Want to feel old? 2...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Want to feel old? 2006 is now retro, apparently.

27 Posts
23 Users
0 Reactions
83 Views
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

https://www.pinkbike.com/news/11-retro-downhill-bikes-from-the-australian-state-downhill-championships.html

That Giant is the badger's nadgers, though.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 12:36 pm
Posts: 8750
Full Member
 

2006 was almost 15 years ago. There are miniature humans walking around now who weren't even born in 2006.

It is nice to look at the bikes though. Wouldn't want to ride any of them. I didn't even want to ride my 2006 bike in 2007.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 12:45 pm
 ctk
Posts: 1811
Free Member
 

Pre 2000 would be a better cut off imo.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 12:47 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

That Giant is the badger’s nadgers, though.

I hope you mean the Warner-esque MCM and not the dullsville one from 2005.

Of all of those, the Shaun Palmer Intense has aged the best I reckon.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 12:50 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I hope you mean the Warner-esque MCM and not the dullsville one from 2005.

Of course.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

I be tempted to race something like this, (I still have my 2000 turner dhr hanging in the garage) then I remember how bad bikes were back then.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 1:05 pm
Posts: 4696
Free Member
 

Try ID'ing young people for alcohol and realising they were born after the year 2000.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 1:07 pm
Posts: 7540
Full Member
 

The Spesh Demo still looks like it could do the business.

Most of the others look way too short with really high BBs.

My oldest bike is a 2004 Stumpjumper hardtail.

I use it on the turbo. It already has rigid forks, I think if i put drops on it it would look like a modern roadbike


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 1:13 pm
Posts: 135
Free Member
 

Used to have a Giant MCM990 back in the day. Full Xt Judy Sl. Bought it 97 or 98 so its doing well given its age


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 1:21 pm
Posts: 13330
Full Member
 

That 222 doesn't look as dated as the rest to my eyes.
The Warner Giant is clearly a lovely bit of kit though.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 1:31 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

I'd say the DH9 looks the least dated tbh, pretty slack up front.

It's funny how squished they all look, my Shore is exactly the same and it looks terrible. Thankfully it rides better than it looks.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 4:54 pm
Posts: 1794
Full Member
 

Mmmm

My bimble bike is a 2006 (I think) orange 5 pro hope......


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 4:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Spesh Demo still looks like it could do the business.

I lusted after a 2005-2006ish Demo 8, even a 9 back in the day. The LBS wouldn't / couldn't sell me. Apparently, and I say apparently because I've never trusted this lbs very much, Spesh at the time said there was no real call for them in the UK, so they only let a couple come here and you had to put your order in months before the new models were released. In the end the guy in the shop put his arm around me and whispered "sorry, I've ridden one, they're rubbish".

They weren't really DH bikes during that era, they were in the more fashionable, at the time, Freeride segment, so they weighed an absolute tonne, even by the standards of the day. The Big Hit, or Big Shit as they were sometimes known was the DH bike and that wasn't well liked either.

I actually sat on a Demo8 once at Cwmcarn, the owner admitted he only wanted it because of 'Roam' and the like, it was slow, rattly and prone to flexing, still looked so, so cool.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 5:03 pm
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

I had a Demo 7, it came with a Marzocchi 66 fork with a 1.5" steerer. I replaced it with a Boxxer and the bike ended up about two pounds lighter.

Yes, that's a front mech. And yes, it had top tube, seat tube, down tube, down tube to seat tube tube, seat tube to top tube tube, a top tube brance, and an extra set of chainstays above the swingarm.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 5:06 pm
Posts: 17106
Full Member
 

680 bars?

My shopper has 740s and that feels impossibly narrow.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course the DH ‘Daddy’ of that era seems criminally unrepresented.

Maybe they were just too fast to photo on the day or maybe their reputation for being a bit fragile has meant none survive... but if there wasn’t a bright green Iron Horse Sunday there is be amazed.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 6:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My current daily beater is a 2006 Pace RC200. Works a treat, like they say, age is just a number.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 7:07 pm
Posts: 1613
Full Member
 

2006 Stumpy was my main bike and only full susser until last year. The bang up to date bike that replaced it is so much better at flattering my limited abilities and to be honest I think I am still learning how to ride it but I wasn't really that much slower on the stumpy and it gave me a hell of a lot of fun.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 7:30 pm
Posts: 32265
Full Member
 

My Soul is 2005....


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 7:32 pm
Posts: 17106
Full Member
 

I’ve spent a lot of time on here extolling the virtues of single pivot Marins.

After a summer of riding modern bikes I can confirm that it is indeed a twitchy, wallowy piece of shit.

How I set a lot of my koms on it I don’t know. Even riding it to the shops feels like I’m going to die.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 8:41 pm
 Bazz
Posts: 1987
Full Member
 

My full susser is still a 2006 Kona Dawg, still puts a smile on my face and isn't likely to get upgraded anytime soon either.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 8:51 pm
Posts: 15261
Full Member
 

I had this circa 2006:

Must have been an 02/03ish frame?
Heavy, overcomplicated a bit big for me TBH... Loved it.

Glad to see there's still at least one being raced somewhere a decade and a half later...


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 8:53 pm
Posts: 8750
Full Member
 

I’ve spent a lot of time on here extolling the virtues of single pivot Marins.

That's the problem with this place sometimes. People will sing the praises of whatever they're using. Bikes, suspension, tyres or whatever. Despite having never used anything newer and vastly improved.

Not picking on you in particular I've never seen your Marin posts.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 8:56 pm
Posts: 6575
Full Member
 

Full on retro nerd here. The debate has been done to death but the overlords of retro quite rightly keep the cut off as 1998 (If I had my way it'd be 1995). Mid 2000's are just old bikes.


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 9:00 pm
 Pyro
Posts: 2400
Full Member
 

That 222 doesn’t look as dated as the rest to my eyes.

As someone had noted in the PB comments, it's still very much a current model for Orange...


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 9:14 pm
Posts: 1612
Free Member
 

2006/7 is peak retro for me as it's when I first seriously got into MTB. But like someone said we need the Iron horse Sunday there for me to feel acute pangs of nostalgia

I remember the 2008 moelfre uplift like it was yesterday, so many Big hits, Sundays, 224s, commy supreme FRs and box like V10s getting scratched to shit on that old farm trailer


 
Posted : 22/09/2020 9:19 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

The Big Hit, or Big Shit as they were sometimes known was the DH bike and that wasn’t well liked either.

There was nothing wrong with Big Hits, they were just the Citroen Saxo "clit car" segment of the mtb market.

Yes, that’s a front mech. And yes, it had top tube, seat tube, down tube, down tube to seat tube tube, seat tube to top tube tube, a top tube brance, and an extra set of chainstays above the swingarm.

What was with all the extra stays? I could never figure out what was going on there.


 
Posted : 23/09/2020 3:13 am
Posts: 3190
Free Member
 

Citroen Saxo “clit car”

Errrr.... "Renault clito" surely?


 
Posted : 23/09/2020 3:44 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!