XT M8100 crank repl...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

XT M8100 crank replacement options

25 Posts
15 Users
22 Reactions
491 Views
Posts: 1503
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I keep smacking my XT cranks on roots and rocks, so am considering going to 165mm, are there any potions other than Shimano?

Hope and E13 only appears to be available in 30mm spindles.


 
Posted : 05/07/2024 9:30 pm
Posts: 462
Free Member
 

Dmr axe would be my choice. Look lovely, super strength, just seem to work. I'm eyeing up the silver which look amazing


 
Posted : 05/07/2024 9:47 pm
Posts: 462
Free Member
 

Ah, dmr are 30mm as well

Sorry


 
Posted : 05/07/2024 9:47 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
Posts: 3231
Full Member
 

DMR Axe also need a special BB.


 
Posted : 05/07/2024 9:49 pm
Posts: 3445
Free Member
 

In the realm of light/cheap/tough, imo it's hard to beat whichever Shimano fit your budget tbh.

The Hope 30mm BBs are pretty good, so I wouldn't let that standard put you off.

Cracks do nothing for me so I'd find it hard to look elsewhere, especially when I hear the horror stories of RF carbon failures and Hope fiddlyness. I had some E13 one which were a total PITA, but, E13, so that was predictable.  Plus, coloured cranks are gopping..


 
Posted : 05/07/2024 9:52 pm
Posts: 7954
Full Member
 

RF turbines. Yes 30mm but what's the problem there?


 
Posted : 05/07/2024 10:59 pm
Posts: 2139
Full Member
 

RF Aeffect or Aeffect SL are sensible money, 24mm axle and let you use their tough as old boots steel chainrings. Come in 165 as well.


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 8:53 am
StuF and StuF reacted
Posts: 9539
Free Member
 

If you are happy to stick with Shimano then I have some new XTR 165mm that I bought after a PSA on here. You can have them for what I paid.


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 9:23 am
Posts: 2435
Full Member
 

What't the problem with Shimano?  Are you actually bending or breaking them? they're lighter, stronger and cheaper than almost anything else and they have the best/easiest/most reliable axle/crank interface IME. I've had various Hope, RF, SRAM, Middleburn over the years but other that looking different all were worse than Shimano in various ways.

Personally wouldn't even bother with XT.  The SLX looks better, wears in better, and has the same construction and weight (IIRC the weight difference to XT comes from the XT composite chainring) and is cheaper.


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 10:44 am
bikesandboots, sillyoldman, kelvin and 3 people reacted
Posts: 2819
Free Member
 

@thered ive sent you a PM


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 10:54 am
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

It does seem to appear that other than a few cheap GPX or the entry level RaceFace, everything is now 30mm or dub. Nothing wrong with good BSA30 bottom brackets like the Hope and nothing wrong with Shimano cranks.

I am about to move a set of RaceFace Turbine from a boost mountain bike to a gravel bike. That's only possible because the chainline is in the chainring, not the cranks. You can't do the same with Shimano.


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 11:05 am
b33k34 and b33k34 reacted
Posts: 7954
Full Member
 

@onzadog you can also play with the axle length. You may find a Easton cinch axle gives a better chain line or the slightly shorter RF axle from before boost. There is a massive tech doc on the RF site that gives the measurements for the different combinations.

If your turbine's are boost era they should have a a rf136 axle. For your gravel usage a rf134 or the 128 (iirc) from the road sets would be better.


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 12:18 pm
Posts: 2435
Full Member
 

@onzadog  hmm.  You *can* fiddle with chain lines on Shimano bit it was never elegant. 


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 3:45 pm
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

@nixie they are 134. I boosted them via the chainring as they are from 2016.


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 4:36 pm
nixie and nixie reacted
Posts: 279
Free Member
 

@thegeneralist what model of xtr?


 
Posted : 06/07/2024 4:36 pm
Posts: 9539
Free Member
 

https://flic.kr/p/2q2JS3k


 
Posted : 07/07/2024 3:03 pm
Posts: 9539
Free Member
 

@ beargrease

I appear to have reached my limit of PMs.

Can you me your phone number and I'll phone you


 
Posted : 07/07/2024 3:12 pm
Posts: 279
Free Member
 

Ooooh the shiny black one 🙂

was really meaning like 9100,  9130 etc. Should be written on the end of the drive side (left crank will just say 9100 I think).


 
Posted : 07/07/2024 7:27 pm
Posts: 6468
Free Member
 

@thered 165 XTs on my proper bike if you want a spin. I put 30t chainring on as it does make a difference in power/ torque whatever over 175.


 
Posted : 07/07/2024 11:13 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

SLX come in 165 and I believe the crank arms may be slightly lighter than XT.

I can vouch for them being durable and reliable.

Slight lack of third-party options for Shimano DM rings, but I'm happy to suffer than for the "it just works" design.


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 10:53 am
Posts: 3757
Full Member
 

The Shimano rings are way more durable than aftermarket options anyway.


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 10:57 am
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

The Shimano rings are way more durable than aftermarket options anyway.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe they make a 28t ring?


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 11:06 am
Posts: 3757
Full Member
 

XT comes in 28T

Part no SMCRM85Z8


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 11:13 am
chakaping and chakaping reacted
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Nice one matey, I'll keep an eye out for discounts and give it a try next time.


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 11:24 am
Posts: 993
Full Member
 

@thegeneralist msg sent


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 11:25 am
Posts: 9539
Free Member
 

The ones pictured above are FC-M9120.

U02sgb


 
Posted : 08/07/2024 12:47 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!