera nerds on here, anyone anticipating this release? Meant to be coming out tomorrow apparently. Canon Rumors site seems to have crashed with all the fevered speculation.
These look like the specs.
Unsurpassed Image Quality
22.3 Megapixel Full Frame CMOS sensor
DiG!C 5+ Image Processor
ISO 100-25600 (expandable to L:50 H1:51200, H2: 102400
Full HD Movie (ISO 100-12800 (H:25600)High Performance Operation
61-point high-density reticular AF (up to 41 crosstype points)
6.0 fps for high continuous shooting
Intelligent viewfinder with approx. 100% coverage
3.2-type, approx.1.04m dot (3:2 wide) Clear View LCD II
iFCL metering with 63-zone dual-layer sensor
Shutter durability of 150,000 cyclesHigh end features
Silent & low vibration modes
Dual card slots (CF & SD)
High Dynamic Range (HDR) Mode
Multiple Exposures
Comparative Playback function
Improved durability & water and dust resistanceSPECIFICATIONS
Available Colours – Black
Megapixels – 22MP
Sensor Size – 36 x 24mm
ISO/Sensitivity – 100 – 25600
Autofocus Points – 61 points
Lens Mount – Canon
LCD Size – 3.2?
Liveview – Yes
Viewfinder – Optical TTL
Min Shutter Speed – 30 sec
Max Shutter Speed – 1/8000 sec
Continuous Shooting Speed – 6 fps
Self Timer – 10 sec, 2 sec
Metering – Centre-weighted, Spot, Evaluative, Partial
Video Resolution – Full HD 1080
Memory Type – Compact Flash
Connectivity – USB 2, HDMI, Mic Input, Wireless (optional)
Battery – LP-E6
Battery Type – Lithium-ion
Charger – Includes Li-Ion Charger
File Formats – AVI, RAW, H.264, MOV, MPEG-4
Dimensions – 152 x 116 x 76mm
Box Contents – Battery Pack LP-E6 .. Battery Charger LC-E6 .. AV Cable AVC-DC400ST .. Interface Cable IFC-200U .. Eyecup Eg .. Wide Strap EWEOS5DMKIII .. CR1616 Lithium Battery+
Could be ideal for my photography but probably a bit too spendy on launch.
Other than the AF improvements, I don't see any reason to upgrade my mkII, based on those specs alone. Besides, I only finished paying for my mkii this month.
I'm still on a 5D mk I! Main things I would like are the AF and the high ISO performance. I like to shoot fast lenses wide open quite a bit and shoot weddings where light is quite often bad, so those two things would be very handy.
If I already had a mk II I'd probably not be that interested though. I might even pick up a s/h mark II if prices drop a bit.
I might just upgrade to one of those new 41MP Nokia phones instead 
ISO 102400 - I would actually use that occasionally. I think my 40D maxes out at 3200!
The features don't really speak for themselves, it will be interesting to see it in the flesh, what ISO you can still get a noise-free image from and what they've done to improve video (moire and rolling shutter).
I'm probably more interested in the GH3 though as this is out of my price range.
I'm getting a 7D tomorrow 😉 , planning to wait until the 5d III has been out for 6 months and the inital frenzy has subsided, then go Full Frame w/5d mkIII. If it has the electrical wireless flash built in, that would be fun 😉
sorry for a numpty question, but was there much difference between the 5D and 5D MK2?
5D seem to go for a reasonable price, well, for second hand for a full frame anyway?
5D would make a great wedding/portrait/landscape lens.
IIRC (it's been a few years) It's main weaknesses are with auto-focus, focus points and slow frame-rate compared to current crop.
The 5D mkii improved on some of that and added full HD Video (it's headline-grabbing new feature).
Most people I know who had a 5D didn't bother upgrading unless they wanted the video.
The camera about which I am excited is the Olympus OM-D. Not sure why tho, I've got no chance of getting one!
Nice one lodious, enjoy (is it my fault you are spending all this cash? What have I done? 😛 )!
s - mk II has video, more MP, live view, AF micro adjust for lenses - not sure what else. 5D I is still a very nice camera IMO, you just need nice lenses to make the most of full frame.
OMD is a very interesting cam, I'm not too keen on the overtly retro styling though (which is obviously the important thing).
Well the retro styling is a nice touch imo but there's a lot more. It's a progression of all the ideas Oly have been having over the years. It's small, light, well made, super fast (apparently) and has some pretty clever IS related features. And the art filters, which are a bit of a daft gimmick on my camera, are becoming interesting.
Full frame...
[img] 
[/img]
[url=
Nikon[/url]
Just bought a 5D MKII at work mainly for video use, they've been heavily discounted for a while now and the MKIII was going to well out of our price range anyway so was a no brainer purchase.
I'd still love to upgrade to a Nikon D7000, not that in all honesty I really need to, or could justify the expense.
The Nikon D800 looks nice - was released recently.
Reckon my next camera related purchases will probably be a prime lens - not sure if I should get the 50mm 1.8 or the 35mm 1.8. 35mm is a bit more pricey, but I think the 50mm will be a bit too long.....hmmmm.
Also wanna get a Tamron 90mm macro. Been on about it for ages, but never seems to be the right time to buy....
Oh dear. Love my 7D and have a fair number of EF-S lenses, but this is very very tempting.
I don't think its worth it over a 5d Mk2, isn't it £1000 more?
I won't be upgrading.
Could this be why dpreview is down just now?
3k....ouch! Looks good though.
The cost difference between the 5Dmk111 and the D800 would cover the losses in selling lenses/flash guns, so I guess if people want to transition from Canon to Nikon, when moving to FF the costs would be similar? I wonder when the two camreas will actually be available to buy in the UK? End of March is not long off!
Erm.......5D would make a great wedding/portrait/landscape lens.
oh - you know what I meant!
damn, I was hoping to sell my mk ii before this happened!
Looks absolutely perfect for my needs, but as usual the US-UK price difference is pretty crazy. $3500 is about £2200, even adding on sales tax etc it's s big difference. I'm not sure why they reckon it's worth £600 more than a D800 on uk preorder prices.
Not sure I can be bothered with selling all my lenses etc though, and the massive MP count on the D800 has no real appeal for me. Will wait and see what happens one prices settle down a bit. I ithink historically Nikon have held their prices pretty firmly long-term, whereas Canon bodies get cheaper over time.
Been waiting for this almost as long as I've been waiting for a 100-400 replacement, will wait till the frenzy's over and the price comes down a bit though.
Preview and sample high ISO shots added here:
Video:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/03/02/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III-preview
Preview:
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos5dmarkiii/
Photos
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos5dmarkiii/9
ISO 102400 looks poor - ah well 😀
ISO 25600 looks very usable indeed.
Yup the high ISO performance looks pretty damn impressive, as does the shadow detail on an example I saw on CR. not 3k impressive yet though for me.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/canon-5d-mkiii/canon-5d-mkiiiA7.HTM
Still looking good - grey import preorders for £2500
http://www.digitalrev.com/product/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii/MTAwMDQwNQ_A_A
Still too much for me to stomach at the mo....
will be brilliant for posting sunset pics and lurid HDR 'architecture' shots on flickr.
the measurebators will be going for the d800 though.
Here it is.
the measurebators will be going for the d800 though.
Love that word 😆
It's amazing the frenzy that people get into - discussions of these cameras on places like dpreview are just hideous. Was there thousands of angry nerds desperate to score points before the internet, or did the internet create them?
You not tempted by the D800 though - would it be useful to have that resolution for your commercial stuff?
For wedding photography the 5D III looks about perfect.
You not tempted by the D800 though - would it be useful to have that resolution for your commercial stuff?
would be ideal but i can't use the 90 and 24 t/se canon lenses on it and the nikon equivalent's are not up to scratch, they do a fantastic 14-24 but i don't really have much use for that.
im thinking more of a used H3D-39 and a MkIII depending on a few jobs that might be happening to pay for it.
despite forum chatter about the III being a minor upgrade it actually has some features that would make my shooting easier like the inbuilt level (interiors), extended auto bracketing (natural HDR's) SD card (straight into macbook for the rare occasion when not shooting tethered)
better af for the times i shoot things that move and the better quality video.
i'm about to open an 800asa raw file to see what the shadows are like.
It's amazing the frenzy that people get into - discussions of these cameras on places like dpreview are just hideous. Was there thousands of angry nerds desperate to score points before the internet, or did the internet create them?
Yeah, according to teh internets my camera is crap, but I bloody love it 🙂
On topic - the camera in that vid looks absolutely gigantic!
23 megapixels?.. why? most people aren't shooting for 48 sheet posters. The file size must be huge!
You can get decent A4 prints from 6mps.
My nikon D3s is only 12.5 and that plenty megapixels in my book.
23 megapixels?.. why?
Cos.. it's more, isn't it? See?
manitou - Member
23 megapixels?.. why? most people aren't shooting for 48 sheet posters. The file size must be huge!
I am not sure this camera is aimed at 'most people'.
I suspect it's secretly aimed at techno geeks who just want the biggest and best thing. I bet that's where most of their revenue comes from with these things.
Why so many megapixels....so you can crop the bejeesus out of it of course.
The improved AF is much needed, the AF on the 5Dmk2 is crap, I know I have one, lovely files tho. The improved AF and weather sealing will make it a viable alternative for news and sports shooters (I am one)and at a much cheaper cost than the 1DX (I`ve had a play, nice but how bloody much!). I quite fancy a couple, what am I bid for a 5Dmk2 and a 7D?
23 megapixels?.. why? most people aren't shooting for 48 sheet posters. The file size must be huge!
it's only a 60meg tiff which while big enough for a 48sheet (i have just shot a 48 sheet on a MKII) is not exactly huge, i am retouching some files in 16bit from an iQ180 phase one back and they are 450meg tiffs before i even add another layer 😯
I suspect it's secretly aimed at techno geeks who just want the biggest and best thing. I bet that's where most of their revenue comes from with these things.
absolutely, without the amateur market cameras would be very expensive for professionals, there wouldn't be the healthy second hand market for lenses either
Amatuers make up over 95% of the market, pros are mostly just a shop window for Canon and Nikon, its why Canon painted their big lenses white, so they stand out on telly at sporting events.
I wonder what percentage of the market for these £3k cameras are is pros though? Do pros even use them or more expensive stuff still? Such as Mr Smith mentions I suppose, which answers that.
Do pros even use them or more expensive stuff still?
i use both as do most other photographers i know. medium format and 35mm digital.
but that's not from a wedding/social/press/editorial perspective.
They were showcasing the camera at the Focus On Imaging show at the NEC in the last few days. Couldn't bloody move on the Canon stand.
Nikon had a similar crush for their new camera and to be fair, the Nikon stand was better designed to allow people to move.
The medium format stuff must be too big for weddings/sports/harassing celebs etc I suppose.. studio only or landscapes....?
Lots of press guys have one, great files and full frame comes in very handy.
23 megapixels?.. why? most people aren't shooting for 48 sheet posters. The file size must be huge!
You can get decent A4 prints from 6mps.
My nikon D3s is only 12.5 and that plenty megapixels in my book.
Tell that to Nikon who just brought out the 36MP D800. I bet there was a time when people said 4 megapixels was all you would ever need. 😉
I don't need 23 megapixels most of the time, for weddings I sometimes shoot in mRaw which I think is about 10MP - 23 (or even 36) would still be handy at times though. I've had clients ask for a shot to go on banners before.