Camera buffs - tell...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Camera buffs - tell me why we should/should not buy this camera. Pleeeease.

20 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
69 Views
Posts: 31056
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Sorry, I know two fifths of bugger all about cameras but mrs deadly has plopped for [url= http://m.johnlewis.com/mt/www.johnlewis.com/230478818/Product.aspx#reviews ]this one[/url] from John Lewis. It's a Canon Powershot S95. What are the goods and bads?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Quite nice. [url= http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_s95 ]Review here.[/url]
I used to have an old PowerShot S75. Good cameras, well made.

You might also want to consider the Canon G12, which is slightly bulkier but a bit more "serious":
http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_g12


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks too cheap, I think you should be spending somewhere in the region of 4-5k on the body alone. Anything less can't really be called a camera. Beyond that I can't help, I only deal in real cameras.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like them. S100 is soon to be released, but S95 still looks really good. I'd buy it.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

how the other half 😯

(canon's are decent cameras around that price point, better lenses than many other brands in that kinda range)


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:52 am
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

Is that form-factor a requirement?

Mrs Grips just spent slightly less on a Sony Cybershot TX10 which is waterproof and shockproof, but still small and svelte.

[img] [/img]

Personally I'd go for this slightly larger - Olympus XZ-1. Should take significantly better pictures.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:55 am
Posts: 459
Full Member
 

I had one of [url= http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-PowerShot-SX210-Digital-Camera/dp/B00375N4O4/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1317815606&sr=1-2 ]these Canon Powershots[/url] and it were marvellous.

EDIT: Until it got wet, now it's crap.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 11:55 am
Posts: 31056
Free Member
Topic starter
 

G, why would you go for the G12 for a hundred squid more?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:07 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12381
Full Member
 

http://www.camerapricebuster.co.uk/prod1598.html

Kerso was selling them for £269 last time I got his price list

My Nephew is a pro 'tog in That London's famous London and he used the S90 as a walkaround camera with great results


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:21 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I've got an S95.

Bloomin love it. Best thing about it is it is so small you can take it everywhere. Pictures taken with it have been mistaken for SLR pics and you wouldn't take an SLR with you everywhere (or a G12 for that matter).

In the hands of someone better than me it would be er... even better 🙂

Here's my picassa album https://picasaweb.google.com/107924463712607063923


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

G, why would you go for the G12 for a hundred squid more?

Mainly I prefer that form factor: chunkier dials, bigger buttons and more direct controls rather than faffing in settings menus. I also like having an optical viewfinder.

The articulated screen, ability to use an external flash and longer lens are also plus points.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:27 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

It's the best compact in the world, until the S100 comes out, according to Ken Rockwell.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/recommended-cameras.htm#pocket

I had a play with one in Jessop's the other day. Quite a shock to the system going back to a compact after using a dSLR for a few weeks.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:29 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12381
Full Member
 

Oh yes, and [url= http://sebrogers.typepad.com/seb_rogers_blog/2011/06/the-elusive-proper-compact-camera.html ]seb rogers[/url] reckoned it was the only compact he'd buy from those he tested.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:30 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So, erm, it looks good for a compact then. Cheers DezB. And cheers all for comments from others. 🙂


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:33 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Only problem is, I never remember to get my finger out of the way of the flash when it pops up!


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:37 pm
Posts: 1008
Full Member
 

Depending on what you want the camera for and if zoom is of interest after lots of testing I went for the Sony DHX 9V. Take a look at this blog which has some really interesting not widely known points.

http://hx9v.blogspot.com/?zx=f72aee65e47b1bb1


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 12:50 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I looked at this and the Olympus XZ-1. Went for the Olympus in the end as it's got a faster lens across the zoom range. The video is not as good as the Canon though.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 1:07 pm
Posts: 5787
Full Member
 

It's the best compact in the world, until the S100 comes out, according to Ken Rockwell.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/recommended-cameras.htm#pocket


Yes, but he wears his camera on his belt.

I think you've found your reason why you shouldn't buy this camera.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I've got the S90, the immediate predecessor to the S95. It's ace, get one.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 1:36 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm never going to wear a camera on my belt but I'm more than willing to take buying advice from those who do. 😀


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 1:37 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
 

The XZ-1 has a much wider aperture and larger sensor than other compacts, so it can take blurry background portraits and is great in low light. I'd go for it for sure unless small size was a major consideration. Having said that, it's hardly big.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 2:09 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!