2013/14 Rugby Threa...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] 2013/14 Rugby Thread

3,962 Posts
139 Users
0 Reactions
41.7 K Views
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Him and the winger are clones of each other right?
Kudriani looks good, they'll shift the right winger back to 13 and he's bloody good too.
Not sure who will be 13 for Wales. Cory Allen did well but it will be a massive step to play Aus and he went off injured.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 8:15 pm
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Yeah it was the crim 11 that looks like a 118 118 fella...him and Hooper do look similar though!

As for England....very encouraging really-missing a few key players and still made as good a game of it as just about anyone else this year.

Backs are pretty dire though. No confidence in Dickson, Farrell isn't a 10 and the rest bar Brown may as well not be playing.

Little over 6 months ago Brown was as bad as anyone in world rugby....fast forward to now, play him in his proper position and he's been player of the Autumn. It'd be lovely to have two out and out wingers on the pitch at some point in the future!!


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 8:19 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Oh sorry was it a winger, wasn't really concentrating. I shall sit on the naughty step 😆


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 8:23 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

At this rate Wales will have the Gavin Henson and Scott Gibbs centre partnership v Aus.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well done Wales for saving the pride of the home nations. That's a solid win against the argies.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 9:30 pm
Posts: 27603
Full Member
 

Just watched the England game and although we lost we did well. Should be a good team when the "a" backs and front row play. 🙂

Barrit an tuilagi with Yarde and Wade could be formidable or at least enough. Ashton and what's-his-name at 13 need to go. Brown cemented his place with Foden on the bench for me in that team.

I think we could easily win the 6n based on that performance and without Ashton.


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 9:31 pm
Posts: 27603
Full Member
 

P.s. I told you Ashton would get drawn in - who owes me a fiver?


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 9:33 pm
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Yeah how the **** Ashton ended up as the last defender 20 meters in from touch after 30 seconds is frankly baffling!


 
Posted : 16/11/2013 9:35 pm
Posts: 7763
Full Member
 

Did you see Ashton berating the defense for not tackling at last AB try? Some folks have no self awareness...And what was with the booing of AB kicks at goal? Still,bloody good of England to take their hooker off to ensure t kiwis went through the year unbeaten,cracking game and England's best performance of year so far. Why would Lancaster do that,was Hartley injured? Wales also looked really good,but need to wrap gethin and Adam in bubble wrap between now and Jan. So car crash time this afternoon 😐
AA that was a straight red after 30 secs,let alone 8 to go. Reinforcement of that has been given to refs at all levels with emphasis on second tackler being the one tipping. That one looks just like the irb video. Imagine that as a job,OK guys thus morning you and Trevor leota are going to demo a high tackle,hopefully just need a few takes,then some lunch and tip tackles with Sam...


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 7:11 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Ducks I think Hartley got his bell rung making a tackle.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 7:16 am
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

AA that was a straight red after 30 secs,let alone 8 to go. Reinforcement of that has been given to refs at all levels with emphasis on second tackler being the one tipping. That one looks just like the irb video. Imagine that as a job,OK guys thus morning you and Trevor leota are going to demo a high tackle,hopefully just need a few takes,then some lunch and tip tackles with Sam...

I agree but then the ball is supposed to be put in the scrum straight too!
I just thought it looked accidental and clumsey rather than dirty. It wasnt as bad as Sams world cup error. Wonder what sort of a ban he will get.

Yeah I think England will easily win the six nations too but not without Ahston!!! 😉


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 7:39 am
Posts: 27603
Full Member
 

anagallis_arvensis - Member
Yeah I think England will easily win the six nations too

Yes, he said it.

Hartley knocked himself out on McCaws hip during a tackle and couldn't walk straight. It's a shame because Tom Youngs ineffective throwing in really helped us lose possession we so vitally needed at that point.

Robshaw will be nursing a shiner this morning - ouch!


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 7:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All the tip tackles I have seen looked accidental. Apart from one particular incident...
I don't think that's the point though. It is the tacklers responsibility to make sure he doesn't have/cause an accident...

Mega dissapointed with Ashton, I had always hoped he was going to sort himself out, I think it is time to replace him.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 9:22 am
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Yeah Hartley couldn't walk straight! Great turnaround of fortunes for Hartley this Autumn. ...back as number one choice for me. Robshaw's eye will look pretty horrific today I'd guess!


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 9:37 am
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Technique is a big thing in tackles, a few pages back I posted a video of Warburton highlights. What struck me on watching it was the number of times he lifted players in tackles prior to the world cup semi. He has clearly worked hard on not doing this since. In most of the cases in the build up to the semi and the red card another player came in and it changed the tackle. For example in the 1/4 final he creamed OGara, it was only Charteris in that stopped it getting nasty.
I am not trying to say the aussie shouldnt have got red I was simply reacting to the idea it was intentional or dirty also had it not been the ladt ten mins anyway it would have been a tougher decision for the officials.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=POr1EiXjLiA


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 9:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didnt think it was intentional either, but how can you judge it clearly anway, I guess I just default to benefit of the doubt.
Interesting thoughts on warbs, I imagine his red stole a lot of his head space after so I can see what you mean about getting the technique right.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 9:51 am
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

it would have been a tougher decision for the officials.

Our forum official says it would have been a straight red. Along with an international ref, a touch judge and a TMO. I'm happy to go with that.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 10:24 am
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Wales looked good yesterday. To look completely in control despite so many errors and missed tackles (25% tackles were missed in the first 20 minutes!) is reassuring and quite un-Welsh. The defense wasn't really up to the usual standard and Argentina made some easy yards but they looked far, far better in attack. I'm certainly not a Biggar fan but he did seem to get the backs flowing far better. The lesser experienced players didn't look out of place either and did very well (besides Lee!). Tipuric and Warburton looked like a good combo and Tips gives you that extra link between the forwards and backs- a bit like having another centre at times. Good to see Halfpenny used in attack and that really seemed to help get outside the Argentina defense. Faletau was awesome too.

I think this difference with Wales with Biggar playing as he did also goes to show what England could be with a 10 with decent distribution. Farrel might be defensively strong and a reasonable goal kicker but he's like the spikey Mike equivalent distubution-wise of fly halves 😀 (OK so Phillips has been playing pretty well recently but you get the point).

Why was Farrel replaced so early? Things seemed to go downhill with the him and Dickson replaced, not to mention the chubby centre's throwing. As other have said the forwards must be distraught all their hard work is in vein as soon as the backs got their hands on the ball. I don't think the forwards as a unit can be criticized and were pretty awesome. What NZ did very well especially early on is use the desire of the English players to smash NZ out of the park in tackles to draw players out, ride a bit hit and put others in space. Using England's individual over-enthusiasm early on was pretty clever and shows why NZ are where they are in world rugby.

Only saw the first half of Ireland but it looked a mess 😀 Lots of individuals, hardly any cohesion in the forwards and the ball thrown out to the backs early and left to fend for themselves- you can't expect Bowe or Kearney to smash through a pair of locks on a regular basis. Bit weird given so many individuals with such potential (or reputations I guess). The positive for Ireland is this now means they will win the 6 Nations following the successful Wales model- "Poor in November, a 6 Nations to remember" 😀


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 12:31 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Lawes who has often been a liability was very good yesterday.

What will befall Scotland today?


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can the scots keep S.A. to below 50 points today? I think about 47-15 to the boks


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

AA, I am with you on the intent/dirty aspect. Bad tackle yes, against the laws yes, warrant a red, probably yes, full intent to be dirty, not really. But I always thought that Warbs was hard done by.

Only watched the first half of Ireland match before swapping to Eng highlights. it was quite a shock to see the score. I blame the shirts.

Lawes seem to be getting a good write up to day. May be fair, but I find it strange that someone with such physical prowess doesn't break more tackles. Sheridan was the same for me. Big strong blokes who seem to go to ground far too early/easily. I thought England would be mashed down the middle but old 36 had a pretty good match in my opinion. Foden was a disappointment for me though.

Shame as someone else said ( was it Duckman?) to hear the the traditional Murrayfields jeering of kickers now being heard at Twickenham. Poor show.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Regarding Lawes size, I was surprised to see that the stats showed that Launchbury is heavier!
I hear that Lawes brother is coming along well, and even bigger than he was at that age(!)
I can't give Foden too much shit, he's being played out of position and outside of a pair of centres who struggled all game.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:10 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Warbs wasnt hard done by as the ref got it right. Problem is others often get away with it such as Ferris on Evans.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:14 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

AA, I am with you on the intent/dirty aspect. Bad tackle yes, against the laws yes, warrant a red, probably yes, full intent to be dirty, not really. But I always thought that Warbs was hard done by.

Probably? You appear to have access to footage or rules to which the ref, touch judge, TMO and our resident level 5 referee don't? None of them appear to say "probably". Intent to be dirty means nothing. You tip a player over drop him on his head (though, fortunately for O'Mahony he didn't come down on his head in this case.) One can talk about intent all one wants. It's a fruitless discussion as in this case, it doesn't matter.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course it doesn't matter, like 100% of debate/banter on here Darcy!

As dear old pitbull says, the only person who matters is the ref. Funnily enough I am sure that the same far-more qualified group have access to better knowledge and views on feeding at the scrum, deliberate blocking of chasers, constant offside with kickers etc, runners offside in last weeks try against Wales etc. I will remember not to comment on any of that in future.

Good to see the reaction of the guy carded though. Clealy not a Wendy. Just wipes his nose in the shirt, no backchat and just straight off without dissent or argument.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:36 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

True it is a fruitless discussion as none of us can influence any outcomes but the consistency of the application of the laws of the game must be as frustrating for the players as it is us fans.

As a_a says, it isn't so much any injustice (or not) on a single incident but the fact so many other similar incidents get very different outcomes. In the Wales game North I think it was completely upended someone, legs up in the air, down on the head and neck yet no-one even so much as mentioned it. Common sense would say there was nothing in it but the law doesn't say so.

On other law related stuff, Phillips put the ball to the second row in half the scrums as did SA last week yet this is supposed to be one of the big crackdowns. I think Phillips only got pinged for it once.

I felt sorry for the Argentina forward who tackled Phillips when he had his hands on the ball and gave away a penalty for offside. Phillips did have his hands on the ball, the replays showed this and the Argentina player said this. The referees reply wasn't to ignore it or march Argentina back 10 for back chat, instead he said something along the lines of "I don't care if he had his hands on the ball, I don't want you taking any chances, don't come round in future"... basically giving Phillips as much time to fanny around as he likes in the future. It would be nice to see some of the referees less involved as personalities but more as enforcers of the law.

In Wales news: Cory Allen looks to have dislocated his shoulder and Scott Williams has foot or toe ligament damage. Henson's phone will be ringing soon 😆

Carter also looks to have aggravated his long standing Achilles injury which can't be good


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:41 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

As dear old pitbull says, the only person who matters is the ref. Funnily enough I am sure that the same far-more qualified group have access to better knowledge and views on feeding at the scrum, deliberate blocking of chasers, constant offside with kickers etc, runners offside in last weeks try against Wales etc. I will remember not to comment on any of that in future.

Of course they will get that stuff wrong occasionally. The ref can't go to TMO for every decision, so those ones will always be up for debate - part of the fun. What I'm pointing out to you is that you can "probably" all you want, but as our resident level 16 official has stated, and the three officials who reviewed it with the help of video evidence, there was no "probably" about it. I can't see why you'd think it was "probably" a red.

Also, the fact that other players have "got away" with it is no mitigation.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Again I agree DD, so let's stop debating any incident and rule infringement in future. You are as correct to "ping" me for the completely wrong use of the word probably earlier, as the ref is to ignore the word of the law at nearly every scrum or kick in open play.

At least you can (correctly) claim the moral high ground (unlike the myopic ref who picks and chooses 😉 )


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:51 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Even with TMO evidence there is still room for "probably" and opinion whether it be the opinion of refs or fans. Hartley's recent block for the try against Aus was "a block but not quite enough of a block." One of the worst examples would be in the Samoa vs SA spring game the Samoan 15 grabbed the balls of one of the SA's in a ruck, the TMO said this, and the ref when armed with this information gave a penalty. Is that what the laws say? There are countless examples so opinion from all concerned will always be part of it all...


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:55 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

Oh bugger off you big Wendy!! 😀

Edit: that one at thm.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:55 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

There are countless examples so opinion will always be part of it all...

Tru dat. Just not in this particular case.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

The habit of refs referring it to the video ref, watching the big screen and then telling the video ref what to say really pisses me off.
Lacey's yellow card on Tips was harsh imo.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:16 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

The habit of refs referring it to the video ref, watching the big screen and then telling the video ref what to say really pisses me off.

Totally agree! The ref has the benefit of others to help make a decision so use them, especially if asking for extra help in the first place


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:22 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

If Allan and Williams are broken, christ knows Hook and Beck?... ****....that Roberts Davies Williams and Allen. If Eli is fit we may see North at 13.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:23 pm
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

I agree a_a. We're not that far off an NFL style review system.

All we need now is an "Unnecessary Roughness" offence. 🙂


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unusual to see Andy Nicoll being so upbeat about Scotland's last performance 😉 My highlight to the rugby weekend starts now....makes someone else (cough) look totally unbiased in his views!!!


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If Allan and Williams are broken, christ knows Hook and Beck?... ****....that Roberts Davies Williams and Allen. If Eli is fit we may see North at 13.

As long as they're back for the RWC, does it matter? A lot of the time, injuries allow new players to come through.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What struck me on watching it was the number of times he lifted players in tackles prior to the world cup semi. He has clearly worked hard on not doing this since. In most of the cases in the build up to the semi and the red card another player came in and it changed the tackle. For example in the 1/4 final he creamed OGara, it was only Charteris in that stopped it getting nasty.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=POr1EiXjLiA

Indeed - 2:17 in that video for those who can't be bothered to watch the rest - had Charteris not been there it would quite clearly have been a red card offence.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:47 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Well that made me cry! 🙁


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:49 pm
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Dusty in here to a_a. What a bloke!!


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gosh. Humbling indeed.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

As long as they're back for the RWC, does it matter? A lot of the time, injuries allow new players to come through.

we are at the stage where we will have to pick jobbing pro's who will never be good enough


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Perhaps, but it'll improve the strength of the squad. More game time for the players who don't usually start.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 2:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Time for a rugby music petition? Can we find Scotland a decent anthem and ban swing low, sweet chariot at England matches.

After that sack the Scotland marketing muppet who signed this kit contract. How can anything make England's purple nightmare look good.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gosh - you expect SA to win easily, but that just looked far too straightforward for them. I mean it was obvious what they were going to do, and they just did it.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:06 pm
Posts: 4899
Full Member
 

Sad to see Van der Westhuizen has motor neurone disease. I thought he was a great player. Expect the springboks will give him a win to watch today. Still more in hope than expectation Come on SCOTLAND!


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:08 pm
Posts: 7763
Full Member
 

I have two options; it's our ball, we take it and walk away, match abandoned. Plan b; we are quite close to the bar; a few pints and it won't matter: this is going to go VERY badly for us.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:27 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

If you want to see a bad tackle check out Georgia Canada brawl on rugby dump 😯 how only 2 were sent off is a mystery.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:32 pm
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Oof tough 60 seconds 😆


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ok AN, heres your chance...


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh no what a let down. I've waited 40m for AN first comment and there wasn't a hint of positivity there.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I felt sorry for the Argentina forward who tackled Phillips when he had his hands on the ball and gave away a penalty for offside. Phillips did have his hands on the ball, the replays showed this and the Argentina player said this. The referees reply wasn't to ignore it or march Argentina back 10 for back chat, instead he said something along the lines of "I don't care if he had his hands on the ball, I don't want you taking any chances, don't come round in future"

I saw this, the argies pointed out that Phillips had his hands on the ball and IIRC the ref said something like "doesn't matter, it wasn't out". In the eng/NZ game the ref had a completely different opinion and called that the ball was out as soon as the 9 put a hand on it. Very confusing.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Wish TJ was here he'd still believe Scotland can win this and go on to dominant the six nations. I miss him.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:57 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

+1


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 3:58 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Laidlaws passing is awful.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 4:09 pm
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Lovely display of footballing skill from Scotland this half 😀


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 4:10 pm
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Woohoo here comes Eben.....methinks that him and big Jim will get along great!


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 4:17 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Or am I getting them mixed up the nines passing was shit but then they bought on a ten who is even worse.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not sure about nematodes. The pitch looks like it's mole-infested.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 4:55 pm
Posts: 26725
Full Member
 

Just seen this apparently Eastmond chucked it in and went home at half time

http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-union/news/12553/9028014/aviva-premiership-bath-discipline-centre-kyle-eastmond-for-walk-out


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 6:20 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

I saw this, the argies pointed out that Phillips had his hands on the ball and IIRC the ref said something like "doesn't matter, it wasn't out". In the eng/NZ game the ref had a completely different opinion and called that the ball was out as soon as the 9 put a hand on it. Very confusing.

When the 9 has hands on the ball in a ruck it is ball out whereas the 9 can have hands on at the base of a scrum without it being out, the ball is only out when it is beyond the back foot (of course when the ball is beyond the back foot in a ruck it is also out)... does this sound right to those with more rugby knowledge?


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great game, and we had a great win.

Sad new about Francois Louw mind, we won't know the outcome until tomorrow..

Just need to find it on Iplayer as I was driving home when the match was on.


 
Posted : 17/11/2013 8:56 pm
Posts: 7763
Full Member
 

Dan; soon as hand(s) are on the ball the scrum/ruck/maul is over and the person playing it becomes the offside line. However if you wildly swing a foot at the ball as it is getting played expect to be offside 8)


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 8:13 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Why were the Scots playing in that ridicuous costume? Dont the sarfricans have an away strip?

Duckman what are the rules about wrestling a player off a ruck by the neck which seem in vogue these days.


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 8:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also when did the rules change to make the home team, rather than the away team, change strip in the event of a clash.

Is replacing navy blue in the saltire with a turquoise part of the post 2014 planning!?!? Modernisation gone too far.....


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 8:23 am
Posts: 7763
Full Member
 

It is purple and has been on the strip for about a decade;represents heather dontchaknow. Home team has always changed strip AFAIK


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also when did the rules change to make the home team, rather than the away team, change strip in the event of a clash.

It's always been that way in Rugby although nowadays they sometimes agree to part with convention (to sell more shirts).

Although what big jim did was legal, I can't see how it can remain so. Someone's going to get their shit severely ****ed up soon.


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 8:43 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I'm getting increasingly riled with shirt changes, notable in the HC as well.

There should only ever be a shirt change if there's a clash. So, for example, when Wales play Tonga, and both are in red, one changes. When Scotland play France, both dark blue, so a change, etc.

Just changing to an away strip willy nilly is marketing guff and annoying. Even more so when some of the away shirts are so chuffing horrid!


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 8:53 am
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Dan; soon as hand(s) are on the ball the scrum/ruck/maul is over and the person playing it becomes the offside line. However if you wildly swing a foot at the ball as it is getting played expect to be offside 8)

So does that basically mean that it is so hard to referee that area that refs would rather not have anyone challenge for the ball as soon as the 9 get hands on otherwise everything would become quite messy?

On the subjects of referees, although I did not catch all of the game, the team in charge of the Eng/ NZ game seemed to do a far better job than some of the others we have seen this November. Easy to criticize but I think some credit is due to them (unless those that watched the full game feel otherwise of course 😀 )


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wasnt (as) worried by ling purple, ( thanks for the explanation) it was the ghastly turquoise. But I'm with flashy on the shirts thing. Ditto all the fireworks and other crap that seem to be part and parcel of modern international. It's not the bloody X factor.

But I must be old, it was always away team to bring extra shirt in case of a clash in my day. Note that fAlshy calls them Away strips which is a hint that may be he is as old as me!!!!!


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:10 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

You're only as old as the man you feel, old chap! 🙂


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Duckman; if you're caught on the wrong side of a ruck and prone with your arms up (so as to demonstrate that you're not interfering) as you cannot roll away or remove yourself from the ruck; is there any reason you could not communicate to your team mates when the opposing 9 has hands on the ball? Is it bad form?


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:18 am
Posts: 7763
Full Member
 

Dan; in theory you could grab the 9, in practise he is moving as he takes the ball and will be protected by his own forwards. Swinging a boot is usually pinged as dangerous play. Wrecker,yell away; the ball will be in the 10's hands before anybody can react. Ever tried calling the ball into the scrum as a wing forward, "ready,ready...aw crap" 😆


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He was about 80 when I passed him the soap in the pool showers this morning Flashy!!!! 😉


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ever tried calling the ball into the scrum as a wing forward, "ready,ready...aw crap"

Yep. Same with "ball gone", they all moan if you stop calling it though.


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I glimmer of hope for Scotland this weekend !

6 Oz players serving internal bans for boozing

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/24983640


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 11:42 am
Posts: 31056
Free Member
 

So they may have been hungover for the game? Jeez, how much would they have scored if they'd had clear heads. 🙂


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks like the Aussie coaches are taking pity on Scotland. Scotland need to hope that another 6 Oz players are out on the lash during the week.


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 1:15 pm
Posts: 7763
Full Member
 

Must be some culture there that Deans allowed to develop. I mean guys in rehab or at London Irish that would suggest to the rest that getting on the lash while on national duty isn't going to be tolerated anymore.


 
Posted : 18/11/2013 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dean Ryan's analysis of England's performance is spot on here.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2013/nov/17/england-wide-boys-limitations-new-zealand

PS- I don't monitor club rugby so much, I wonder who is in contention to usurp Tom Youngs as our replacement hooker, unless he improves his accuracy I don't want to see him the 6N..


 
Posted : 19/11/2013 1:12 pm
Page 16 / 50

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!