Another helmet thre...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Another helmet thread, but bear with me...

33 Posts
29 Users
0 Reactions
106 Views
Posts: 5
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If the wearing of a helmet whilst riding on the public highway was made compulsory by law, would it reduce the amount of riding you do?

Please, no further debate on the rights and wrongs, etc., just an indication of whether it would alter your time spent on a bike or not.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:22 am
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

No, it would not.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:24 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

By "public highway" do you mean just roads, or also bridleways, BOATs, cycle paths etc?

Anyway, put me down as a "[b]No[/b]"

I don't currently wear a helmet for my commute, but I would if I had to.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:24 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

no, not at all especially as it is legal over here in Oz.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No, but I might organise a protest group.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Avoid roads as much as possible, so nope for me.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:26 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

(I can see the flaw in this argument already, but I'm saying nowt)


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:26 am
Posts: 5
Free Member
Topic starter
 

By "public highway" do you mean just roads, or also bridleways, BOATs, cycle paths etc?

Yeah, I'm thinking roads and cycle lanes rather that byways, bridleways & cycle [i]paths[/i].


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd just ride on pavements instead. Do I win?


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No (but I think you are missing the point)


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:27 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

50/50


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:30 am
Posts: 14595
Free Member
 

No but..

How would the law be implemented?

Would you also implement a law to enforce carrying identification.

Or would the police be able to impound the bike and leave you miles from anywhere with no transport?

Would be interested to know how it works in OZ BTW.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:32 am
Posts: 860
Free Member
 

Riding my own bikes - no. I always wear a helmet anyway.

Riding Boris Bikes - yes. I wouldn't cart a helmet into London on the off chance I wanted to use a bike.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

No. I'd get a cheaper helmet for the pub/beer/pie run.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:34 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

If the wearing of a helmet whilst riding on the public highway was made compulsory by law, would it reduce the amount of riding you do?

No. I'd just ignore the rule if I didn't want to wear one for some reason.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:34 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

nope I already always wear one


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm with PP, I'd carry on doing what I want - no doubt the CTC would organise non-helmet wearing 'civil disobedience' protests. I'd love to see them try and enforce helmet compulsion in a big city. And during critical mass....?


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:42 am
Posts: 6603
Free Member
 

no I nearly always wear one anyway.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Theoretically yes - the little jaunts to the shop, or to return a DVD, wouldn't happen. But like some others, I'd probably just break the law.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:46 am
 trb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Theoretically yes - the little jaunts to the shop, or to return a DVD, wouldn't happen. But like some others, I'd probably just break the law.

This

nb IIRC in New Zealand you get an on the spot fine. But as we don't do on the spot fines, not sure how any law would be enforced.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Would be interested to know how it works in OZ BTW.

Very well, actually. People put helmets on before riding their bikes. Simple really.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No difference to me


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:54 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

No. But you are asking a bunch of generally helmet-using folk who are happy to be seen in cycling gear, rather than joe bloggs who has a mild pot-belly and wants to go to work and not look a fool in front of his BMW owning mates.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rather than joe bloggs who has a mild pot-belly

You're putting your helmet on wrong if it enhances your belly


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:59 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Knew I was doing something wrong!


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 11:59 am
Posts: 6690
Free Member
 

Theoretically yes - the little jaunts to the shop, or to return a DVD, wouldn't happen. But like some others, I'd probably just break the law.

+ 1

Big road rides or MTB'ing i wear one anyway


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:02 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]But as we don't do on the spot fines[/i]

Police regularly issue fixed penalty notices for cycling on Brighton Seafront. IF they're satisfied they can identify you then they just give you the ticket.

How many people here don;t do any road riding before/during/after an off road one?

I'd wear the helmet and cycle on road as much as I do now. Main reason I don;t is 'cos I'm lazy not because I feel it's my 'right'.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:03 pm
 IHN
Posts: 19694
Full Member
 

No, but I'd probably ignore it on occasion, like I sometimes use a mobile when driving and sometimes speed. If I got nicked for it, so be it, my tough $h1t.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:15 pm
 Pyro
Posts: 2400
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

Just bearing with you. Nothing to add.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

don simon - Member
No, but I might organise a protest group.

Participate in a spontaneous celebration, surely?

😉


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:26 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

No. But you are asking a bunch of generally helmet-using folk who are happy to be seen in cycling gear,

And that would be the obvious flaw.

You're asking cyclists. People keen enough on cycling to spend part of their day reading an internet forum about cycling.

Those are not the people that would be put off cycling by helmets.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

don simon - Member
No, but I might organise a protest group.

I would let an informal "celebration" group [i]not [/i]organise itself.

Much more hipster way of doing it.


 
Posted : 02/08/2012 12:28 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!