661 'Do a maxx...
 

[Closed] 661 'Do a maxxis' Objective marketing content

87 Posts
49 Users
0 Reactions
338 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If it were akin to the 70's she'd actually have her tits out. Are were really that sexually repressed nowadays that we have [s]to get in a froth about [/s]a [s]bit of [/s]bare [s]skin and a pretty [/s]lady being used in advertising?

 
Posted : 17/01/2016 6:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep - she's clothed!

 
Posted : 17/01/2016 6:55 pm
Posts: 8290
Free Member
 

Yep - she's clothed!

I don't think that even in the 1970's the Big D models were actually topless?

 
Posted : 17/01/2016 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well I can remember a saturday in the Working Mens club craning over the bar to see the boobs whilst Grandad got Nan a Snowball 😆 (G&T actually - tha old Witch)

 
Posted : 17/01/2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Gotta admit to being surprised that the poll on the frontpage is actually that close. I thought the arguments in here would purely be from the noisy types and not representative as a whole.

 
Posted : 20/01/2016 2:24 pm
Posts: 43056
Full Member
 

Yeah. I get the impression that the poll didn't go quite the way Mark was expecting.

 
Posted : 20/01/2016 2:26 pm
Posts: 6069
Free Member
 

Just voted & it's spot on 50/50

 
Posted : 20/01/2016 2:28 pm
Posts: 17674
Full Member
 

If I was flicking through a bike mag......would I stop to look at yet another pic of a rider (male or female) clad in 'rad enduro' gear advertising the latest wonder product? Probably not. Would I stop to glance at a picture of an attractive woman wearing little clothing.....? Probably. Oh, and look she's got 661 knee pads on - bugger! Suckered in to looking at an advert because I'm a disgusting lecherous, Neanderthal man. Damn....

Should I be ashamed to admit this on here? Probably..... 😆

 
Posted : 20/01/2016 2:45 pm
Page 2 / 2