Spokes, straight vs...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Spokes, straight vs bent

23 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
155 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

New wheels on the horizon, straight pull look bling and the physics seems logical. But...maybe it's a nominal improvement if at all.

I favour performance over aesthetics, but obviously aesthetics counts.


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 12:53 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Straight pull spokes are way better than conventional ones, which break ALL the time. No spares are available, becuase you'll never need them.

Seriously, they both work fine, conventional ones are much easier to get as spares.


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 1:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rubbish - my mate snapped 3 straight pull spokes in Chatel last year and no spares in sight - would have been a doddle to fix with standard spokes.


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 10:27 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Can you read?


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

Straight can also rotate when being adjusted, which is a right pain in the bum. Perhaps there's advantages but all I've ever found is disadvantages with mine.


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think bent seems the easier bet, the late great Sheldon Brown has got me thinking about a half radial half crows foot rear wheel...


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 11:16 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 11:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That's 2 leading, 2 trailing right?


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 11:37 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

3 leading 3 lagging, my favourite build so far 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/04/2011 11:56 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

That is actually quite cool.

Holding up ok?

You done that drop off yet?


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 5:26 am
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

J bend spokes are the way forward. Slightly easier to break. Hell of a lot easier to fix.


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 8:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now, i have to say that straight pulls are better. The wheels can be built stiffer which means better turning, and better power transfer.


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 10:00 am
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

Is that extra stiffness measured or perceived? Not being pedantic, genuinely curious.


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 10:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For any advantages you might get with straight, they are negated by the difficulty of finding replacements... J bend spokes can be found everywhere.
Unless you plan to carry a full compliment of replacements everywhere you go, get j bend!


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 10:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Onza dog,

I was at an uplift last weekend, and i had two sets of wheels with me.

First up was my hope pro2 on mavix EX729 wheels (32x J-bend spokes). Ran these for 5 runs of the course, then at lunch time, i switched to my Mavic crossmax SX wheels (24x straight pull spokes), swapped the tyres over and had the same pressures. You could feel the difference in turning - the bike turned much more positively. You can also feel the difference when cranking out of corners.

So yes, the stiffness was 'percieved' but also slightly measured.


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 10:14 am
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

anto164 - Member

First up was my hope pro2 on mavix EX729 wheels (32x J-bend spokes). Ran these for 5 runs of the course, then at lunch time, i switched to my Mavic crossmax SX wheels (24x straight pull spokes), swapped the tyres over and had the same pressures. You could feel the difference in turning - the bike turned much more positively. You can also feel the difference when cranking out of corners.

And you know that's because of the spokes being straight pull, not because there's 8 less? Or one of the other various differences caused by a wheelset that weighs about 2/3ds as much as the other? 😕


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 11:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There was also a lot less noticable flex in the wheel when holding it.


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

Oh hang on, I had that all back to front, sorry 😳


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 12:10 pm
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

But the point remains, there were more variables than just the shape of the spokes.


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think a good test would be same rim, same hub but in both variants and as similar weight spokes (same number) as poss. There must be mechanical tests comparing such things?

If it can mean equal strength, but a lighter setup, that's a pretty big deal!


 
Posted : 16/04/2011 8:48 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

I was just about to flame anto164, what a comical comparison. Glad someone beat me to it in a tactful manner.

kepe readign the magazines mate!


 
Posted : 18/04/2011 8:54 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

J-bend. Straight pull are a bugger to true, a bugger to replace and IMO have no real performance advantages.

Hope Hoops Pro 2 vs SP-XC6s would be the test I guess.


 
Posted : 18/04/2011 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ah, the sweet reality of bargain purchases has bitten down it's jaws. Second hand ftw. Hope II EN 321 on it's way. Holding out for a Hope II AM rear on ebay.

As they say in the US, "get bent".


 
Posted : 18/04/2011 10:02 am
Posts: 4336
Free Member
 

I bought a set of (roger musson)Hope pro 3/stans 355 (straight pull) about 2 and half years ago. They've been everywhere and I broke 1 spoke on the rear last month. Mate replaced it no problem

Not sure if it's better than j bend or not but they seem to be holding up well and feel very light


 
Posted : 18/04/2011 10:25 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!