[Closed] Best budget SLR for sport photography?

Any good make DSLR from the last 5 years should do that.
I've got an old Olympus E400 that is as good enough for me as I need. More modern cameras may have better resolution etc, but in the real world, there isnt much difference - not enough for me to spend £600+ on a new body.
Good variety of lenses/accessoires, then stick with Nikon/Canon, if you want something slight;y different, with a little less availability, then Olympus/Pentax/Sigma etc may suit.

Hi Ricks your going to struggle to get a good low light setup for that money.

On a tight budget I'd go Canon 40D (2nd hand) (6.5 fps (frame per second) and the Canon 75-300mm but if you can stretch your budget get the Canon L series 70-200 f4 (around £380.00 on Ebay)

Andy

Pentax KS1 good reviews with favourable comments regarding its lie light performance.

On a tight budget I'd go Canon 40D

Might allow some nice glass, but not a great body for low light performance. Nice enough camera (I have the 30d) but old tech now. I'd go for something newer, if it's something important to you. You can always pick up new lenses further down the line.

Hi Ricks your going to struggle to get a good low light setup for that money.

Spend the money on good glass

A. Think about the settings you're going to use and get the camera/lens/flash that does that.
B. Think about the images that you want to take and get the kit that does that.
C. Get any old DSLR are develop a technique that allows you to take photos within its limitations.
Could you throw up some images that you'd like to replicate, please?

You could almost take any body, but you need a fast zoomy lense, and they ain't cheap even second hand

I think you'd get a D300 for for that. Proper multi AF point tracking stuff

Lens? maybe a a 18-70 3.5-3.5

Don't get too hung up on the old tech thing. A D7200 isn't as much as a stop better than a D300.

A D90 gets the same sensor as the D300 but less good AF

The D7000 gets the 16MP sensor which was probably the last real jump in sensor technology

A 35mm f1.8 lens will make way more difference to light gathering than a newer sensor

How far away are the things you are photographing?

A newish body and a 70-200ish f4 would be a big step-up from the Nikon 1.

The canon 70-200 f4 is cracking all round lens and not too heavy

The 70-200 2.8IS is an amazing bit of Glass but expensive and real heavy!

[URL= http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/_I2C5000_zpsk5scb9rq.jp g" target="_blank">http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/_I2C5000_zpsk5scb9rq.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

[URL= http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/JI2C3325_zpsvdqpnt44.jp g" target="_blank">http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/JI2C3325_zpsvdqpnt44.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

[URL= http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/JI2C3369_zpsx8tljwvx.jp g" target="_blank">http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/JI2C3369_zpsx8tljwvx.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

[URL= http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/_I2C5087_zpslugl36nc.jp g" target="_blank">http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy285/kbrembo/_I2C5087_zpslugl36nc.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

Do we give a prize for the person over budget by the biggest margin?

[url= https://c8.staticflickr.com/8/7569/15720739599_b77c6302b1_k.jp g" target="_blank">https://c8.staticflickr.com/8/7569/15720739599_b77c6302b1_k.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/pXbUbt ]Cyclocross-2[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/john_clinch/ ]John Clinch[/url], on Flickr

D90 and 18-70

[url= https://c7.staticflickr.com/9/8301/7761072062_98885a8cc9_k.jp g" target="_blank">https://c7.staticflickr.com/9/8301/7761072062_98885a8cc9_k.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/cPPwkh ]london 2012-16[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/john_clinch/ ]John Clinch[/url], on Flickr

D70 and 18 70

Both combinations well in budget

Speaking as a Canon user,

You know Nikon. Stick with that.

Nikon 1 has little in common with a Nikon dslr. I'd look at what deals are to be had, regardless of brand.

You should pick up a used 70-200 f4 £300 or less and a pretty cheap body from below..with honest conditions etc

Or Gumtree if your feeling lucky

[url= https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-lenses/used-canon-fit-lenses/canon-ef-70-200mm-f-4-l-usm/sku-627453/ ]Click Me[/url]

[url= https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-digital-slr-cameras/used-canon-digital-slr-cameras/ ]And Me[/url]

Thanks chaps,

I'm struggling to see anything in the suggestions so far that fits in my budget.

My short list is going along the lines of:

Nikon 5200
Nikon 3300
Nikon d70
Canon 100d
Canon 750d

.....

Cheers

Ricks

The Canon 70-200 is a better used buy than I thought. So apologies on budget doupts

A few here for under £300

http://www.ffordes.com/category/Lenses/Canon/EOS/Canon/Others#&&SortDirection=Ascending&PageIndex=5&SortExpression=

But I'd say a prime was a better bet as f4 isn't that fast....

I'd go 2nd hand personally mate

Picked up a mint Canon 50D and a couple of lenses in the classifieds on here a few months ago for £200, it's way better than anything newer for even double the budget IMO aside from the fact it doesn't shoot video of course. The same seller, tastypixels, is selling a very little used 350D with lenses in the classifieds right now. Could be a good shout on a budget, and at least you wouldn't be too precious about it on the trail!

ampthill - Member

The Canon 70-200 is a better used buy than I thought. So apologies on budget doupts

A few here for under £300

http://www.ffordes.com/category/Lenses/Canon/EOS/Canon/Others#&&SortDirection=Ascending&PageIndex=5&SortExpression=

But I'd say a prime was a better bet as f4 isn't that fast...

+1 ffordes especially when 15 mins away!

It's probably just my screen, but some of those images above are horrendously over exposed. 🙁

It's probably just my screen...

You would be lucky to get a lense for £400

Yes, it is.

So is that snow on the trees?

A D90 is in budget and way better than a D70

£130

https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-digital-slr-cameras/used-nikon-digital-slr-cameras/nikon-d90/sku-619330/?gclid=Cj0KEQjw9vi-BRCx1_GZgN7N4voBEiQAaACKVpKDvqmHxEOIbPd9eyKIZ3YOSoi8m3ideru5mD9EGhsaArQ98P8HAQ

Pay a little more and get one in better condition

18 70 here

£94

https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-digital-slr-cameras/used-nikon-digital-slr-cameras/nikon-d90/sku-619330/?gclid=Cj0KEQjw9vi-BRCx1_GZgN7N4voBEiQAaACKVpKDvqmHxEOIbPd9eyKIZ3YOSoi8m3ideru5mD9EGhsaArQ98P8HAQ

D300

£210

https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-digital-slr-cameras/used-nikon-digital-slr-cameras/nikon-d300/sku-625277/?gclid=Cj0KEQjw9vi-BRCx1_GZgN7N4voBEiQAaACKVoTZjoIY7g8I_gLPXcisJvvk2MJyQmfOqNmFg2kE4EoaAn_E8P8HAQ

So is that snow on the trees?

There's blown highlights, but the subject is correctly exposed.

captainsasquatch - Member

There's blown highlights, but the subject is correctly exposed.

But the backgrounds are horrendously over exposed then, and it's not my screen.

Geez...chill.

I wasn't photographing the backgrounds...

I guess I need to work on my skills... living in the Highlands I'm not use to the bright sunshine we had on that day.

Lets help the chap get a new setup

Geez...why so bothered?

captainsasquatch - Member

Geez...why so bothered?

Because there's more to taking a decent photo than a list of equipment.

Ok...any tips?

Ok...any tips?

Ok...any tips?

[url= http://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/best-budget-slr-for-sport-photography#post-7966703 ]Where should I start?[/url]

EDIT:

Expose for the subject, not the background?

Kbrembo

Tips

Shoot RAW

Shoot pictures that don't clip the highlights. I bet these haven't clipped in RAW

In Post set exposure for the main subject

Darken the rest. In Lightroom I'd use the virtual neutral density filter

[img] [/img]

For me the bright grass under the rider distracts from the rider. Not too late to darken it

EDIT - waaay too slow with this! Five or so posts above have it covered!

But the backgrounds are horrendously over exposed then, and it's not my screen.

It's not your screen. The shots are generally over-exposed, though maybe not "horrendously".

There's blown highlights, but the subject is correctly exposed.

Too many blown highlights, at least for my eyes. I'd have exposed the subject less in order to prevent at least some of those highlights. Of course, shooting in raw would have given plenty to play with. We all know why raw is so much better; right?

Kbrembo, try not to take it to heart. They're pretty good shots in terms of composition, but could be better technically!

Kbrembo, try not to take it to heart. They're pretty good shots in terms of composition, but could be better technically!

Cheers..No offense taken 🙂

ampthill - Member

Kbrembo

Tips

Shoot RAW

Just yanked some pics of the PC to help get this guy to choose a setup and didnt think it was a photo critique...

[img] [/img]

 

You forgot the bokeh.
😉
As said, don't take it to heart, Graham Watson was a true professional at dummy spitting if you critised his pictures. 😆

Ok...any tips?

Get the biggest dick swinging zoom you can afford, wear it round your neck with pride. 8)

That looks much better - loads more detail, more vibrant and much easier to look at, which is what it's all about!

Ta for the tips..I always shoot RAW & Jpeg

If you shoot raw, there's no need to produce a separate JPG unless you need to export an image immediately, you're only taking up more card space.

[img] [/img]

Rickon

I have a Nikon D3100 for sale if your interested
With the standard 18-55 battery, charger, and a camera bag
Its getting on a bit but still produces decent images
Not sure on the shutter count but I can check if you are interested

Will be px'ing it for a new D5500 at the weekend but happy if I can sell privately for a bit more than the part-ex offer which I don't imagine will be much say £120

Hi Ricks your going to struggle to get a good low light setup for that money.

Seconded.

I recently sold my Nikon D90 and D300 (amazing camera) and bought a D7200, purely for the low light. I would happily have carried on using the D300 if it could work well at indoors events and under tree cover on cloudy days; arguably you can adapt your technique and take different shots, but at the end of the day I also use it for work and need things to be pin sharp.

From my limited perspective (I'm not a camera techophile and only really shoot sports) the main gain over the past five years has been low light / high ISO - the difference between what the D7200 and the D300 can take is incredible, even if in regular conditions the D300 is actually a nicer camera to use.

The 3100 above is certainly worth a look IMHO.