[Closed] Thoughts please on Commencal Meta 5.5

What size is it

Very fun bike that is massively capable. I'd want a warranty though unless it is dirt cheap.

It's a large (for an almost 6 footer). I did wonder about size...

Full shop warranty with it.

i never liked mine. sold the frame and bought a 456 - much better. shame i spent £600 to find this out.

Great going down but can feel cramped when climbing. At 5'10 a medium feels much to small for me to use as a all day bike, the large is much better but gives me no standover clearance. They're also a bit heavy.

I'd avoid the 2009 ones personally. Even if warrantied it's going to be a ball ache if it goes el cracko when you're out on a ride. Great bike though, really good fun to rag about on 😀

2009 Meta 5.5. Not had one but have some advice:

What warranty does it come with? Can you live without it for a month or two if the warranty is required? Beaware that the distributer changed since this was imported and the shop will have to deal with Commencal direct for any replacement (I'm in that boat at the moment - again). Replacement last time took 13 weeks. Hoping for better this time.

2010 onwards are much much more relialbe (apparently).

Check, double check, then check again that the frame hasnt any cracks in it, 2009 wasnt a great year for commencal. Id be very cautious if it looks like its take a beating too.

Blimey - glad I asked, all good stuff.

Anyone got any photo's they want to share of them (or the broken bike disasters they might become!)

2007 Model
[img] [/img]

It had a hard life and I don't blame manufacture issues for the crack.

Large should be the right size for you. I replaced mine with a Transition Covert and whilst the covert is better its not my much imo.

Initially bought a 2009 Large.
Broke it at the seat tube/top tube weld after 6 months. Propogated rearwards from weld through seat tube.
Sizing wise: had to swap the 350 seat post for a 400 (6'2", 34" inside leg).

2009 was a bad year. 2010 introduced changes

Warranty replaced with a 2010 XL.
Much better build quality. All previous issues fully addressed.
Better sizing for me.

Overall impressions:
Excellent bikes on fast downhill stuff but not so great on the ups as the seat angle puts you a long way back. I had to run my seat all the way forward on the rails to get a better climbing position.
Stock bars/stem were hopelessly narrow/long. Swapped for a 50mm stem and 745 bars, which transformed the bike into something quite capable on steeper downs.
Rear suspension is very, very good IMHO. Never felt it bottom out despite running about 30% sag and some clumbsy landings to flat from up to 6' drops.
Back end feels flexy though and really benefitted from upgrading QR to bolt-through.

By way of comparison: I've since bought a 20" 2011 Orange Five, which feels smaller and more manouverable, better on techy stuff and climbs better too without being any inferior on the fast descents. The rear sus on the Five does not feel as good as the Meta's though IMHO and I'm frequently using all the travel despite running less sag than I would on the Meta.

I do like the Meta 5 but would suggest it needs a few mods to get the most out of it:
1. Shorter stem and wider bars
2. Double and bash
3. Chain device (stinger)
4. Bolt-through rear axle

Just an opinion. Hope that it helps.

I had a 2009, replaced with a L 2010 after the seat tube crack. I echo the above post, good bike can be made a little sharper with those changes. I'm running QR front and back, and to be honest, I don't know any different so it works for me. Suspension is very nice, rear end does feel limitless in it's travel. I think the climbing postion is good for me, though I think it's too short for me anyway, but this can be advantageous at times.

If it comes with a warranty, go for it.

Colin

Cool. Thanks everyone.

I've ridden a Meta 5 for 4 years now, I first have a 2007 which cracked on the downtube rocker mount and I got a 2009 (large) frame as a replacement which I've been riding until last week (just upgraded to Yeti ASR5). Mine also cracked at the seattube as described above, but out of warranty, apparently a common problem*

I agree entirely with what Ecky thump - everything he says is spot on.

Great for going down, nice angles mean it's fast. OK for going back up but the seat is in the wrong place so the front wheel wanders a lot. Grip is phenomenal though, it tracks the ground beautifully and the travel feels bottomless. Back end is really flexy though (I never upgraded to bolt-through).

*Because the crack on mine was above the seattube-toptube weld, I figured it wasn't a structural problem as such, the integrity of the front triangle was intact. So I figured I could fix it. I used a section of an old 30.9 seatpost cut flush with the top of the seat tube, and bolted through at the bottom end. I then used a smaller diameter seatpost which fit into inner diameter of the 30.9 seatpost. Essentially I just installed a new section of tube within the seat tube. At first I imagined this would be a temporary fix, but I managed to ride the bike for 6 months like that with no problems at all...

Had a 2009 which cracked.. replaced with 2010 which I still ride and love! I'll echo what others have said, they are fantastic on the downs, and pretty good up hill too. No "bob" problems, never bother with the propedal. Fitted a shorter stem but still run with the stock bars.

I'd have another without hesitation.

J

Had a 2008, cracked it.
Got a 2009, cracked it.
Got a 2010, sold it and got a 5spot.
Wish I'd kept the Meta.

Now we've built all this love, is it a good point to introduce the fact that I'll have my 2010 XL up for sale shortly as I can't justify keeping both the Meta 5 and the Orange 5.

The bike's currently in the possession of a buddy who's been trying it out, so I can't get any pics up yet but will get some soonest if anyone's interested.

[url= http://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/fs-commencal-meta-5-xl-2010-frame-full-bike-with-shimano-kit ]Here's my previous ad[/url]

Please post on the ad if interested.

Cracked an 07 and an 08 here.

07 went exactly like MRanger's one above.

My 08 frame has multiple cracks - once you spot one, you find all the other ones!

Loved it when it was going.

Re size, I'm 6ft and rode a medium on all dayers. Was considering getting a size large if I went for the crash replacement deal from commencal though.

I had -09 green Meta (the best color ever), which cracked as typical. I bought Turner 5 Spot -09 frame (got it half price) and build it with new parts. After long warranty process I got new -11 Meta frame and built it with new and old parts. I have to admit that like more my Meta than Turner.

But I would stay away from -09 Meta frames.

2009 - I can hear it cracking already.

Excellent hooning bike and not too bad at climbing either. Admittedly I do also like my 456 more, which is probably a testament to on-one rather than a criticism of Commencal.

Absolutely love my 2007 Meta 5.5

Am making the most of it while waiting for the cracks... so far it has survived a trip to Morocco, three Alps trips and as much abuse as trail riding in Scotland can throw at it. It seems to eat up the miles, climbs well and is a joy when you point it downwards.

I have had it from new, thrown abuse at it, come off it and dropped it down various rock faces and it is still in one piece - guess its just the luck of the draw.

I'm also looking at these frames but wonder if anyone has any comparison between the meta 5 and the super4? I would guess that the 4 will solve the rearward seat issue mentioned but wonder how much worse it is at descending? Also, does anyone know what size I should try first as at 5 ft 7 I seem to be between the small and medium sizes.

jwab - I love my super 4. Cant compare to meta's sorry. It climbs very well with a 120 fork - not as goat like as some racy frames - but v good. Just dont buy an 09!

Size - I'd say size up. It a tad on the shortish side of average - if that helps you. I was borderline m-l (5-10). Got a L (used a 70mm stem). For the 1st warranty (09 model) I asked for a M. I have to use a 100mm stem to feel comfy. Should have stuck to an L.

2 years on a 2008 meta. Loved before and even more loved now. Never felt so good on a bike (save the meta SX 2012 😉 ), I never rode so fast either. If having fun going down on a bike is what you're looking for then look no further. The bike have been faultless so far. I really can't see myself riding something else at the moment. Meta 5 are shorter than super 4 for obvious reason. They climb very well too, provided you just sit and spin and let the magic of the rear end work.

HTH

ive got a 2009 ltd edition used off road most weekends since june 2009. Takes a lot of abuse in all weather/conditions etc. i think iv been lucky though going by the reports on cracks. agree with points above on seat position and cranks are a bit low, back end wanders a bit and weight is abouts 33 1b, i love it but will be getting a lighter steed next year to replace it.

Cheers coulda, was leaning towards the super due to more xc nature. I'm gonna sell my 16" blue pig as it rarely sees huge descents so is a bit wasted so now just trying to match the sizing.

Was thinking about a shorter frame simply to make it easier to get my weight back and raise the front end (tho current issues prob more due to lack of skill) but I think it will make the bike too cramped on long rides.

Cheers again!

Just an update on my slightly whingey:

Replacement last time took 13 weeks. Hoping for better this time.

This time took 4 days. That's more like it.

Thoughts? Fragile

Crotchrocket - I guess you're being sarky like 😉

Just to be clear = my comments weren't about the 55 - more about the Commencal warranty situation (change of distributer and that) which 6 months ago was terrible. It seems a massive amount better now. Mine was/is/will be again a Super 4.

I bought a large 2009 green meta frameset which had what appeared to be the usual crack above the weld on the seat tube. I had the frame blasted and a pro frame builder check it before having it powder coated. What appeared to be a crack turned out to be shrinkage/flexing of the poor paint finish and not cracking as first thought! Great bike which has been tarnished by cracking horror stories on what is probably not a huge percentage of numbers sold. I love mine and it's still crack free.

How do you tell the difference between a 09 and a 2010?

If anybody fancies a full carbon Meta 5 frame then look here.....

http://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/commencal-meta-5-carbon-frame-2011-small

I need it gone ASAP as its taking up space! Offers invited.

I have a Meta 5 VIP from 2008. It has an RP23 at the back and a 140mm revelation at the front. It's a medium and I'm 6' 3".

I absolutely love it. Don't get me wrong, it's my first full suss, but I wouldn't change it for the world at the moment. It climbs amazingly, and descends even better. Like the others have said, the linkage is fantastic. Travel feels bottomless, I've never felt mine bottom out, but the o-ring on the shock clearly shows that I have done on many an occasion.

I have to agree with the others though, the only let down is that th swingarm does flex a bit, I intend to get a 12mm axle through the back of mine at some point to reduce this.

Nice bikes... just broke my carbon 2010 though 🙁 Warranty frame in Team blue, Medium is now in the for sale section, brand new in the box £450 😛
Going to give the AM a try now

hora - Member
How do you tell the difference between a 09 and a 2010?

The 09 broke first ?

ragged the hell out of my 07, everytime I thought I had outgrown it it proved me wrong, it munched up techy alps trails and was always fun to ride, only got rid of because I was left some money and new AMs were on sail... upgrade was vanity and love for shiny things rather than necessity.

GF had a 09 and loves it. I abused it for a few runs in the Alpes and it didn't die

Colour/graphics changed on the 2010 onwards bikes.

The older Meta's really do ride well, surprisingly well when I had a go on a couple, that's what tempted me to try an AM which is awesome. In terms of angles/numbers it's pretty much my ideal bike. Really enjoying it 🙂

Going to give the AM a try now

Which climb even better than the meta 5.5 but careful it needs more skills to go downhill

How much does the AM frame weigh?

Which climb even better than the meta 5.5 but careful it needs more skills to go downhill

How much does the AM frame weigh?

Kiddin. Im out. Just alittle less than SX and that has a coil shock.

For me a AM is a Lapierre if you are buying new.

Hora
My AM is 30lb builtup
Hope Stans flow wheels
Xt 2x10
Hope v2 brakes
Fox 32 forks
Nothing particularly light
It rides lighter and climbs better than the Meta 5it replaced (29lbs)

hora - Member
How do you tell the difference between a 09 and a 2010?

I think the difference is
2009 27.2 seat post
2010 31.6 seat post

Perfect ta

I think the difference is
2009 27.2 seat post
2010 31.6 seat post

nope.

2009 s/m were 27.2 l/xl 31.6

don't know about 2010

Wierd!

my 2010 medium is 31.6 seat tube frame was a warranty replacement for a cracked 2009 and had a shim fitted so the original 27.2 seatpost could be retained.

FWIW I get on really well with mine, built up pretty heavy with pikes, double & bash, reverb, heavy duty rims and tyres brilliant trail bike but as others have said avoid <2010

For me a AM is a Lapierre if you are buying new.

MWAhhhhhhhahahahahaha, mind you you'll probably don't see the difference.

UT OH...Broke my hand with the 5.5 on a downhill route... What's gunna get broken on the AM ?

Its a bicycle frame not a Fireblade sweetie. If I rode a Lapierre it'd feel LIGHTER for a start.