suspension gurus - ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] suspension gurus - Fox 36 or RS Lyrik??

78 Posts
34 Users
0 Reactions
172 Views
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I'm liking the sound of the new 2016 Lyrik in 180mm flavour, but anyone ridden one back to back with the Fox 36??

I suspect they are almost impossible to separate in term of performance, in not in terms of price......

vote now!


 
Posted : 16/01/2016 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

No one? Come on, stick your oar in peeps! 😉


 
Posted : 16/01/2016 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ive been on Pikes for a good few years now and have just ordered some 36 RC2's for my new build. Should be on it after next weekend so will let you know my thoughts.

As far as I can tell the Lyriks are just slightly beefier Pikes so will probably be every bit as good as them and a bit stiffer/heavier.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 10:18 am
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

Ive had the new RC2 36 and the Lyrik both at 170mm travel and would without question always go for the Lyrik. Its a lot more supple off the top with almost zero sticktion. The 36 seems a bit wooden in the initial travel.

The paint finish on the Fox is in a different league to the Rock Shox though.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

interesting. the lyriks are a good £200 cheaper than the 36s and i love my 160mm pikes, so maybe the lyriks are the answer. will have to machine up some new larger dia axle side spacers for my wheel hubs to make use of the torque cap system on the lyrik.

id love to see some shock dyno graphs for them to see if there is any difference......


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rockshox over fox any day whichever model! Agree with fox forks feeling wooden especially against pikes, and fox always start creaking or stantion wear too easily. I would never buy fox again if I can help it.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 2:08 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

I am just trying something to make my 36 a bit plusher off the top. I will let you know if its worked tomorrow.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 2:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not had a go with the lyriks, but I am a 36 convert after riding pikes for a while. They do have a very stiff chassis, so really helps the front end stay put. The small bump compliance of the 36 is harsher than the pikes (and lyriks if reports are right) but when you're pushing hard they are so much more responsive and capable. You just have to decide if you want a plush feeling fork or something that thanks you for pushing the limits.

If you can, then wait a few months for the 2017 fox lineup as there are rumours the harshness has been tweaked out....


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 2:25 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

well at the risk of sounding like a massive fanny, i can't think of a single time when i've thought my current 160mm pikes had "lost composure"?? Sure, i've used all their travel (hitting the DH runs in the Alps this summer chasing the boys 'n girls on their proper DH rigs.... 😉 and felt the bottom out, but never felt they'd run out of damper control, and they always seem to jump quickly back up into their travel ready for the next hit.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 2:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Öhlins ?


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 2:37 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Out of those two, Lyrik. Without fail.

I've commented before on the 36/Lyrik debate before and my old 36 was probably least reliable fork I've owned. And it felt like crap. It either had no initial stroke suppleness at all, or was a nasty, wallowing pig.

It was fine when racing, but even for someone who races 10-12 times a year, that's the overwhelming minority of the time. it was just harsh & unforgiving for all my other riding.

I current have a Deville on my bike, as the Lyrik is on my wife's, which is also lovely (only secondhand though) can't be dealing with warranty etc with them.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 3:12 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

If you can, then wait a few months for the 2017 fox lineup as there are rumours the harshness has been tweaked out....

LOL they promise that each and every year. Oh this years Fox lineup has cured everything wrong with the old ones and every single year they fail.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 4:14 pm
 duir
Posts: 1176
Free Member
 

Interesting, I know of several long term rock shox fans that recently switched to fox 36. The overwhelming concensus is the 36 is superior in every way. The 3 pairs of pikes I have had on warranty all developed the ssme 2 problems, stuck down travel and creaking steerer. Everyone raves about new stuff but over time all the faults come to light and rock shox are famous for testing products on the public for a year or two. Can't imagine the lyrics are any different.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 4:22 pm
Posts: 65918
Full Member
 

Rick Draper - Member

LOL they promise that each and every year.

Harsh but basically fair 😆 Every major Fox "innovation" is really just a fix. 34s because they can't make a stiff enough 32, new seals to replace the new seals to replace the new seals... But that doesn't mean they're not good forks sometimes.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 4:52 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

I've just got new RCT3 170mm Lyriks on my Capra. They feel amazing and are significantly better than the 36 vans on my old bike but then those are a few years old. I'm whatever the opposite of a suspension guru is though.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 5:09 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Same forks as grum, previously i had 2016 pikes rct3 and the lyrik is definitely better. Can't comment on fox though. Very good firm forks, stiff and well supported when you start working them hard. In fact this is when they really shine.


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 8:35 pm
Posts: 818
Free Member
 

Very little between the two, I'd lean towards the 36 for HSC and a slightly lower weight. The damping on it is also brilliant and doesn't have the tendency to spike on repeated big hits like the pike does, though I haven't tried the new lyrik.

That said, I'm now on a Bos Deville that's even better than the 36 when riding hard 😀


 
Posted : 17/01/2016 9:47 pm
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

The various reviews of the Fox (both professional and end user) are very complimentary about its plush initial stroke.

Yet a few here with direct experience are saying its a bit wooden.

Rick - when you first got that fork you praised its initial plushness in posts on here and mtbr,whats changed?

Quite fancy a fox 36 for its stiffness, but not if its no good


 
Posted : 19/01/2016 8:03 pm
Posts: 6926
Free Member
 

What about the Suntour Durolux? Anyone tried them?
I'm specing up new forks and wheels and looking at Lyriks and Durolux.


 
Posted : 19/01/2016 8:09 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

Rick - when you first got that fork you praised its initial plushness in posts on here and mtbr,whats changed?

It started off been plush and just deteriorated with time. It's a lot stiffer than a pike but no where near as plush as a lyrik. I have just made some mods to mine in the hope I can make it more plush initially. Find myself running the HSC fully open most of the time. It also has a lot of stiction in comparison to other forks.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 1:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Lyrik 170 are very plush and also ramp up nicely.

Currently have it on 70psi and no tokens compared with 65psi and 2 tokens on my old pikes.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 8:27 am
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

Rick - do you think something broke in them making them less plush? Or dirt in them? Or just worn out really quickly?

Sounds odd, whatever it is.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 8:58 am
Posts: 470
Full Member
 

I've been running the new Pikes since they first came out, up until last month when I bought some Fox 36's at a ridiculous good deal... (if it hadn't been a good deal i wouldn't have swapped..)

Yes the Pikes are initially softer, however the Fox are much much more composed when pushing, yes all the magazines say the same, but I actually feel it. When I first used the Fox I wasn't impressed - i missed the initial 'softness' of the Pike, but then I hit some steps/rock gardens that I know well, and the fork came alive!

I think this sums it up - last year in the Alps I swapped to my 180 Fox forks - took the Pikes but couldn't accept the flex - this year I'd happily use the Fox 36's..

Hope that helps - I have no experience of the Lyrics though.. 🙂


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 9:34 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

36 Float RC2 from 2015 onwards, if they feel rubbish you haven't set them up properly.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 9:43 am
Posts: 52
Free Member
 

The reality is people all have a very different perception of the word plush.

I have ridden extensively the new 34, 36, Pike and more recently the Lyrik.

Fox have never seemingly got the initial stroke suppleness right, it is an improvement with the new 34 over the 36 but then it uses a different design air cartridge. I believe a lot of the stiction on the initial stroke comes from the air side because of the symptoms I and a lot of people have experienced.

What they lose in suppleness they do however gain in mid stroke support and bottom out control which is good on both.

The 36 I was using had been fettled my Mojo as initially I felt it could have been the bushes were too tight but they said it was all ok and gave them a service. This particular fork I could never find the balance between too much stiction off the top or too little mid stroke support with the fork collapsing in g-out corners.

The Pike is a nice fork for the most part I believe it seems to do everything well and only really gets out of its depth on really fast rough stuff but it is not a big cause for concern. It does not have the mid stroke support of the Fox, but for 90% of it use I believe it to be the better fork as it gives more grip on the front end. I dont know the reliability is there with the chassis though, when the fork came out there was seemingly a large number of people suffering with stanchion/crown unbonding issues.

The Lyrik has been good so far. It has better mid stroke support than the Pike, almost as comparable as the 36 I believe. Where is does have a big win is the initial stroke again though, it is a marked improvement on the 36, which yields far better grip and comfort levels. Durability is unknown as yet but with extra meat around the crown and a larger stanchion overlap should address some of the earlier Pike issues. It also has the revised seal head in the Charger cartridge which should stop the cavitation issues some Pike users experienced.

It is worth stating also, holding a 36 in one hand and the Lyrik in the other, the 36 looks to be considerably better made. The quality of finish is far higher and internally that theme continues I believe.

It was mentioned above regarding the new Ohlins fork as well, which is currently only available in 29" format, I do not know what wheel size you are looking at and there may be some compatability issues surrounding the crown race design but having ridden one for a while on my SJ it is a very, very good fork also.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 10:01 am
Posts: 555
Free Member
 

Can't compare to the current 36 floats (had 2014 van RC2), but can make a comparison between lyriks and pikes, the difference is a lot bigger than i thought it could be.

I first set up my lyriks identically to the pikes, same pressure, tokens, LSC, rebound, rode them without checking on sag, they track better, less hand impact but better feel of what is going on, nice and stable on steep and braking, got a real nice patter sensation through high speed rough, haven't bottomed them out totally yet (tried to on the triple at rogate if anyone knows it), i hate bottoming out, like to have something in reserve for hucks. Checked the sag, was on about 15% on the pikes, was 20% on the lyriks, upped the air pressure, now 15% sag. feel just as comfortable and preserve my bikes geometry even better now.

Stiffness wise, i can't feel much difference between the lyriks and what i remember of boxxers, always felt the fox 36s were a bit twangy (were 180mm tho), the lyriks are 160 and feel solid, pikes felt like a trail fork, the lyriks feel like a DH fork.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 10:25 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

36 Float RC2 from 2015 onwards, if they feel rubbish you haven't set them up properly.

Hmm, not sure I agree, Fox USA & Mojo extensively worked on mine & the still didn't feel good.

I had an old, spare Deville I never got round to selling which I put on my bike as a short term thing until I decided what to do after selling my 36. It's never been touched & from a performance perspective is better in every way than the Fox.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 10:35 am
Posts: 713
Free Member
 

I've had the pike, the DVO, and now on the 36's
like most on this thread, i cant compare to the new lyric.

I liked the pike, but they developed the CSU creek problem, and felt like a change, so bought the DVO, as i liked some of the features it offered, and drank the cool-aid on the company ethos...

The DVO lasted two rides before developing a problem, and after no response from DVO themselves I got my money back and bought 36's so didn't really have them long enough to form any real opinion, other than i don't trust the company to look after me like SRAM/Mojo would/have in the past.

The 36's make the pike I had feel "loose" is the best way I can describe it.

I was worried about the reports of "harshness" before getting them, and the reality is that they do feel harsher over small chatter when not going warp speed.

Basically I find running a couple of volume spacers and quite low pressure works really well for me on a day-to-day trail ride, and I add about another 5-10 psi to them if I am doing an uplift day or something "big" and as others say they feel so much more composed smashing though the straight line in a rock garden than the pike.

buying forks is a bit of a minefield right now as everyone says everything is good, be it the MRP/Manitu/Marz/Pike/Lyric/fox etc etc..

The reality is for most of us mortals, in any given race, if you have the pike/lyric/36 i think your unlikely to see any difference in time down to the fork, as things like rider mistakes/skill etc are going to be more significant.

But if I was doing it again, I would by the 36's again


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 10:38 am
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

Is anywhere doing decent deals on the fox 36 rc2 in 650b flavour (ideally 170mm travel)?

Couldnt seem to find any especially cheap deals witha quick google search last night


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 10:52 am
Posts: 6575
Full Member
 

36 Float RC2 from 2015 onwards, if they feel rubbish you haven't set them up properly.

It seems that many on here have far more problems with forks compared to any one I know. I wonder if it's because many spend so long messing about with them, taking them apart to 'fix' issues and the like?

Could it be that some of you are not as good with a tool role as you think you are?


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 1:18 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

On the other hand it could be ropey QC.

Any new Lyrik owners also had experience of the old Marz RC3 ti forks - 55, 66 or 888?

Curious if the Lyrik gets anywhere near them for comfort and fluidity. Some claimed the Pike did, but it doesn't really.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 3:19 pm
Posts: 6575
Full Member
 

Yep, certainly could be or a mixture of both.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 4:58 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fox QC, has been pretty good as far as I'm aware.

RS it has varied between production runs, Lyriks are pretty similar to the Pikes 2016 in all respects, bar the extra chassis stiffness.

Out the box the RS will feel more 'forgiving' as the spring curve generally more linear.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 5:25 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

Rick - do you think something broke in them making them less plush? Or dirt in them? Or just worn out really

Nope I don't believe anything is broken internally.

I spoke with a few people about them and Darren at Push was very open in saying he felt Fox spec the HSC valving very stiff from factory. Also he mentioned that even after a Push tune it's pretty normal to run the HSC almost fully open.

Yeah are on my new 5010 now and I have just made a small change to them so I will see how they go. They were returned back from Mojo a while back after having a replacement CSU.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 5:49 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

36 Float RC2 from 2015 onwards, if they feel rubbish you haven't set them up properly.

Go on then please feel free to throw some settings out then?.


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 5:50 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Setup guide: http://locotuning.co.uk/tech-info.html

HTH 😀


 
Posted : 20/01/2016 6:34 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Reviews have suggested the Lyrik is like the Pike, but with better small-bump sensitivity and mid-stroke support - and a touch burlier obvs.

That sounds pretty good, but I wondered if owners agree?

And are those dropouts as annoying as they look?


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 11:55 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Reviews have suggested the Lyrik is like the Pike, but with better small-bump sensitivity and mid-stroke support - and a touch burlier obvs.

Yes, I would agree with that, and also it doesn't seem to have that spiking sensation on really fast, nasty stuff.

Not sure what you mean by the dropouts - are you talking about the Boost ones?

You can get them in a normal 15mm axle too.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 12:03 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

Reviews have suggested the Lyrik is like the Pike, but with better small-bump sensitivity and mid-stroke support - and a touch burlier obvs.

That sounds pretty good, but I wondered if owners agree?

And are those dropouts as annoying as they look?

The Lyrik (and Yari) have bigger negative to positive ratio, which gives them a better start feel, and then a (I think) smaller diameter air chamber ramps up a little faster than the Pikes, so more mid-end stroke support. Its good, but I would say that the token system is a little harder to find the perfect spot as a result, but thats just a case of more trial and error required.

The dropouts I thought would be a pain... actually in real life its ok. The brakes mean that the wheel seats roughly right, and its just a wiggle needed to get the axle started.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 12:17 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Cheers guys.

Not sure what you mean by the dropouts

They have a deeper recess for the "torque caps", which my wheels don't have.

So it appears you have to line them up like the older 135x12mm rear through axles.


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Lyrik (and Yari) have bigger negative to positive ratio, which gives them a better start feel,

I suspect next years Pike will get the same treatment and close the performance gap between the 36, most reviews suggest the Lyric has better small bump compliance because of it (than the Pike).


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Job Jobbed:

[img] [/img]

Simple job to machine some matching torque caps for my Mavic wheelset (that uses push in adaptors anyway 😉


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 4:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice maxtorque.
The only thing thats really put me off RS recently is the black on black on black... but we might just add a bit of white. So tired of seeing stealth bikes.

I've been running a 2016 170mm 36 on my bike since July last year. 3 ½ months at tA in Les Arcs (and the wider Savoie) and its been absolutely faultless. So much support that i've removed all tokens and only have 60psi in them. Honestly haven't noticed any lack of small bump sensitivity... even though it went some way past the recommend service interval.
Best fork I've used in a long time... even better than the mighty 55 RC3 ti from 2010.
Can't wait for the 2017


 
Posted : 21/01/2016 6:48 pm
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

Maxtorque - where did you get it from b? How much?


 
Posted : 23/01/2016 7:27 pm
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

So, just ordered a lyrik, rct3 170mm. Would have preferred a fox 36 ,but the price difference is too great, £526 for the lyrik,from germany versus £799 for the fox 36.

So will give the lyrik a good go,and if its no good will move it on. It has to be said that i have my doubts that it can be substantially better than the pike i currently have , seemingly havinga very similar if not identical damper, but willing to be proven wrong.


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 9:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wonder if Yari with avalanche would be a good option still cheaper than fox slightly more than the lyrik.


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 9:24 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

There are a few places you can get the 36 for £650ish, but even if the price were the same as the Lyrik, I'd still pick the latter.

Wonder if Yari with avalanche would be a good option still cheaper than fox slightly more than the lyrik.

I expect it would be lovely, but I can't see it being a cheap option, it's going to be £800 ish if you have to buy the fork.


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 9:25 pm
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

Whos doing the 36 for £650ish?

The best i could find was £799 for a 2016 27.5 rc2.


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 9:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Think you can get Yari £400 and avalanche for £300


 
Posted : 28/01/2016 11:00 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Plus shipping, import duty, VAT, etc for the cartridge. I think £800 might be a bit conservative, unless you get lucky with the duty charges.


 
Posted : 29/01/2016 7:05 am
Posts: 2571
Full Member
 

Apologies for the thread hijack, but figured it made more sense to have one thread.

The Pikes on the front of my Reign are dying a slow creaky death, will be going back for warranty, no idea how long it will take (bought from CRC). They also feel pretty awful in comparison to a brand new Pike on my 29er, even though its been recently rebuilt with new seals all the way through.

Currently weighing up the 36 or Lyrik as a replacement (have an X2 already). There does seem to be complaints about the 36 being harsh on the small bump sensitivity, for those who have complained about this, is your fork spaced down (i.e. a 170mm fork running at 160mm) or is it running at its supplied height? As speaking to a bike shop mechanic they were adamant that spacing down the fork cures some of the harshness.

Reading some of the threads on here and other forums, it was mentioned that the charger damper has little in the way of compression damping, and effectively relies on the spring & tokens?


 
Posted : 25/04/2016 12:26 pm
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

Reading some of the threads on here and other forums, it was mentioned that the charger damper has little in the way of compression damping, and effectively relies on the spring & tokens?

It has adjustable low speed compression damping , which has a large range, going from very little, to way too much. Perhaps people think it has too little high speed compression damping? this may well be the case, but it feels great.

I think the new lyrik is fantastic, I dont know how its done, but it does feel substantially more controlled and sensitive than the pike I had before it. Its a substantial step up despite on paper appearing to be very similar. I'm surprised that Rockshox dont do more in terms of marketing to differentiate it from the pike.


 
Posted : 25/04/2016 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Talking of the Lyrik being fantastic I've dropped the new damper into my old Lyriks. Not as much adjustment now but overall a big improvement. Basically the forks have a lot more pop to them and support.


 
Posted : 25/04/2016 1:47 pm
Posts: 65918
Full Member
 

Scamper - Member

Talking of the Lyrik being fantastic I've dropped the new damper into my old Lyriks. Not as much adjustment now but overall a big improvement. Basically the forks have a lot more pop to them and support.

If I could, I'd put the damper and coil from my old Lyriks into my new Pikes 😆


 
Posted : 25/04/2016 1:56 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Well, having plumped for Lyriks a few months back, and now having ridden them enough to set them up, and i'm happy with my choice!

It's taken quite bit of setup mind, as i'm a pretty light rider (70kg). I've ended up down art just 40psi, with 1 token in, but this manages to recreate the famous Pike initial compliance and yet not batter through the travel too soon.

Perhaps, if you're a bit heavier, then the Fox36 is a better fork, but none of the ones i've tried (and i've tried a few now, including a set on an identical Dune to mine) have got close to matching the Lyrik for the initial soft response.

As my Lyrik is 180mm, which not that long ago was I guess a DH only kinda length, i think i can get away with running it a bit soft to start off with, as there is plenty of travel and hence plenty of time on any given hit, for the fork to react and move upwards.


 
Posted : 25/04/2016 3:08 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Currently weighing up the 36 or Lyrik as a replacement (have an X2 already). There does seem to be complaints about the 36 being harsh on the small bump sensitivity, for those who have complained about this, is your fork spaced down (i.e. a 170mm fork running at 160mm) or is it running at its supplied height? As speaking to a bike shop mechanic they were adamant that spacing down the fork cures some of the harshness.

Reading some of the threads on here and other forums, it was mentioned that the charger damper has little in the way of compression damping, and effectively relies on the spring & tokens?

My 36 (both of them) were 160m travel, one being a 2015 & the other being a 2016 fork.

There seems to be some people doing some custom work to the air side to try improve the small bump compliance, no idea if it actually works though.

I've had my Lyrik for about 7 months now & it's just worked. Nothing fancy to set up. Running pressures a bit higher than recommended & 3 tokens in them, as I don't want a divey fork when racing.

Don't get arm pump any more, don't get grief from my previously broken wrist, and I don't get angry with a fork that's almost impossible to find a sensible balance with.

I'm not a fan of the 36.


 
Posted : 25/04/2016 7:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

in summary

"I would have given the Lyrik the edge as far as small bump sensitivity goes but after spending time on Fox's updated 2017 FIT 4 damper that's no longer the case, and the two competitors are neck-and-neck once again. Fox does have the advantage when it comes to external features - the 36 is available with a damper that allows for both high-speed and low-speed compression to be adjusted independently, and they also offer a version with convertible dropouts that allow riders to run either a 15mm or 20mm thru-axle. At the end of the day, choosing one over the other will come down to what features you value the most, since both forks leave little to be desired out on the trail."

long review of lyrik here

http://www.pinkbike.com/news/rockshox-lyrik-review-2016.html


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 8:11 am
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Good review there.

I'm pretty much decided on the Lyrik. Just need £600 now... so maybe it'll have to wait then.

🙁


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 8:39 am
Posts: 2571
Full Member
 

Mojo are currently out of 36 Floats, 2017's should be arriving some time in June. The Lyriks are £200 cheaper, seems a no brainer to me.


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 8:59 am
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

I managed to buy some new 2016 170mm rct3 solo air lyrics for £530 off a German shop on eBay a couple of months ago. Might be worth a hunt around for some bargains


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 9:15 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

If you're a lightweight like me, i think the lyrik is a more sensitive fork. I just couldn't find the sweet spot on the 36!

If you're a bit heavier, what feels like a bit more initial stiction is much less relevant, and the extra "Tuneability" of the Fox damper could be the decider (all be it for significantly more initial outlay). But, as you can't tune out the stiction, that dominates for racing snakes like me......


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 12:14 pm
Posts: 65918
Full Member
 

Funny thing is, the Pike came out in 2013 and is largely unchanged, and the Lyrik's really just an evolution. How many Fox models and major product changes has it kicked the arse of? I'd not be surprised if Fox have caught up but you know it won't last.


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 12:33 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

If you're a bit heavier, what feels like a bit more initial stiction is much less relevant, and the extra "Tuneability" of the Fox damper could be the decider (all be it for significantly more initial outlay). But, as you can't tune out the stiction, that dominates for racing snakes like me......

I'm not a racing snake, would say I'm a fairly average 6ft tall & 83kg.

It was just harsh, unless you ran silly low pressure and then it was just useless.


 
Posted : 26/04/2016 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My lyrik eats trails. I have a 170mm but I'm slightly concerned about my rebound. Sometimes the fork leaves 0.5cm+ of unextended travel when on two wheels. SRAM said it's the negative air spring for the "zero breakaway feel"
-could you guys send some pics of your fork after its rebounded from like a 50% compression (while on two wheels)
I'm just under the 10% bracket sometimes


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 14146
Full Member
 

My brand new Lyriks are the same zcmudd


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 5:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Suntour Durolux are awesome, I've got them on both my bikes (hardtail with 120-160mm and FS steamroller-tank-o-matic with 140-180mm). They're as stiff as owt and work really well. I haven't tried any newer air spring RS forks but my OH has some older U-turn coil Pikes on his bike and they're absolute crap (flex like mad) compared to the Durolux on mine 😀


 
Posted : 13/05/2016 5:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If I could, I'd put the damper and coil from my old Lyriks into my new Pikes

CrConception in France do a coil mod for the pike, AWK in Germany does a dual positive air chamber mod that is similar to the system found in the Ohlins and IRT equiped Mattoc. Both will boost midstroke support and sensitivity without massively increasing the bottom out resistance.


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm just under the 10% bracket sometimes

Sram are notorious for misplacing the sag indicators. Break out a ruler - also my Pike has a bit of travel that can be pulled out - a few mm. I'm pretty sure its normal, though they can develop stick down due to grease in the port that equalises the pressure between the positive and negative air chambers.

Besides, in motocross there is free sag and race/rider sag. It's likely that what Rock Shox says is correct, that the large negative spring makes them so sensitive they sag under the bikes weight like a motorbike. I've only ever really seen that on coil equipped downhill bikes.


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 9:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not a racing snake, would say I'm a fairly average 6ft tall & 83kg.

It was just harsh, unless you ran silly low pressure and then it was just useless.

2015 model? They were overdamped, the stock models came with a racers enduro tune! 😀


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 9:08 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

2015 model? They were overdamped, the stock models came with a racers enduro tune!

Originally yes, until they were replace with a 2016 fork after the cartridge spectacularly exploded and basically trashed the whole fork.

The 2016 fork wasn't any better really, and was worked on by Fox USA and Mojo, but still felt like crap. The Lyrik just works fine.


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 9:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well...crap. I was counting on buying a Fox after my Pike died twice in a few months. The second time, Fisher took 5 1/2 weeks to get the fork back to me.

Their excuses included "the computers went down" and "the bloke doing your forks is on holiday".

Great.


 
Posted : 17/05/2016 9:21 am
Posts: 6243
Free Member
 

any long term thoughts on the lyriks for those in the thread who bought them? hobnob? how are yours going? you seem to put them through their paces

one thing that puts me off SRAM is the turnaround when they break, for example the last post above! 5 1/2 weeks! having one bike only, its simply not possible to be off it that long, I'm currently waiting on a reverb warranty which is already at 5 weeks, its crap!

mojo and fox forks you would be away back on the trails within around 3-5 days max

but my 36 I'm having trouble setting up, far to many settings for my liking on the RC2 I have so I'm thinking of selling and getting some lyriks


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 7:37 am
Posts: 6243
Free Member
 

also have the new lyriks combatted the dreaded creaky CSU yet?? or is that still a problme


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 7:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

also have the new lyriks combatted the dreaded creaky CSU yet?? or is that still a problme

Friend has developed the cracky steerer on his new Lyriks that replaced his cracky BOS forks. The Lyriks have gone back to YT, yet another month he won't have a bike!


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 8:09 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Still have the Lyrik - although they are on my wife's Nomad now.

They are fine - no issues whatsoever, I still steal her bike when I break something on mine & have no issues really. No warranty issues etc.

The don't seem to suffer from the creaky crown of the Pike, but then I read that although they are visually similar - the Lyrik has more meat on it.


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 8:19 am
Posts: 6243
Free Member
 

Hobnob - good to know no long term problems (with the bladder exploding etc), and creaknyess!

out of interest does this mean your not running them anymore? what have you got now? as I thought you hated the 36's for the same reason I'm struggling with mine

milkie - doh, to counteract one, although googling doesn't suggest a single creaky lyric so far and they've been out a year nearly now, its very frustrating the turnaround though that's the for sure, that is ultimately whats stopping me getting some really over fox (even for the price hike)


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 8:24 am
Posts: 4588
Free Member
 

I've had the Lyriks for about 8 months now, they're great still. No issues with creaky CSU , but then I didnt have that issue on my pikes either.

Have added a token to whatever they come set up with out of the box ( 170mm 650b Solo air rct 3 model).

I did originally feel that I couldnt get the rebound damping slow enough, I was right on the last click, and so I was going to change the rebound shimstack to the more firm setup, but in the end I added a token and lowered the air pressure instead. I may yet change the shimstack when I have them apart for a service.


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 9:15 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

I'm not - i've got a 2016 36 with a custom damper cartridge in it.

Yes - not a fan of the standard 36's to be honest - although i've not tried the current stuff.


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 9:21 am
Posts: 6243
Free Member
 

cool hobnob, I am tempted by the fit4 2017 ones (but the price is insane) to see how they fair over mine, and for the simplicity of them and also a 15mm QR

julians - sounds promising, I'm only a light rider, I had a little go a mates lyriks and they just feel so plush over everything, I cant fault the 36 when it gets rocky they do seem to work well in that scenario, but for most stuff they just feel a bit wooden to me, the lyriks if they have avoided the creaky CSU then that's a positive, and if the bladder doesn't explode then they are onto a winner!


 
Posted : 12/10/2016 9:38 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!