Thinking of getting...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Thinking of getting a Heckler- please tell me good and bad about them

49 Posts
29 Users
0 Reactions
232 Views
Posts: 1
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just always fancied a Heckler really....

Main use Alp type holidays, uplift days, having fun on.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 11:41 am
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

They size up small, they're dead reliable, and they'll do exactly what you describe above.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 11:43 am
 igm
Posts: 11833
Full Member
 

Heckler? That's the American version of the Five isn't it.
Well you're unlikely to find any opinions on that sort of thing round here.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 11:48 am
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

I'd say the Heckler is for exactly what you describe. Ive just spent a long weekend in the Alps with mine. It takes a 160 fork, has a bulletproof single pivot bearing, and loves going downhill.

It can be prone to bob if you mash the pedals, but its a 160 bike, FFS!!

[img][url= http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2828/9052250758_ccc15f10fd.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2828/9052250758_ccc15f10fd.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/76248110@N06/9052250758/ ]Untitled[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/76248110@N06/ ]danthomassw13[/url], on Flickr[/img]


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 11:56 am
Posts: 9175
Free Member
 

^Nice 🙂 I've wanted a heckler for a while - had a Bullit and loved it but it was a bit too much bike for what I was riding. Heckler pretty much seems the same apart from shorter travel and lighter.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:07 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

I had an old style Heckler last year with 150 Revs, and it was my main bike. This one has 160 Marz55's, offset bushings and 1x9. It can climb when needed, but I am lucky it is a second bike for me.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 2387
Full Member
 

I had a first generation Heckler. The back end was several milimetres wider than my 135mm hub so had to get sent back and replaced. I rode the frame for just over three years until it cracked at the seat tube weld. Jungle sold me a replacement frame at a discount. It then broke in the same place. They then sold me a Superlight at a discount. It didn't break but then I stopped riding it after two months when I bought a Turner and sold on the Superlight.

Jungle dealt with the problems but I never really felt the love for Santa Cruz bikes despite having owned three of them.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:19 pm
Posts: 1049
Full Member
 

the old 26" or the new fangled 27.5" for 2014?

I love my 26" 2013 Heckler but it's my first FS so can't compare it to anything other than my old hardtails. The bike seems to relish being thrown around and ridden hard, handles very well even with a 140mm Rev.

Only negative point I can think of is the paint work is made of cheese and scratches easily.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here's mine...

[URL= http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o124/weasels_bucket/IMG_3044_zps66847c59.jp g" target="_blank">http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o124/weasels_bucket/IMG_3044_zps66847c59.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

150 Revs, reverb and tubeless. Recently converted to 1x10. I live and ride in the dark peak. Its been to the Alps. Its been to trail centres (including Antur Stiniog). I love it.

Good things - bomb proof, even with crests. Likes going down. Makes me smile
Bad things - can be a bit wandery on very steep climbs. Probably not the lightest, but then I've never weighed it or cared.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:27 pm
Posts: 1809
Free Member
 

A good bike, I bet the new Heckler is twice the bike, has that perched ok feel, was replaced by a Five that was a far better alpine weapon.
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
Topic starter
 

was replaced by a Five that was a far better alpine weapon.

interesting, can you elaborate please?


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is my 2011. Its now running 1x10, Orange Easton Havoc bars and stem, dropper post and bigger tyres. It rides up pretty well but the RP23 isn't the best as it blows through its travel very easily. I've put a large lump of grease in the body of the shock and it makes a massive difference.

Took it to the Alps last year and again tomorrow for a week and its a joy to ride. It takes anything I can throw at it. I totally love the bike but my riding style is changing so looking at going to a Nomad when I get back.

You will not be disappointed in any way. It works really really well with the Fox 36 apart from on low gradient fast trails as the front is quite loose. I drop the forks down to 130mm on the Talas and it sorts the problem.
[img] http://www.flickr.com/photos/alekschris/6494718475/ ][img] http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7024/6494718475_398b51c9bb.jp g" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/alekschris/6494718475/ ][img] http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7024/6494718475_398b51c9bb.jp g"/> [/img][/url] [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/alekschris/6494718475/ ]santa cruz 003[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/alekschris/ ]Aleks & Chris[/url], on Flickr[/img]

Just do it!!!!


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good allround do-most-things-well-enough bike.
Not owned one myself but a couple of riding buddies do. Pretty similar sort of thing to a Five I'd say.

If it's primarily for uplifts & Alps, then it might be a little under-gunned but would cope (as would a Five)


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 1:01 pm
Posts: 1809
Free Member
 

interesting, can you elaborate please?

Slacker stiffer and generally more robust feeling, I would deffo have another Heckler as a lite trail bike but IMHO its a poor an all mountain bike.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 1:05 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

It's like a 5 but priced properly for what it is, a simple full sus, nowt fancy just does a job.
[img] [/img]
160mm front slightly longer rear shock balanced it nicely. Never had any problem keeping up with people...


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good fun bike, pivot kept coming loose and I sold it because it annoyed me. Short for fat American types.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 1:23 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Can also post mine for a nice price 🙂 Blur LTc en route


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 1:25 pm
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

how much are these bikes weighing (average?) I'm guessing north of 35lbs? Is that about right?


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:05 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

mine on show above was 15kg/33lb
2x9
EX321's
Minions
KS Post
Marx AMSL's
NP Bars

Frame for sale


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:07 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

Mine is 32lbs


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:10 pm
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

oh, OK, less than I thought. Could it be a "one bike" bike?


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 1049
Full Member
 

I've previously posted that mine weighed around 38lbs (bathroom scales) but after hanging the thing off a mates park tools scale it slimmed down to a more respectable 32lbs & 15oz.

That's with a rev rl, am4/721 hoops, dh tubes, m4 tech brakes, 3x10 deore cranks and a Hilo. Not exactly the lightest build options.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[quote=nickc ]oh, OK, less than I thought. Could it be a "one bike" bike?

Yes


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:16 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I had a go on one and didn't like the swingarm rubbing my calves. Well, not exactly "rubbing", but came in contact fairly regularly.
Might have changed them since then, but I preferred the Mk1 style (which was fab, but I couldn't afford at the time).


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 2:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh, OK, less than I thought. Could it be a "one bike" bike?

It's my "one bike"


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:08 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

rebuilt my '03 coil shock version at weekend, knocked out 40miles* on it tuesday night, grinning my tits off.

very [b]very[/b] fun bike.

*biggest ride of the year so far - on a chunky, bobby, sticky tyred build too.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:15 pm
Posts: 1049
Full Member
 

It's my "one bike"

Same here, apart from the one I ride to work on but that doesn't count, does it?


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Mine has a coil shock, lyriks and dual play tyres. It's a little heavy but can still do a decent XC job (the limiting factor is the portly rider).

[url= http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2474/5794136872_652d0721cc.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2474/5794136872_652d0721cc.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/8584844@N06/5794136872/ ]IMAG0261[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/8584844@N06/ ]NazcaMan[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:26 pm
Posts: 6468
Free Member
 

I've had 4 or maybe 5 Hecklers, messed about with other stuff but never had anything else as good an all rounder.

Current one was bought 2nd hand and is a 2011/12, much nicer with a 1deg Works angleset fitted. Tried offset bushings but didnt like them as they slackerized the seat angle.

I got a cheap Kashima RP23 off CRC, much better than any other air shock I've had, virtually as good as the coil on previously. Got lucky with the compression / rebound tunes though- seemed about right out of the box.

All shown here apart from recent changes to Marz 55s & new back shocker.

[url= http://www.pinkbike.com/u/scruff0372/album/bikes/ ]http://www.pinkbike.com/u/scruff0372/album/bikes/[/url]


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:30 pm
Posts: 3223
Free Member
 

Chris36860 - do the shim mod (search for rp23 shim mod) to your RP23. Was the first thing I did to my Heckler when I got my frame. Makes a massive improvement to the shock.

Dantsw13 - did you get 2 offset bushings for your Heckler? I just bought 1 in an attempt to lower the BB a little, only ridden it once, but I might get a 2nd.

I have 160 vengeance on my Heckler, and onyl recently realised how high the BB is after test riding a few new trail bikes.

The pre '12 Heckler is a little too steep for my liking. I had 150 revs on previously and always felt that it could be better on the downs being a little slacker. 160 forks beef it up considerably and match the stiffness of the rest of the bike, plus complement the 150 rear very well. I dont find it any trouble climbing. Also never suffered from pedal bob, but that might be how I pedal.

The 07-10 models had pinch bolts on teh swingarm and also thinner walls on the tubes around the pivot. Pinch bolts breaking were pretty common, and I also cracked the tube wall so had to get a replacement swingarm from Jungle. The newer design is a lot better. I would try and get a 10+ model.

Comfortable and good fun. It might not be the fastest bike out there for most of your general trail riding, but as a solid, simple, pretty reliable do it all, its not bad at all.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
My much loved heckler tarted up (powder coated etc) before selling on 🙂
Preferred the coil shock at the rear though


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

Superfli - yep, both bushings. I find they keep the bb down to offset the height of the 160 fork, as well as slackening the bike.

Scruff, I'm pretty sure the offset bushings steepen the seat tube angle?


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

superfli - Member
Chris36860 - do the shim mod (search for rp23 shim mod) to your RP23. Was the first thing I did to my Heckler when I got my frame. Makes a massive improvement to the shock.

Dantsw13 - did you get 2 offset bushings for your Heckler? I just bought 1 in an attempt to lower the BB a little, only ridden it once, but I might get a 2nd.

I have 160 vengeance on my Heckler, and onyl recently realised how high the BB is after test riding a few new trail bikes.

The pre '12 Heckler is a little too steep for my liking. I had 150 revs on previously and always felt that it could be better on the downs being a little slacker. 160 forks beef it up considerably and match the stiffness of the rest of the bike, plus complement the 150 rear very well. I dont find it any trouble climbing. Also never suffered from pedal bob, but that might be how I pedal.

The 07-10 models had pinch bolts on teh swingarm and also thinner walls on the tubes around the pivot. Pinch bolts breaking were pretty common, and I also cracked the tube wall so had to get a replacement swingarm from Jungle. The newer design is a lot better. I would try and get a 10+ model.

Comfortable and good fun. It might not be the fastest bike out there for most of your general trail riding, but as a solid, simple, pretty reliable do it all, its not bad at all.

I love to two tone green paint job!!


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:44 pm
Posts: 6468
Free Member
 

dantsw13, mine didnt. Slackened the front end & seat angle off and dropped the BB. I'll chuck em back on when I go t'Alps next though.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think they're a bit long in the tooth now. Ideal for people who wished they could afford an Orange Five but can't. If you're going second hand and want a single pivot bike, try a cannondale prophet (or get a five!)


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ooh a Heckler love in! I have a 2009 w/ 140 revs, reverb, coil DHX4. Recently fitted a Works 1deg head angle which has helped for the downs.
It's my everyday bike in the summer and I love it. (Have a HT as well)
Tested a Marin, Orange5 and a couple of others when I bought it.
Reliable, fun, and complements my rubbish skillz. Think it's about 31Lb and was perfect for the Spanish rock gardens with Switchbacks.
If the new 650b is a noticeable improvement (and I can save enough pennies) then I will be upgrading next summer.
My only complaint could be a strike the pedals quite often and a little bit of pedal bob but I clear technical climbs better than I do on the HT which is around 4lbs lighter.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 3:57 pm
Posts: 3238
Full Member
 

Didn't like mine at all - I bought a 2010 version 2nd hand and kept it for 6 months or so before getting rid. I'll concur with most of the negative comments and try to think of something positive about it.

Negatives
Short - 1-1.5" shorter front end than it ought to have for the size -guess it's designed around a 100mm stem
Steep - Tried slackening mine off with offset bushes but didn't help enough
No support in suspension - the oft mentioned hole in the travel - it can be fixed and it's probably the RP23 more than anything but it was unnerving to ride
Wide rear end - catching heels every now and again - no damage but it gets a little annoying
High BB - Even if it's actually not they just look like it been jacked up a bit in the middle
Heavy - 7+lbs for a very simple trail bike frame is a bit porky

Plusses

It didn't break.

Errrrr . . . . . . they're cheap(ish)

Sorry but I couldn't recommend anyone bought one but as is shown above there are lots of people that think they're great.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 4:15 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

igm - Member

Heckler? That's the American [b]and less expensive[/b] version of the Five isn't it.

fify 😀

In fact I think it would still have been signficantly less than a 5/sub5 when they were welded in USA then shipped here and Jungle Tax applied (and cost a little more than the taiwanese versions iirc) then shipped here and import and 'Jungle Tax' applied.

-If you get a new one in the UK you get free pivot bearings for life. Only £15 a set for the hecler but every little helps...
-they look nice, almost round tubes and everything!
-iscg 05 tabs on new ones.
-30.9 seat tube for droppers
-newest ones have tapered headtube for unnecessarily-sized fork steerers.
-I think they are fun. Others think they are to high up (esp compared to a five) Both the five and the heckler are also ubiquitous enough that chances are someone near you ought to have one in your size you could have a go on.

But yes the sizing on sc's is interesting: pay attention to top tube lengths. (I have '05 vintage small size yeti and a large size sc, both have same seat and top tube lengths, go figure!)


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ideal for people who wished they could afford an Orange Five but can't.

Funniest thing I've heard in ages.....

But yeah, Quality trolling, right there... 🙄


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 5:12 pm
Posts: 9175
Free Member
 

Steep? 68 degrees ish head angle which is spot on for a versatile bike, slacker does not (always) equal more fun, quite the opposite in fact!


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 5:36 pm
 igm
Posts: 11833
Full Member
 

Given I just weighted my Alpine 160 at 33.5 lbs, including Reverb, Fox 36 Talas, 3x10 drivetrain and flat pedals, those Heckler weights seem quite high.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never had one, but have always had a soft spot for the Heckler probably because I used to lust after the Team MBUK downhill bikes a long, long time ago.

They've always struck me a pretty good bikes, never the lightest or most cutting edge but good solid bikes.

My big issue with SC is the sizing - the top tubes seem to be ridiculously short.

There's a strong second hand market so you may as well try one. If you don't like it, I doubt you'll have any issues selling it on.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 7:12 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Ideal for people who wished they could afford an Orange Five but can't.

ah bless, maybe it's the price an Orange should be?


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 11:05 pm
Posts: 9175
Free Member
 

My big issue with SC is the sizing - the top tubes seem to be ridiculously short.

This is why I like them. Seem like they're made for fun rather than all out efficiency or whatever. Both the Bullit I had and the Chameleon I have now are probably the most playful and fun bikes I've ridden. It's a toss up between the cham and my old blender anyway.


 
Posted : 27/06/2013 11:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Loving that 68 degrees is steep lol


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 9:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think it is the combination of short top tube and 68 degree head angle, although I'm sure my 2006 was69 degrees! I really didn't like it on anything steep downhill.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 9:47 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[quote=nmdbasetherevenge ]Loving that 68 degrees is steep lol

Yep I literally have no idea how I can ride it, the bike screams last year so much.

Edit# also add in the inconsistency of measuring quoted angles, the range of for lengths available and the range of A2C measurements for forks of even the same length...


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 10:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I brought a new Heckler in 2004 and have changed pretty much everything on it apart from the frame. Love it. Tried various other bikes, when I get the new bike itch, but nothing seems to have that "fun" factor. Easy to maintain as well.

Current setup is 32.5 lbs, and use it for everything, including 24hr races! Get a coil shock though and I also have 140mm Van32 up front.

[img] http://www.flickr.com/photos/94594000@N02/9156430777/ [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 10:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pic of my Heckler

[img][url= http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5527/9156430777_ff46413062_o.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5527/9156430777_ff46413062_o.jp g"/> [/img][/url] [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/94594000@N02/9156430777/ ]photo (14)[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/94594000@N02/ ]pug_b70[/url], on Flickr[/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 10:31 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

Ideal for people who wished they could afford an Orange Five
chuckles, you're funny. Virtually the same bike but orange cost 50% more* True I wouldn't mind being able to spaff even more money on bikes but between those two I'm never going to opt for orange prices no matter how minted I am.

Admittedly SC do stupid price bikes aswell.

Another 47 damp miles in the bag for my heckler yesterday 😉

*Not seen the 27.5ified heckler prices so dunno if things have changed.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 7:50 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!