 You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Click for more
[url= http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r90/dezb99/Junk/flea.jp g" target="_blank">http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r90/dezb99/Junk/flea.jp g"/> [/IMG][/url]
Thats about 4" across, not even close to microscopic!
Cool 🙂
but a picture taken with a microscope is microscopic.
I didn't say it was microscopic ya twit.
Oh yeah !
[img] 
[/img]
I try to educate people and what happens? 😕
i thought they were marvellous, by the way!
[i]I try to educate people and what happens?[/i]
Your'e young aren't you? You really should think of your actions/words before you post on here. Maybe you need to do a Thinking Skills Programme, your local prison will probably do one.
Excellent photo's BTW.
[i]Your'e young aren't you? [/i]
😆
I think that's an electron 'microscope' scan - it has far too much depth of field to be optical! So, no lenses, the subject has to be plated with metal and any colour is false...
I didn't say it was microscopic ya twit.
very educational!
PS brilliant pic, however obtained 🙂
[b]Using a Scanning Electron Microscope, retired scientific photographer Steve Gschmeissner, 61, from Bedford, is able to magnify insects by up to a million times. [/b]
(the pic is a link)
*Meanwhile, Dez wishes he'd never bothered*
I thought they were fantastic photos! Especially liked the caterpillars's boogley eyes.
Don't worry Anna, the stupidity of STW keeps me happy 🙂
Who cares how it was taken, its a striking image.
PErsonally I find the SEM almost as interesting as the subject. We recently binned one at work, if I'd had the ability to order in the gases and a room to put it in I'd have taken it myself!
Who cares how it was taken, its a striking image.
people who like taking pictures ? And it does make a difference, as the subject is necessarily dead as the scan is performed under vacuum, and any colour is an afterthought
You're not saying... he killed a flea??