You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Most telling thing for me was race 4 where Ineos had a great start and forced ETNZ into 2 tacks in quick succession. Should have given Ineos a good lead and control of the beat but Kiwis were even/first to the windward gate.
read (from Ineos team I think) that those 2 tacks only lost ETNZ 20m whereas Ineos would have lost 100m in the same scenario. ETNZ seems to be able to get back up to speed quicker or glide through head to wind better.
Hoping Ineos can pull a few back to make it a better competition.
Great Mozzy Saul’s video on the tacks
Just like you i couldn’t believe how little ground those 2 tacks cost NZ
The most interesting thing he says is that Ineos is faster up wind and down windin a straight line at full speed. But they hardly spend any time going at full speed
It sort of hints at the ai NZ talked about in the last cup where they let a computer run 1000s of visual regattas to see what sort of boat would win
Interesting how the team that gets to decide the design rules of the boat have an advantage!
[angry face emoji]
Interesting how the team that gets to decide the design rules of the boat have an advantage!
To be fair, unless there's a well hidden loophole they're exploiting, then it's the same rules for everyone.
It was more of an issue in previous campaigns where they would deliberately write rules to disadvantage teams they didn't want to face (budget caps to keep high spenders away, high entry fees that kept small teams away, different numbers of prototypes allowed for challenger / defender, etc). And RYS/Ineos were the challenger of record, so were involved in the negotiations on the rules, location, etc. I didn't keep up with the politics this time round but for AC36 ETNZ designed the mechanicals of the foils, while Prada as challenger did the foils themselves?
It's not the pre J-class era when the defender could build a lightweight speed machine while the challenger had to sail to the race in an more sturdy offshore yacht. Or the IACC/12M eras when the winner was whoever won the preceding court case over who's boat bent fewer rules.
Haven't the first four races been in relatively light winds? Maybe Ineos would be better in a blow.
What happened there? Just started the live stream and NZ are doing 2kt at the start line
Did they have a technical issue or just human error?
Going alright now so I'm guessing a mistake.
guess they'll be happy that they are probably facing a mere drubbing, rather than the total wipeout!
I think that's the first obvious mistake from NZ.
interesting that the UK still excelling at......the cycling - avg ~380W vs ~280 for the kiwis
Wow...that was close!
NZ faster and tactically better. Game over. 7-0. F1 analogy is good.
Well this aged like a fine cheap New Zealand wine. plonk
I might be back in a few days to eat my words, but I'd remind people of the last time Ainsley won the Americas Cup ......
Writing off today as a couple of small but heavily punished NZ mistakes misses the point, match racing is a bit like nougats and crosses, winning is very difficult but there's lots of ways to make sure your opponent doesn't win. NZ need to force GB into a tacking battle, GB need to force NZ into a drag race.
And remember this?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-Fod7rvSHQ
Close racing. I was edge of my seat for the last couple of legs.
It's interesting how many armchair assumptions can be sunk depending on the conditions, developments/learning and boat set up.
Britannia were meant to be better in higher winds, but lost to Luna Rosa in those conditions.
Britannia was observed to struggle for a high mode in early races, but squeezed LR.
NZ were supposed to be stronger in light winds, but haven't run away on any of the races in the final, which have all been light wind.
Woooo..... well done INEOS - back in it and no longer the whitewash that I feared!
@thisisnotaspoon - glad we made a better effort of it today. I'm just a cynical old GBR fireball sailor at heart and know how much fight Ben has in him. Would dearly love ineos to win so very happy to eat my words on that one.
I went down a rabbit hole on the mid-race course changes and wondered how they moved the buoys:
The cheapest ones go for 5k per mark, but they are quite shitty, they have a single propeller and not very powerful. In 25% of cases, they will make a mess
The first decent ones go for 8k/pop, they have 4 propellers and are more powerful and they have inertial guidance for when GPS fails/they lose contact. They might make a mess in 5% of cases, but usually in really bad weather that is also covered.
The AC ones are probably in the 25k/ mark. Huge numbers for sailing clubs, chump change for the AC.
Interesting how the team that gets to decide the design rules of the boat have an advantage!
Ineos agreed them
Last cup got close to breaking the rules and maybe did. This year they just look to be really good at sailing
The marks are pretty cool.
I guess at the same time they update the competitors race software to give the new laylines.
match racing is a bit like nougats and crosses
Bit of a nutty analogy if you ask me.
According to mozzy's analysis last night, Ineos lose about 25m per tack more than NZ. If they're doing say 16 tacks a race that's about 400m per race lost to tacking.
It also means that all other things being equal, Ineos are going to lose any tacking battles unless they get a close cover and give NZ dirty air almost immediately the tracking battle starts.
If I were ineos, I'd be figuring those tacks out ASAP.
It also means that all other things being equal, Ineos are going to lose any tacking battles unless they get a close cover and give NZ dirty air almost immediately the tracking battle starts.
But they won the second race yesterday and only cover-tacked twice.
We are in agreement twodogs. Ineos did use a couple of close cover tacks and later on in the race tacked a few times to stay between nz and the mark but didn’t engage in any tacking battles. Ineos got the better start then sailed their own race and generally minimised tacks which kept the boat speed up and reduced their tacking losses. Top speed (actually VMG) upwind on ineos in those bumpy conditions is better than nz but ineos take longer to get up to speed post tack so ineos do better when in the lead to generally hit the boundaries and avoid tacking battles. This tactic can backfire if they get on the wrong end of a big shift or sail into less pressure but it generally pays them.
I think we defined “second best” today
ETNZ sailed beautifully today. The first upwind starboard tacks were crucial in both races
So it seems Ineos likes bumpy conditions (or rather, NZ doesn't). Light winds forecast for tomorrow, but it doesn't really matter, cos I don't think GB is going to win 5 in a row!
Will be interesting to see if Ainsley carries on til 2027, and if Radcliffe wants to keep funding it. (Assuming they continue the current 3 year cycle)
We won the first start, but they just sailed right past us. Once ahead they rarely make mistakes. They are arrogant in post race interviews though…….
They are arrogant in post race interviews though…….
They are not alone in this though….
They are arrogant in post race interviews though…….
Easiest way to fix that is to beat them on the water.
Ah well. 7-2 in the end
With total investment across the fleet being north of 1/3 billion GBP - everyone has a different value on money but I'm just not convinced its justified in terms of guaranteed spectacle.
Just caught up after a day on the water (far slower speeds). Enjoyed the racing more than I expected to overall. Kiwis seemed to be able to pick the shifts and gusts well overall and didn’t make many (any) errors.
Not long until the Vendee Globe starts to have some sailing to follow. Some Brits to keep an eye on there. Also a Kiwi but his boat doesn’t have foils.
I think this cup has been great (despite the result), especially with the youths and women's events included.
Going to miss having racing to watch, luckily the Sail GP series kicks off in Dubai on 23rd Nov with Giles racing against GBR (Dylan, Ben or Hannah on the helm..?)
The AC40 circuit is also planned for next year, fleet racing is more fun. They have a breakdown of the costs on their site if anyone fancies entering a team - 700 to 900k Euros, but that doesn't include the yacht or 4 world class sailors!
Disappointed we didn't win.
I'm of the view that the cheaper youth and women's was more interesting to watch, and SailGP kicks it into touch from a watching point of view. Sailing was never the biggest watching spectacle though, it's a sport best taken part in.
The result went the right way. We lost to a slightly better boat and slightly better sailors. I think we should have had 1 or 2 more wins. There were a couple of shifts that put NZ ahead which i think were luck not judgement.
I’ve enjoyed the event, particularly the Mozzy Sails stuff. But it’s just a money pit. There is no way that’s it’s providing a return to the sponsors on coverage.
I think the big question is whether we will have a team next year
There is no way that’s it’s providing a return to the sponsors on coverage.
What? You mean you're not sat there sipping your Liptons tea whilst the manservant fires up the Sopwith Camel?
It's always been an expensive project for the obscenely rich to pour their cash into.
£100million to the Emirati, Larry or Sir Jim is probably proportionally no more than one of us buying a budget commuter from Halfords.
Sir Jim literally has more money than he knows what to do with - for him it's small change and a chance to get himself written into the history books ie the ultimate ego trip.
It looks like ineos will continue to sponsor BAR/ineos for the next cup.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/sailing/articles/cj02m85qeveo
Thoughts on developments overnight? Sounds messy. Can't quite work out who is walking away with the infrastructure/detritus of the last campaign and who is starting from absolute scratch. Well - I guess you start from scratch every time but someone must own the sweepings although unsure if that's an asset or a headache. Which of them holds the rights to be challenger of record?
Having met both of the main protagonists in this falling out briefly over the years I'd describe both as personalities that are hard to like. A touch of Armstrong about them. Clearly makes you a winner.....but not the type of person you'd follow into war - more a case of being bullied to their will. Be interesting to see where it goes from here.
I say interesting....for me the Vendée Globe showed up the AC in pretty much every conceivable way as a more enjoyable spectacle, with personalities and daring do. If I had a literal boat load of money to spaff, I'd be pushing it that way.
To me it looks like a normal grown up commercial disagreement.
I assume each AC cycle is on a fixed term contract so before the parties enter another one they'll be agreeing what the next one looks like. If they can't agree someone else gets hired.
I don't think the team has won the AC at any point (no criticism of BA it is a massively hard task if you look at the calibre of others who haven't won it either).
While it is clearly news there doesn't seem to be much drama to it (publicly at least).
I’d describe both as personalities that are hard to like.
interesting, my nephew has very similar comments ( if a little ruder) to make about Ainslie having met him a few times. Driven people can be difficult to like and appear to bully their way through life. He admired the achievements and focus but disliked the approach to those around him.
While it is clearly news there doesn’t seem to be much drama to it
What makes this news worthy, and unusual, is when a big sponsor parts ways with a sports team, they don't normally spit then state they are going to carry on in the sport. I can't quite work out if Ansile has been sacked from his own team and is walking out with a wall chart and plants in a cardboard box, or is he left with the bricks and mortar (and an irrelevant boat to scrap) and Inios are going to start with a blank bit of paper......or a just holding on to some rights they think they own to sell back to Ainsle/someone else.
My reading of this from the link below is that Ben is left with the smaller boats for the Women's and Youth AC
My reading is that Ineos hold the old boat and are challenger of record. They also state they have the team working on the new boat. Depending on where the next AC is the old boat might have value. Its a test platform for foils and some one might buy it for the next campaign, assuming the venue has waves.
If Ben gets a team together this could get interesting
My reading is that Ineos hold the old boat and are challenger of record.
RYS are the CoR, I think that allows them to select whoever they want as their boat (Ineos, Athena, or someone else).
I does read like Ineos think they are taking the 'team' though. Which is odd as I thought it was all still "BAR", but maybe Ineos bought a share of that when they came onboard rather than just pouring money into it as a traditional sponsor.
RYS are the CoR
This, which = BA
He may have a problem with JR/INEOS having ownership of all the Mercedes F1 technical data - and TBH that tie up with Merc is probably very important moving forwards.
At the end of the day BA is a great helm and very driven.... but there's more where he came from.
.for me the Vendée Globe showed up the AC in pretty much every conceivable way as a more enjoyable spectacle
This also, although really only this race onwards as they've now mostly all got Starlink (probs) so they can post lots of video and it seems like they're just down the road rather than 1000's of miles away from anywhere in the southern ocean.
The only issue with it is there is an element of luck to not break something (see Pip Hare's mast and Sébastien Simon/Boris Herman's foil).
A friend is out racing with one of the cylcors next week so more info to come!
I thought the best Vendee Globe coverage came from Pip's post calamity posts. There are only so many episodes of grizzled Frenchmen being tossed around in a carbon coffin before it gets a bit samey... Aaaaand.... Who on earth did the web dev for the VG official site? It's awful 🙁
He may have a problem with JR/INEOS having ownership of all the Mercedes F1 technical data – and TBH that tie up with Merc is probably very important moving forwards.I
I'm sure it's valuable, but they're not the only show in town when it comes to UK based motorsports teams. Red Bull (already tied in with Alinghi though) or McLaren (although that would probably end up as a Bahrein based bid?) , would seem like good fits or even Williams (always seem keen to find work outside F1 but I'm not sure they've had the budget the last decade to develop the sort of tools the bigger teams might have).
I’m sure it’s valuable, but they’re not the only show in town when it comes to UK based motorsports teams
Absolutely but Merc started developing those foils in AC36 - a new team are going to take time to catch up.
The one super interesting thing would be if he could get Aston Martin involved as that would include Adrian Newey who is also keen on sailing and apparently knows a bit about aerodynamics (hopefully that carries over to hydro also)!
Be interesting if Athena/ BenA could get his Landrover sponsorship back to compete with JR Grenadiers as sail branding. Think Landrover was dropped pretty quickly when the Ineos $$ came along so unlikely. ( see also bridge burning with the Portsmouth base and council).
Cant be many sponsors around able to fund an AC campaign. And like mentioned above the IMOCA / Vendee Globe is a more interesting story as well as being orders of magnitude cheaper. My imaginary literal boat load of money would go to funding a GB team of Sam Goodchild & Pip Hare (Sam Davies as well possibly) , new boats out of the same mould built by Carrington (Southampton) . Alex Thompson as manager trainer. Would still be less than an AC campaign.
Be interesting if Athena/ BenA could get his Landrover sponsorship back to compete with JR Grenadiers as sail branding.
I doubt they'd have the money TBH. One strong possibility for BA is Emirates as he has a relationship with them already with sponsorship of his Sail GP boat.
mozzysails speculating that INEOS might have wanted to take ownership of the team, with Ben not wanting to be an employee.
Don’t Emirates back the NZ AC team though?
So a little "inside" info...
BA owns the hardware and the IP but JR wants more control.
Rock meet hard place. It's going to court and it will probably delay the next AC.
RCYC may have to decide between a lifelong member and money.
It's a right mess.