 You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Which is the preferable model?
1: Having all the "vested" interests of society (of whatever stripe) [i]represented[/i] in a parliament and the various positions argued out for the purposes of making laws, or
2: Having [i]Governers[/i] who's job it is to control things and make them "better" for everybody?
I answer your question with a question. Why is it either or and not a bit of both?
No 1 is the 'pure' theoretical democracy
No 2 is the 'pure' dictatorship position
We have a mix of the two in the UK and the political ebb and flow shifts the split between 1 and 2 as the country requires.
I think 😛
It occurs to me that ensuring the ebb and flow continues and remains effective, you need a majority of floating voters who are not committed to either end of the spectrum.
[img] 
[/img]
OP - in this context what's your definition of 'control' and 'better'?
Good questions.
Write your own frackin essay - honestly - kids these days !