Why 32:16?
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Why 32:16?

36 Posts
34 Users
0 Reactions
86 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Instead of 20:10, 30:15, 40:20, etc. etc.

Is it something to do with balancing ground clearance with chain life/reducing chain slipping? Or did some bearded bloke just decide that 32:16 would be the standard one day?


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.sheldonbrown.com/singlespeed.html ]The god father speaks [/url]


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 10:54 pm
Posts: 9
Full Member
 

Maybe because most middle rings are 32 and that makes it an easy conversion? Plus someone told me that 32 is the smallest you can have on the middle ring position.


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Standard middle chainring size is 32 teeth innit.


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 10:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ok, cheers all.


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 11:02 pm
Posts: 25815
Full Member
 

is it because they're weak, both physically and emotionally ?

34:15 is where it's at

(err, in the new forest) 😳


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 11:19 pm
Posts: 5139
Full Member
 

and using the middle ring position gives you the best shot at a good chainline


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 11:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Job 32:16

Shall I wait, because they do not speak, Because they stop and no longer answer?


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 11:32 pm
 igm
Posts: 11833
Full Member
 

Is that because they are so far behind and knackered on the climbs?


 
Posted : 12/11/2010 11:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

igm - Member
Is that because they are so far behind and knackered on the climbs?

😆 Best post of the week!!!


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:00 am
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

igm - Member
Is that because they are so far behind and knackered on the climbs?

No, they hang back out of consideration.

Gears are for the old and frail and it would be impolite to barge in front of such a person.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

20:10 - ever tried fitting a 11t cog to the middle of a cassette body?
30:15 - doable but would need to buy a new ring inted of current middle
40:20 - not much in the way of log clearance

it works and if fine so leave it. 😛


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 10:37 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I have weeds knees and thus run 32:18

[i]"The weak shall inherit the 18 toothed cog"[/i]


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

another 32:18 pansy holds his hand up in shame.

i do live in sheffield tho! - please understand and forgive me.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have 42/20


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 11:38 am
Posts: 418
Full Member
 

32:18 North Wales


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because many ss evangelists like to have 'rules' and requirements so that those not in the clique can be laughed at.

Or just because 32 is standard and 2:1ish is the ratio at works for most people.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most people blindly put up with standard gearing without ever knowing about gear inches or that 42/21 is the same as 32/16 or 60/30.I can remember pouring over gear charts in my youth before going to the shop and picking my choice of sprockets off the wall display to get exactly the gears I wanted,those were the days


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:33 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

bigger is better in terms of wear/ component longevity

smaller is better in terms of weight/ clearence

32:16 is a nice comprimise

[url= http://surlybikes.com/blog/spew/3_-_single-speed_drivetrains/ ]interesting surly article here[/url]


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

32:17 here.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 12:44 pm
Posts: 751
Full Member
 

36:16 in flat old Suffolk.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 1:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ridden 2:1 for years but have always prefered the additional overlap and reduced wear of 36/18 and the 18T sprockets, King in particular, look nicer imo.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 7321
Free Member
 

36:18 here.

I had a 36 ring on the bike and the singlespeed kit I got had a 16 and an 18 ring. I chose based on the 2:1 ratio. It works for me.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 2:00 pm
Posts: 227
Free Member
 

32:17 in Cannuckshire in the wet
32:16 in the dry


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 2:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

32:22 ftw.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 2:10 pm
 jonb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

48:16 here, but that's on the road and have the standard 32:16 on my mtb.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've tried using the 32:16 on my conventional gears for a whole ride just to see how I get on, I can appreciate the simplicity of not having to think about gear changes, I also appreciate it can present a challenge of different approach and way of thinking altogether when riding over techy terrain, up hill switchbacks etc..

But the ride to get off road is a few miles for me and I found that utterly monotonous, having to freewheel on flat areas, would only go SS if I was driving the bike to the location.

Tempted by the thought of a 3 speed Sturmey Archer though. 😉


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 9
Full Member
 

But the ride to get off road is a few miles for me and I found that utterly monotonous, having to freewheel on flat areas,

Yep - it'll do that! I ride 3-5 miles on road each way to get to my rides, and it's a little tedious, but it's a price I'm willing to pay. It is pretty nice scenery on the ride, so that makes it tolerable. Having no other option also helps! When I occasionally commuted on 32:16 (if I was going out at lunchtime/after work) then I hated riding through town.

And riding 32:16 on a geared bike just somehow isn't the same. I found it a lot easier on the true singlespeed.


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 3:08 pm
Posts: 10485
Free Member
 

32:16 on my SS MTB and 42:16 on my SS commuter, that's what they came with from the shop. MTB one suits me just fine, road might go 46:16 to make things a little more fun


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 656
Full Member
 

because everyone else does....no i mean i chose 32:16....people must have copied me!


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 8:11 pm
Posts: 13369
Full Member
 

34:17 - Coz it is what I had


 
Posted : 13/11/2010 8:18 pm
Posts: 6317
Free Member
 

Because thats meant for girls.
42/18 on my SS Cx in the not so flat FoD.
No off to chop a few trees to BBQ a boar.


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 5:52 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3258
Free Member
 

when I had a 32:16 singlespeed I found that it was only any good for undulating woods and stuff. It was rubbish on the road or anywhere that required continuous pedaling for any length of time, spins out too soon and makes you look like coco the clown. So I gave it to my brother, he loves it.

Kev


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

30:20 on the Mendips. You know what? I can actually climb a lot of stuff (until I go blue). I tried 32:17 and got fed up with the stopping and walking on long climbs. Each to their own.


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 149
Free Member
 

32:17 here on 26" and 32:19 on 29" get up most things around here when I am on a good day


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 6:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1) 36/19 for me in hilly Devon
2)it was the size of chain ring I had lying around
3) it's gear inches that are important sayeth the prophet Sheldon Brown.


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2:1 of a 36-18 here up in Yorkshire 🙂


 
Posted : 14/11/2010 7:01 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!