You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Hmmm. I watched this over the weekend. It started off okay - if a tad violent. Can anybody explain what the flip happened? It just went really weird at the end. Any comments, opinions appreciated. It was one of those where you press "stop" whilst shaking your head!
No - but I have it waiting to be watched, possibly tonight whilst the Mrs is out. So I shall be bowing out of this thread until I have!
terrible film. just awful. the ending was a total cop out and showed the film for what it was - an excuse to make an ultra violent 'cult' movie and sell lots of DVDs; it had nothing.
the ending - made no sense; it was just more of the same. i don't think you missed anything. the ending should have given some kind of explanation and some sense of justice being at least attempted. but it didn't.
The first 45 mins were like an episode of Brookside, then it goes really weird. A bit scary in places, the violence was pretty hideous but all that Wicker man cobblers was a bit daft. You are offered no tidy endings or explanations, which is ok.. it seemed like it might be sequences of the characters dreams as there were phrases said at points in their 'real world' and then repeated later during the strange revenge killings. The cult members did not respond in normal ways (running at gunfire etc ) all a bit surreal, I also think it might be a commentary on combat trauma though this is just my take on it and in no way true!
Spoiler alert! not sure this explanation makes it a better film but makes some sense of the madness
from here http://www.holymoly.com/film-dvd/blog/kill-list-what’s-it-all-about-then61097
Jay and Gal are both ex-soldiers who’ve served in Iraq. Since leaving the army they’ve set up a business together. That business appears to be the business of killing people. Jay’s wife Shel sets up their contracts with their employers. Their last job together was in Kiev, and appears to have either been a gruelling experience that might not have gone to plan. We never really know what happened in Kiev, but perhaps Gal’s throwaway line ‘At least we’re not killing a toddler’ hints at what might have happened.
Their assassinations are being carried out not for a group of criminal masterminds, but for a cult that worships death and sacrifice. Unbeknownst to them, these assassinations are actually part of a ceremony to turn Jay into the new Antichrist. The whole film as mentioned by the cult leader is ‘a reconstruction’. Jay is the subject of their reconstruction.
They see the pure evil that's inside him. He’s become someone who is unfeeling and psychotic. After Fiona sees his behaviour at the dinner party, he is officially ‘marked’ by her when she carves the cult’s symbol on the back of his mirror.
Did you notice the bloody tissues on the sink? Possibly from her ritually sacrificing the rabbit in the garden, which Jay later eats for breakfast, thinking it’s an offering from the cat. Instead, he is unwittingly accepting the sacrifice and the first stage of his reconstruction.
The way his victims smile and thank him when he is killing them is because they know who he really is. They’re even happily surprised to see him, as though they know who he is and are happy to play some small part in his reconstruction. To be killed by him is an honour to cult members.
The three victims – the Priest, the Librarian and the MP – are obvious figures of authority, each with a stereotypical dark side. The Priest is seen smoking outside the back entrance. The Librarian has a stash of hardcore porn that is so horrific that it sends Jay on a mission of revenge to kill the people who made it. The MP is the third person on the list and the one with, perhaps, the darkest secret of all.
As they close in on the MP’s house, Jay and Gal happen upon a midnight procession of naked, torch wielding people. As they sacrifice a girl by hanging, Jay opens fire on them in a rage. They are chased into sewers, where Gal is fatally stabbed by a cultist. He begs Jay to kill him. Just before he dies, he says ‘thank you’ in an ironic echo of the previous victims.
Jay flees to his family cottage where Shel and his son are hiding. They are followed by the cult, who set up a torchlit ceremony outside. Shel is captured.
Jay is forced to fight the final victim on the Kill List – ‘The Hunchback’. As he stabs the hunchback multiple times, the disguise comes off to reveal his wife and son, in a scene already foreshadowed by Jay’s playfight with his wife and son in the garden at the start of the film.
As Shel laughs, hysterical at the horror of what’s happened, Jay looks at her emotionlessly. The cult’s members begin to applaud.
Killing your own wife and son is the ultimate sacrifice, and the biggest honour. Jay has done it and will now become their new leader.
Read the whole story on Holy Moly! http://www.holymoly.com/film-dvd/blog/kill-list-what%E2%80%99s-it-all-about-then61097#ixzz1mHCSQauv
The best celebrity gossip site in the world.
Well after that synopsis, I'm out.
Is this the one that was advertised on TV a few weeks back with some "comment" from Tarrantino? If so the images in the ad and a +1 from QT were more than enough to make me want to miss it. BTW I do like some QT, haven't seen Inglorious.... mainly because after Planet Terror or whatever I sort of lost interest. I suppose he's always been somewhat marmite but seems to lost track of himself in his own fundament recently.
The story seemed to be about about a death cult, selecting an appropriate subject and then performing an extended ritual with the ultimate intention of making that bloke their leader or some evil preternatural figure.
I thought it was gratuitous, unpleasant and generally not very good. A contrived mix of genres that doesn’t really work IMO. The critics liked it though, drawing political allegory and all sorts from it - which I thought was pretentious guff. It’s a brutish exercise in violence - to shock, cause controversy and sell and nothing more.