[Closed] A nice chat about faith?

Try the Quakers - amazing power of silence and prayer without the unnecessary liturgy and adornments.

I see there's some argument over the terms

The terms are pretty well defined, I thought? They only really get wooly when someone posits some form of "you can't be an atheist / agnostic because of some logic failure or misunderstanding I've just made up" type of argument.

Atheism is the rejection of the belief in god(s), agnosticism is ostensibly "I neither believe not disbelieve." Which is why I laughed like a drain at Derek's argument on the first page, which was broadly:

"Everyone with a belief system different from mine is stupid."

"Oh? Why, what do you believe?"

"I don't know."

Try the Quakers - amazing power of silence and prayer without the unnecessary liturgy and adornments.

Also, great breakfasts.

in the grand scheme of things Religion has been a hugely positive thing for the human race

Wow.

GrahamS - Member
just to arrogant to accept their might be a higher power than their own.
You're stepping into territory that dereknightrider and TheBrick touched on there.

I doubt that many, if any, atheists would be short-sighted enough to think that humans were the absolute pinnacle of evolution and the very best possible thing that the universe is capable of.

We only have a sample size of one habitable planet and there are potentially billions upon billions of them out there.

Atheism doesn't reject that. Neither does it arrogantly state that we know everything (as dereknightrider tried to imply).

Atheism is just the rejection of a belief in religious deities - nothing more.

I didn't imply atheists state they know everything, other than my early 'just as stupid as theists' throwaway comment which was I accept a tad flippant, I pointed out that they had made their mind up there is no God or Supreme being or deity, which they can't possibly know, so they are as wrong as those who do.

Atheists not arrogant? That's a new one, I must frame that.

I worked with a man for several years who was super religous. We used to have interesting debates about it quite often. I decided to stop debating when he said he believed that I should renounce my homosexual friends ,because they were going to burn in hell and deserved to do so!
My nana thought her the sun shone out of her local vicars arse , until he was convicted of fiddling with kids.

IMO there's good and bad in all walks of life ,it just seems alot of the bad is done in various religions name. Which removes the Faith for me.

I've met a few religious types who want to save the rest of us, but they're very much in the minority

and typically have some sort of mild mental health issue to accompany it

I consider myself Atheist not Agnostic because I choose not to believe in the existence of God or the possibility of the existence of God. The fact that I also accept I can't possibly KNOW doesn't come into it. I don't prescribe to the idea that if I can't prove something doesn't exist then it might do. If that makes me arrogant then belief in something for which there is no evidence must also be arrogant surely?

Cougar - Moderator
I see there's some argument over the terms
The terms are pretty well defined, I thought? They only really get wooly when someone posits some form of "you can't be an atheist / agnostic because of some logic failure or misunderstanding I've just made up" type of argument.

Atheism is the rejection of the belief in god(s), agnosticism is ostensibly "I neither believe not disbelieve." Which is why I laughed like a drain at Derek's argument on the first page, which was broadly:

"Everyone with a belief system different from mine is stupid."

"Oh? Why, what do you believe?"

"I don't know."

You didn't ask what I believe, I just pointed out that those without were as silly shall we say as those with, when really we don't know and the description for those of us that admit we don't know, is Agnostic.

If there were a description other than Jedi Knight for those of us that believe in the Force I might have used that, but it wouldn't exactly have been taken seriously would it and since I don't really know anybody that well, best stick to known terms.

I always thought that gnosticism was about 'knowing' something. So I (like Richard Dawkins btw) am an 'agnostic atheist' - someone who doesn't know if god(s) exist but based on evidence and probability will live my life as if they do not.

Although my view can be changed by evidence.

Similarly you can get agnostic theists which move to the side of 'living life as if they do exist', then you get gnostic theists ("god(s) definitely *do* exist!") and gnostic atheists ("god(s) definitly do *not* exist!").

I pointed out that they had made their mind up there is no God or Supreme being or deity, which they can't possibly know, so they are as wrong as those who do.

Do you believe in that cosmic teapot then? Or faeries at the bottom of your garden? Or those monsters that hide under your bed but turn invisible when you look for them with your torch? Or magical unicorns that can fart rainbows?

You can't possibly [i]know[/i] these things don't exist either.

That doesn't make it "arrogant" to "make up your mind" that the lack of evidence means you have no good reason to believe in them.

I pointed out that they had made their mind up there is no God or Supreme being or deity, which they can't possibly know, so they are as wrong as those who do

plus you can't prove a negative, so if there is no god we can never "know" that there isn't, so you can label people agnostic if you want, you could also label them agnostic russel'steapot-ers or agnostic gardenfairy-ers if you want but I don't think it would really help matters.

Wow

Good spot, that's a bold claim indeed.

I'd be hard pressed to judge whether religion has been positive or negative [i]on the whole[/i], that's a Big Question™.

I'd perhaps speculate that religion has been beneficial overall if you look at it historically. All the murdering and various attempts at genocide aside, religions have attempted to build communities, to bring people together, to provide hope, to provide guidance and morality to the great unwashed, to enforce laws, and try to answer some other Big Questions™. In the absence of any real knowledge about much at all, it's probably served us well on balance.

These days, I'm less sure. It's holding us back scientifically as organised religion tries ever more desperately to retro-fit scientific theory and discoveries into their belief systems (or, worse, argue that it's wrong and start pushing things like the ironically-named Intelligent Design). It's used as an excuse by extremist loonies to justify some truly terrible acts, and by moderates as an excuse for bigotry, intolerance and treating women like property. And in lieu of a big old book or two we now have many books, schools, a legal system, and all the other trappings which tell us how to be excellent to each other.

Religion still has positive benefits too of course, as others have said, but a lot of those benefits could easily be served by other means. Community centres, shared-interest clubs, heck even the local pubs are all places where people can meet, exchange opinions and knowledge, and be nice to each other. With the exception of the notion of providing comfort to the dying and grieving by lying to them, I'm struggling to think offhand of many modern-day benefits of religion which wouldn't still work if you crossed out the 'god' bit.

Ie, as Douglas Adams once said, isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it?

I pointed out that they had made their mind up there is no God or Supreme being or deity, which they can't possibly know, so they are as wrong as those who do.

[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot ]Russell's Teapot[/url].

I identify as Atheist, not agnostic. You're right that I can't possibly know about a non-existence of a god or gods, as it's conveniently impossible to prove a negative. However, in the face of no evidence whatsoever to suggest a deity and plenty of evidence to support the theories we currently have about the universe, I see no compelling reason to entertain the idea of a supernatural creator any more than that of the tooth fairy. I can't disprove the tooth fairy, so are you seriously suggesting that the only "intelligent" standpoint here is to be tooth fairy agnostic?

You'd be right of course, as far as that logic holds water (or tea). But everyone old enough not to have milk teeth [i]knows [/i]that the tooth fairy doesn't exist, for all practical purposes.

And the thing all the theists always seem to overlook is, [i]this is not a static belief.[/i] Atheism doesn't imply a closed mind, it's a current standpoint based on available information, and is open to change as new information and evidence comes to light. This is how science works, kids! I know that there isn't a tooth fairy, however should my teeth suddenly start disappearing and I'm finding 50p pieces under my pillow with little notes saying "love and kisses, the tooth fairy" in a handwriting other than my partner's, then I will of course revise my knowledge accordingly. Seems unlikely though, don't you think?

Atheists not arrogant? That's a new one, I must frame that.

You could do it like one of those motivational posters with a caption underneath. May I respectfully suggest, "irony"?

About to reply but can't add much to what GrahamS said:

Do you believe in that cosmic teapot then? Or faeries at the bottom of your garden? Or those monsters that hide under your bed but turn invisible when you look for them with your torch? Or magical unicorns that can fart rainbows?

You can't possibly know these things don't exist either.

That doesn't make it "arrogant" to "make up your mind" that the lack of evidence means you have no good reason to believe in them.

Not much there to argue with I'd have thought...?

I was just saying to someone the other day they should teach logic in schools. Some of the basic fails on this thread are reinforcing that opinion.

That doesn't make it "arrogant" to "make up your mind" that the lack of evidence means you have no good reason to believe in them.

It's not even that there's no good reason to believe in them. It's that it's highly likely, given what we know about the world and the universe, that these things don't exist. To attribute something a supernatural cause you wouldn't just need a few scraps of evidence, you'd need something pretty damned compelling.

In my tooth fairy example above, if the situation I described did occur, who would actually think "wow, the tooth fairy is real after all!"? I've seen that David Blaine bloke walk on water and resurrect himself from the dead, if he claimed tomorrow to be the second coming would anyone believe him? Or would we see it with our own eyes and not be convinced, but yet happily believe it if it was written in a 1500 year old book?

You want to believe in a higher power, or have an "open mind," or sit on the fence about the whole thing, you fill your boots. But don't do that and then in the next breath tell me my logic is broken.

Some anger on this thread. The athiests need to find something.

Coffee and lunch, I fear.

just to arrogant to accept their might be a higher power than their own.

Always makes me smile this old Chestnut. Could it be more arrogant to imagine that (in your imagination) the most powerful entity in the universe cares what you do when you have no clothes on 🙂

From one wiser than me

"You believe in God, and another does not believe in God, so your beliefs separate you from each other. Belief throughout the world is organized as Hinduism, Buddhism, or Christianity, and so it divides man from man. We are confused, and we think that through belief we shall clear the confusion; that is, belief is superimposed on the confusion, and we hope that confusion will thereby be cleared away. But belief is merely an escape from the fact of confusion; it does not help us to face and to understand the fact but to run away from the confusion in which we are. To understand the confusion, belief is not necessary, and belief only acts as a screen between ourselves and our problems. So, religion, which is organized belief, becomes a means of escape from what is, from the fact of confusion. The man who believes in God, the man who believes in the hereafter, or who has any other form of belief, is escaping from the fact of what he is. Do you not know those who believe in God, who do puja, who repeat certain chants and words, and who in their daily life are dominating, cruel, ambitious, cheating, dishonest? Shall they find God? Are they really seeking God? Is God to be found through repetition of words, through belief? But such people believe in God, they worship God, they go to the temple every day, they do everything to avo id the fact of what they are and such people you consider respectable because they are yourself."
J. Krishnamurti

Coffee and lunch, I fear.

Maybe the form of Jesus will appear in your coffee.

Really? Better make it tea, then.

If only there was somewhere I could get a teapot from.

The athiests need to find something.

Funny you should say that actually, I've just found something fishy. But as I'm filled with atheistic love for my fellow man (in a platonic non-touchy kind of way), I'll deal with it after lunch.

I don't believe in teapots.

If only there was somewhere I could get a teapot from.

Just believe in the teapot. Believe that it once existed and was typed and talked about for many hours.

[s]I'm a little teapot...[/s]

Sorry, 2015, isn't it.

#JeSuisUneThéière

hora - Member
If only there was somewhere I could get a teapot from.
Just believe in the teapot. Believe that it once existed and was typed and talked about for many hours.

I don't know.. it might not be there, don't they squeeze things from tubes on that space station?

Then again.

The other problem I could end up believing in the teapot, not be allowed to speak of coffee percolators and what about teas maids? Would they be second class citizens? Would it have to be a Yorkshire Tea Pot? And does it mean you as the prophet Hora who brought me the enlightenment, would I have to kill anyone who defames your character in future? What about the Unbelievers? Them as well?

So many questions.

Best not to know

hora - Member
Some anger on this thread. The athiests

I WONDER why that is?

Do I HAVE to post the article about the Saudis again?

Some things just make you bloody angry. Consequently I wasn't feeling in a generous mood when a Jehovah's Witless thrust a pamphlet at me with the title "What was the reason life began?" or somesuch and I just said, loudly, as I went past - "It evolved, you IDIOT". Currently not in the mood for reasoned debate - I'll leave that up to Cougar who seems to retain some patience with all that gibberish.

Mr Woppit - Member
Do I HAVE to post the article about the Saudis again?

Yes please ... 😀

What is it about?

Consequently I wasn't feeling in a generous mood when a Jehovah's Witless thrust a pamphlet at me with the title "What was the reason life began?"

As long as she is a fit female she can thrust me as much as she likes ...

Mr Woppit, I'm going to get a divine epithany and become a prophet of my own religion and lay my hands on you 😯

This covers it.

http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2007/10/atheists-and-an.html

Mr Woppit - Member

This covers it.

http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2007/10/atheists-and-an.html

I have no objection to her thoughts but why on earth does she need to post a pic of herself on her blog? Why is she so fixated with sex (her biography)? I sense a bureaucrat in her ...

there's a nice recently widowed pensioner on our street , in the winter I clear her steps and put salt down for her . her daughter caught me doing it this year and said "that's very Christian of you" I pointed out she was agnostic and I was doing it because I felt we should all help each other when we can to which she said "I wish more people at my church felt like you."

In truth it was a selfish act on my part when I am 80 i'll need someone to do that sort of thing for me and I hope to reap what I sow.

I would suggest that given all the available evidence the only logical position to hold is atheism it requires faith to be a theist i.e. a conviction that goes beyond the evidence, and a form of doubt that there may be something more than the available evidence plus a suspicion that that "something" is a deity to be an agnostic.

Logic is based on sound propositions not faith or contingent suppositions.

"Why is she so fixated with sex (her biography)? I sense a bureaucrat in her" perhaps if you could read better you would see she is not a bureaucrat but a "sex writer" possibly that is why she mentions sex in terms of what she has done in life , a biography generally being the story of ones life.

OP….

I started out very much like yourself… nice people, lovely atmosphere, good to hear lots of "be excellent to each other” ... but didn’t believe in God and wasn’t so keen on all the “confuse your sin” malarkee.

But I stuck with it because I couldn’t deny the fact, that deep down, I enjoyed being there, in church, even if I didn’t believe in God.

Ended up doing a confirmation course with the mind set of.. lets go and have a look and listen and ask some questions…. I don’t have to commit to anything at the end of it.

But I did get confirmed and was happy to do so ... in fact I’m very glad I choose to be open minded about it all.

Give it a chance OP…. you’ve nowt to lose and lots to gain.

Hey, you may even find God isn't a Beardie bloke on a cloud, a tooth fairy or indeed a tea pot

And far more importantly .... You will have looked for yourself.

Rather than wait for someone else or science to find him/her or royal doulton for you.

Enjoy

I struggle with the concept...some geezer, in the sky, looking after us all, must be lovely if your trying to dodge reality (or maybe scare folk) but c'mon really?

you may as well believe in a God or a dolphin or whatever.

I'm no Marine Biologist, but I'm pretty sure I believe in Dolphins.

Well said Ro5ey 8)

Personally speaking, after my own curiosity and searching, religion isn't part of my faith. Yet I cherish my faith.

Allah

I tried to find Him on the Christian cross, but He
was not there; I went to the Temple of the
Hindus and to the old pagodas, but I could not
find a trace of Him anywhere.

I searched on the mountains and in the valleys
but neither in the heights nor in the depths was I
able to find Him. I went to the Ka'bah in Mecca,
but He was not there either.

I questioned the scholars and philosophers but
He was beyond their understanding.

I then looked into my heart and it was there
where He dwelled that I saw Him; He was
nowhere else to be found.

The most beautiful poetry in the world.

Indeed hora, too many look in the wrong direction!

Allah

I tried to find Him on the Christian cross, but He
was not there; I went to the Temple of the
Hindus and to the old pagodas, but I could not
find a trace of Him anywhere.

I searched on the mountains and in the valleys
but neither in the heights nor in the depths was I
able to find Him. I went to the Ka'bah in Mecca,
but He was not there either.

I questioned the scholars and philosophers but
He was beyond their understanding.

I then looked into my heart and it was there
where He dwelled that I saw Him; He was
nowhere else to be found.

The most beautiful poetry in the world.

Why is God in belief always a HE?

Some people refer to mother nature.

Some people refer to mother nature.

One day Pedants will rule the earth.

When you stop analysing and looking for holes within life and existance you can relax and enjoy.

Why is God in belief always a HE?

Only in Judaoe Christian religions as I understand it.
Plenty of female Godesses in other religions, as well as animals, elements, celestial bodies etc.

Some people refer to mother nature.

I'm not sure people generally use that to refer to an actual female deity though. I certainly don't. For me it is just a shorthand for natural processes like weather systems or evolution.

And the thing all the theists always seem to overlook is, this is not a static belief. Atheism doesn't imply a closed mind, it's a current standpoint based on available information, and is open to change as new information and evidence comes to light. This is how science works, kids!

Nope. As you stated earlier, atheism is the rejection in the belief of god(s). Not "rejection in the belief of god(s) until proof comes along from science or something"
What you have there is agnosticism.

No shame in that. No need for absolutes.

I find this pretty much covers what I've believed most of my life. I don't use the 'G'-word, however...
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Cougar, your search for the tea pot could be over:
http://www.teahouseemporium.co.uk
I actually have one of these from that very emporium:

[img] [/img]
Flying teapots, you say?

[img] [/img]

Nope. As you stated earlier, atheism is the rejection in the belief of god(s). Not "rejection in the belief of god(s) until proof comes along from science or something"
What you have there is agnosticism.

Nope. I am an aetheist. I don't believe in the existence of deities.

If some compelling evidence comes along to convince me otherwise then I'll change my mind and I will no longer be an atheist. That doesn't make me an agnostic, it makes me someone who is prepared to change their mind in the face of new evidence.

Likewise you might identify yourself as Christian. But if the elephant God Ganesh showed up in person and started doing miracles and shizzle then you might change your mind and become Hindu.

That doesn't mean you are not Christian or that you are secretly a bit Hindu.

No need for absolutes.

Indeed.

As you stated earlier, atheism is the rejection in the belief of god(s).

Atheism is the absence of belief, not the rejection. I have never rejected a belief in god because, as far as I can remember, I've never had one to reject.

Not "rejection in the belief of god(s) until proof comes along from science or something"
What you have there is agnosticism.

Agnosticism, as has been pointed out several times, is a position on the possibility of knowing if a god or gods exist, not half way between belief and non-belief.

I'm with Ro5ey, OP. BUT

You should try at least ten more gods or so before the christian one. You could start wit HUAI-NANZU who was a Chinese immortality god. Loads to choose from.

Have a look at [url= http://www.godchecker.com/ ]godchecker[/url] as there are over 3,000 other gods!

crankboy - Member

"Why is she so fixated with sex (her biography)? I sense a bureaucrat in her"

perhaps if you could read better you would see she is not a bureaucrat but a "sex writer" possibly that is why she mentions sex in terms of what she has done in life , a biography generally being the story of ones life.

(please note I am making a lot of assuming about this author as I am extrapolating her intention and the possibility of her intentions)

No, no, anyone that says this is good for you or that is bad for you by pretending to be an expert is a closet bureaucrat. A bit like slowly slowly catchee monkey ... Also just because whatever she has done is not something everyone cares to be honest. Constantly fixated on sex and going on and on about sex ... FFS! We on this planet multiple ourselves to death and she wants to lecture us about sex? We are animal and out natural instinct is to reproduce by passing down our genes ... I bet she will now consider herself to be victim the moment attention is focused on her then retaliate by saing .. "look at me! look at me! I am lesbian! We are wife and wife! ... ya, right at least you are doing the right thing by not passing down your gene to populate the already populated planet. 🙄

How is this:

Agnosticism, as has been pointed out several times, is a position on the possibility of knowing if a god or gods exist, not half way between belief and non-belief

Any different to this:

If some compelling evidence comes along to convince me otherwise then I'll change my mind and I will no longer be an atheist. That doesn't make me an agnostic, it makes me someone who is prepared to change their mind in the face of new evidence.

So if evidence comes along that shows a god(s) exists you'll change your mind. How is that not allowing the possibilty of god(s) existing?

Other than a badge to wear, I'm not sure why anyone would logically be either a theist or atheist.

hora - Member
Allah

I tried to find Him on the Christian cross, but He
was not there; I went to the Temple of the
Hindus and to the old pagodas, but I could not
find a trace of Him anywhere.

I searched on the mountains and in the valleys
but neither in the heights nor in the depths was I
able to find Him. I went to the Ka'bah in Mecca,
but He was not there either.

I questioned the scholars and philosophers but
He was beyond their understanding.

I then looked into my heart and it was there
where He dwelled that I saw Him; He was
nowhere else to be found.

The most beautiful poetry in the world.

Horah - peace be upon him, a true prophet, tell us of the teapot oh blessed one.

GrahamS - Member
Nope. As you stated earlier, atheism is the rejection in the belief of god(s). Not "rejection in the belief of god(s) until proof comes along from science or something"
What you have there is agnosticism.
Nope. I am an aetheist. I don't believe in the existence of deities.

If some compelling evidence comes along to convince me otherwise then I'll change my mind and I will no longer be an atheist. That doesn't make me an agnostic, it makes me someone who is prepared to change their mind in the face of new evidence.

Er no, I'm afraid actually, it makes you an agnostic as I understand agnosticism.

But hey wasn't it you that begat the prophet Hora of teapot fame with your earlier elucidation? 😉

I'm a Existential nihilist.

I'm afraid actually, it makes you an agnostic as I understand agnosticism

[b]Agnostic:[/b] A person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God.
-- http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/agnostic

That's not me. I choose not to believe in the existence of deities or gods. That makes me an atheist. A person without theism.

I make that choice based on the evidence I see, therefore clearly I do believe that something CAN be known about the existence of gods. Which means I am not an agnostic.

Clear?

That was some read ..

I was going to post some long winded drivel about Noah being 500 years old when he shoved cats and dogs in the same boat for a year because the locals got a little restless , (in the same respect were all doomed ) But for me the Bible is full of contradictions, and has been re-written so many times to keep the locals in check , Perhaps in theory at the time it was a way for people to conduct themselves in a manor befitting others with respect,

Me I believe ,there might be a God, some proof would be nice , there might not be ,but what I do believe wholeheartedly is people should keep their faith to themselves ,not use it as an excuse to rage war ,kill ,or harm others in his, hers, or Its name

A statistically significantly higher percentage of prisoners are religious than non religous when compared to the general population. That fact conclusively answers the OP's original assertion that church is the place to meet nice people.

[/end thread]

I'm still a little confused about the atheists are angry bit, just like the OP's sweeping generalisation that religious people are nice (skipping the oppression of women, persecution of various groups that are different, twisting of region to incite violence etc.) it's just not that true. To follow up the atheists are angry with heaps of ram it down you religion is awesome your the ones that are missing something stuff really helps the cause there. For all those that found something maybe it's time to let go of it.

I'll live my life, I won't judge your beliefs you are entitled to them so long as they are yours and not being pushed onto others.

I'm an absurdist, apparently.

This has to be one of the most fantastically 6th form threads on here for some time. Keep it up!

Well said Ro5ey

For all that we may disagree, Ro5ey is consistently entertaining and interesting, and I applaud his attitude.

Atheism is the absence of belief, not the rejection. I have never rejected a belief in god because, as far as I can remember, I've never had one to reject.

I was raised to make my own discoveries. A family friend used to give me Jesus comics, with a back page where you could buy your own "good news glove" with multi-coloured fingers. At the time I was young enough to believe adults and found it fascinating.

In the grand scheme of things I was never 'religious' per se, but I was certainly exposed to concepts which, as an adult, I reject.

Have a look at godchecker as there are over 3,000 other gods!

Off the top of my head I reckon you need another four zeros on that figure.

And,

Nope. As you stated earlier, atheism is the rejection in the belief of god(s). Not "rejection in the belief of god(s) until proof comes along from science or something"
What you have there is agnosticism.

No shame in that. No need for absolutes.

No. I'm atheist [i]right now.[/i] If situations change, if new evidence presents itself then I may progress to agnostic or even some form of theist. But right now (for reasons I've explained) I'm atheist.

Arguing that because I don't believe but have an open mind I'm agnostic screams of special pleading from the theists. "Yes, but you're not [i]reeeaaally[/i] atheist are you, you're secretly one of us..." It's point scoring and, frankly, a bit sad.

I was brought up with the standard UK we are all christians schooling but parents never really pushed it (only went to church when my mother was applying for jobs at church schools). I can see why they get a good conversion rate as if you teach it as the norm from the age of 4 then some will stick. Other religions were treated as something to point a bit at and understand that they might believe that but ours is right....
I guess for most who identify as Christian they would identify as Muslim, Hindu, Jewish or Buddhist if they had been born somewhere else.

I was raised to make my own discoveries.

Have a look at godchecker as there are over 3,000 other gods!

Though if I did have to pick one for an afterlife etc. then I think you can't go too far wrong with this lot
[img] [/img]

Other than a badge to wear, I'm not sure why anyone would logically be either a theist or atheist.

Put it this way -

I have no belief in any 'deity', I believe all the ones mentioned to be human inventions (ie disbelieve owing to lack of evidence for such creatures, notwithstanding the overwhelming wealth of evidence showing them to be of human invention). I also think it unlikely that any supernatural 'deity' such as described actually exists, but am open to change my mind given any new overwhelming evidence

I don't require a label, yet, 'logically' what would my position be known as?

Other than a badge to wear, I'm not sure why anyone would logically be either a theist or atheist.

LOL... missed that one
I don't like nuts, lots of people who like nuts don't get it. I could go into detail and explain my reasons every time but sometimes I get bored and just say allergy. It's quicker and easier.
Same as when people can't comprehend that you don't share their view on other things, it's easier to have one word that answers the question.

I'll live my life, I won't judge your beliefs you are entitled to them so long as they are yours and not being pushed onto others

At horaJnrs school I noticed the church (cough) school had placed a cartoon book in his satchel. In it depicted the angels rising over mons on the battlefield and the miracle that occurred there.

I stopped myself from correcting them about the true story of the event. Whats the point?

There are people hereabouts who bang on about the advantages of different wheel sizes. Surely they can't all be right?

That's faith bolstered with science. If the position is still felt to be insecure then use pseudoscience. If there is no good result via pseudoscience then fall back on faith alone. If faith alone isn't working then besmirch those without faith. And around it goes

Here by the grace of secularism go I*

(*On my 26ers/20ers and sometimes 700cers - all welcome in my Church of Bike)

In it depicted the angles rising over mons and the miracle that occurred there.

Photo realistic picture of some Angles Rising Over a Mons:

[img] [/img]

Edit: boo, amusement spoilt by a ninja edit 🙂

the angels rising over mons on the battlefield and the miracle that occurred there.

Even the author of this tried telling the papers (at the time) etc that it was fictional but eventually gave up.

I stopped myself from correcting them about the true story of the event. Whats the point?

It would bother me if they were teaching my children fiction as fact.

But if it was just a cartoon illustrating a story then that'd be fine by me. As long as it was clear it was just a story.

In the same way I am happy for my kids to be taught about religion. In fact I think it is important. Just as long as it is taught as [i]"This is what some people believe"[/i], rather than [i]"This is what we/you believe"[/i]. Sadly the latter seems very prevalent.

Arguing that because I don't believe but have an open mind I'm agnostic screams of special pleading from the theists. "Yes, but you're not reeeaaally atheist are you, you're secretly one of us..." It's point scoring and, frankly, a bit sad.

I don't think so.. just seems like semantics to me. We've all set our positions out, we just don't know what name to apply.

We've all set our positions out, we just don't know what name to apply.

I'm pretty clear what name applies to me: atheist.

But for some reason a couple of other people seem keen to tell me what I [i]really[/i] believe and what I [i]really[/i] am. 😕

I then looked into my heart and it was there
where He dwelled that I saw Him

Let's suppose that you're talking about your "innermost self" - a concept created by your self-aware intelligence - and not the actual organ that pumps your blood around.

Mate, that's not a "god" - that's YOU.

Perhaps you might want to consider that this concept itself - "I" - is a result of the interaction of various parts of your brain that mostly function as separate independent process engines (we know this because it is evidenced) then you can grasp that even this - the concept of "I" - is an illusion of the imagination, plus everything generated from it including ideas about gods and the like.

As a tool to measure and observe the universe and agree on the results (that includes ourselves and what makes us ourselves), our conciousness is unparalleled. At least, on this planet.

hora - Member
At horaJnrs school I noticed the church (cough) school had placed a cartoon book in his satchel. In it depicted the angels rising over mons on the battlefield and the miracle that occurred there.

I stopped myself from correcting them about the true story of the event. Whats the point?

don't think so.. just seems like semantics to me.

But for some reason a couple of other people seem keen to tell me what I really believe and what I really am.