[Closed] Why don't you ride trailquests ?

To be honest I hadn't heard of TQ until I saw your posts 😕
I'm def TQ curious - I like maps & navigation, ride to see & enjoy the countryside so TQs, yeah why not, tell me more.......

Same here, Interested in doing some trail quest, got a link to a schedule of event or further information?

*Edit* Just clicked on the link in your post, reading now*

I'm attracted by the idea in some ways.

I did one bike treasure hunt/orienteering event, which I enjoyed and i think wone, organisedby some friens. They were big in that scene (sophie Wood use to be Bowtell. I think she was national mixed national champion in one of the variations)

Any way cut along story short its the map. I rode a new area locally last weekend. It was all stop and look at the map stuff. Its just not as fun as following the arrows

I hate myself for saying that I'm still a fell walker and general outdoors person. But navigating on bike is a necassary evil not something I'd opt into

i admire your search for more support I hope you find it.

I'm cotemplating a mini trailquest using pubs as the control points (orientbeering?) also a trig point challenge. I don't know if there are any local clubs into that sort of thing...

You may enjoy the navigation aspect but for many it is a chore. A nice waymarked route leaves you free to enjoy the riding and if that route is at a trailcentre you can be pretty sure it will be fun too.

I do the Open5 races in the Winter, won't be doing any more though as my knee is well ****ed so can't run any more

may look at some trailquests

Did one years ago on Cannock Chase. It was fun as a one off but the navigating got in the way of a good ride for me.

Have done a few races (No Fuss 10s etc) because I thought they would be exciting, fun (and they are!)

Don't think trailquests would be exciting or fun. Might be wrong but that's my honest answer.

OK, for those who don't know how it works, there are slight variations in format, but the most common one is;

Turn up at a village hall.
You will be given an A4 sized 12x8km section of 1:50k OS map with up to 36 Control Points marked on it.
You have as long as you want to plan a route between the CPs.
Go to the start marshal's desk and clock out.
You will now be given the CP values, so you might want to amend your route, or just set off anyway and improvise on the way round.
Keep watching the time. You've got 3 hours and there are penalties for getting back late.
Hand your scorecard to the finish marshal.
Hang around. Discuss your route with other people and see how your score compares.
Go home.

Did 10 or 11 Polaris's (Polari'i?) & umpteen TQ's, best finish was 90th O/A in the 1999 Summer Polaris, guess I just got sick of being crap. 😥

MTB is motorsports without a motor for me. Trailquest strikes me as a rambler thing. So I guess I simply don't get it in the same way I don't get rambling.

To do a Trailquest you need to be able to read a map well.

Trailquests are not sociable events. You usually spend most of the event on your own.

So, you're on your own and you aren't very good with a map, how much fun is that?

Instead you can enter a variety of events which are waymarked, and you can ride round with your mates.

Back in the day when the Polaris was young, it attracted lots of riders, and sold out. There were very few other events that vied for riders, plus I guess that most riders back then had an outdoors (map reading) background.

Trailquests just aren't cool - its not the same as turning up with your latest bit of bling at a 24hr race, riding a few laps and then having a beer and BBQ! And most people struggle to find the way to the end of their road, never mind open country! 😆

They require effort, thought and no hand-holding!

I used to do loads of them, and to me they gave a greater sense of achievement than any race when you knew you'd picked a good route and timed it to perfection.

I'm useless at reading maps

Life is not a competition so I don't really care if other people can read maps and ride faster than me

I've only done one and loved it. Was then gutted that my local one (Shackleford) was cancelled due to lack of interest!

Oh, and one other thing.

(Not one of your events), but I went for a ride yesterday with a friend who is competing well in our local series to get a feel for an event's location.

The map geek might have revelled in route choice, and I'm sure there will be plenty, but in 4 hours riding, I didn't find a trail I would have chosen to have ridden.

Rubbish riding.

Don't we do this one quite regularly? Its probably the image of buffalo, beards and marins thats never quite gone away. There's also more / other organised mountain biking events now.

There are some popular leagues - Dark and White Summer seems to have pulled in around a 100 each one. Talking to the guys who organise them the last round of the winter series had around the 200 mark in entrants. They have though gone back to 6 events in stead of 8. Felt quite sorry for the guys who did NEMBO league at Blanchland and in Teesdale. Both only looked at having around 40-50 people. The guys had put a lot of effort into the Blanchland one, negotiating access to quite a lot of moorland tracks for the event. Hopefully they'll go again next year with the series.

The success of Dark and White in terms of number vs some of the other leagues could in part be down to location. Winter league has a fairly large catchment of potential riders from the towns and cities around the Peak. Its also a known quantitiy as an area. I suspect events in the South Pennines / West Pennines would also have a good level of attendance.

Lack of awareness is probably another reason for low numbers. Dark and White gets a few plugs from myself and others each year. The same doesnt seem to happen for NEMBOs (North East Mountain Biker Orienteering) and NYMBO (North Yorkshire Mountain Bike Orienteering. Never mind XCC (Cross Cumbria Cyclists) or Walton Chasers. Both of which have week day and weekend events in the next few months.

[url= http://www.bmbo.org.uk/calendar/ ]British Mountain Bike Orienteering's [/url] callender gives details of most of what's coming up.

I like them - probably my favourite MTB event. Been doing the Scottish ones in the borders this year - reading the map at the micro level to get the best route is a great challenge IMO.

However, I can see where they might struggle in appealing to folk, at least if the SMBO ones are representative - the one's I've done are over big areas for 3 hr events and that can be at the expense of fun, technical mountain biking on the singletrack. I've done a couple on my cross bike (out of necessity, MTB has been bolexed) and it's been a wash, maybe an advantage even. There's a lot of miles to cover.
There's actually a MBO rule saying 'no cutting through' which seems a bit odd to me and supports the sort of fire-road fest that tailquest detractors criticise it for.

Their used to be an event at Glentress run by PCC that was superb - the smaller map area meant you could take in loads of singletrack. Possibly it became too hard to stage at a trail centre though - potential for mishap with the one way trails.

Basically I think they're great, but understand why they might not be for everyone, and think the duration / size of map area makes a big difference to the type of riding you will do.

There's one in Duddon Valley this sunday - great riding:
[url= http://www.bmbo.org.uk/ ]From Seathwaite[/url]

Have done a trailquest and a mtb orienteering event recently. I know their different formats, but they still rely on navigation as a key element of the event.

The mtb orienteering event - felt the check points were too close together, it was difficult to go fast between points because the distances were so short and it was easy to miss a turning. Plus reading a map on the move is difficult.

The trail quest was better - did it as a pair which was a lot more sociable. The distances between points was further so you could plan your route and then get going without fear of zipping right past the check point for quite a distance. It seemed like a good way to explore an area I'd never ridden in and some of the trails we came across were good fun, and the terrain was varied. (that was near Gloucester/Stroud). Top marks to Midlands Trailquest for the after event sandwches, cake and coffee! I'd do one again. Plus the entry fee was way more reasonable than any marathon/enduro ride!

Whilst the navigation is the main differentiator, reducing the reliance on navigation might improve popularity? So essentially it becomes a big ride, checking off the points, but with multiple pre-marked routes to each point? Same points scoring but there is still the elemenr that requires riders to look at contours etc and plan the choose the quickest route?

Or have some trails marked to check points and others not. The unmarked route check points score a lot more points.

I used to do them fairly frequently when I was younger, before I got into racing. The navigation I can handle fine - even if it does mean fitting a gopping map board to my bars! What I got tired with was that you;re effectively riding blind - sometimes ending up down really bad bridleways which are just a chore, and end up ruining a nice day out

E.g. thinking it would be a really good idea to go for that 30 pointer on top of Catbells and end up carrying the bike up what is effectively a scree 😉

The quality of the riding thing is definitely valid for me. They did one around the Surrey Hills, everyone was on the fireroads because that's the fastest. I'd far rather ride the singletrack, but then you're less competitive, so where's the fun?!

Marked route, ridden flat out, far more fun. You've said yourself Graham that you do quite a lot of road bits, that's not fun IMO!

My thoughts are that if I want to involve map navigation in a route then I want to be doing it somewhere that I want to ride, seeing something that I want to see and enjoying the peace and quiet of the countryside alone or with a couple of good mates.

I actually prefer to get lost whilst out riding
finding out where you are is more fun than working out where you are

E.g. thinking it would be a really good idea to go for that 30 pointer on top of Catbells and end up carrying the bike up what is effectively a scree

I think I might have organised that one? 😳
You went the wrong way - should have been carving down the scree!

I've mocked them in the past I admit that. The concept of a navigational event is very appealing to me, I've orienteered in the past and Fell Run now.

However, I prefer the thrill of an against the clock / other people event, but where you are racing the other people.

Pootling around the cotswold lanes to find some checkpoints is something I'd associate with a school / care home trip day out TBH. Maybe thats a bit harsh but it just sounds too sedate...

[i]Maybe thats a bit harsh but it just sounds too sedate... [/i]

But thats the thing with Trailquests - they can be what you want them to be. They can just add a competitive element to a ride, or be a flat-out blast.

Want to do the singletrack routes, then fine!
Want to take the road and be quicker, then fine!
Want to stop and have lunch at a pub then fine!

I should add that if you are doing it competitively then there's nothing sedate about Trailquests, especially if you are 5 miles from base and have only 15 minutes to get back within the time limit!

Trailquests can also get you to ride in areas you would never normally think of riding. I've ridden some great trails in places I would never normally have gone to.

I don't ride them because I'm not really into mass events.

As for other people I expect it's partly the map reading part, most people really struggle with maps and the idea of not using GPS e.t.c. probably put a lot of people off.

I wouldnt say events are sedate you need to be blisteringly quick on two or three hour events. In terms of giving more people a chance I think a 'pies league' running in parallel to the events might work - not too sure on which stats you'd use to find it but...

The person with the average or closest to average score gets 1000 points people either side of the average (or mean or mode is there a stats expert in the house) get a proportional of this figure. Its the same way some league scores are worked out now. The original idea I had was for a Northern Pies League where you'd need to do one event in each of the northern counties over a calender year and atleast one summer or one winter event. Eyes on the Pies spot prize for the most av score at each event.

But thats the thing with Trailquests - they can be what you want them to be. They can just add a competitive element to a ride, or be a flat-out blast.

Want to do the singletrack routes, then fine!
Want to take the road and be quicker, then fine!
Want to stop and have lunch at a pub then fine!

I should add that if you are doing it competitively then there's nothing sedate about Trailquests, especially if you are 5 miles from base and have only 15 minutes to get back within the time limit!

Well a TQ is advertised as a race.

Attracting new people (mountain bikers) to a TQ would rely on gnarr riding route choices (bonus points), beer stops (bonus points), pie stops (double bonus points) + fairly easy navigation.

That might sound flippant, but if you are wanting to attract new blood, maybe a parallel event with the emphasis on the riding/vibe rather than the nav would in time bring more interest to trailquests.

I think I might have organised that one?
You went the wrong way - should have been carving down the scree!

That's kinda what I'm saying about riding blind though, you have no idea if one direction will be better than the other unless there's a bit of local knowledge involved. The descent was a hoot for sure, but if I had chance to do it again I would go east to west!

Not using a GPS? Really?

No wonder they're not popular.

Sorry, It does sound like the red socks brigade on bikes and you don't really alter that perception MTQGraham.
1) Turn up at village hall...........etc

Well a TQ is advertised as a race.

Trail quests and racing hold no interest to me at all. Simple really.

Surrounded By Zulus - Member
My thoughts are that if I want to involve map navigation in a route then I want to be doing it somewhere that I want to ride, seeing something that I want to see and enjoying the peace and quiet of the countryside alone or with a couple of good mates.

But if it takes place on public bridleways I thought it wasn't allowed to be called a race...

Don't be a pedant.

There are lots of races/challenges whatever that use bridleways/footpaths.

You can race most places ecept SSSI maybe with landowner consent.

I already don't get enough time to ride, am not competitive (natured or fitness-wise) and don't fancy the idea of fireroad grinding between points (I think this would be prety inevitable if TQ is as I imagine). TBH, If I was going to take a day out for riding it wouldn't be to map-read or race.

Course, the other trouble here on stw is that all the people who **** on about keeping it real and getting out there with a map would have to stay away or have their bluff called if they really had to navigate their way around somewhere 😉

I'd rather poke my eyes out.

I used to do a few in the 90's, along with the odd NAMBS thing, then moved on to longer events and adventure racing, but I haven't done any competitive stuff (against others) for years bar a couple of cross and short course races.

RE the 'trailquests are boring' argument – I think when the points are set well, in a good area, there is the potential for the competitive scores to favour good riding over estate/landrover track, forest roads and tarmac. This doesn't always happen though and isn't always possible to ensure as most areas of the UK have lots of roads and vehicle tracks.

The problem more generally with trailquests is that I can go out and ride the same stuff (usually, though occasionally access is arranged to non-legal routes as OAP notes) at any other time when I feel like it. Having finished at or near the top of a few events, I'd have to say they aren't (or at least weren't) anything like the level of intensity of xc racing, so they probably don't appeal massively to that many racers (though there are a few who cross over of course and this may have changed). Navigation is neither here nor there for me – I love cartography, but I don't ride because I want to challenge my map reading ability. So their unique thing – making your own route and going around faster/further than other people do their thing, paying for it, and doing it on a set day – probably has a fairly limited appeal. Mind you, loads of people pay to do road sportives and mtb Meridas which I cannot fathom either.

One thing that I used to like (pre-internet) was the fact that you could go to an event where you had little idea what the riding would be like and discover something new. You can find out that kind of thing now at the click of a button and plan something you know you will like, and do it free of charge when the conditions are good. I've seen local events (adventure races admittedly) where the conditions have been poor and good singletrack have been trashed when usually local riders would stay off them to prevent damage. That has made me sceptical of the planning of some events, and ultimately contributed to me realising that I prefer to do my own thing.

Anyway, that was a bit of a meandering answer, but really more or less what SBZ said above.

i am a veteran of many polaris events and many tq events.
the price put me off polaris, and half a days riding round usually pretty tame locations used to leave me want something more than tq's.

Ton :Waves:

Don't look at the price of this years.

[i]Turn up at a village hall.
You will be given an A4 sized 12x8km section of 1:50k OS map with up to 36 Control Points marked on it.
You have as long as you want to plan a route between the CPs.
Go to the start marshal's desk and clock out.
You will now be given the CP values, so you might want to amend your route, or just set off anyway and improvise on the way round.
Keep watching the time. You've got 3 hours and there are penalties for getting back late.
Hand your scorecard to the finish marshal.
Hang around. Discuss your route with other people and see how your score compares.
Go home[/i]

The reason I don't enter TQs...

[b]36 Control Points[/b]

WTF? Thirty six of anything other than inches of breast is of no interest.

[b]plan a route between the CPs.[/b]

All sounds a bit middle-aged-man-in-pub telling you the best way to get from Huddersfield to Doncaster...

[b]clock out[/b]

What?

[b]given the CP values[/b]

Values? for Control Points?

[b]there are penalties for getting back late.[/b]

Eh? You penalise me for not doing it right?

Hand your scorecard to the finish marshal

[b]Hang around[/b]

No thanks, I have a life to be getting on with.

[b]Discuss your route with other people and see how your score compares.[/b]

See above.

I'm trying to make you see that the whole concept just reeks of dullness and sandals.

I've done orienteering fell running events with exactly the same format and they are only marginally less dull.

All this 'Well actually, young man, you have to ride jolly fast to get back to the start and compare your route with all the other spoddy types....

No, it just comes across as dull and I suspect that it just doesn't fit with the image or the perceived target market for mountain biking, whether correct or not.

It's all a bit Werthers Original.

hello rich mate..............have you been in jail...... 😉

Everything bajsyclel says rings true for me also, I suppose. I am a climber, walker, mountaineer and enjoy map reading and navigating, but it's a means to an end on a bike. On a bike, I just want to get out, ride and have fun, with mates. I'm probably not and have never been, organised event type material tho.

Ton: HeHe, I've been riding my bike and running.

Got visiting rights for the evening, but my sober STW probation officer in the morning will tell me my time is better spent out there.

Over your way in August for a couple of weeks, lets ride and drink beer if I don't see ya before

To be honest if I had to pick one navigation 'event' I'd like to do its probably the big welsh ride thing.

rich, i am up for the beer bit mate. 8)

Why don't you ride trailquests ?

why should i? - convince me! 🙂

(yes, i'm being a little awkward...)

I did orienteering at school and it was alright, but only because I could read a map and so beat the faster kids (I was a bit lardy then).

Did a TQ last year at wellesbourne, my teammate (pairs) failed to turn up, so I did it on my lonesome. The first control point was a nightmare, I was exactly at the point on the map, searched for 15 mins, couldn't find it, rode off. 2 mins later down the hill, I remembered along with a map, I had a cluecard as well, which stated the exact location, hidden so that a randomer wouldn't find and disturb it.

After that infuriating first point, I had a great time navigating round, seeing some interesting views and places I hadn't been, nice bridleways and villages. Pushed myself so that I was miles away from the finish nearing the end, so I had to pegg it back for 35 mins at full speed, the hardest sustained ride I have ever done. I definitely want to do more, I have moved back to London for uni, although coming back up to the midlands this summer. Will definitely do more TQs in the future, and have all the MTQs in my google calendar, so if I'm free I'll be heading to the local village hall and signing up.

I agree with the Picto, richpips and njee20 stance really, for me it's about riding ace singletrack as fast as my chubby little legs will propel me (so not very quick then) and the thought of biffing around on my own looking at a map and then riding down some uninspiring trails because they'll get me back to the beardie geography teacher to mark my homework just doesn't really appeal

EDIT: waves at Picto and swears about a small time trialling obsession that seems to be growing in my mind 😳

I used to do them,enjoy them and not do too badly in the results.
But in those days, other than XC racing it was the only thing going. The last TQ that I did, left me believing that the guys who rode it for fun have moved on, leaving the harcore of supefit fell runner types, sad to say it felt like a different sport.

not done one before but i'm interested in giving one of the NEMBO league ones a go as they'll be closest to me - thanks for the heads up MidlandTrailquestsGraham

I nearly got mown down by a pair of abusive knobs doing a TQ on my local bridleways in the Peak a few years back. Idiots riding straight at you in a drooling frenzy of desperation to reach the next checkpoint don't do a lot to spread the love. I'm sure it's not typical of TQer behaviour, but most of the competitors we saw that day seemed grumpy and po-faced and it's put me off the things permanently.

That and seeing people wearing Tracksters in OAP's recent checkpoint photo collection - surely there's some sort of law against that these days 😉

Today's mid calf socks are tomorrows tracksters.

Racing is good, riding with a map is good. Using a map to find the fastest (rather then most enjoyable) route between points doesn't really appeal.

I've done a polaris and a couple of trailquests. The best one was a night time event in Cannock Chase about 10 years ago.

I'd rather do an MTBO or TQ than riding around a muddy paddock for 12/24 hours.

Diffrn't strokes for diffrn't folks.

Once or twice a year there will be a trail quest around some of my local trails. On these days you can pretty much guarantee that an army of balding lycra wearing men in their forties with bun bags, salomon trainers, G-shock watches and red buff round their head will rampage through the forest as if they were (at least in their minds) the SAS storming a foreign embassy.

On at least one occasion I've exchanged some choice phrases with some of them as they took exception to people riding their bikes the wrong way (downhill) on "their" route (a downhill track).

I don't think you could pay me to be in room with a group of questers so I really don't think I'll be partaking anytime soon.

No appeal for me. I have done a couple of races but finished midfield - but enjoyed the mass event aspect. I am a map geek but like to use maps to look for the best places to ride not the quickest routes. it just seems like neither fish nor foul to me

The mtb orienteering event - felt the check points were too close together, it was difficult to go fast between points because the distances were so short and it was easy to miss a turning.

Normally MTB orienteering (where you have a fixed order of checkpoints to get and quickest wins, rather than get the highest score within a fixed time) addresses many of the criticisms of others, as with good planning you do get to ride the interesting tracks. That's a combination of having a more fixed route, with checkpoints in the middle of interesting tracks, thus forcing you down them, and the use of specialised maps which actually show the single track. Because of the fixed route, you can also make use of a much smaller area. If anything, taking part in an event like this can actually enhance your enjoyment of an area, as it becomes a challenge to ride tracks at speed which wouldn't be that difficult if just riding slowly.

wearing a cardigan with buttons on the front

I'd love to do one but all my spare time is spent looking for a cardigan that has buttons on the back.

Don't own a Marin, don't have a beard and don't wear tracksters.

So I'm out.

(Actually I have done a few before and won a category once)

Yes, Trailquests do have an image problem.

I have never done one (although weirdly I organised one for a corporate games once) and what puts me off is that you don't have extra points for writing down the numbers of any trains that you see en route.

Now that would get you some new members !!

sometimes navigating the diversions at afan is enough of a trailquest

Ive read all these comments, and the threads before on the same issue.

Ive wondered the same thing and feel that its a change of attitude that has a lot to do with it.

It seems a lot of riders only go riding if:

- They are following a trail center route.
- They are following a waymarked trail / mag route.
- They are being led round.
- They dont have to plan anything.

Look at the number of threads we get on here where people say "where can I ride" - they dont think of looking at a map.

Look at the way trail centers have grown in popularity - its all on a plate for you with graded runs and a one way system.

A lot of people cant read maps and now use a GPS in their car.

People also want to ride socially, look at the popularity of things like 12/24 hr races. They are very social, for most its Beer/BBQ/camping with a bit of mountain bikeing thrown in.

People are also very unlikley to be self reliant and self responsible. When faced with a challange the default action for most people now is to look for someone else to sort it out, or tell them what to do and how to do it. Planning their own route to a time and doing it on their own is so different to pretty much everything else they now do in life.

I love navigator events, I love maps and am happy riding them on my own. For years I did all the Trail Break ones, and miss them now they have stopped. Their numbers dwindled from a few hundred down to a few tens in the end. They tried using GPS's, doing them in the evening from a pub and changing the format. Didnt work out.

People seem to want to put less in for more return. Working at your fun is seemed not to be fun.

I applaud your efforts at spreading the word about the event, but I think most people unsuited and unable to do them, which is a shame.

No appeal for me. I have done a couple of races but finished midfield - but enjoyed the mass event aspect. I am a map geek but like to use maps to look for the best places to ride not the quickest routes. it just seems like neither fish nor foul to me

oh shit. 😯

i like riding as fast as i can (in events/races), stopping to read a map isn't in the plan. i can read a map and enjoy looking at them and planning routes for something different, paticularly if im visiting a new area. i have no interest at all in doing a trailquest.

It needs new clothes doesn't it? Literally and metaphorically, even the name sucks like a Dyson - anything with the word 'Quest' in it sounds like some awful, dungeons and dragons nerdfest.

Jazz it up, make it interesting, give prizes for stuff other than collecting points, add some 'special stages', re-invent it or live with the reality that old, tired formats attract the same people who are comfortable with them.

Go back to first principles, ask yourself what the events are trying to achieve then find a newer, fresher way of doing, which doesn't reek of Tracksters and mapboards.

Incorporate modern technology - GPS, geotagging, digital photos. Make it interesting, Make it original. Call it something new and contemporary, make it something different...

It's all a bit Werthers Original.

+1

I rode the dark and white winter series last season for the first time. Overall very enjoyable.

The thing that would put me off doing it again is the quality of the riding, it seems to be often around places with not much off road riding. And then, crucially for me, you seem to be able to win by staying on the road as much as possible and riding a bike with drop bars and then running the last few metres to a checkpoint. If there was a way to make the riding more technically challenging, and the points system to reward more technical riding, it would definitely improve it for me.

All sports have their sub-genres. I'm a climber and I enjoy long multi-pitch mountain routes but don't enjoy indoor wall climbing even though it's a valid sub-genre of the sport.
Same goes with biking - there's many 'disciplines' to the sport, XC, trail, freeride, DH, trials and so on. It's simple really, what one person likes the next ain't necessarily going to.
For me, biking is about a 'flow' and not about stop-start or maximum heart rates etc (not that TQ is about the latter).
Each to their own, one is not necessarily 'better' than the other that's all.

I know that whenever trailquests get mentioned on STW there are people who like to sneer at them

And I enjoyed doing it.

After dabbling with TQ a few years ago, I'm back doing dark and white's winter series just gone, and the summer series this year. I race allsorts - 24hr, short xc, triathlon, road running, fell etc...

Obviously they're all different, but trailquests are possibly my fave - the fastest 2/3 hour segments of my life, because you need to use your head as well as lungs and legs, you're on it all the time.

There's so much bobbins in these threads, and crikey's post above just doesn't make any sense whatsoever! Yes, you're penalised for being late - or as you put it [i]'doing it wrong'[/i]. It's what makes it a challenge, otherwise it becomes a navigational day out & the organisers will never go home. Absolutely, there should be a lot more of that in the world!

Anyway, there's loads of reasons I like Trailquests/MTBO's/whatever they're called at the moment:-

[list]
[*]You need to use your head. There's way more than just navigating between points - you use gradients and flat areas to your advantage. I tend to create a general concept in the first 2-3 minutes after being given the map (dark and white events you get the map with CP's marked as your time starts), then get out picking up points. Navigation is an on the fly exercise - I never stop riding to navigate, it's all done on the move[/*]

[*]It's exciting & fast - you don't know how many points someone else might accumulate. I hammer myself, the 2-3 hours is absolutely flat out, and as mentioned, you'll not ride harder when tired as in the last 15 mins of a TQ![/*]

[*]They are what you want them to be - if you don't want to ride hard, don't, just have a good ride navigating yourself around[/*]

[*]They open up new areas - There are bits of the white peak I'd not ridden before which I will do now.[/*]

[*]They don't all start in church halls 😉 [/*]

[*]They're cheap - £10-15 for the dark and white events[/*]

[*]There's a big range of abilities & ages - very few bearded people, and there's a fair mix of the sexes :)[/*]

[*]They're friendly events, way more so than a lot of xc racers. You don't have to be social though, you can go straight home afterwards if you want[/*]

[/list]

There's loads, I might add more as they come to me.

There's an appeal - I've done one before, and I've done many Polarises, but mostly it seems like a good ride spoiled by having mess about with a map. The best fun I've ever had on them was mad dashes for the finish line with minutes to spare. Or an hour and a half to spare with 20 miles of off-road and a mountain in the way...

I remember the Brecon Polaris a few years ago, it resulted in me TTing along the canal towpath at ludicrous speeds on a sunny Sunday afternoon weaving in and out of the dog walkers most irresponsibly, and tearing through town as illegally as possible like a New York courier being chased by a helicopter. It's amazing what you can find the energy for after 2 days of riding 🙂

Rubbish riding.

Actually, one of the reasons I like them is that they make riding on less good areas fun. Living in the S of England I don't have regular access to the sort of terrain where I would want to go for a an epic day ride, but I did a 3 hour Trail Trax event the other day and got a really good work out just S of Basingstoke, and it was fun!

Before I had kids I used to do loads of TQs and Polaris (and MTBO), but Polaris went downhill in the early 2000s. TQ used to be fantastic when I went round the country doing them and discovered The Lakes, The Dales, Wales and Scotland by bike. But now that I've ridden most places, they don't have quite the same appeal - and I'm also less keen on driving for miles to get to events (so I now have fun discovering smaller areas in more detail by orienteering).

A trailquest is a race, therefor the point is to win, not have fun.

Biking should be fun, therefor no racing.

I like maps, I like navigating new places, I like riding fun trails, I like riding new fun trails I've found on a map. I have no intrerst in riding the quickest route between a collection of points other people want me to go to.

Add in my experiences of meeting trailquesters/Polarisers out and about in a variety of locations - range from grumpy to downright obnoxious. No response to a greeting, riding like a t!t past other (non bikey) trail users, and the sheer number of times I've had a gate slammed in my face when I've literally been within touching distance of it - that's just ignorant.

So to conclude - simply not interested.

I've only ridden one trailquest event - the Clent Canter as a pair with my bro. We did well and came 2nd overall I think.
It was good fun I must admit and despite going into the event for a bit of a laugh, we got really competitive as soon as we started.
It's a different slant on mtbing and can open your eyes to trails you would never think of including in a ride in the area that look pointless on a map, but are sometimes little gems.
O.K. it's not for the extreme sports end of the mtb rider spectrum, but once in a while as an alternative type of day out on the bike, why not?
A bit of tactics and planning added to the excitement I thought and boy, does the last hour go quickly!!!

Add in my experiences of meeting trailquesters/Polarisers out and about in a variety of locations - range from grumpy to downright obnoxious.

have we met?

Yeah, there are a lot of old fogeys there. Also a lot of people who are only out for a laugh. Which is fine, but it's hardly a race then is it?

I love to race because I love the imperative to push myself to ride really fast. You can do this on a TQ but you have to keep stopping to look at a map which really breaks the flow of riding. It's a skill of course to read maps quickly under pressure, but I always find that rather stressful.