The new 27.5 inch.
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] The new 27.5 inch.

17 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
64 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anyone feel the need to jump on board and buy/try one of these bikes? I really can't see three different wheel sizes surviving in the mtb world, i think one of them's gotta give.

Unless things maybe go down the route of 26 for downhill, 27.5 for all mountain, and 29er for XC and marathon racing. Cant see it happening though, all the faffing around and having 3 bikes where barely any parts are interchangeable if you need to grab say a wheel off a different bike as an emergency fix.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 5:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No. My 26" wheels go round just fine...


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 7:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

29er no other bike come close.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 7:53 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

Well seeing as there's been 1,000,000 threads starting with almost identical posts, yes I think there is enough interest in it.

Unless things maybe go down the route of 26 for downhill, 27.5 for all mountain, and 29er for XC and marathon racing. Cant see it happening though, all the faffing around and having 3 bikes where barely any parts are interchangeable if you need to grab say a wheel off a different bike as an emergency fix.

You're right, 29er for everything is a much better idea. Dirt even did a test, a 29er 4" bike was faster than a 26er 5" bike, a 29er 5" bike was faster than a 26er 6" bike.

I reckon we'll see 26ers like we do hardtails now in 5-6 years. You'll tell everyone they should have one to make them a better rider, learn skills, etc etc etc, but when you go out to the shed you'll pick up the FSer 95% of the time.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:10 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

I enjoy my 29er. I enjoy my 26er (especially after riding the 29er as the 26er feels more alive. I would happily swap to all my bikes being 27.5 if I get the wheels off the ground mischief of my 26er and the amazing added stability of my 29er.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:16 pm
Posts: 6275
Full Member
 

sod the clown bikes 😉 i like 26" wheels.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought in that Dirt article that one guy was faster on a 26 and the other was faster on a 29.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:27 pm
Posts: 7544
Free Member
 

a 29er 5" bike was faster than a 26er 6" bike

No it wasn't. One bloke was faster on one 29er, another bloke was slower on another 29er.

Which is as good an argument as any for choice and not ramming the bloody things down our throats.

I have wondered if you could just ram 26" wheels in a 27.5" frame if the world goes that way. I have no interest what so ever in other wheel sizes but given that the difference between the two is this much [-----------] I can't see why putting normal wheels in would do much harm if a nice frame existed.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:28 pm
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon - Member

Dirt even did a test, a 29er 4" bike was faster than a 26er 5" bike, a 29er 5" bike was faster than a 26er 6" bike.

26er was faster in the first case.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:31 pm
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

munrobiker - Member

I have wondered if you could just ram 26" wheels in a 27.5" frame if the world goes that way. I have no interest what so ever in other wheel sizes but given that the difference between the two is this much [-----------] I can't see why putting normal wheels in would do much harm if a nice frame existed.

26 wheels would drop the BB on a 27.5 bike by an inch and a half - enough to cause problems.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:32 pm
Posts: 7544
Free Member
 

George- no they wouldn't. It'd be 0.5" (Given than 27.5" isn't actually 27.5", it's 27", and it's half the difference).

Also, the 6" 26er was quicker (a Trek Slash) than the 5" 29er (a Rumblefish). We'd all be buggered if a 5" 26er were quicker than a 4" 29er because then the marketing man would be wrong. 🙄


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:38 pm
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

munrobiker - Member
George- no they wouldn't. It'd be 0.5" (Given than 27.5" isn't actually 27.5", it's 27", and it's half the difference).

Duh, sorry, you're right. I should drink less/more.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:44 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10064
Free Member
 

Why stop at 29? Why not 30/31/32?


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:47 pm
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

DT78 - Member
Why stop at 29? Why not 30/31/32?


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 8:55 pm
Posts: 46
Free Member
 

^That is amazing. I want one


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 9:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why stop at 29? Why not 30/31/32?

There are no common rim sizes that currently exist bigger than the 700 road rim (29er).
Without that, its about creating something totally custom, like the 36er.


 
Posted : 20/09/2012 9:12 pm
Posts: 1384
Free Member
 

This somethin thats been bugging me. 29ers look and feel right for me (am 6'6" ish) and have loved the inbread single speed so much started thing about full suss.
Well did another peak ride on the trusty xxl 5 spot and i cant think of a better bike without spending stupid amounts.


 
Posted : 21/09/2012 6:10 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!