 You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Is that an acceptable way to describe someone without malice?
I've been asked to describe someone I don't know to their boss (purely for identification) for some customer service feedback. They don't wear name tags and there's a small chance the person I'm describing might actually be the Boss, rather than someone I'm just trying to describe to her.
I've tried to write it 3 or 4 different ways and they all sound mean, she was normal height, white/European, more muscular than average, slightly heavier than average (pot, kettle etc) fair haired, but short-back-and-sides style and spoke with a gruff voice. They wear uniforms so there's nothing to go on there and whilst I don't remember her eye colour, it seems silly to go to that level of detail to dance around some more obvious traits.
Also the feedback is negative, but not terrible (they asked me, I'm not moaning) so I don't want to sound like I'm homophobic or some misogynist who's having a dig because she doesn't conform or some nonsense.
she was normal height, white/European, more muscular than average, slightly heavier than average (pot, kettle etc) fair haired, but short-back-and-sides style and spoke with a gruff voice.
sorry but that sounds like a good way and not mean ??
No you can't say that, it's defo derogatory. How about stocky build with short hair.
"Heavier set and more of a masculine build than you would expect for a woman" (hides behind parapet)
Yeah it doesn't sound very appropriate.
Maybe go for more of a police-report type description e.g. '30s white female, about 5'5, short light hair, average build'.
with a face like a bulldog chewing a wasp.
I see no problem in the description but perhaps that's my understanding ... not sure stereotyping or not. If it might be a problem then perhaps you want to describe her as woman with a male gender look or behaviour? Yes?
fionap - Member
Yeah it doesn't sound very appropriate.
Maybe go for more of a police-report type description e.g. '30s white female, about 5'5, short light hair, average build'.
Average build in the GeordieLand is heavy. 😛
"Wears comfortable shoes"
how can this not be a hora thread ? 😯
matt_outandabout - Member
"Wears comfortable shoes"
[img]
[/img]
Thanks all,
I've been trying the write the bloody thing all day between jobs and I think I couldn't see the wood for the trees.
I'll going with "stocky women with short hair".
'Have you seen prisoner cell block h'
really? You would never have guessed.so I don't want to sound like I'm homophobic or some misogynist who's having a dig because she doesn't conform or some nonsense.
How about "fond of a bit of scissoring" or "afraid of warm willys".
🙄
"an east german shot-puttering fanny licker?"
I'm not sure as you can - or should - be ascertaining someone's sexuality based on looks. Would "beardy Muslim type" be acceptable?
You've said you've struggled with a description, then described her perfectly well to us in the next paragraph without the need to draw parallels to a lazy stereotype. TBH, "lass with short cropped blonde hair" is probably sufficient for identification purposes unless it's from a huge team.
Is it that hard to describe someone without bringing their sexuality into it?
"Aggressive looking"?
"Doesn't want to buy a whole pig to get a bit of sausage"
?
I think any reference to a person's sexuality - real or supposed - is unhelpful, as it perpetuates the problem exhibited on both 'sides' of the human sexuality debate that identifies a person with what they may or may not do in bed.
People are a hundred things [i]before[/i] they are sexual things. If you know what I mean.
Edited, repetition.
"Doesn't want to buy a whole pig to get a bit of sausage"?
Made me lol anyway.
IBTB.
Nothing helpful to add.
Any help?
He-man in a dress
"You've seen Rocky right? Well she looked like Dolf Lundgren in it".
Job done. No derogatory remarks, just a likeness to help illustrate......
Let us know how you get on!!!
"Unattractive enough that the sisterhood wouldn't get their knickers in a twist if she were advertising shin pads".