BB92 and UK all yea...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

BB92 and UK all year riding

27 Posts
22 Users
4 Reactions
295 Views
Posts: 494
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am debating a bike change and on the list is a frame with BB92 and after all the various posts around pressfit etc I am curious about some real life experiences with that bottom bracket as at this stage it scares me.

For a bit of context I ride twice a week, week in week out all year, through son (3 weeks a year) and mud / bog (49 weeks a year) and my original screw fit dub BB used to get replaced twice a year due to wear, so a press fit of any type worried me hence the question to find some real life truth aside from the "press fit is bad" generalisms.

Only have one bike, ride it a lot and don't have space for a trailer queen bike that gets emotional, moody, or munches bottom brackets more.

Ta

James


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 8:32 pm
Posts: 9783
Full Member
 

Got a 2015 stumpjumper Evo. Had it from new. It's still on its original PF30 bottom bracket. Gets used all year round mainly in the Peak


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 8:37 pm
 AD
Posts: 1573
Full Member
 

BB92 on my road bike.

The only way I stopped it creaking like a bastard was a C-Bear ceramic bearings and Loctite 641 on the cups in the (aluminium) frame.

Its been great since though ?

EDIT  - FFS - the question mark was a smiley face...


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 8:41 pm
Posts: 2191
Free Member
 

No issues with mine, gone through two on my MTB which was purchased in 2017 and used all seasons of the year.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 8:55 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

BB72 on my fatbike and that's seen all sort of conditions - snow, ice, mud, peat, sand, sea. It's now on its second BB.

BB72 on my MTB. That lasted even longer.

BB72 on my road bike. That's only two years old, so maybe too soon to tell?

The first lasted 4 years. I really don't think they are near as much of an issue as folk made out.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 9:07 pm
100psi and 100psi reacted
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

No worries or issues on the Yeti ARC I use all year round.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 9:07 pm
Posts: 167
Free Member
 

I've used SRAM GXP BB86 bottom brackets and I found them to last longer than the thread BSA ones. Perhaps I was just riding less.

If you buy a good quality press fit bottom bracket then I can't see why it wouldn't last as long as a good quality threaded bottom bracket.

Creaking likely comes from poor frame tolerances/poor installation. As mentioned above, Loctite will solve this.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 9:07 pm
Posts: 2139
Full Member
 

If it’s a decent manufacturer I wouldn’t let it put me off. Or rather, a threaded vs pf bb might be the deciding factor between two similar bikes and I’d definitely prefer one, but it wouldn’t be a showstopper.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 9:08 pm
Posts: 5153
Free Member
 

Mine ended up ovalised and started chewing through bottom brackets.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 9:21 pm
Posts: 780
Free Member
 

Gravel bike has a Press Fit. Ridden in all weather and conditions, and often out of its comfort zone (small jumps, drops etc). The stock BB lasted around 1500 miles before developing a creak. It actually outlasted 2 chains, 2 cassettes and a set of wheels. Replaced it with a Dura Ace and have put just under 600 miles on it with no issues.

Still prefer threaded for MTB though.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 9:57 pm
Posts: 17728
Full Member
 

BB92 on my Stumpjumper FSR.
Lifetime isn't great and it tends to get very stiff to rotate after wet & muddy rides. It normally frees up after a minute or so, until it doesn't. Which is a pain. Never had issues with creaking or that kind of annoyance.
I'd avoid when it comes to replacement.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 10:03 pm
Posts: 751
Full Member
 

My Pivot has been brilliant with a PF92 - really does depends on the manufacturer as I know Pivot are really hot on QC on their BBs.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 10:14 pm
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

Had bb92s on my last 2 bikes ridden all year round and raced from the alps to Ae

OEM Sram ones lasted a few months, wheels manufacturing screw together ones, bearings last a couple of years, don't creak at all and bearings are just tapped out when they do go.

I have a shimano pf92 on my hardtail which I thought I'd have to replace summer, I've ridden all through the last very wet winter and it's still running fine.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 10:39 pm
Posts: 335
Free Member
 

Had a 2015 specialzed enduro with a pf bb, I heard all the horror stories before purchasing but really wanted the bike. Used to go through a bb a year, the same as every other kind of bb I’ve used, never creaked and I used to just hammer the new one in with a wooden mallet!


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 10:44 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

The PF BB on my Neil Pryde road bike had an absolutely incurable creak. I tried a screw-together Wheels MFG BB, extra strength Loctite bearing gap filler, Loctite primer - nothing worked.

I've avoided them ever since.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 10:50 pm
Posts: 2324
Full Member
 

Put a wheels mfg thread fit to replace a pf30 on my orro road bike. Has been completely flawless for last 2500 km


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 11:04 pm
Posts: 433
Free Member
 

I've had a lot of bikes with press-fit bottom brackets. None have creaked. I hate creaking so would soon notice. Lifespan seems the same as BSA. Can only imagine those that creak are poor quality/out of spec frames/bottom brackets or assembled dry.


 
Posted : 06/08/2024 11:45 pm
Posts: 494
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That is super helpful, thanks all, particularly interesting to hear from @nickc as that is the very frame I am looking at - Yeti Arc.

James


 
Posted : 07/08/2024 5:09 am
Posts: 1553
Free Member
 

Fitted a Hope PF30 to my GF's Yeti SB5 back in 2017 and still not had to change it out yet (and no creaks).


 
Posted : 07/08/2024 12:51 pm
 Yak
Posts: 6920
Full Member
 

BB92 with shimano is fine. Easy to swap in and out when they do wear and also not too expensive. Plenty of room for decent size bearings with a 24mm axle.


 
Posted : 07/08/2024 1:11 pm
Posts: 7544
Free Member
 

They've been fine for me with one big caveat - only with cranks with 24mm axles. Anything with a 30mm axle, the bearings just disintegrate. A decent BB92 pressfit BB (like a Hope) with a Shimano crank will last a very long time.


 
Posted : 07/08/2024 1:13 pm
Posts: 494
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So in summary it works but only if you use 24mm spindle, bugger, so how does that fit with transmission then? As I think, but don't know, it's just SRAM cranks and their all 30mm 🙁


 
Posted : 08/08/2024 9:19 pm
Posts: 9783
Full Member
 

Ours has a 30mm spindle.


 
Posted : 08/08/2024 9:32 pm
Posts: 4421
Full Member
 

My Arc runs the pressfit Hope/Enduro bearings and a 30mm Hope cranks.  I’m on the same set for 18 months now.


 
Posted : 08/08/2024 10:13 pm
Posts: 7544
Free Member
 

Ours has a 30mm spindle.

Yours also has a BB30 bottom bracket though, not BB92.


 
Posted : 09/08/2024 12:43 pm
 Yak
Posts: 6920
Full Member
 

Maybe run the SRAM dub one and if it doesn't last very long then change to a Shimano/24mm crank/BB and sell the dub crank. Yeah big initial cost but that v lots of future BB swaps.  BB92 is a pressfit system designed around Shimano and the 24mm axle.


 
Posted : 09/08/2024 1:56 pm
Posts: 494
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all really helpful, makes me wonder if that Hope crank and BB have better tolerances perhaps from @blazin-saddles comment and run it till it dies then review has always worked for me 🙂


 
Posted : 11/08/2024 5:26 am
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

i used the xt pf92 for years in my remey in all conditions, it was absolutely fine- as good as any other 24mm. Also had the hope one which was ridiculously overcomplex and barely any better in practice


 
Posted : 12/08/2024 2:33 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!