32" monitor - yes o...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] 32" monitor - yes or no?

27 Posts
20 Users
0 Reactions
102 Views
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just about to buy a new 4k monitor via work as this one's a bit knackered. I'm currently using 28" but I could go to 32". On this current one, I'm not using the smallest scaling option (this is a Mac) but I think that perhaps on a 32" I would be able to so that would grab me a bit more screen area, which would be nice.

But is 32" just too massive on a fairly small desk?


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 1:46 pm
Posts: 13240
Free Member
 

cut out a cardboard shape and try it on the old screen


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 1:51 pm
Posts: 1862
Free Member
 

32" diagonal is just two inches in each direction wider than 28", so that's fairly easy to gauge.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends what you are using it for. For me, working with a lot of spreadsheets, data and documents I’d rather have a super wide monitor rather than just a bigger one. It’s the height of a big monitor that’s the issue, it might be a bit awkward in that respect.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:14 pm
Posts: 9135
Full Member
 

32″ diagonal is just two inches in each direction wider than 28″, so that’s fairly easy to gauge.

Obviously better
26" wheel V 29" wheel, and that only 1 1/2"


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:15 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Super wide's not an option.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Super wide’s not an option.

I just use a pair of identical 24" side by side.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:36 pm
Posts: 14146
Free Member
 

But is 32″ just too massive on a fairly small desk?

How small is your desk? Doesn't look too big on mine

[url= https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50150998632_5779e24ccb_k.jp g" target="_blank">https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50150998632_5779e24ccb_k.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://www.flickr.com/gp/85252658@N05/k0dR06 ]2020-07-25_11-14-38[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/85252658@N05/ ]davetheblade[/url], on Flickr

With Surface Pro and XPS 17 for comparison

[url= https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51057759663_87a417cc29_k.jp g" target="_blank">https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51057759663_87a417cc29_k.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://www.flickr.com/gp/85252658@N05/4ZfvoL ]2021-03-21_10-47-16[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/85252658@N05/ ]davetheblade[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:53 pm
Posts: 405
Full Member
 

You’ve gotta go with a 21:9 ultra wide aspect ratio. Makes a huge difference.

I have a 34” curved one (cheap from Amazon) and it’s been life changing.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:58 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

How long are your arms?


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 2:59 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

If you're using it for general office work then 32 is a good size, or an ultra wide as you don't really need to worry about response times or high refresh rates.

For gaming 27" 1440p is probably the sweet spot as high spec monitors any larger cost an absolute fortune.

Equally, anything much bigger than 32" is a bit too big as you'll be moving your head around to look at different parts of the screen which is kinds counter productive.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 3:57 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Super wide’s not an option.

I just use a pair of identical 24″ side by side.

Two side by side is not an option for the same reason as ultrawide isn't!


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 3:58 pm
Posts: 15068
Full Member
 

Just to add, my 'office' machine is a 14" laptop with an old 1080p 27" monitor and I'd quite like a higher resolution 32" to replace it, but there's nowt wrong with it so can't really justify replacing it.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 4:08 pm
Posts: 8392
Free Member
 

I'm on a 4K 32" for general use. Very happy with it, especially as it was Costco cheap at £200ish.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 4:12 pm
Posts: 2425
Free Member
 

I run a 32" and 40" next to each other at home and I think its a 50" at work - more screen space is great when you have multiple docs open, so I'd go big.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 5:09 pm
Posts: 19434
Free Member
 

32" is a good size. Yes, go for it.

I am also in the market for a similar size monitor for my PC but my budget is tight at max £200 only.

I am using Samsung 32" TV monitor as my PC monitor now but the pixel is not that good as it is a TV.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 5:23 pm
Posts: 4421
Free Member
 

I recently got a 34" Samsung Ultrawide. Was £280 delivered. It's really good, but even getting it quite far back on the desk, I find I'm scanning my head side to side like Arnie in Terminator 1 when he's hunting Kyle Reese and Sarah Connor, so if I was buying again I would probably pay for a curved one.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 6:28 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I suppose you don't have tomput the thing you're looking at most in the corners of the screen, do you...


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 8:04 pm
Posts: 4421
Free Member
 

Actually, on a big screen like that a lot of menus etc are down the sides and the main content is in the middle so you are going left and right a lot


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 8:34 pm
Posts: 8392
Free Member
 

That’s true if you have a single app full screen, but with stuff like Word or smaller spreadsheets etc, you can sit a window the size of a 22” monitor in the middle and maybe have smaller windows showing emails and task lists etc around the sides.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 9:16 pm
Posts: 17209
Full Member
 

I find 22 inches is good, 24 better, 28 is far too big. My peripheral vision isn’t good enough and I find that I can’t focus on a really big screen. You end up tilting your head up and down to accommodate documents. All about the solid angle. Wide is probably good but taller does not work for me. Writing this in front of a 208” screen but I’m sat 4m away.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 9:45 pm
Posts: 5182
Full Member
 

I’ve used a 40” 4K TV as a monitor for years. It’s great. No, you can’t see it all at once without moving your head but then you never need to maximise anything either. I still use 125% scaling at that size too.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 9:52 pm
Posts: 8771
Full Member
 

I don't understand why some people go for ultrawide instead of an overall bigger screen? For me personally the extra vertical space is just as useful/important as the extra horizontal.


 
Posted : 31/08/2021 10:52 pm
Posts: 6856
Free Member
 

I don’t understand why some people go for ultrawide instead of an overall bigger screen?

Depends what you mean by ‘overall bigger’. I’d argue that for the same number of pixels, a wider format is more usable for multiple apps. I often use two or three apps side-by-side on my 34” 1440p ultrawide. Eg a browser + reference manager + Word. I don’t need more height for any of those apps. Or I use Photoshop in full screen with an image in the middle and toolbars to either side and out of the way.

If your workflow involves very tall (but not wide) spreadsheets or coding then vertical height is indeed potentially more important. I wouldn’t go back to 16:9 unless I needed it to do something else (watch films or play games I suppose?).

Obviously you may feel differently, but there’s a reason that a lot of people like ultrawide.


 
Posted : 01/09/2021 6:42 am
Posts: 8613
Full Member
 

For 4k then yes, definitely go for 32" over 27"


 
Posted : 01/09/2021 8:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ultrawide is where its at. We see in landscape so the aspect ratio is far more natural. Also when we have multiple windows open we tend to arrange them horizontally rather than vertically. Far easier to work with an ultra wide and no need for multiple monitors.

I have a 24" ultra wide monitor for my work laptop and a 27" iMac. I would say the 24" ultra wide is a better screen for work despite the better resolution of the Mac screen and the taller dimensions.

You can probably get a similar result with a 32" 16:9 monitor because you're sat so close.


 
Posted : 01/09/2021 8:24 am
Posts: 5182
Full Member
 

Part of why I got the 40” is that it’s similar size/pixels to a 34” UW (and I tend to use about 60-70% of the vertical pixels for most things) but you have the flexibility to have that usable area high or low on the monitor, or have taller windows if you need.


 
Posted : 01/09/2021 8:33 am
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

you can sit a window the size of a 22” monitor in the middle and maybe have smaller windows showing emails and task lists etc around the sides.

That's what I do. I do stuff like an editing window in the middle and logs scrolling by in terminal windows elsewhere.


 
Posted : 01/09/2021 9:20 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!