You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Islamic faith based schools are under investigation and support for them is growing in Muslim communities.
Parents, who wish to remain anonymous, are talking to and accusing the press of victimising Islam, making false accusations and flat out lying in the media.
Irrespective of the investigations report, they say they will continue to send their kids and support these schools.
Should this be surprising to non Muslims?
Is this something you are concerned about and what possible negative outcome could result in withdrawing interference?
Do you believe there is false reporting and possibly a deliberate attempt to bolster anti Muslim sentiment from within the government as suggested?
Hark!
I hear the sound of onrushing liberals.
Difficult area for debate, espicially on here, lets all be careful and adult please. :o)
All education should be secular imo, all religion is divisive.
I'm happy that there are schools for our secular society, where else would they go for education?
If they can affort it then why not.
If they can't afford it then create a fuss over religious content.
Any faith school is wrong.
To educate anyone about an imaginary bloke who live in the sky is wrong.
It it intellectual lazyness to continue to believe in religion, never mind it being quite wrong to allow the promotion of homophobic ideas and the seperation of the sexes etc.
A child is no more a member of a religion than they are a member of the Postal Workers Union. Therefore "faith" schools shouldn't exist. Don't care whose faith it is.
**** all religions.
Can we start a Star Trek or a Star Wars school ?
This is a big problem for any of the left wing who believe in multiculturalism and also want a secular society.
You cannot have both.
I was educated in the 70's and 80's and went to Catholic schools. This did cause some issues and I personally think they were a bad idea.
Eh ? you just have a secular multicultural society. They are not mutually exclusive
Most people who are devout who send their kids to a faith school care more about the faith bit that the school bit - certainly more true of Islamic schools than christianity IME - I have never worked in other faith schools]
Neither catholic nor muslim schools allow outside agencies [ NHS or youth workers] to discuss contraception C of E was mixed on this respect.
It easier to shout racism than discuss the issue
That said some objectors are just racist [ probably on both sides of the debate]
I would ban all faith schools there is no place in education for indoctrination IMHO and the state should certainly not be funding this.
Eh ? you just have a secular multicultural society. They are not mutually exclusive
Yes they are.
A well accepted definition of multiculturalism:
“at ease with the rich tapestry of human life and the desire amongst people to express their own identity in the manner they see fit."
If someone wants to send their children to a Faith school who are you to tell them they can't?
Faith schools shouldn't be funded by the state and private schools should be forced to adhere to a common curriculum. If they choose to supplement this with Islam, Catholicism or learning how to beat servants then that's their own business and that of the kids and parents.
Yup. Faith schools are a bad idea and there is no way the state should be funding indoctrination of children into any religion.
If someone wants to send their children to a Faith school who are you to tell them they can't?
Parents don't own their children. They aren't allowed to beat them, neglect them or mentally abuse them - so we already place restrictions on what parents can do with their children.
[troll]Arguably indoctrinating children into religion is a form of mental abuse.[/troll]
Mr Jefferson, build that wall.
who wish to remain anonymous
There's always something suspicious about stories based on comments by anonymous people.
If they wish to remain anonymous why are they talking to the press ?
That's the press which they accuse of victimising them, which makes it even more bizarre.
If someone wants to send their children to a Faith school who are you to tell them they can't?
two points
1. I am saying we should not pay
2. [ reductio ad absurduum]If i wanted to send my kids to a school that taught about the joys of suicide bombing and that was how they graduated by doing one ...who are you to object?
All tolerance has a limit.
If your end goal is an integrated society of different but equal and respectful people then any school that is not is inclusive is part of the problem irrespective of what they 'preach'. Trouble is, that is not a shared goal both within the islamic community [url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27599401 ] or the wider community[/url]
All tolerance has a limit.
So your limit is that children should not be taught about their culture and religion in a state school?
So your limit is that children should not be taught about their culture and religion in a state school?
People should be taught about all cultures and religions in a state school.
People should be taught about all cultures and religions in a state school.
There wouldn't be much time for anything else if you taught them all.
So your limit is that children should not be taught about their culture and religion in a state school?
Religion should be part of the history class. Anyone that wants their children taught that one religion is true should fund the school themselves.
Education should be secular. Religion, if it has a place, is for the home and church. Glasgow is full of pairs of catholic and proddy schools beside each other. What a waste of money!
Dunno, my Religious and Moral education colleagues manage it on 2 50min periods a week from 12-15.
People should be taught about all cultures and religions in a state school.
No they shouldnt and I would not want my children wasting their time learning about all the hundreds of religious sects in existence.
Faith schools shouldn't be funded by the state and private schools should be forced to adhere to a common curriculum
@atlas, what do you mean by faith, CoE, Catholic, its a very tricky subject ? What concerns me is the division this creates in societies where certain communities group together and don't integrate and such segregated schools contribute to this. What about Northern Ireland or Glasgow as referenced above ? Rather anti-choice isn't to say private schools have to adhere to a common curriculum, that's just as draconian and dictatorial as the strictest religion. Private schools should have to follow certain academic standards but a focus on specific religious teaching or even sports should be the choice of the school or parents.
People should be taught about all cultures and religions in a state school.
@grum agreed totally, and to an extent they are.
Surfer - like it or not religions have played a major part in world history and culture. Daft to pretend they don't exist.
Rather anti-choice isn't to say private schools have to adhere to a common curriculum, that's just as draconian and dictatorial as the strictest religion.
What a ridiculous statement.
When Lord Parekh explains the rise in racist attitudes in terms of “People have a feeling that we are losing control of our own society”, is this not the inevitable result of his prediction in 1998 that Britain was becoming a “community of communities”?
People living in divided parallel communities and schools are much more likely to generate distrust and hostility to 'outsiders', whoever they are. The taxpayer should not be financing this.
If you consider Freedom of Religion to be a fundamental human right, then how are you going to allow for the different traditions and practices of the various religions?
Muslims have different Holy Days and holidays from Christians and Jews.
Catholics have their own Holy Days.
What about the daily prayer times for Muslims?
Or do the children have to leave their cultures at the door when they go to school?
Yes
Daft to pretend they don't exist.
I didnt say they should be ignored Grum did I? You said children should be taught about "all of them" which given the number is a ridiculous suggestion.
Religions aim to isolate and control people, particularly women, with their different holy days, diets, languages of religion, clothes, attitudes, lifestyles, prejudices, cutting of children. All of that should be left at the door of institutions of learning.
I believe the Abrahamic religions are a blight on mankind. I truly wish we could do away with them. In the meantime we ought to discourage schooling that creates division, religion is for the home and the church and should have no place in British schools.
Religion is without a doubt the Worst, Thing. Ever. I increasingly find it hard to separate the believers from the beliefs.
All of that should be left at the door of institutions of learning.
So which holidays will be taken by the secular schools?
This holidays thing is often bandied about. In the UK we have a legacy of certain christian holidays which most take, why does that need to change?
If you consider Freedom of Religion to be a fundamental human right, then how are you going to allow for the different traditions and practices of the various religions?
Freedom of religion doesn't include the right to 'bagsy' children for a particular faith IMO. Let them decide as adults which religion they'd like to follow, if any.
surfer - ok, didn't really mean [i]all[/i] of them.
What a ridiculous statement
Current private school system has demonstrated quite clearly it's strength in exceeding the current nation curriculum, whether that be for academically focused schools (criticised for being too good and thus an unfair advantage) for sports focused schools or for those which favour a less-academic approach to learning.
We need faith schools in this country to support the communities which require them. The question is whether they should be state funded (as CoE and Catholic schools have always been) or private, and if private what regulations they should be subject to.
Yes
@Bill, your approach is very dictatorial, you are trying to force your (non-religious) views onto those who believe otherwise. I see that as the same as a religious group who try and force everyone to adhere to their beliefs.
We need faith schools in this country to support the communities which require them. The question is whether they should be state funded (as CoE and Catholic schools have always been) or private, and if private what regulations they should be subject to.
Why do "we" need them?
Freedom of religion doesn't include the right to 'bagsy' children for a particular faith IMO. Let them decide as adults which religion they'd like to follow, if any.
@grum, that's your view and you are free to raise your kids that way. But every religion I am familiar with has a commitment (made at marriage usually) to raise any children in that faith. Its a totally normal thing to do.
Its a totally normal thing to do.
It really isn't, It's abusive.
Freedom of religion doesn't include the right to 'bagsy' children for a particular faith IMO.
Most religions insist that you will teach your children and bring them up as Christians/Muslims/Jews or whatever.
To prevent this would be seen as preventing religious and cultural freedom.
certain christian holidays which most take, why does that need to change?
To allow families to express their religious freedom and to worship together at their important religious holidays.
Why do "we" need them?
Because we are a multi faith country and those faiths require it, CoE, Catholic, Islam, Jew etc
I taught in a Tower Hamlets school where many/most of the kids were off for the different Eids, Jews and Sikhs on the staff took their holy days and that was on top of the traditional holidays. As an atheist I got a bit teed off with being the only one who was always there. I ended up claiming to have joined a Melanesian cargo cult, I had to stop work every time a plane went over in case John Frumm was being resurrected.
It really isn't, It's abusive.
Of course it is not. It is no different you bringing your children up for example with a view that there is no God.
Of course it is, teaching children some bronze age madness as their fundamental life principal and perhaps removing parts of them as babies due to your pact with god is child abuse plain and simple. The fact it's institutionalised doesn't change that.
Faith has no part in the school system apart from being taught for educational purposes. Aligning a school to a particular faith and effectively forcing that into childrens lives has no part in modern society. All children should be taught about all faiths equally. This will allow them when growing up to make an educated choice as to what they believe and what most aligns to their personal view.
BillMC - MemberReligions aim to isolate and control people, particularly women, with their different holy days, diets, languages of religion, clothes, attitudes, lifestyles, prejudices, cutting of children. All of that should be left at the door of institutions of learning.
Please explain how religions isolate people, particularly women.
I wonder if you are aware that many of the worlds various religions were the original institutions of learning, are you saying that because now we are all so much wiser we should encourage the complete dissolution of all religion or should we just regulate its use ?
I think we have all gone off topic here. The main question asked by the OP was:
Do you believe there is false reporting and possibly a deliberate attempt to bolster anti Muslim sentiment from within the government as suggested?
No I don't believe it was false reporting.
Why would the Government want to bolster anti Muslim sentiment?
Islam is misogynistic/sexist and does instruct to separate boys and girls for schooling.
So your limit is that children should not be taught about their culture and religion in a state school?
My limit is straw man arguments - others explained what could work
what do you mean by faith,
Its not hard to work out if the school is a faith school or not as they shout about the fact and usually have it in the name.
Rather anti-choice isn't to say private schools
rather anti choice to only allow rich people to attend so the argument works both ways
The fact I cannot murder folk , who make bad arguments on the internet*, curtails my choices as well. It is what society does we should discuss whether it is fair and appropriate not whether we do it.
We need faith schools in this country to support the communities which require them.
NO we dont they have religious buildings to do that we should not be "educating" them into the faith
No one seems to want to let me have my suicide school Jihad Wahhabi Islam school you intolerant bastards...i am sure we could find a community that wanted that and to do female genital mutilation for religious reasons and a variety of other stuff we do not like
Education should be that and religion should be a private matter by which i mean not state funded.
Jam we all know if you select your pupils for certain abilities the school then does better in that respect
if you then give them more money per pupil than other schools they perform better still
Both of these would be true whichever sector it was in.
* I am not being serious either on the point or to that poster
What is your point dragging in private schools can we just discuss one issue please?
Please explain how religions isolate people, particularly women
Your right the three things they are know for is their massive respect and equal treatment of
1, Womenz
2. the gays
3. those who do not follow their religion
No one could argue differently or give any credible evidence to counter this eh - so we all concede this well made point
Islam is misogynistic/sexist and does instruct to separate boys and girls for schooling.
Many institution/organisations do similar, why just pick on Islam ?
Many institution/organisations do similar, why just pick on Islam ?
Because that's what the OP asked about.
Also, I don't know any that do it because God tells them to do.
A well accepted definition of multiculturalism:“at ease with the rich tapestry of human life and the desire amongst people to express their own identity in the manner they see fit."
You're the second punter to make that statement recently. I don't agree with that definition and I don't agree that it is well-accepted.
I don't think people are picking on Islam, I'm good picking on all the Abrahamic faiths, Islam just seems to be the most shouty and aggressive. Even moderate islam isn't. I believe Islam is completely out of step with the established values of the United Kingdom but I'm happy to be convinced otherwise. In regard to the OP, no I don't believe the reporting is false, in Tower Hamlets religious pressure was brought to bear upon voters, this is not acceptable increasingly Islam is being asked questions in the media that it finds uncomfortable to answer.
What has multiculturalism done for us over the last 50 years? Apart from raise serious crime statistics of course
Positive and negative ?
You're the second punter to make that statement recently. I don't agree with that definition and I don't agree that it is well-accepted.
Who are you calling a punter?
I'm not the 2nd, it was me that quoted the 1st time.
It's from wiki so it must be true.
What's your definition then?
Your right the three things they are know for is their massive respect and equal treatment of
1, Womenz
2. the gays
3. those who do not follow their religionNo one could argue differently or give any credible evidence to counter this eh - so we all concede this well made point
That is a statement not an explanation, so no we maybe ought not to concede its a point well made !! maybe you ought to find a link to post to prove the point !
The above 3 points are not exclusive to religious practice
Deleted..... 😉
What has multiculturalism done for us over the last 50 years? Apart from raise serious crime statistics of course
Whereas in the 50 years before that we had peace and happiness, apart from the wars and genocide committed by whites on other whites was around 30 million deaths including Stalin's genocide I think?. Multiculturalism has been mostly good for the UK the problem comes when people do not integrate and then claim it's because the UK is racist when the truth is quite the opposite. People live in their own communities, go to their own schools and create isolation and division.
No discussions about Muslims on stw go unpunished. I give this thread an hour before closure and a couple of week long bans...
you ought to find a link to post to prove the point !
Yes ok then I will get one but first I am off to proves water is wet , the sun is warm.
The evidence for all three is pretty much indisputable [ well anywhere but STW obviously] and I was using sarcasm to prove it
we maybe ought not to concede its a point well made !! maybe you ought to find a link to post to prove the point !
Maybe you ought to read the whole quote and understand sarcasm as that was directed at your point not mine
no faith schools full-stop. no segregation, no animosity, no media scaremongering.
Wars and genocide are not the crime I refer as you well know.
No discussions about Muslims on stw go unpunished. I give this thread an hour before closure and a couple of week long bans...
Can we have an STW online stoning?
alpin - Memberno faith schools full-stop. no segregation, no animosity, no media scaremongering.
My kind of utopia (without Mao, Stalin and all that malarky)
STW can be a truly scary place sometimes. The dictatorial anti religious rhetoric is quite disturbing. Its frankly no different than persecuting one religion because you don't agree with it.
@gobuchul. Getting back on track. No I don't think there has been deliberate misrepresentation. There is a legitimate question here to be answered regarding the faith schools and a legitimate concern.
I was talking recently to a man who had been to ****stan to help Christian victims of persecucution.
Firstly I admired his guts, secondly I felt sorry for the persecuted.
Then I felt angry that someone had infected them with a belief that gets them killed.
Its not worth dying or killing for.
Religion ,get over it.
One of the few good things about the US state Education system is that it's secular.
Poor old Islam 🙄
dictatorial anti religious rhetoric is quite disturbing
Yes we need to stay within the realms of calm measured reasoning like that eh 😉
Can we have an STW online stoning?
I will happily get stoned just for STW 😯 we do mean that type?
One of the few good things about the US state Education system is that it's secular.
Apart from in the states where they manage to slip it in the back door via the 'science' of creationism.
Not quite sure why I should respect any religion, especially one as unpleasant as Islam.
Most religions insist that you will teach your children and bring them up as Christians/Muslims/Jews or whatever.To prevent this would be seen as preventing religious and cultural freedom.
Well then they can do one. What about the child's personal freedom?
But every religion I am familiar with has a commitment (made at marriage usually) to raise any children in that faith. Its a totally normal thing to do.
Just because something is 'normal' doesn't make it right. FGM is 'normal' in some places.
Of course it is not. It is no different you bringing your children up for example with a view that there is no God.
Absence of belief is not the same as belief. I would bring up my children to think for themselves and the state should too.
The dictatorial anti religious rhetoric is quite disturbing. Its frankly no different than persecuting one religion because you don't agree with it.
More ludicrous hyperbole.
My kids go to the CofE aided village school. They have regular religious assemblies, regular trips to church for special services, and the diocese has a couple of people on the board of governors.
Both kids are in the local Scouts and Guide unit, also attached to the local church, also attend regular services.
Both of my kids have much better knowledge of different religions than I do, neither of them actually believe in a god or consider themselves religious.
I think the religion haters like to overstate the risks and dangers of those they oppose, just as much as extremists in many religions.
Apart from in the states where they manage to slip it in the back door via the 'science' of creationism.
Still way better than the UK where the state actively funds religious indoctrination miss-labelled as education.
I think the religion haters like to overstate the risks and dangers of those they oppose
Yes there is just no link between being brought up in a religion and then following that religion- FACT
Extensive study shows that almost no one ends up in the same religion they were brought up FACT
Thanks for the info 🙄
Grum - there is quite a difference between education that is informative and education that is doctrinal. You can have the former without the latter. I don't remember the exact quote but I do remember Dawkins saying he felt he was one of the most informed and educated people (he is never short of self belief!) on the subject of religion in the modern world. And he thinks it's all bobbins.
Whilst I don't think there is any place for faith based schools I would say that anything other than a very surface deep understanding of the world around us is impossible without an appreciation of the faiths that have elicited actions and events so religious education does have a place.
Know thy enemy and all that.
Who are you calling a punter?
You.
Both of my kids have much better knowledge of different religions than I do, neither of them actually believe in a god or consider themselves religious.
So what's the point of them going to a religious school then?
I think the religion haters like to overstate the risks and dangers of those they oppose, just as much as extremists in many religions.
People keep coming out with utter, utter bullshit like this. The fail is so strong it's hard to know where to start.
So not agreeing with religious indoctrination of children is the same as religious extremism?
Whilst I don't think there is any place for faith based schools I would say that anything other than a very surface deep understanding of the world around us is impossible without an appreciation of the faiths that have elicited actions and events so religious education does have a place.
Yup, don't have a problem with that.
STW can be a truly scary place sometimes. The dictatorial anti religious rhetoric is quite disturbing.
Can you give me an example of this dictatorial rhetoric of which you speak, please?
I have no problem with religion being taught in school as long as it is factual
this may even involve saying they believe this they do that and explaining why and discussing it in historical fashion as to its influence then and now
These are facts - them being true is not a fact. It is not even close to a fact, It is not even close to have any evidence to support it never mind crap evidence
Nothing else so poorly evidenced would be allowed to be taught in school never mind making it mandatory to GCSE level NOTHING.