waterproof socks th...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] waterproof socks that actually are waterproof?

29 Posts
26 Users
0 Reactions
201 Views
Posts: 943
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Are there any?

Mine seem to be like normal socks, but more expensive. [sealskinz and dexshell]

Is there a knack to this?


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:07 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

sealskins are waterproof, ime, but they do let water in via the hole in the top.

I've worn long waterproof trousers and ended up with shoes swimming in water but still had dry feet.

wearing them with shorts or 3/4's my feet stay warm as although they get wet inside it's not a constant flow so it warms up and my feet don't get cold.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I got some from Aldi. Tested them Sunday, in very wet conditions. Worked excellently, until the rain was biblical and water ran down legs into the socks. There is no way around that of course.

They are £9.99 at the moment in store.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All socks that I've seen have a big hole in them!

Unless you get something like knee length SealSkinz then any sock will let water in when they are immersed. It may only be a little bit with the better makes but each time will let more in. Also if you get bits of grit in your shoe then you need to remove it ASAP as it will wear a hole in your sock pretty quickly.

Generally I don't worry about it - socks that act like wet suits will retain any water that ingresses but your body will warm the water up. What you don't want is a flow of water over your feet with water that you've warmed up being replaced by fresh cold water.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:15 am
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

Wwaswas +1, all waterproof socks have a big hole at the top. I've never had a pair of sealskinz actually leak.

Same applies to waterproof boots, although some people claim success with drysuit cuffs worn the wrong way around to divert water over the top of the sock.

I've got some polypropylene socks for sailing which are great as they don't retain any water, the opposite idea to whitestone's idea that they should work like a wetsuit, they're freezing cold when stood in a puddle, but dry out almost immediately, which is great in a goretex boot which keeps most of the water out but allows the damp sock to evaporate out.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:20 am
Posts: 13741
Full Member
 

I use knee length sealskinz and a couple of wraps of black (you can use other colours) electrical tape to keep them in place, wear thin pair of merino socks underneath for toasty toes

No problems


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Don't bother. Walkers have had the solution for years - big merino wool walking socks.  You can be down at minus ten and have warm feet.   If you get wet feet in cold conditions they do the job of being wet-but-warm.

I swear by brigdales myself and ride in all temperatures.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:24 am
Posts: 4267
Full Member
 

My newer Seal Skins have a righter rubber seal inside the cuff, which is better at keeping the water out. Probably not as effective as a drysuit cuff or taping it up, but works ok. Knee length would work even better.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 11:11 am
Posts: 4170
Free Member
 

The knee length Dexshell's have a seal at the top. Probably not to the level of a full drysuit but good enough if you have waterproof trousers over them.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 11:29 am
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

Try these over your socks?

https://www.gripgrab.com/products/cyclingaiter


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 11:34 am
Posts: 943
Free Member
Topic starter
 

those look good but they want £15 postage!

For that reason, I'm out.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 1:11 pm
Posts: 943
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Found them on ebay...


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 1:18 pm
 geex
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is there a knack to this?

Yes. Wear a thin pair of cotton sports socks under the sealskins. this stops the socks getting damp from your own sweat and to some extent the inner socks cuff soaks up the small amount of wet coming in through the top of the sock. In extremely wet weather trousers that cover the cuff stop them being filled up from above.
also. don't do your shoes up tight, but that's for circulation and keeeping your feet warm when your shos are soaked through rather than keeping water out of your sealskins.
I've worn genuine sealskins for well over 15 years on every proper ride wet or dry summer or winter and found Aldi's ones slightly better than genuine Sealskins.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Water doesn't matter. All socks have a hole in them. Sealskins let you get water round your feet but it will warm up.

The problem is wind. If you are out in cold windy conditions then your feet will get cold.Solution is to accept wet feet but keep the wind off them. Overshoes or suchlike.

These are as good as you need.

https://www.inmotionproducts.com/shopdisplayproducts.asp?id=94&cat=OZZO+Cycling+Overshoes


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 1:24 pm
Posts: 822
Free Member
 

I wore sealskinz with a pair of gaiters over them but under my knee pads one winter. Looked absolutely stupid but kept my feet dry. One of my worst mornings on an uplift was with waterproof socks holding water and not having to do enough pedaling to warm up. Stuck normal socks on in the afternoon and although wet were so much more pleasant.

Last winter solution was waterproof trousers with a fairly tight cuff over the waterproof socks which worked too.

Am currently preferring the fit and feel of the Aldi ones to Sealskinz.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 1:30 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

Those gripgrabs are going on my christmas list!


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 1:36 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

thisisnotaspoon

Wwaswas +1, all waterproof socks have a big hole at the top. I’ve never had a pair of sealskinz actually leak.

Make that +2.

One thing though, make sure you get a relaxed fit, not a tight one.

Another thing to watch for is to make sure that some numpty has not pierced the toes for the swing tags in the store...


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 4:41 pm
Posts: 5177
Full Member
 

I have a knee length pair of sealskinz and a pair of the Aldi ones

I wore a thin pair of synthetic socks for a bikepacking trip in the lakes that I knew would be wet. Wore a waterproof jacket and shorts, but normal socks

I find they get wet anyway, so if I can keep them walk enough (wasn't particularly cold) then I'm OK. I put on dry socks for bed, but put wet socks back on the next day, they soon warm up


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 4:48 pm
 nuke
Posts: 5763
Full Member
 

Ive no issues with sealskins if working within the limitations of the hole at the top....with this in mind, ive found the longer ones better and, if particularly wet, ive got rubber wristbands (think livestrong charity bands and the like) and put them on over the top of the sealskin socks near the top to improve the seal (does depend on how massive your calves are though)


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 4:57 pm
Posts: 6317
Free Member
 

Dexshell seem longer lasting than Sealskin. I use lengths of motorcycle inner tube as a gasket. Just like those things in the pick but free.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 5:13 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7371
Full Member
 

The cuff of a sock is not a hole. Basic topology 🙂


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 5:43 pm
Posts: 12507
Free Member
 

I have goretex bootliners. Ex mod. I use them to inspect bridges which involves standing and moveing around alot in water.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 6:21 pm
 brwr
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have sealskins and have had success with cutting the cuffs off a pair of Wilko heavy duty rubber gloves and using them over the top of the sock. Nice cheap solution. Think I read about it on here a while ago.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 6:27 pm
Posts: 1513
Free Member
 

Sealskinz work up to a point, but when you start riding along trails that have turned into streams they do wet out, as I found out this weekend.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 7:47 pm
 nach
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Camaro neoprene. Even the thin ones are so warm you'll sweat in them midwinter though. Warm and wet rather than cold and wet.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 8:19 pm
Posts: 9069
Free Member
 

Ordered a new pair of Sealskins from Merlin earlier for ~£5, along with some other winter gear, they have 10% discount applied to basket for some brands including Sealskinz and Funkier.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 8:26 pm
Posts: 44146
Full Member
 

I never have this issue with water running down my legs into the waterproof socks - maybe because I have trousers / tights over the socks?  Worn them in some very wet conditions.  I love them.  One thing i do tho is get them slightly too big so you don't stretch them too much.  I wonder if that makes them last better?


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 9:07 pm
Posts: 2865
Full Member
 

I've stopped using waterproof socks as a sock full of water is grim. After a few commutes getting to work and being able to pour water out I put some holes in the bottom for drainage. Worked better at keeping the cold and grimness away. I ended up with elastic bands on the cuffs. Now I just use a couple of pairs of socks to stay warm and just get wet.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 9:48 pm
Posts: 65918
Full Member
 

Very pleased with my dexshells. Fit's really important though, and high tops will always work better.

even if they leak, like my knackered ancient sealskinz, it's still miles better than the alternative- sure you get wet feet but you'd have definitely got that anyway, the difference is you get one dose of water that you can warm up, instead of a constant fresh stream


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:00 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

IIRC Sealskinz used to use the same membrane as Dexshells until they each went their own way.


 
Posted : 13/11/2018 10:06 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!