[Closed] Banning Cycling on A24 Dorking to Leatherhead?

Am not going to go so far as to say I support the idea, but I've never understood why people choose to use the road over the cycle lane along there. The southern side is in good condition I think, and while there are a few places where you have to stop for driveways et c, that's surely better than competing with the traffic on the road itself.

If we're talking about a ban on cars and/or bikes, let's talk about the Box Hill climb..I reckon it could do with cycling and driving only being permitted at certain, different times at weekends

Its a very dangerous piece of road. Not the daftest petition I have ever seen especially if there is a cycle lane. Used to annoy me in London when bus lane had cyclists in it who where not using the cycle lane provided

I have driven along there and wondered why the cyclists aren't using the cycle lane, cant be pleasant on that stretch of road.

Signed.

Not really, but seems sensible.

Can we set up a counter petition to fix the cycle lanes?

I have driven along there and wondered why the cyclists aren't using the cycle lane, cant be pleasant on that stretch of road.

If cyclists aren't using a provided cycle lane, preferring to mix it up with traffic, then I'd assume there was some issue with the cycle lane. Given the choice between poorly maintained cycle lanes with confusing priorities and crossing driveways etc. I'd prefer the road when making progress on a skinny tyre road bike.

Can anyone who drives that stretch of road comment on why it's so dangerous for cyclists to be on it?

I use the cycle lane between Dorking and the bottom of box reasonably often and sometimes use the road next to it, it's not imho a particularly dangerous piece of road. Its got reasonably good sight lines and iirc the max speed is 50.
I am not sure why there should be a ban on cycling up Box hill at the same time cars are using it. Iirc it's a 20mph speed limit with speed bumps and a scenic area, not your normal cut through.

Absolutely not signed.

Having looked at the road on street view I personally would use the cycle path, but you are setting a dangerous precedent by banning cycling on a road as there is a cycle path there.

Let people make their own decisions.

I have driven along there and wondered why the cyclists aren't using the cycle lane, cant be pleasant on that stretch of road.

I can't speak for that particular section of road/path, but in my experience 95% of cycle paths are not fit for purpose. They might be fine for a tourist ambling along at 10mph on their touring bike, but 20+mph on a road bike is a different kettle of fish entirely. More often than not cycle paths are gravelly, bumpy, covered in leaves/twigs/glass etc etc. And that's before we get to shared use paths and having to dodge pedestrians and dogs every 50 yards.

I should add I drive that road quite often too, it's not a dangerous bit of road imho

but in my experience 95% of cycle paths are not fit for purpose.

Being generous there.

And that's before we get to shared use paths and having to dodge pedestrians and dogs every 50 yards.

... and the game of russian roulette you play with driveways. Then there's being stuck for ages trying to cross busy roundabouts and junctions, with no priority and usually very poor visibility, that you'd sail across if on the road.

That cycle lane is fine on my titanium tripster with 40c tyres running tubeless to reduce the risk of punctures, otherwise it is not fit for purpose in many sections.

Sort that out and there wouldn't be many cyclists on that road.

@mrblobby ime in London people chose not to use the cycle lane as they want to go faster (or think the cycle lane is too full of "amateur" cyclists). My daughter who commutes daily in London by bike says "super hero" cyclists barging past in the cycle lanes are the most dangerous part of the ride. FWIW it was the same when she lived in Copenhagen.

Used to annoy me in London when bus lane had cyclists in it who where not using the cycle lane provided

This?

If cyclists aren't using a provided cycle lane, preferring to mix it up with traffic, then I'd assume there was some issue with the cycle lane

Any cycle lane will get used if it's a good design, and a well maintained facility.

The Embankment cycle lane in London is great in places, and a pain in the bum in others so sometimes I use the road. Bad points are lanes not swept at all, speed bumps, joggers, lemming like pedestrians, poor traffic light phasing, and wandering cyclists at busy times.

If the A24 is becoming a safety problem how about 30mph average speed cameras along there? Now there's an idea for a petition!

@mrblobby ime in London people chose not to use the cycle lane as they want to go faster

Is an interesting one that. Most want to get to where they are going in good time. If there's a slow and a fast option, I suspect most would take the fast option. If it's riskier then some will think it worth the risk, others won't. I'd be the same for car drivers if they were faced with similar choices.

Other reason I'll often use roads over cycle lanes is because the rules are clear to all, you and drivers know who has right of way, who has priority etc. I think it's often safer to be part of the traffic rather than being in conflict with it at junctions and roundabouts (which is what happens when you use cycle lanes in the UK.)

I cycle into London on one of the designated cycle super highway as it was largely fit for purpose, most people cycling my route seem to use it. I tend not to use minor cycle paths as they are not. Superhero cyclists, nodders, Boris bikers there are all sorts and standards, idiots will be idiots. Bit confused as your daughter seems to be saying the aplha types don't use cycle paths but are also barging past her on the cycle paths, maybe they are very fat

I use the cycle lane in both directions at least one a week, both on mtb and 23c tyred road bike for commuting in to London. I've never had a puncture on it thankfully.

Going Northbound it is probably one of the best cycle lanes in the UK between Denbie's and Givons Grove (with the exception of the bit around Burford Bridge /Westhumble). It could do with being swept a bit more access a bit of work doing to reduce puddles when wet.

Southbound is good between Givons Grove Ave Mickleham, but then it is a concrete slabs between Mickleham and Burford which have settled causing a poor surface.

Heading south I usually find it easier to use the northbound track.

mrblobby, you've got that bang on. I want my commute done as quickly as possible, it's not a pleasure ride.

And that's before we get to shared use paths and having to dodge pedestrians and dogs every 50 yards.

is there not an irony in that cyclists complain about having to dodge other slower moving, less predictable path users, and arguing that they should therefore ride on the road, where they become the slower moving, less predictable road users that others have to dodge?

Is it actually possible for a council to ban cyclists from an A-road?

[quote=5lab ]is there not an irony in that cyclists complain about having to dodge other slower moving, less predictable path users, and arguing that they should therefore ride on the road, where they become the slower moving, less predictable road users that others have to dodge?

In what way is a cyclist riding on the road less predictable than idiot car drivers? If pedestrians on shared use paths moved like cyclists do on road, nobody would have an issue - the problem invariably is either peds across the whole width of the path ignoring you, or dogs out of control, neither of which is in any way similar to how cyclists ride on the road. So the only irony is in the Alanis Morissette sense.

Is it actually possible for a council to ban cyclists from an A-road?

A470 out of Cardiff has no cycling signs on it (not a problem, as there's a quieter parallel road all the cyclists use anyway), so presumably the answer is yes.

Is it actually possible for a council to ban cyclists from an A-road?

I always choose the cycle path on that bit of road.

Do we think there will be a time where it is compulsory to use a cycle path if there is one, rather than a road?
Are there other countries where this is the case? I was bibbed by a car in Belgium last year for not using the cycle path (which was a similar quality to he one on the A24....

Can we set up a counter petition to fix the cycle lanes?

and iirc the max speed is 50.

You're right but you try finding someone who actually sticks to that limit on that stretch of road.

I haven't done so this year but I used to ride that stretch regularly also and would never ride on the road section. Not because I don't think we should be there or because there was a reasonable alternative (actually over the winter I used it before I switched to Box Hill alternative that stretch would be so underwater you needed a canoe not a bike) but rather because a lot of drivers saw you as a legitimate target if you were on the road and not the cycle path.

The number of death passes I got scared the shit out of me and no amount of 'we shall overcome' would get me back on that stretch of road.

I drive that stretch quite often, and I find that observance of speed limits is actually pretty good....but I wouldn't want to mix it on a dual carriageway with cars and lorries doing 50mph

I drive that stretch quite often, and I find that observance of speed limits is actually pretty good....but I wouldn't want to mix it on a dual carriageway with cars and lorries doing 50mph

You'd think it'd actually be safer though than smaller busy A roads where the speeds are just as high but the roads are single carriageway and narrower so likely poorer visibility and less room to give cyclists a wide berth.

I live not that far from there half the week, and find, espescially at weekends, the number of MAMILs with poor bike handling skills and lack of awareness of others pretty appalling. And it isn't the club peletons, but fat blokes on new bikes. As a roadie when I was young, I really wonder if there should be more encouragement for people to learn some road position and awareness skills for road-riding, rather than carrying the "I am in my safe tin box" car mentality onto their bikes. And learn to pedal and change gears on hills FFS...

Leaving aside the quality of the road surface that cycle path is pretty much a benchmark for cycle paths in Blighty. I'm not sure it would be that easy legally to randomly ban certain classes of vehicle from specific roads, rather than a specific class or category of road.

Is it actually possible for a council to ban cyclists from an A-road?“

"A470 out of Cardiff has no cycling signs on it (not a problem, as there's a quieter parallel road all the cyclists use anyway), so presumably the answer is yes."

The A470 is a trunk road managed by either the South Wales (or North Wales, depending on which section) Trunk Road Agency.

This is similar to how Highways England manage a number of motorways and major A roads in England.

They have different powers to councils for how a 'Trunk Road' can be managed and what can be restricted from traveling on it.

This section of the A24 is not a 'trunk road'. I'm not aware of any non Highways England managed roads in England where a local council has been able to dictate that cycles are not permitted on it.

I tend to use the cycle path, but the only place I got a puncture last winter was on that path, and it happened twice. There are a number of junctions across it where cars tend not to give way. The surface isn't perfect, and there's a pretty sketchy narrow bit by the Burford Bridge roundabout.

The road is fine, I don't get the comments about it being hyper dangerous. Considering the thousands of cyclists who have to cross it to get to Box Hill (which starts 200 yards off this road) I'm not really aware of any major incidents.

Usual small minded stupidity IMO.

Plenty of roads in the Netherlands ban cyclists - but then the cycle lane provided is almost always better.

[img] [/img]

From this article

[url= http://www.aviewfromthecyclepath.com/2014/10/why-do-cyclists-fear-being-banned-from.html ]Why do cyclist fear being banned from the road[/url]

hate to say it, but i kinda agree with the guy with the petition (although maybe not his methods)

The A8 (i think, goes past the Airport) into Edinburgh is similar, paths either side but there are always cyclists who prefer to use the road. It's one of the busiest roads in the area, especially during rush hour. There seem to be so many roads that are in no way designed to accommodate cyclists but it seems that some people will put their own lives in danger to prove a point

Surely a petition to upgrade the cycle paths would be prudent here.

Is it actually possible for a council to ban cyclists from an A-road?

I don't believe it is.

Are there other countries where this is the case? I was bibbed by a car in Belgium last year for not using the cycle path (which was a similar quality to he one on the A24....

Yes, pretty sure some are in both Belgium and Holland. Certainly when we rode the Tour of Flanders the marshals were keeping people on the tracks beside the busy roads.

Personally, I don't have a problem with this in principle for roads above, say 50mph, *IF* it's combined with tight specifications for the standard of cycleway (which would include the cycleway sharing priority with the road that it follows - ie if the main road has priority over a side road so does the cycleway) and an obligation on highway/local authority for them to be in place and maintained. We're a long way from that in the UK at the moment though.

Chubstr

The cyclepaths next to the A8 are awful. That's why cyclists go on the road.

Its my local road and it always annoys me when people cycle on the dual carriageway. The cycle path is wide and smooth tarmac and that section has been 70mph for 50 years and few people stick to the new 50mph limit.

Around here (Mole Valley) cyclists are winding up car drivers enormously and this is just another issue they are creating.

that section has been 70mph for 50 years and few people stick to the new 50mph limit.

So, the safety issue is not the cyclists but drivers breaking the speed limit?

The cycle path is.... smooth tarmac

Nah, it's potholed and otherwise unmaintained.

As somebody said above, it's fine if you're on 30+ tyres and a robust bike, I wouldn't want to take a skinny road machine down it*

* well, anywhere but that's not the point.

Isn't that stretch of road a TT course as well? Pretty sure it's the Holmwood circuit. Can't help the argument when people are perceived to be racing on the public highway.

Other side of Dorking... https://www.strava.com/segments/629691

Racing would usually be on a weekend or late evening though.

They should add the A3 to that petition!
Bloody sportive every week with Boardman wannabes anywhere right out to the centre line.
With best will in the world sometimes you can end up with nowhere to go when one of them changes position and you're unable to get into the outside lane .
How someone hasn't been hit - particularly as they use the Liss roundabout is more luck than anything else.

Want to do a road race?
Fine - close the road - not use a 70mph dual carriageway FFS!

Want to do a road race?

They will usually be experienced riders, riding alone, going off a 1 min intervals, outside peak traffic times (and subject to risk assessment, signage, and traffic police approval.) Really not to be confused with a sportive!

If cyclists aren't using a provided cycle lane, preferring to mix it up with traffic, then I'd assume there was some issue with the cycle lane

You would think so, and I'm all for cyclists being able to use the road if that's what they want to do but in some cases I can't understand why an individual would choose a road over a cycle path.

12 miles of my commute is on a designated cycle path that runs along the A77 Kilmarnock to Glasgow. This road was a dual carriageway, a motorway was built so the old road was taken down to 2 lanes and a cycle path made with a wide raised section separating it from traffic.

In the 12 miles I ride it's intersected by 2 minor road, one of which never has any vehicles using it, the other is also pretty quite. There's one roundabout where you need to either cross the road, go on the path at the other side of the road, then cross back onto the path, or exit onto the road and just ride through the roundabout. Not a big deal and doesn't slow you down.

The path is rural so isn't the usual glass covered urban path.

It really is a fantastic facility.

But people still frequently use the road and I just don't get why. In summer its not a big deal as the road isn't that busy, although there are quarry trucks on it, but a few people regularly use the road in dark winter nights and mornings, really can't think why as it's not pleasant. I've ridden it when the paths been icy and there are a couple of horrible sections where drivers pass with inches to spare.

It's odd behavior if you ask me.

A few people saying here that the A24 cyclepath is potholed and a poor surface. I've only ever ridden the south side of it which is brilliantly smooth. Presumably very different on the north side then?

A9.

There are decent alternatives almost the whole way from Perth to Inverness (barring the gravel-strewn track at Drumochter) but folk just seem to want to take the "main" road regardless. Of course, a lot of these are LEJOGers looking for the shortest/fastest route.

As somebody said above, it's fine if you're on 30+ tyres and a robust bike, I wouldn't want to take a skinny road machine down it*

* well, anywhere but that's not the point.

I agree - is part of it that people are riding bikes that aren't really fit for purpose for what they need and blaming poor infrastructure when part of the issue is having the wrong tool for the job?
I have a "skinny road machine" with 25mm tyres and there are only a handful of roads in the south east that it is actually really comfortable to ride on.
Are road bikes the equivalent of trying to drive an F1 car on the road?

[quote=dknwhy ]Are [b]road[/b] bikes the equivalent of trying to drive an F1 car on the [b]road[/b]? Err....

Are road bikes the equivalent of trying to drive an F1 car on the road?

They shouldn't be, and any road that's unpleasant to ride a road bike on is likely to be unpleasant in any other vehicle - in a car you might not be risking a puncture, but it'll probably be noisy, which isn't good for either you as a driver or anyone who lives near the road.

A few people saying here that the A24 cyclepath is potholed and a poor surface.

It's hard to see, but this is the bit I'm on about - surface has worn away
https://goo.gl/maps/yQ2yG1EQohB2

and a bit further on - lumps every few metres.
https://goo.gl/maps/pCcphqwds7J2

From memory, there are worse bits and better bits. I can see why people don't use it.

The other side does look nicer (& it's sunny 🙂 )
https://goo.gl/maps/nwQU6zzHuU42

**** me this site is infested by some dumb ****s.

Are road bikes the equivalent of trying to drive an F1 car on the road?

As has been said, road bikes are designed to be fast and efficient on the road, much like cars. If you want road bikes to use cycle paths they need to be built and maintained to the same standards as the roads then it would be fine. It's a bit like saying we should cut back investment in the road infrastructure, let it all go to ruin, not bother fixing pot holes and cracks, and that we should all just buy 4x4's to compensate for that 🙂

It's hard to see, but this is the bit I'm on about - surface has worn away
and a bit further on - lumps every few metres.

That looks sh*t.

scotroutes - Member
dknwhy » Are road bikes the equivalent of trying to drive an F1 car on the road?
Err....

Ok, poor choice of words but "road" bike marketing is actually selling race orientated bikes - 23mm tyres, rigid frames, low spoke count etc.

Ok, poor choice of words but "road" bike marketing is actually selling race orientated bikes - 23mm tyres, rigid frames, low spoke count etc.

They may be race bikes but they're still designed to be raced [b]on roads[/b] (though they do race much the same bikes over the cobbles at Paris Roubaix, which many cycle paths resemble.)

jimdubleyou - Member

A few people saying here that the A24 cyclepath is potholed and a poor surface.

It's hard to see, but this is the bit I'm on about - surface has worn away
https://goo.gl/maps/yQ2yG1EQohB2

and a bit further on - lumps every few metres.
https://goo.gl/maps/pCcphqwds7J2

From memory, there are worse bits and better bits. I can see why people don't use it.

The other side does look nicer (& it's sunny )
https://goo.gl/maps/nwQU6zzHuU42

Does indeed look a very different prospect. I'll stick on the south (until it floods again!)

Im against the ban. Live very locally to it and have no issue with cyclists on the A24...can't say id notice enough cyclists on that road to consider it an 'issue' and handily, it being a dual carriageway, there's another lane for cars to move into to overtake!! 8)

To me the junction from Westhumble Street on to the A24 is the dangerous location as cyclists cross the north bound carriage to get in the correct lane for the roundabout...seen some awful manoeuvres by car drivers & cyclists at that junction

They may be race bikes but they're still designed to be raced on roads (though they do race much the same bikes over the cobbles at Paris Roubaix, which many cycle paths resemble.)

They may be but if my commute involved the cobbles of Paris Roubaix, I wouldn't be doing it daily on a 23mm tyred road bike. Even the pros make adjustments within the UCI guidelines to make things more comfortable - wider tyres, double wrapped bars etc.

I guess i'm playing devil's advocate a little - i'm not suggesting that people shouldn't be riding those types of bikes - it's personal choice after all but i'd be pulled apart here if I decided to take my road bike to a trail centre and moan that the trail centre wasn't fit to be ridden on a road bike.

Generally, cycle paths in the UK are poor, as are many roads. They should be fit for purpose and obstruction free but they're not. I do wonder though how many of those people complaining about pot holes etc have actually taken the time to report them and follow through getting them fixed?

@Gary M yup, I said that to someone years ago about the A77 and got all the usual excuses - it's probably this or probably that when in fact it's what all paths should be like.

They did similar round here, fixed a section of completely awful path and made it fantatstic. Still the stubborn MAMILS refuse to use it even though the road is as rough as a badgers.

Couldn't make it up.

To me the junction from Westhumble Street on to the A24 is the dangerous location as cyclists cross the north bound carriage to get in the correct lane for the roundabout...seen some awful manoeuvres by car drivers & cyclists at that junction

Its called 'chicken run' on Strava! I always use the underpass on my mtb which now allows you to cycle it, so no excuses there either.

IMO, its purely selfish roadies riding on the road causing potential accidents, rather than ride on the perfectly smooth south side path. The reason the paths are there is because its not safe to cycle on the road.

The reason the paths are there is because its not safe to cycle on the road.

Obvious troll 🙂

Reason these paths are there is because of regulations requiring the provision of cycling infrastructure.

It's a bit like saying we should cut back investment in the road infrastructure, let it all go to ruin, not bother fixing pot holes and cracks, and that we should all just buy 4x4's to compensate for that

Why is it so annoying cyclists are on the road? Surely it's not that difficult to overtake?

That section of road is less than 4 miles long, with roundabouts, towns and associated traffic at both ends. It's like they are cycling up the M1.

They should just make it single carriageway. Motorists can't have nice things. Too selfish and impatient.

I have to say I have mixed feelings about this (I'm a Libra, what did you expect).

I live in Epsom and know that stretch of road well having driven it a thousand times and ridden it about half that number of times on both MTB and skinny tyred road bike.

I don't like the thought of cyclists being banned from certain roads (other than motorways) because it sets a dangerous precedent.

But I have never ridden that section on the road, I always use the cycle lane (both North & South) out of a sense of self-preservation just because it's so bloomin' dangerous. I do tend to sigh when I see roadies (for it's rarely MTB'ers), riding along that section of road although I fully accept that they have every right to do so.

The riders who chance crossing the fast moving traffic as they dart out from Westhumble Street frankly just scare me. It's much easier to use the underpass

Oh and I'm not in any way a nervous rider, I cycle-commute 36 miles a day into central London and back including such perambulatory delights as Tooting High Street (the closest thing to a shoot em up video game in real life you will ever experience), Clapham Common, Elephant & Castle, Tower Bridge and/or the Embankment so I'm comfortable in traffic.

HoratioHufnagel - Member
Why is it so annoying cyclists are on the road? Surely it's not that difficult to overtake?

Car drivers have plentybof other roads they could choose to use if the bikes are in the way.

Are there any accident statistics to support the proposition that cycling that stretch is actually dangerous?

I suspect the real issue is that driving and - yes - cycling standards are poor and needy better policing.

In any event, I am firmly in the "thin end of the wedge" camp. Banning bikes on one stretch of road sets a very dodgy precedent.

They should add the A3 to that petition!
Bloody sportive every week with Boardman wannabes anywhere right out to the centre line.
With best will in the world sometimes you can end up with nowhere to go when one of them changes position and you're unable to get into the outside lane .
How someone hasn't been hit - particularly as they use the Liss roundabout is more luck than anything else.

Want to do a road race?
Fine - close the road - not use a 70mph dual carriageway FFS!They should add the A3 to that petition!
Bloody sportive every week with Boardman wannabes anywhere right out to the centre line.
With best will in the world sometimes you can end up with nowhere to go when one of them changes position and you're unable to get into the outside lane .
How someone hasn't been hit - particularly as they use the Liss roundabout is more luck than anything else.

Want to do a road race?
Fine - close the road - not use a 70mph dual carriageway FFS!

I'm in 100% agreement with this. Just because you are legally allowed to do it, common sense says its really not a good idea to be clogging the road up in rush out evening traffic.
Just reinforced that all cyclist are b@llends really.
Someone will get killed.

Just reinforced that I am a [s] all cyclist are[/s] b@llend[s]s[/s] really

Someone will get killed.

You mean everyone is frothing at the mouth over this and no one has actually died yet?

mrblobby - Member
Want to do a road race?
They will usually be experienced riders, riding alone, going off a 1 min intervals, outside peak traffic times (and subject to risk assessment, signage, and traffic police approval.) Really not to be confused with a sportive!

They might be in all the gear blobby but trust me they aren't riding alone a lot of the time.
It is definitely not "outside of peak times" either.
Mid whatever it is at 7pm on that stretch is idiocy.

[quote=dknwhy ]I agree - is part of it that people are riding bikes that aren't really fit for purpose for what they need and blaming poor infrastructure when part of the issue is having the wrong tool for the job?
I have a "skinny road machine" with 25mm tyres and there are only a handful of roads in the south east that it is actually really comfortable to ride on.
Are road bikes the equivalent of trying to drive an F1 car on the road?

It's a while since I've ridden a road bike in the SE, but I've been down that way plenty of times in the last few years, and can't say I've noticed the roads having got significantly worse than when I was riding a 23mm tyred (or even 20 when I was young and stupid) racer in various different places, and nor are they any worse than round here where I'm perfectly comfortable on skinny tyres. Not like a gnarr machine with fat tyres and 6" of suspension maybe, but fine if you're used to it. Cycle paths are a different matter - went riding around MK recently which is supposed to have some of the best infrastructure in the UK and some of that was pretty awful and I definitely wouldn't want to be on a racer (not great on what I was on, a geared unicycle).

Is the suggestion here that a racer isn't fit for purpose because you should be riding on the bike paths which aren't suitable for a racer rather than on the roads which are? 😯

No, it's in no way equivalent to driving an F1 car on the road.

I always use the underpass on my mtb which now allows you to cycle it, so no excuses there either.

Hmm. Haven't they just tightened up the barriers (or put fencing up to stop you riding around the outside of them) which make it *more* difficult to ride through (and impossible on a tandem/trike/bike with trailer/tag along)

I mostly end up there on a mountain bike but, out of a sense of self preservation, use the path.

Some of it is wide and smooth.

Some of it is rough and narrow with metal railings.
https://goo.gl/maps/HsAkR6PL6ts

All of it loses priority at junctions which have wide sweeps so motor vehicles can turn into them at speed.
https://goo.gl/maps/SLYmasbAQ1C2
https://goo.gl/maps/UAFFkpTa2CB2
https://goo.gl/maps/aFWn2jqjAGp

Traffic closing at 70mph over your shoulder that may decide to indicate and turn late - nice. Blind to the side road which could have traffic closing on it (mostly far faster than is safe or necessary)

that section has been 70mph for 50 years and few people stick to the new 50mph limit.

Which would seem to be the main problem. You give these motorists big wide roads and they can't even obey the few restrictions that are placed on them.

As cycle paths at the side of A Roads go, it's one of the better ones. Is is actually good? No.
Is the surface smooth (as smooth as the road?) - no. Does it drain properly? no. Is it regularly swept? No. Does it have priority over side roads (ie the same priority as traffic travelling straight on in the main carriageway - no it gives way to traffic turning on and off the A24 at every junction.

[quote=simons_nicolai-uk ]All of it loses priority at junctions which have wide sweeps so motor vehicles can turn into them at speed.
https://goo.gl/maps/SLYmasbAQ1C2
...
Does it have priority over side roads (ie the same priority as traffic travelling straight on in the main carriageway - no it gives way to traffic turning on and off the A24 at every junction.

I'm confused here - not only because some people are saying the "South" side is better, when there appears to be an East and West side and I can't work out which the South side is, but also because right opposite that is https://goo.gl/maps/Y4S2TnVcCvB2 which looks equally, if not more shit.

Do other people have ridiculously low expectations of cycle paths that "facilities" like this are considered to be good? Lack of priority at junctions is to be expected on almost all UK cycle paths and a reason on its own why I'd choose to ride the road. What's more, for all those saying the road is dangerous, looking at real objective danger and looking at those junctions I'd suggest that perception is probably misplaced - using the cycle path looks more dangerous.

Hmm. Haven't they just tightened up the barriers (or put fencing up to stop you riding around the outside of them) which make it *more* difficult to ride through (and impossible on a tandem/trike/bike with trailer/tag along)

Go and have a look now...its a designated cycle route.

I'm confused here - not only because some people are saying the "South" side is better, when there appears to be an East and West side and I can't work out which the South side is, but also because right opposite that is https://goo.gl/maps/Y4S2TnVcCvB2 which looks equally, if not more shit.

Its on the left of the Leatherhead bound carriageway and is in perfect condition currently.

Thing is, despite all the reasons people are coming up with to ride on the road, all they are doing is making motorists angry, which will at some point in time, have disastrous consequences for someone.

Which would seem to be the main problem. You give these motorists big wide roads and they can't even obey the few restrictions that are placed on them.

True, but then these motorists have driven safely on these roads at 70-80mph for decades and now the Nanny state has decreed its a 50mph for the simple fact that the A24 further towards Horsham has a poor record of deaths and they decided to tar this stretch of road with the same brush.

Thing is, despite all the reasons people are coming up with to ride on the road, all they are doing is making motorists angry, which will at some point in time, have disastrous consequences for someone.

Sad to think that just by riding on the road you can get a motorist sufficiently angry to put your life at risk 😕

Do we really need to segregate cyclists to protect them from the uncontrollable rage of some motorists? WTF is wrong with some people 🙁

Should start a petition to ban motorists from the A24.

Or lifetime bans from people not mentally stable enough to use the road network without getting in a rage at other road users/traffic.

Do we really need to segregate cyclists to protect them from the uncontrollable rage of some motorists? WTF is wrong with some people

When it is as appears to be the case that the majority of people on a cycling forum think that roads should be kept clear for the cars at the expense of bikes you can see how bad things are and how ingrained the me, me me me me culture is.

Its on the left of the Leatherhead bound carriageway and is in perfect condition currently.

No it's not. South of Westhumble road it's gravelly and broken up. Then you've got the crossing of Westhumble road, where cyclists notionally have ROW, but cars can turn in at speed, and usually (I've had exceptions) aren't expecting to give way. Then there's the barriered section alongside the roundabout, which is narrow, on a blind bend, with a broken surface. It is in then a better surface most of the way, although in autumn it gets covered with leaves, which remain most of winter because of the lack of traffic to clear them. When it rains significant parts of it flood, or it freezes and you have a skating rink to contend with.

There are half a dozen residential roads and little turn offs where cyclists have to give way to drivers who see you as target practice, and because they're blind you either chance it, or have to stop at each one to check it's clear.

Then you get the fun of trying to rejoin the road at the roundabout at the Leatherhead end without any real exit, or follow the signed route right across the neck of the junction of the road up to Bookham.

The surface isn't bad on the middle bit though, you're right. Shame about everything else.

You'd think this was the comments section on a DM article!

It's a great bit of infrastructure for a family bimble, or a mountain bike ride. It's acceptable for a road bike (I use it regularly on a 23mm-tyre-shod road bike with carbon wheels), but it's far from perfect, and in winter I'll use the road due to the decreased likelihood of ice. I'm not aware of a single fatality on that bit of road. It's not dangerous IMO. Traffic does stick to 50mph, not least because there's a speed camera.

I haven't read the whole thread but despite not being good the cycle lanes on both sides are usable - my cycle club uses the north bound one every Saturday on the way to Box Hill.

I have seen ambulances dealing with both cyclists and bikers involved in accidents on that stretch.

After my last experience a while back I wouldn't consider using the road on my own (maybe in a peloton though) the moving over to the right in preparation to do a right turn at the roundabout is just too dangerous.

The cycling lane although not good really isn't that bad. The alternative is worse imo. Although admittedly I usually only use it for the short distance between the roundabout near zig zag road and the previous roundabout.