Aeropressers
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Aeropressers

46 Posts
31 Users
0 Reactions
69 Views
Posts: 1642
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Any of you coffee hipsters use a metal filter disc thing rather than the paper ones?

I've just got one for using at work, but when I use it in the normal way the coffee flows through it pretty quickly and there's not much pressing to do!

Do you need to use the inverted method with these or am I doing something very wrong?


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I always use the inverted method. You're right that it flows through a lot faster.

My wife bought me the metal filter so I have to use it, I'd rather use paper as I can't tell any difference in taste and popping the used filter & coffee puck straight into the bin was one of the big selling points for me !


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:35 am
Posts: 4736
Free Member
 

I use a bit less coffee and inverted method.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:35 am
Posts: 11486
Full Member
 

If you push the plunger in a few mm, the vacuum should slow the drippage down significantly. I used to do the inverted method but then went back to traditional as it's easier to rinse the paper with hot water and pre-warm the cup in one step.

Edit: sorry, that's with the paper disc.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:36 am
Posts: 14410
Free Member
 

I use a metal filter but have temporarily lost it a few times e.g. campsite sinks.
It cost about $4+$8 postage on eBay so I got 2.

Inverted method just seems to give it more time to brew. Doesn't taste any different to me.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:37 am
Posts: 4
Full Member
 

I use a metal filter disc now but have always used the inverted method whether paper or metal, I never quite understood the "normal" method as I'd assumed you'd lose half the tube into your mug before you got the plunger in!

I don't see how the metal would be any better / worse than the paper discs in either method to be honest. So in short, I don't know, have no experience of your method, but recommend you go inverted!

Notter, "Coffee Hipster" 🙂


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:38 am
Posts: 5177
Full Member
 

Inverted method here, and use paper discs

Faff free cleaning, and I don't use it often enough to warrant it. I've had it about 5 years and I'm probably on my second pack of filters


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 10:45 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I invert and still use paper filters. I didn't like the metal mesh when I had one.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:01 am
 thv3
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Normally invert, but did notice when I moved to the metal filter I also needed to grind the beans finer.

Had been told the ebay filters weren't the best in that the filter wasn't that fine, friend recommended one off Amazon which they don't seem to do any more, was about £16 and has been spot on.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:21 am
Posts: 76
Free Member
 

I've got one and I liked it... but the coffee tastes no different to me than a plunged
coffee? I thought they were meant to rival the taste of a proper machine or am I wrong?

I've got one of those thermal bowden mugs with a plunger now that seems less faff than the aeropress


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:27 am
 DrJ
Posts: 13416
Full Member
 

popping the used filter & coffee puck straight into the bin was one of the big selling points for me !

This. Inverted, paper filters. I thought about buying a metal one but the paper ones are so cheap there's no saving for years, before which you will have accidentally thrown the metal filter in the bin and lost it.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:29 am
Posts: 13240
Free Member
 

The reason that I got an aeropress ,was to escape the metal mesh of Caffettieras.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:31 am
Posts: 3351
Full Member
 

If the grind is fine enough (but doesn't need to be espresso fine) then nothing drips through with the normal method. Get resistance when plunging too.

EDIT: I use paper


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:33 am
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

I thought they were meant to rival the taste of a proper machine or am I wrong?

You need to play about with it and with different coffees, but it can give fantastic results that are way better than anything plunged.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:34 am
Posts: 5177
Full Member
 

While this thread is live, does anyone use a single Aeropress fill to do more than one cup/mug

If I'm doing 2-3 people I tend to do 2-3 aeropresses


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:35 am
 DrJ
Posts: 13416
Full Member
 

While this thread is live, does anyone use a single Aeropress fill to do more than one cup/mug

Yeah - cos I'm lazy. It's not ideal though.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:37 am
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

If the grind is fine enough (but doesn't need to be espresso fine) then nothing drips through with the normal method. Get resistance when plunging too.

I always get some dripping through, and that's with a grind fine enough to work for espresso on a Gaggia machine.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 11:40 am
Posts: 3351
Full Member
 

By saying nothing drips through, I meant nothing significant.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 12:03 pm
Posts: 1968
Free Member
 

I've got one and I liked it... but the coffee tastes no different to me than a plunged
coffee? I thought they were meant to rival the taste of a proper machine or am I wrong?

I don't think "rival" is really the right word, machine and aeropress will give you very different styles, difficult to compare.

Personally think a well done French Press is excellent and underrated. Where the Aeropress always beats the french press is in convenience (lack of cleaning) and the fact that it filters out a lot more of the ground coffee, so the taste is cleaner and less sludge left at the end of the cup.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I use mine the "normal" way and hardly any drips through and takes loads of pressure to push the plunger down. Makes a lovely cup too. I'm using pact coffee ground for aeropress, apparently, and paper filters.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 1:04 pm
Posts: 5727
Full Member
 

Does everyone fill to the 1 or 2 point, or do you do it the same as me and fill to the 4 so that all i have to do is as milk and it fills a mug


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 1:10 pm
Posts: 1361
Free Member
 

fill to the 4 so that all i have to do is as milk and it fills a mug

This


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I invert it and fill it right up, usually use a metal filter but prefer the paper ones as you dont have to bother cleaning them.

Cant use the metal filter using the normal method as all the coffee drains into the cup to quickly even if you depress it slightly to create the vacuum


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 1:19 pm
Posts: 993
Full Member
 

Inverted FTW!

I gave up using my metal disc as it's easier and quicker to pop the puck and paper filter into the bin and get back to my desk and reading aeropress threads on STW. I also have about 6,000,000,000,000,000 paper filters.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 3652
Full Member
 

Inverted and metal disc here. There is a slightly different flavour compared to using the paper, neither are better, just slightly different. As if there are some tiny bits or oils that get caught by the paper but get through the holes in the metal.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 1:57 pm
Posts: 14410
Free Member
 

what coffee do you drink?
I'm rather fond of Booths Monsoon Malabar & Grumpy Mule Panama Esmeralda


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 2:08 pm
Posts: 6603
Free Member
 

I use paper. I find with finer grind that the flow is reduced. Or, rather than do the inverted method I just put the plunger in the top. Stops enough of the flow that it gets long enough to brew.

Never bothered with the metal thing as, like others, the easy clean is one of the big selling points. Might as well use a normal coffee pot if you are going to faff.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 2:29 pm
Posts: 14410
Free Member
 

Might as well use a normal coffee pot if you are going to faff.

Assuming that you clean the aeropress, cleaning the metal filter takes an extra 5 seconds.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Also, I just put part of the water in, let it brew, then add the rest of the water before plunging. As per the top placed recipes in the [url= http://worldaeropresschampionship.com/recipes/ ]World Aeropress Championships[/url].

Yes, that seems to be a real thing 😆


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 2:49 pm
Posts: 3351
Full Member
 

Just remembered (as just used Aeropress) wetting the paper filter before you add the coffee may prevent excessive dripping. You have to remember to tip away what goes through though, otherwise you get overflow! It also warms the cup.

fill to the 4 so that all i have to do is as milk and it fills a mug

[coffee snobbishness]

MILK!!!!!!!!!! Nooooo, never with milk!

[/coffee snobbishness]

Actually I used to have milk. I found I was becoming intolerant of lactose and stopped drinking milk for a while and having coffee black has stuck. Also some of the more fruity coffees taste rank with milk


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 2:53 pm
Posts: 1421
Free Member
 

I use a metal filter just in case you can no longer get the paper filters for whatever reason.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 6:49 pm
Posts: 77347
Free Member
 

That's a good reason to own a metal filter, to to use one. (-:

What's this 'inverted' business? Ah, I suppose I should just look on YouTube huh.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 7:01 pm
Posts: 1421
Free Member
 

Fair point. A finer grind tends to slow the flow, but flavour wise there's no great difference. I use mine about three times a day with the metal filter. I don't use the inverted method, but then I tend to use stronger espresso type roasts.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What are the benefits of inverted? Just watched the YouTube video of this method and it just looks unnecessarily over complicated.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 7:34 pm
Posts: 5935
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Granted, not an Aeropress, but a Sowden is what I use at work. Think mine was about £15 off ebay so pretty cheap. It's not an espresso replacement, I would describe it as a much lighter, sweeter drink. Totally faff free, as you merely fill the pot with boing water, wait 30 secs for it to cool slightly then add ground coffee and allow to brew for 30-40 mins. Have always used it with espresso grind from home, but now have a hand grinder so experimenting with different grinds. Its really forgiving though. Just thought I'd throw it in as an alternative.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 7:42 pm
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

add ground coffee and allow to brew for 30-40 mins

Are you sure? Website says 4-8 min. I only checked because waiting 40 min for a brew seemed a l o n g time!


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 8:29 pm
Posts: 5727
Full Member
 

I find inverted much easier as you don't have the risk of leakage. For me i just chuck the coffee in, add 2 marks of water (well off the boil otherwise it scolds the coffee and makes it bitter) give it a stir to Bloom then fill in with water (same temp as before). Stick the filter and lid on and press. Simple really.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 8:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where you get the risk of leakage from? Don't you have the aeropress on top of the mug when you fill it?


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 8:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Inverted and paper.

I use the paper filters for a very good reason, the paper filters out some of the acids that the metal filter doesn't, while it doesn't affect the taste one iota using the metal filter means the coffee accelerates digestive transit or in other words it gives me the sh**s


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 9:10 pm
Posts: 5935
Free Member
 

Yes TooTall, never quite understood that on the website, though I think they recommend stirring as well and that's not part of my method either. Common advice I've seen on forums etc. was where I got the 30-40 mins from. Also have been to a brewing demo comparing many methods and that was their advice. Have tried leaving for shorter times and not obtained as clean a result. Another advantage is that after that time it's the perfect temperature for drinking 🙂


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 9:11 pm
Posts: 5727
Full Member
 

Nah, I have to be honest I have never tried it with the filter paper in place before filling. I just find it easier to use the inverted method.
Either way I am sure makes damn fine coffee, I prefer inverted (maybe put it down to the climber side of me)


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 9:12 pm
Posts: 5727
Full Member
 

40 minutes seems like a hell of a long time, I think with a stir mine takes about 3-4 mins in total.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 9:15 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 13416
Full Member
 

40 minutes is enough time to nip out to a bakery and back so you have pastries with your coffee.


 
Posted : 25/02/2016 8:02 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

inverted and metal disc (not metal mesh)

I have a stack of papers, but just use the metal disc at the moment. I havent tried a taste test between the two - the theory behind the metal disc I gather was that it doesnt absorb coffee oils, but it's probably voodoo.


 
Posted : 25/02/2016 8:22 am
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

40 minutes is enough time to nip out to a bakery and back so you have pastries with your coffee

Or nip out and buy a cup of coffee. 🙂


 
Posted : 25/02/2016 8:26 am
Posts: 24498
Free Member
 

give it a stir to Bloom

Stirring is so old hat, have you not read the Aeropress world championships recipes.

You need to give it a turbulent wiggle 😯

I used to know a girl with a turbulent wiggle; used to lead to fairly rapid blooming.


 
Posted : 25/02/2016 9:38 am
Posts: 4
Full Member
 

In 40 minutes I'd have drunk the first mug from the Aeropress and be on to making my second!
Looks like a nice shiny piece of kit though 🙂


 
Posted : 25/02/2016 9:43 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!