You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Just that this is out soon, got me thinking about how it fits into the whole Alien franchise, so it's apparently in between Alien and Aliens.
The film I'd like to see is a follow up to Aliens, where they 'gun-up' and head to take on the Xenomorphs on their planet. An all action film.
It’s looking good, they used the many of the SFX teams who created the original film Xenomorphs, it’s all physical effects, and I think there are some production people who were involved with the two original films.
Always wanted the opposite…. one of them gets back to earth
Isn't that Alien Vs Predator?
Alien, Aliens and Alien Isolation are great. The rest are terrible films. Three had promise before the studio started meddling. Resurrection was FireFly with an Alien and Prometheus and Covenant looked pretty but were awful. Honestly think Alien Isolation may be my favourite Alien thing. I’d love Romulus to be good but I don’t think it will be.
IMO Prometheus and Covenant both suffered from trying to build too much other stuff on top of the basic Alien premise, that mostly wasn't as interesting as Ridley Scott seemed to think it was.
I'm hopeful that this might be a more back to basics deal and I might be pleasantly surprised, like with Prey.
Another prequel really.
How long before we get Alien: Jonesy. From the cats perspective.
It’s not a prequel, it is set between Alien and Aliens.
Why come on to a thread about a film franchise you’ve never watched? That would be like me opening a football thread. Just ****ing weird.
While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonizers come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe.
Sounds like the success of the Alien: Isolation game may have influenced this one. What's the betting that if it's between Alien and Aliens, one of the colonizers turns out to be Ripley's daughter?
Always wanted the opposite…. one of them gets back to earth
There are two Alien movies in production, I think the other one has a working title of Alien: Earth.
Didn’t even know Isolation even existed, which one does it emulate?
It's most like the original Alien, it's a (terrifying) stealth game where you're pretty helpless and being hunted by the xenomorph.
Directors cut of 3 was good, if you’ve not seen it then you should. Totally different movie.
I remember watching an early dodgy copy of Alien 3 when I was a kid, it turned out to be totally different to the released movie, wonder if it's similar to the director's cut? I might need to search that one out.
I remember the Alien 3 computer game being good too.
Directors cut of 3 was good, if you’ve not seen it then you should. Totally different movie.
As a fan of the franchise, I despise Alien^3. The Director's Cut is nominally less dreadful.
Didn’t even know Isolation even existed, which one does it emulate?
It's an in-universe video game. As mentioned above, the protagonist is supposed to be Ripley's daughter. It's very good. I borrowed it from a friend, spent two hours shitting myself, didn't see a single alien. (-:
They didn't have to. They just did.
I think that's what doomed it for me personally. Aliens is one of my all-time favourite films, the opening 5 minutes of Alien^3 just shits on that entire movie and goes "yeah, that was all pointless." I was royally pissed off before the opening credits had finished.
I've since revisited it with an open mind and... it's still not good. I'd rather watch Resurrection.
Yeah it's shit in that respect but otherwise a great film. I like it, I guess someone had to.
Saw the trailer tonight, it has some promise and some cool visuals etc but it didn't <look> right to me. The trailer's also kind of annoyingly flashy, and intent on showing you what's probably a decent chunk of the movie's plot but cut to the bones. Like, we know there'll be facehuggers, we know there'll be chest bursting, you don't need to put it all in the trailer. it felt a wee bit desperate. I mean ffs you can get people excited just by showing a space jockey, and they know that. TBF if I'd seen it on youtube I'd wonder if it was fan-made.
But, hey, I liked 3 and Resurrection.
we know there’ll be chest bursting, you don’t need to put it all in the trailer
i agree. Though Alien was released back in 1979 when I was too young to see it in cinemas* and Aliens was out in 1986. There may be an entire generation who are only aware of these things from memes and tropes rather than big screen events.
*first time I saw it on a big-ish screen rather than ropey VHS was at university film club.
I really hope it’s good but I’m not a fan of the directors other work. I found his Evil Dead remake boring. Just gory with none of the humour or creepy atmosphere of the original. Don’t Breathe started well and the second one was awful.
There’s a script out there somewhere on the internet for the original Alien 3. Set in a monastery and has a scene in a field of long grass that one of the Jurassic Park movies copied and watered down. It seemed genuinely great and very different to what ended up being made. Didn’t the director disown Alien 3?
I think one of the big problems is that it would be hard to improve upon the first two films. They were such fresh ideas at the time. A bit like watching Predator for the first time and having no clue what it is.
The film I’d like to see is a follow up to Aliens, where they ‘gun-up’ and head to take on the Xenomorphs on their planet. An all action film.
An even mor all action film just like the all action film it followed? The thing I most hated about Aliens was the idea that the aliens are just expendable, it stopped being this terrifying unstoppable thing that you didn't understand into a war movie. They may as well as been the hoards of the Viet-Cong they were meant to represent.
the opening 5 minutes of Alien^3 just shits on that entire movie and goes “yeah, that was all pointless.”
while as an individual character Hicks wasn't totally shit just derivative , the death (off screen) of the cardboard cut out 'young girl' character who's entire presence in the film is just so that she can get rescued again and again was blessed relief. Alien3 is at least better than the film that came before it.
Alien Isolation is the computer game, which I suggest you don't play in VR, unless you have some spare underpants at hand!
Video contains swearing...
The Alien/Aliens/Alien^3 universe did produce some books that fit the bill for corporate involvement in the bringing of the bugs to earth. Spoiler, it does not go well. I used to have them at one point, but I donated them when I moved. They are not terrible and, if done well, could be a good way to continue the series.
On the new film, if it is like Alien: Isolation, it could be good. It will be scary as hell.
the death (off screen) of the cardboard cut out ‘young girl’ character who’s entire presence in the film is just so that she can get rescued again and again was blessed relief.
Alternatively, they could've handed off to an adult Newt and retired Ripley / had her as a mentor figure.
Alien3 is at least better than the film that came before it.
Delete your account.
Didn’t the director disown Alien 3?
David Fincher? Nah, he was frustrated by the studio meddling but learned from it. Plus we got the Assembly cut (not the directors cut as I mistakenly said before).
Delete your account.
Aliens is a terrible film unless you're watching it after a session in the pub, otherwise it makes no sense in its own universe, and makes no sense as a film. There's a couple of snappy lines and there's some cool machinery. After that its a run of the mill war film with all the cliches thrown in.
When Hudson says "Wait, is this a bug hunt" you can turn off the movie while saying "Yes, Hudson, yes it is"
At least Alien 3 has some decent actors, and doesn't rely on bang-bang in place of a plot.
The film I’d like to see is a follow up to Aliens, where they ‘gun-up’ and head to take on the Xenomorphs on their planet. An all action film.
Nah, it's been done once a repeat of the same plot (marines Vs aliens) is just dirivative now. The first two are fundamentally different films with Ripley being the common thread/character, they could/should have stopped after Aliens IMO.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and actually say the bit I like about covenant/Prometheus is the idea of David a mad as a box of frogs android who's actually the creator of the aliens specifically to try and wipe out Humanity. Scott's execution of the concept isn't great, the pacing and convoluted plots don't help. But the kernel of the idea I like.
Looking at the cast and crew, i think it'll be a movie trying to give the fans what they want, but not quite doing it, i don't think it has the budget or backing to really do well, it was originally going to be straight to streaming as well.
As for the whole arguments, the Alien franchise has always followed the era it was filmed in, i loved Aliens because it was a proper 80s movie, everything after that has either tried to be too clever, or try and change it up, not a lot has worked unfortunately, but reality is, there's a lot more franchises out there doing similar or the same.
not a lot has worked unfortunately.
Because the original was fine, it didn't need the alien ship explaining, or the space engineers or any of that shit. Movies work just fine without every damn thing needing a back story or an explanation or retconning. Annoys the **** out of me.
I'm a fan of them all, including Prom/Cov. Personally I'd say Resurection is my least favourite, but also think 'standard' Aliens isn't that great after you've watched the directors cut, which adds in a lot more context. I don't really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov - i've found the whole thing really interesting and engaging. There's a good series of 6 shorts floating around on Youtube done for the 40th Anniversary too. Looking forward to Romulus.
Alien 3 worked well as the book which was released before the film and derived from the original screen play iirc.
There's a bunch of stuff in it that didn't make it to the films & what we were left with was very 'hollywood'.
Same for alien Vs predator, some of the books, actually, all of the books are better than the films.
As for the new film I'm purposely not looking at trailers so I watch it with no expectations.
I don’t really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov
I think becasue lots of folks were expecting movies that followed on from the previous set, when in reality they're more a re-boot. I like Prometheus for its themes of "who are we", "Is there a god" "why has it left us" and the Greek and Aztec religious themes. If you ignore that the previous alien franchise exists, its not bad - It has some staggering plot holes mind, so there's that, but overall, I don't hate it like some others do.
I don’t really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov – i’ve found the whole thing really interesting and engaging.
Agreed, I enjoyed Prometheus and Covenant, but then I didn't go in to either film with an encyclopedic knowledge of the whole canon to date, ready to be infuriated by any inconsistencies. In fact I'd always understood Prometheus was supposed to be sort of 'Alien-adjacent' as in it wasn't supposed to be a factually consistent prequel to the original franchise.
Aliens is a terrible film
...
At least Alien 3 has some decent actors,
But it is fun. Alien^3 is just dull. When I come to a movie like Aliens, I'm expecting Die Hard In Space not Schindler's List.
I like films, there are few I actively dislike. But I think perhaps my view of some is irrevocably tainted by my prior expectations vs reality. I was so excited for Alien^3, and so crushingly disappointed by it. It's far from alone here, I paid actual money to watch Highlander 2 in the cinema for god's sake.
it didn’t need the alien ship explaining, or the space engineers or any of that shit.
On this we agree.
The thing that annoyed me most about Prometheus - aside from it being twaddle - was that the crew were supposed to be the cream of Weyland, experts at the top of their game, and they all had the common sense of a bag of grapes. The cartographer gets lost; the biologist removes their PPE before poking an alien life form with their hand; the protagonist so memorable I can't even remember her role now tries to outrun a big heavy thing by running in a straight line in front of it rather than taking two sidesteps and watching it roll on by; and so on and so forth and things of this nature.
But it is fun.
Yes it is, I agree, but it has some god awful plot holes that really shouldn't be there. You could still have a fun movie if you filled them in, or just thought about it for 10 mins, becasue we're all just there for the sentry guns, right? It treats its audience like they're stupid, or that it doesn't matter, and I hate that.
Alien^3 is just dull.
It's not a video game made real, fo shure. The thing is; the reason Alien and Isolation work so well (and Alien3 for that matter) is that it gats back to the root of the thing. Single monster, you hardly see it, you're defenceless against it, and it will kill you, no ifs buts or maybes.
The thing that annoyed me most about Prometheus
The things that annoy me about Aliens: Why would Ripley trust anything the Wayland Corp tell her. Why go all the way to Hadley with just a platoon of marines, why not take a Company? Why do they all go down to the compound leaving no one on the Sulaco. Why do none of them wear the trackers that Hicks gives Ripley, why doesn't Gorman tell the Sergeant that they're under a nuclear reactor, and on and on and on...Once you start seeing them, you can't help but think it was written on the back of a fag packet.
experts at the top of their game, and they all had the common sense of a bag of grapes. The cartographer gets lost; the biologist removes their PPE before poking an alien life form with their hand; the protagonist so memorable I can’t even remember her role now tries to outrun a big heavy thing by running in a straight line in front of it rather than taking two sidesteps and watching it roll on by; and so on and so forth and things of this nature.
This is all movies, ever, though!
Why go in to the creepy looking cabin, why not have backup upon backup for the electric fences, why not check that your lover is ACTUALLY dead before drinking poison yourself, etc. etc.
the protagonist so memorable I can’t even remember her role now tries to outrun a big heavy thing by running in a straight line in front of it rather than taking two sidesteps and watching it roll on by; and so on and so forth and things of this nature.
'Antagonist' surely? you mean 'Vickers' (played by Charlize Theron).
The protagonist survived to the end, only to be murdered offscreen by the mad android and experimented on between films.
I liked the Vickers Character far more from the POV of someone likely to survive an encounter with malevolent Aliens, she was written and acted as competent and decisive, therefore her frustratingly stupid Death was even more annoying. she was Weyland's biological Daughter, who despised him, seemingly because he was more invested in his psychotic Android creation. a way more interesting character that Ridley bumped off before doing anything useful with...
'Shaw' The wet blanket that survives to the end of that film, only to be murdered prior to Covenant, only survives Prometheus through a string of dumb luck and one improbable surgery. That on top of all the other idiot moves by allegedly genius characters does make the film a bit of a wasted opportunity, it was supposed to be doing some world/universe building but really just fluffed it...
But Shaw is the titular Prometheus. That's her fate.
The things that annoy me about Aliens: Why would Ripley trust anything the Wayland Corp tell her.
Context? She worked for the company and then was in cryo for years. Why would she not trust her former employer? We don't find out - she doesn't find out - that they're shady until Burke locks her in with the facehugger.
In any case, she is sceptical. Ahead of agreeing to the excursion she makes a point of asking, if we do this, we're going to kill it, not to bring it back?
Why go all the way to Hadley with just a platoon of marines, why not take a Company?
What do you mean by a company? Like an army?
The official narrative is that they don't know what's there, LV-426 is a colony which went dark. The marines are self-proclaimed badasses, they're arguably overkill even to take down one xenomorph.
Why do they all go down to the compound leaving no one on the Sulaco.
To do what?
Why do none of them wear the trackers that Hicks gives Ripley
Pass. Are you sure they don't? Is the issue here perhaps that he had it at all when he wasn't supposed to have (and if so, why?)
why doesn’t Gorman tell the Sergeant that they’re under a nuclear reactor,
He does, when it's relevant. It's a plot point in itself that Gorman is incompetent and totally out of his depth.
Context? She worked for the company and then was in cryo for years. Why would she not trust her former employer? We don’t find out – she doesn’t find out – that they’re shady until Burke locks her in with the facehugger.
Surely the fact that Ash was installed by the company and given orders by 'Mother' (essentially the company) that sentenced the crew of the Nostromo as 'Expendable' was a strong indicator that Weyland was at least a bit "shady". They then gaslight her in the investigation, and take away her right to work...
She's has it demonstrated that the company are a shower of bastards 70 odd years before the events of Aliens, and yet still trusts Burke on the basis of being back to LV 426 sent with some Marines, and the promise of her flight status being reinstated.
He's right, she should definitely have known better. of course that wouldn't have helped move the plot along though...
He’s right, she should definitely have known better. of course that wouldn’t have helped move the plot along though…
I dunno, it's totally plausible Ripley thought the weyland corp were just ignorant/dismissive of the alien problem, especially with burke playing 'good cop', but of course it was all a ruse to obtain the alien DNA/embryo/whatever to use as a bio-weapon.
The bit where the entire entorage left the spaceship unmanned and in orbit is a bit of a plot hole though, it would be more realistic it there was a sleleton crew left on the ship that kept making up excuses as to why they coldn't do an evac from the planet.
But then they wouldn't have sent Burke down to the surface either, just the Marine squad with Ripley as advisor.
But then the plot mechanism of remote piloting the spare drop ship down to escape wouldn't have worked.
Aliens is a sci-fi action film first and foremost, so some artistic licence is allowed.... I mean acid for blood, strong enough to melt through several floors? yeah that's not exacly plausible either... but so what ...?
Also...
There’s a couple of snappy lines
C'mon now its got more memorable quotes than most of the shwarzenneger films put together..
Why would she not trust her former employer? We don’t find out
Ash tells her after they fight when she see the message - "Bring back specimen, all crew expendable" that mother tells her. Plus she's deduced that Ash has been "protecting it all along"
What do you mean by a company? Like an army?
A company is 4 platoons. They're sending that giant warship all that way, it's carrying all that 'stuff' and its got just 10 soldiers on it? What if they need more than that? Hadley has what? a thousand people in it? What's a squad going to achieve?
To do what?
Anything they need to, if the group you send down to have a look see run into trouble/need backup. If you send down half your troops, they get into trouble and the drop ship is lost, that's a problem, if ther's no one on the ship, and everybody's on the ground, that's a disaster.
It’s a plot point in itself that Gorman is incompetent and totally out of his depth.
That's not a plot, that's a cliché of every war movie
Anyway, Burke knows, or at least suspects, what's happened, after all he's the one telling them where to look for the alien spacecraft, and he's read Ripley's report so he knows what they're dealing with, he's not going to be going down to the surface with just 10 marines, he ain't that stupid.
Oh no wait, apparently he is...
C’mon now its got more memorable quotes than most of the shwarzenneger films put together..
Bill Paxton was the best bit of casting for delivering those lines.
James Cameron had a habit of reusing whatever/whoever worked best back then...
He does, when it’s relevant. It’s a plot point in itself that Gorman is incompetent and totally out of his depth.
I've long assumed that Burke (or Wayland-Yutani more generally) ensured that Gorman was assigned to the mission precisely because he was inexperienced and they assumed he would be easy to manipulate to their advantage.
The big ship, tiny squad thing is quite weird, beyond the meta reason of the squad being a good number of characters to have in the movie.
Why go all the way to Hadley with just a platoon of marines, why not take a Company?
The Tories austerity cuts to the armed forces.
Why do they all go down to the compound leaving no one on the Sulaco.
Save on life support until they return, it's not like anyone is going to steal it.
Why do none of them wear the trackers that Hicks gives Ripley
Only management get those in case they get lost.
I quite like the idea of finding out where the Aliens came from & how they ended up on LV-426 but Ridley's later life David is God obsession kinda ruined both those movies for me - especially the You blow & I'll do the fingering line.
Save on life support until they return, it’s not like anyone is going to steal it.
Completley inplausible though.. the Sulaco is a gigantic* ship, there's no way they'd just leave it floating abondoned in orbit, without at least a skeleton crew of flight crew and engineers... it makes no sense at all' given Wayland wants some people to return, hopefully with an impregnated Ripley.
*edit, actually not that gigantic, https://alienanthology.fandom.com/wiki/USS_Sulaco
But it's a hefty and expensive bit of kit, and if wayland wanted thier sample back, theres no way they'd just leave it un-manned.
I’ve long assumed that Burke (or Wayland-Yutani more generally) ensured that Gorman was assigned to the mission..
That does make sense actually. But I'll stand by the point that you wouldn't send the smallest unit out to situation that you know nothing about in that giant ship. That still makes no sense.
The marines are self-proclaimed badasses, they’re arguably overkill even to take down one xenomorph.
Oh, forgot this one. Ripley tells Burke that Kane had reported that he saw hundred of the eggs on the ship. So Burke knows its probably not just one they're going to deal with.
I don’t really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov
I don’t like them because the cast are all idiots for no good reason and trying to explain the origins of the Xenemorph takes away the unknown element that makes them scary. Having them created by a mad android who plays the flute is a really shit origin that nobody wanted. Also Ridley Scott clearly didn’t watch his own film. The Space Jockey in Alien is massive. The engineers in Prometheus are just pasty basketball players with massive neck muscles. The Space Jockey was best left as an elephant faced unexplained species too.
Terrible films on every level. Apart from “you blow and I’ll do the fingering” inadvertent comedy gold.
Pretty impressive Alien anime to keep you ticking over
I don’t like them because the cast are all idiots for no good reason
Covenant is the worst for that, no one would put such a bunch of clueless morons in charge of a trillion $ spaceship, with no plans or contingencies in place for anything
no one would put such a bunch of clueless morons in charge of a trillion $
I take it you've never worked for a large organisation, private or civil, then?
Romulus was the first ruler of Rome, clue's in the name. I hope the title indicates that this will be the first film in the franchise where the xenomorph wins and just kills everybody.
Either that or it's a metaphorical wolf and someone ends up suckling from it.
Completley inplausible though.. the Sulaco is a gigantic* ship, there’s no way they’d just leave it floating abondoned in orbit, without at least a skeleton crew of flight crew and engineers…
Isn't it kind of established in the first film that interplanetary space craft like the Sulaco or Nostromo only really need humans for the mundane bits at either end of a given journey, tightening up bolts, landing on planets that sort of thing. 'Mother' is quietly in charge of any ship's functions.
Send the crew down, if they all die the Sulaco will just ping a signal back to base when they're overdue and is eventually ordered home and/or a second vessel is sent.
I reckon the logic stacks up fine, and is consistent with the wider Alien cinematic universe, i.e. humans are treated as expendable by big organisations...
Point of order, It's MU-TH-UR not Mother.
Anyway. This sounds promising:
Oh, forgot this one. Ripley tells Burke that Kane had reported that he saw hundred of the eggs on the ship. So Burke knows its probably not just one they’re going to deal with.
I love Aliens, but the plot is holier than Rome, the whole movie was about having a proper shoot em up and war style stuff, the Sulaco thing was always annoying, why not more synthetics to staff the sulaco, in case of any issues with cryo or losing connection and so on, it was all a plot vehicle to have them have to send Bishop away on a big chase, then last minute save with the drop ship and so on.
Kind of reminds me a bit of the current Deadpool movie, the plot is there to support and stitch together the action, rather than the other way around, and it works for the audience it was made for perfectly.
Whereas it seems odd to me that we've developed interstellar travel and somehow a major sticking plot device is that there is no-one around to push buttons on a ship presumably ~60 years newer than the Nostromo which had a fully functioning AI. Why should it need staffing at all?
It's a convoy ship. Fly through space, rescue colonists (hopefully one impregnated with a xenomorph but don't tell anyone), fly back through space, profit. We have Redundancy and High Availability in systems today. What's a synthetic going to do whilst they're away, shove the Hoover around?
Aliens is different from Alien in this regard. Everyone on that 'rescue' mission, with the exceptions arguably of Ripley and Burke, were expendable. The most important things were the alien and the Sulaco itself because Corporate Greed.
I feel a rewatch of the series coming on. ?
Maybe the Sulaco was sent with a relatively small crew as there was a possibility that the colonists would need evacuating and thus a sizeable craft required?
The bigwigs would know that was unlikely but the fiction of the mission had to be portrayed. If a whole company of marines - currently 243 persons - were sent then the Xenomorphs would almost certainly have been defeated/eliminated. A squad as shown in the film was enough to seem reasonable for a "rescue mission" but probably small enough to not win a battle against the number of Aliens likely to be extant from the colonists.
The colony was deliberately placed, or at least placed on a planet which the Corporation knew was a nest-site for the xenomorph. The squad wasn't sent as an actual rescue mission, but ultimately sent to fail, but with the aim of retreating with 'infected' colonists, Ripley, or marines in cryosleep.
I’ve watched all the alien movies, the predator movies and the alien pred movies.
not really a fan of this director and as teaser trailer it’s done nothing to make me want to watch this at the cinema. Really disappointed, but I’ sadly expect the movie will disappoint when I do see it. I do however really hope I’m wrong & it’s brilliant. At least they’ve stopped flogging the Prometheus Fassbender storyline now, that should have been much better than it was.
the pred movies stand the test of time better than the alien series.
I feel a rewatch of the series coming on. ?
In Alien-Universe chronological order or in release date order?
the pred movies stand the test of time better than the alien series.
That's because there are only two of them, and they are what they are... ...pure 80's/90's cheese... unless you mean the 'other ones' which are best forgotten, just like the 'other' aliens films.
In Alien-Universe chronological order or in release date order?
The 1-4 Alien movies don't differ here. Beyond that, eh. I've little desire to watch/rewatch the AvP franchise, Prometheus I should probably revisit at some point now that sufficient time has passed for me to be not cross about it.
I rewatched Alien a couple of days ago. Honestly, it was better than I remember but my god there's a lot of plodding.
That’s because there are only two of them, and they are what they are… …pure 80’s/90’s cheese…
I also watched Prey for the first time last week, on the back of this thread.
It's flawed, yes. But it's a good film, I enjoyed it. The lead actress played a good part.
The colony was deliberately placed, or at least placed on a planet which the Corporation knew was a nest-site for the xenomorph. The squad wasn’t sent as an actual rescue mission, but ultimately sent to fail, but with the aim of retreating with ‘infected’ colonists, Ripley, or marines in cryosleep.
Hence being led under the command of a very inexperienced Lieutenant. Had they been a larger group, a company say under a Major or Colonel, he might have arrived, decided the colonists were fubar,and retreated back to the mother ship to nuke the entire site from orbit.
Honestly, it was better than I remember but my god there’s a lot of plodding.
I think you'll find that's called pacing. Modern movies made for the TicToc generation have to have something happening everything 30 seconds otherwise they loose concentration and start to fiddle with their phones
Sorry, what? (-:
I understand pacing, this isn't my first movie. But it could do with a trim. IIRC the 'director's cut' actually removed scenes to improve the pacing. (I'm not 100% certain which version I just rewatched.)
Yeah, the directors version cut some of the slower panning shots to make way for the inserted scenes, I think there's only a couple minutes difference. Thing is, Scott's on record saying that he did it to make the film more to the tastes of modern audiences, and he prefers the original. #ismynerdshowing
Ah, ultimately though, who cares? It's a great film whichever version it is. It's one of those films that if you stumble across it on the telly, you feel compelled to watch a bit, even though you can recite the lines along with the characters and its way past your bedtime.
Scott’s on record saying that he did it to make the film more to the tastes of modern audiences, and he prefers the original. #ismynerdshowing
(-: That I didn't know.
I know Aliens way better. It's one of those films I could broadly write out the dialogue from the entire script from memory.
I know it's a contentious opinion but I prefer Aliens to Alien, yet I prefer The Terminator to T2. Most people I speak with seem to either prefer both originals or both sequels. Maybe it simply boils down to which I saw first?
Both Aliens & The Terminator have a very 80s aesthetic so they have that in common!
I'd say Alien was the "better" film, once you've seen it and know the plot twists though, it loses out to the sequel in terms of re-watchability as the latter is a (brilliantly done) straight-up action film.
The Terminator is just better than T2 full stop.
Both Aliens & The Terminator have a very 80s aesthetic so they have that in common!
Honestly, that might well be it. (-:
Shouldn't be surprised, but forgot to look until flicking through channels, Ressurection on itv4 now.
Just seen the new film 🙂
I liked…..
Just seen the new film 🙂
liked…..
Me too. Bloody ace. 
Visually pleasing. All the franchise tropes on display and used to good effect. Gritty.
Expands a touch on Weylands ‘Prometheus’ vision. Any development in the Xenomorph Wiki is interesting.
It's not bad technically. But it suffers from a few things I hate most about modern cinema. 1. Fan service and 2. Lack or originality 3. It lets the audience get ahead of the plot.