Which Cycling Satna...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Which Cycling Satnav?

13 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
78 Views
Posts: 576
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm not interested in performance data, I just want to be able to create, load-up and follow routes.

What's the successor to the Edge Touring, but less flakey?

 
Posted : 06/08/2018 6:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wahoo Elemnt. Mapping for a 3 day, 100 mile off road loop in the lakes was spot on. Battery needed a charge every day/day and a half. Can't recommend highly enough.

 
Posted : 06/08/2018 6:50 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7371
Full Member
 

Obvious options are Wahoo Elemnt/Bolt, Lezyne Mega XL/C, Garmin Edge 1000/1030/820/520 Plus. All have pros and cons. (Wahoo wins for general ease of ownership, Lezyne wins for battery life, Garmin wins for quality of navigation, IMO, YMMV etc.)

 
Posted : 06/08/2018 8:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Garmin Etrex 20x. Probably similar to the Edge Touring in terms of navigation, but maybe more reliable. And better battery life.

 
Posted : 06/08/2018 8:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i recently went from garmin to wahoo and couldn't be happier. bought mine off there website as they had a discount code last week, don't seem to get deals on the wahoo stuff anywhere

 
Posted : 06/08/2018 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I recently picked up a Lezyne Mega XL for the very same reason, what appealed was the price compared to an equivalent Garmin, the claimed 46hr battery life and the fact you can mount it either portrait or landscape.

So far very pleased with it, easy to set-up via the phone app, I shall use the mapping function for the first time this weekend.

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 7:29 am
Posts: 5297
Full Member
 

In terms of navigation, didn't the Wahoo come under a lot of criticism because it wouldn't display the track if you wandered away from it, rendering it pretty much useless if you get lost? Or is that something they've fixed? I'm interested in getting one, but that's really off-putting.

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 8:39 am
Posts: 17728
Full Member
 

In terms of navigation, didn’t the Wahoo come under a lot of criticism because it wouldn’t display the track if you wandered away from it, rendering it pretty much useless if you get lost? Or is that something they’ve fixed? I’m interested in getting one, but that’s really off-putting.

If you go off course by quite a distance &/or a road is closed & you need to work out a diversion, then zooming out will often lose you a lot of map details - to the point where there isn't enough detail to work out quite where you need to go.
Depending on your usage requirements, this might or might not be an issue, I recently bought an Elemnt Bolt; I did consider whether the map thing would be a problem, but for 99% of my navigational requirements I just load a course & follow it.
If i get really stuck, I'll just get my phone out & use Google Maps to get me back on track - offline map download means no issue with being in an area with no signal.

The Garmin devices - particularly the 'plus' ones will give you much more scope for navigating 'on the fly' but after no end of problems with my Edge 500 I'd have rather navigated with a map & clipboard mounted on my handlebars than give them anymore of my money.

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 8:48 am
Posts: 5297
Full Member
 

Fair enough. To be fair 99% of the time I use an Edge 500 which is great, but virtually useless for any kind of meaningful navigation, and certainly has its own quirks. So I expect it would be a massive improvement on that. I was hoping the full mapping capabilities would make it ideal for touring and stuff too though, and I'd be able to use one GPS for all, but that I'm not so sure about.

To weigh in on the OPs question. I'm using an Etrex 20 for navigational duties (which it's excellent for). AA batteries with a life of around 25 hours make it ideal for multi-day stuff. Quite large. Need to be careful with the mounts. Controls and software are a bit clunky and basic for cycling. But dependable and robust, it is. Think the newer ones now have Bluetooth and stuff, although I'm not sure how use-able the touchscreens are?

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 8:59 am
Posts: 3438
Full Member
 

Garmin edge 800 second hand off here.

Its been ace!

A pain to learn how to get routes and maps on, easy to use to navigate and when lost to find where I am.

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 9:00 am
 IHN
Posts: 19694
Full Member
 

Wahoo Elemnt here, route planning using RideWithGPS. Ease of use is excellent, on-road navigation is excellent; if you go off route it's pretty easy to get back on again if you realise early enough (and the flashing red LEDs and beeping noise make it pretty obvious).

Off-road navigation is pretty good, easily good enough to indicate the track/direction on the ground that you should be following. If there's no obvious track on the ground and/or you're really out in the wilds, it's okay but probably needs a map as well (but you should have a map if you're really in the wilds anyway).

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 9:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it’s okay but probably needs a map as well (but you should have a map if you’re really in the wilds anyway).

I tend to use Viewranger loaded with offline OS map tiles these days. Good or bad it might be, but I've not carried a paper map when on the bike for years.

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 9:28 am
Posts: 5177
Full Member
 

Most of the bikepackers (me included) use a hiking style garmin for nav - Oregon, Dakota or etrex

I've had an Oregon for 8 years now, love it. Use for biking, walking and the motorbike

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 10:07 am
Posts: 6688
Full Member
 

I moved from Garmin to the Wahoo and not looking back, use it on both MTB and road bike.

 
Posted : 07/08/2018 11:54 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!