[Closed] 'sos' points on the trails....

Nope! We aren't a nanny state just yet and free thinking and choice should still be encouraged...having more 'safety' options on a trail will make even more people stop thinking for themselves and will result in more people getting hurt.

Look at the number of people who ride the trail centres then try some natural stuff and fail as it wasn't marked with a warning or didn't have arrows to tell them which way to go (or had chicken options) - adding yet another option like this (the basic idea is a very good one) will result in more people taking less responsibility for their own actions in the belief that someone else will pick up the pieces...

Well its a "thought" for a start

Whats more its a stupid one at that. Do you want one installing at the bottom of every crag thats used for climbing in the UK too, or how about the summit of every peak in case people get lost ?

This is a troll?.....please God let it be a troll.
Hang on,I've not thought this through.You could have ranger stations every 100m and you could check in to each one with an estimated time to the next and if you were late they could launch a helicopter search and there could be starbucks at each one and someone could deliver muffins at stategic points but not those really gooey ones but the nice cheewy moist ones that don't stick to your teeth and look horrible.Or something.
Or....you could TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN LIFE GODDAMMIT.....and breathe.
just a 'THOUGHT'.....phew

ride within your abilitys if your that paranoid ....

seriously though .....learn some mountain craft ....

It's a no from me as well.

Much as I disagree with some of the tone of Dick's answer, I actually agree with the idea. It seems kind of pointless anyway. At worst you might be lying there for an hour or so before someone found you at a trailcentre.

It'd be a far more 'useful' idea up mountains and such, but still I disagree. Most people who end up calling out the rescue teams are those who are completely unprepared for what they are doing, and I say this knowing that the brother of a friend died 2 days ago in exactly these circumstances. Nature should be wild and make you step back and think, "Am I ready?" before setting off.

just a thought dont we already have this system in place ..... if you ride down the m1 - orange boxes on the hard shoulder ...

"Look at the number of people who ride the trail centres then try some natural stuff and fail as it wasn't marked with a warning or didn't have arrows to tell them which way to go (or had chicken options) -"

Go on, show us the numbers then.

I think this is basically a daft idea but it's got * all to do with "nanny state" or "free thinking and choice". Just that it's impractical. If it wasn't so impractical I'd say go for it, not for the riders but for the emergency services and rangers that have to deal with "I think we're somewhere on the red route, maybe not, we didn't bring a map...".

Now, what IS a good idea is what they do at Kielder, every trail section's got a board up saying exactly where you are, grid ref, nearest reliable mobile phone coverage... So in the event you come across a real emergency, you can get help for yourself or others more effectively. No doubt the "nanny state zomg" people object to that as well but it's a minimal investment thing that makes things easier for the emergency services, I can't see a downside. If you applied that to places with really s*y mapping and waypointing, like Fort William frinstance, it could be of real benefit to people- and not just riders obviously but emergency services.

+1 what Northwind said.

Never ridden Kielder but that sounds far more sensible. At least it should (technically) force someone to be able to read a map.

If it was only at trail centres/bike playgrounds, it wouldn't matter. It would help ensure broken heroes got carted away before they spoiled the trail with too much blood.

But not in our mountains please 🙂

Please let this be a piss take it's bad enough that trail centres exist without adding electronic tagging to them .No one is there to help you on bridleways where you make your own route up without being tagged on a spoon fed trail centre route

"OP goes into witness protection program" shocker......

Each Bog Trotter should be fitted with one on top of their helmet 🙂

[img] ?psid=1[/img]

Just take a phone.

Edric 64 - Member
Please let this be a piss take it's bad enough that trail centres exist without adding electronic tagging to them

Ah, perhaps that's the way forward for trail centres.

A deposit of £50 for an electronic tag which keeps an eye on where you are on the trail, and if you stop for an unreasonable time automatically sends a rescue helicopter.

If you get 'slightly lost' it will administer electric shocks until you are back on course.

Just take a phone.

I reckon mobiles work about 25% of the time in the places we ride...

If you get 'slightly lost' it will administer electric shocks until you are back on course.

YAY!

it's bad enough that trail centres exist

Edric, are you some sort of Harry Enfield character?

IdleJon could be onto something there-if your average speed dips too low it interpretes this as 'mincing' and delivers 30'000volts of electric justice....WINNER.

simon didnt realise you rode in the highlands that often - i really dont see how with the coverage we get up here that you cannot have a working phone for 75% of the rides you do in englandshire....

the ammount of times ive been in the arse end of no where in the highlands and had my phone go off in my bag is uncanny

Rorschach - you could have different settings of course

1 - Mincer
2 - Jeycore lite
3 - Piabetic

I reckon mobiles work about 25% of the time in the places we ride...

My phone (3 network) works at a guess about 75% of the time in the places I have ridden in the Lakes.

i really dont see how with the coverage we get up here that you cannot have a working phone for 75% of the rides you do in englandshire....

75% of most rides 🙂 Maybe propagation is better in Scotland, but generally, if you can't see habitation there's no signal except in a few places.

My phone works at about 7.5% of the time where I ride in wales... 😯

and of course you would need lots and lots and lots of signs like they have on the motorway so you know what direction the "panic" button is and they could be big in case people can't find them - more signs fantastic 😯

I always thought getting a bit lost on rides was part of the adventure, and a bit of risk adds to the enjoyment/ challenge on some rides. 'just a thort' but not much of one.

Truly terrible idea.

I think I read about a forest in Japan where they light numbered chinese lanterns (OK Japanese) if they get lost. BTW I rally think that photo is fantastic. Should be a cover shot.

Take a phone, and if you get into [u][b]SERIOUS[/b][/u] trouble dial:

[center]112[/center]

This will enable the phone to access any network that works (based on signal strength), at no cost to you, and connects you to the 999 call centre.

This also works internationally.

mildred - urban myth apparently - http://www.snopes.com/science/mobile.asp

Grum, if you read the link you posted it agrees with mildred. He didn't say it would magically work when there is no signal, just that it would use the signal of any network that was available.

I always thought getting a bit lost on rides was part of the adventure

I have great nostalgia for my early days of riding when I had no idea where I was - but I made the mistake of looking at maps 🙁

and a bit of risk adds to the enjoyment/ challenge on some rides.

correct 🙂

...it was just a thort...just a Troll then :twisted:?

my t'other half said .... well shall we stop all ambulance services then then and firebrigades and let everyone fend for themselves too..lol (it was his thort of the day anyway.... i just typed it to see wot response there wud be....so anyway end of the TROLL..trip trap trip trap under the bridge- hope that Troll doesnt fall into the Abyss requiring open heart surgery...teeheee

Are you pished?

Please tell me someone other than SFB who sees getting lost, falling off, busting a bike and generally having an adventure as the main appeal of most outdoor sports?
Am I also the only one who was taught to drag your own sorry ar*e of the hill/river (with teeth if needed) if you got hurt or into a spot of bother?

Adventure and self-reliance. Wonderful things.

erm ? nope the Troll is pished ! hahahha

beej - sorry yeah you're right - didn't read mildred's post properly. 😳

Please tell me someone other than SFB who sees getting lost, falling off, busting a bike and generally having an adventure as the main appeal of most outdoor sports?

Dunno about the main appeal but 'having an adventure' is certainly the most memorably aspect of any of it.

Please tell me someone other than SFB who sees getting lost, falling off, busting a bike and generally having an adventure as the main appeal of most outdoor sports?

well, getting lost is not much of an option these days as I carry a 3D map of most places we ride in my head, but I still enjoy the thrill of the unexpected, and accept the occasional crash as part of the experience.

Am I also the only one who was taught to drag your own sorry ar*e of the hill/river (with teeth if needed) if you got hurt or into a spot of bother?

I didn't need to be "taught" that, it comes naturally, however I wouldn't necessarily expect others to conform to my preferences, and one's natural duty of care to others sometimes leads to seeking help from 3rd parties.

don't they have these at most trail centres, by "difficult" bits. impressed by 7 stanes location posts, with hospital info and nearest phone reception area. not in the wilds though? surely the whole point of the countryside is that there isn't posts telling you what to do/where to go

when i am in the country side i take an os map - and stay aware of my surroundings to the point where i could give you a 4 fig grid ref and narrow it down to 1 square Km very soon after looking at the map .

maps are not just for emergencys - knowing where you are is just as important as being able to find out where you are !

Can we have laybys as well so I can stop for a picnic.

and narrow it down to 1 square Km very soon after looking at the map

very soon after I look at the map I find:
a) I'm on the wrong side
b) it's upside down
c) I get all those little coloured lines mixed up...

"a [b]footpath[/b] ? Really ??"

The idea at Kielder was going to be done in a similar fashion at a Scottish location that got left well behind - amusingly it fell on it's face as the FC allegedly refused to pay for a SIM card on each network to check service on all available networks - so rather than offering this info on Vodafone (which was what the ranger had) it wasn't done at all as not everyone used Vodafone so if it couldn't be done for all it wasn't done.

I think the idea is a very good one for trail centres but it also removes the need for responsibility from the rider. Out in the wilds it would be impractical and difficult - trail centres it has more obvious benefits (being in a 'single' location would make it easier to manage - from emergency services point of view it would be a huge benefit).

Have a chat to people riding at the trail centres and ask them how often they ride natural stuff - the majority (in my case) say they don't ride natural stuff as it isn't signposted, no warnings and it needs to be joined up. Saying that I've not asked every single rider who uses trail centres...but in my case, they don't ride natural stuff.

As another daft idea (along similar lines) - I'd suggested some remote cameras in black spot locations - they would be solar powered and would show the area back at a central point - car park/ranger office - that would then let others see if an accident had happened and could be reported - wouldn't identify every single inch of trail but it could be used at locations that regularly have accidents.

Makes alerting emergency services easier (landline from an office rather than potential flakey mobile reception); also makes it much easier for the emergency services to identify the location.

Like I said - another daft idea along similar lines...

Part of the issue is that you are suggesting the removal of responsibility from the rider and you are also adding responsibility on the ranger service/whoever is manning the tv images/call-out service.

I think theres certainly something to be said for clearly identifying stretches of singletrack/trail features at trail centres, either through naming or numbering sections,so that in the event of an incident the location can be quickly identified by both rider and emergency services (rather than "ooh, about halfway round after crossing the stream but before the drystone wall".

Beyond that, lots of phones have GPS, and you only need to go up the nearest hill to get some semblance of a signal, basic mountaincraft means someone should know where you are, your route, and when you're expected back.

[b]sfb[/b] - I didn't need to be "taught" that, it comes naturally, however I wouldn't necessarily expect others to conform to my preferences, and one's natural duty of care to others sometimes leads to seeking help from 3rd parties.

a follow -up ! ::::::: maybe an icolated incident to all of you but i hope sum of you get my point i was treying to gett acrosss and i feel sorry for this chappy... solo riders/ infact any riders...accidents do happen... and maybe some emergency procedure shud be in place on the forest trails... INCIDENT ::::::

June 06 Sun 18.05 Gisburn Forest, Lancashire - Mountain Rescue
A solo mountain biker (m, 25) fell off his bike and sustained a bad break to his arm; his helmet was also damaged. Unfortunately mobile phone contact was lost before an exact location could be obtained. He was found at the roadside by the first CRO vehicle responding, having managed to walk the three quarters of a kilometre out of the forest. Casualty care was provided by CRO until the road ambulance arrived. Bowland Pennine MRT were called and then stood down when the casualty was located.

Wow, a whole 0.75km walk out of a forest, proper backcountry 😉

And what would the hotspot buttons have done to help him? He managed to get to a road and got help...I don't think it would have been any different if there was a button he could press - saying that, he'd have to have fallen right at the button and been able to press it to mnake a difference - he was still mobile and walked out to a road...

Daft idea you'd get people buzzing the SOS button if they got a flat or broke a nail.

However...the mapping/marking out of trail centres does sound a good idea. I (normally) know where I am, where I'm going and potential gib out points whenever I'm out riding au naturele. But the few times I've been to trail centres I ride into the trees, follow the signs then ride out at the end without the foggiest where I was inbetween. The trail centres kind of promote this too with their simplistic innacurate smiley faced maps they have at the cafes.

Eeee by 'ekkk! Theres soem tosh up there!

Solar powered CCTV in lack spots?

Direct phone lines to the ranger?

Stick a first aid kit in your camelback, read a book on how to use it (or even better, go on a course), and take some responsibility!

On any of the SaR TV programs inevitably theres quite a few where you think WTF were they thinking, climbing ben nevis in the worst snow for 100 years in stilletos, but thinking it was OK because if they got stuck they could call the hellicopter? Imagine how bad it would be if you dint even need phone signal?

"I've run out of cliff bars, could ou send us up some flapjack if the ranger is passing by?"

simonfbarnes - Member

Just take a phone.

I reckon mobiles work about 25% of the time in the places we ride...

But you can ring 999 from any network, just do a manual search for networks on your phone and use whatever you can get.

I wouldn't like to see trail centres become more sanitised, bad enough in the couple of years I've been away from mountain biking that trail centres seem to have taken over (as shown by one magazines "local knowledge" route guides that often feature trail centres, first we rode the red, then we rode the black route, superb, what kind of local knowledge is that??).

I'd wonder if MR teams local to the popular trail centres are quite familiar with the routes themselves, and so long as there is someone who can talk them onto the casulties location then pressing a little "help" button wouldn't be needed. Besides, imagine the number of numpties who'd press a button the ride off?

With respect elaine, if you're worried about incapacitating yourself on a solo ride, then no amount of the sort of thing you suggest is going to help. You could smash your pelvis or knock yourself out 200yards from an emergency help point and it might as well not exist.

If you're mobile then you ought to be able to get yourself to a road, or at least to somewhere with a mobile signal.

If you're with other people then they can get you out or get help.

In your scenario from Gisburn the " MRT incident" happens because the injured rider calls for help from an area where he has inadequate mobile signal. A certain amount of mountain rescue time is wasted because they know there is a casualty but don't know where he is. Probably no skin off anyone's nose really and a perfectly good result all round.

Presumably if he'd simply walked to the road and called an ambulance then it could have been done slightly more efficiently, but I don't think anyone can be blamed for calling for help when they've snapped a limb. 🙂

Sorry but I'm going to agree with Elaine here.

SOS points on trails are an excellent idea with the one condition being that in hot weather there are bikini clad beauties serving cold beer at each one and in winter, there are bikini clad girls in hot tubs dishing out mulled wine. Its the future...

I'm really starting to think the outdoor life isn't for you Elaine Anne.

Ok if they did exist just how would the guy in the example above get to them, I guess he'd have to walk the 750m to it.

Don't all trail center marker posts have a little number attached to them? If not all, most do. I always assumed if I ever needed help I'd get my self to one and relay that to the emergency services who should be clever enough to locate it and me via a ranger or similar.

Don't quite know why mobile strength needs to be added, your phone tells you that.

On a tangent, are we all really anti social?

first thing they tell you on DofE or at scouts is get into a group of between 4 and 7 (8/2 = 4, and bigger groups tend to be harder to manage), that way if theres a problem you've got someone to stay with the casualy (v.important) and 2 people to go get help.

All these SOS beakons provide for is Billy no mates? I know we all go out solo occasionaly/all the time but it doesn't hurt to do what MR etc tell you to do and leave detailed route instructions and call home at pre aranged times to let people know your still alive.

I am quite anti-social yes. A vast proportion of my riding is done by myself, and 4 is pretty much my maximum group size ever.

There isn't anyone at home, and leaving detailed route-plans for a day faffing about on the Surrey Hills with my dad seems a bit OTT. Equally, the risks of exposure or being eaten by wolverines while trying to drag my broken body back through the boondocks to the relative civilisation of Peaslake or Westcott are generally manageable. 🙂

Some excellent trail centre snobbery on display today… Bluster, bluster, bluster, Nanny state, mumble, HSE, Bloody kids these days… top stuff..

Yes OP’s idea may be a bit impractical and perhaps misses the point that heading out into the wilderness solo is meant to be a bit dangerous, and that those who do so should be prepared, know the risks and how to navigate.
But I also think there’s no harm in considering and discussing possible infrastructure/systems to prevent loss of life and/or limb, Mountain biking is on the increase and is not the safest sport on Earth, it’s inevitable that more people will get into trouble even at the trail centres, so why not consider what can be put in place to prevent minor problems becoming major ones?

The whole hearted shooting down of well meaning peoples ideas by a bunch of Jaded arses in the “I know best” brigade speaks volumes to me. Constantly keen to belittle those who’s mountain craft, and survival skills aren’t up to their own high standard but hardly keen to pass on “the knowledge”, instead keen to imply the countryside is for “Us” and not “Them” and that everyone other than themselves, who dares venture outside of a major town is a moron inviting near certain death…

Personally I’d like to see a non-way marked trail centre but With Maps freely downloadable and available in the car park, the idea being that visitor would learn in a relatively safe environment how to navigate, and how to tackle unknown trails for the first time... obviously with the provision that should they get into serious trouble they can contact the emergency services and let them know where they are…. Think of it as a training environment perhaps…

Personally I’d like to see a non-way marked trail centre but With Maps freely downloadable and available in the car park, the idea being that visitor would learn in a relatively safe environment how to navigate, and how to tackle unknown trails for the first time

10 years ago that was called navigation & the countryside. OK, maybe the person would have had to plan their own route or follow a magazine route, but it was perfectly doable.

what missing frontallobe said

I love trail centers, mainly because I can do more corners,jumps and fun stuff at Swinley in 15 miles than I could in 150miles on the Chilterns.

But to take away even more responsibility from the user is pushing them in a direction I think would be really bad for the sport. Its an outdoor activity with quite a high element of risk, possibly even higher than rock climbing. But realisticly that risk and its assessment is down to you. If you go out ridig alone in the highlands, in winter, with no food or warm clothes thats your own stupid fault, MR will come out and help you, but if you die its through your own actions, not their inactions. Similarly at a trail center, if you go out, alone, and come a cropper, with no help available, its your risk assessment that put you there. Either minimise the risk by riding slowly on well known easy trails, or mitigate it (body armour, helmet, ride with company). Expecting someone else to assess the risk for you is not going to end well as they dont know you.

No from me, again we're not in a nanny state and the outlay in costs and staffing requirement is mental. There's just no need having someone holding your hand all the time, if you're not able to navigate don't go out alone. If you have an accident then, generally, a phone will work most trail centres and if not then ride carefully if you're worried.

What I'd suggest a far more sensible option is something that logs whether you've returned after a ride+some expected delays and alerts a friend/family member.

why not consider what can be put in place to prevent minor problems becoming major ones?

I rather take the view that most of the cost-effective things are down to riders being sensibly prepared.

My "mountain craft and survival skills" aren’t up to much personally, but things like first aid kit, survival blanket, tools and spares, adequate food and clothing, phone and some means of establishing where you are are (a) basic, (b) no imposition on anyone to carry and (c) capable of preventing a large number of potential problems from turning ugly.

If measures to ensure that a trail centre is safer are cost-neutral then fine. But I'm not sure I see much point in spending money on the assumption that people are genuinely clueless and putting in costly measures to ensure that their assumed cluelessness doesn't cause problems.

We've said it before, but "Better drowned than duffers. If not duffers won't drown".

It is, as you say, not the safest thing to be doing and it's entirely reasonable to expect that sensible people will take some basic precautions when they go out. For most people's low-level, not-far-from-a-road, tolerable weather excursions most of what is needed to stay tolerably safe is not rocket science or "mountain craft" particularly. And if you're going up into the highlands in winter and want to have help points then perhaps doing somewhere else instead is the best answer. 🙂

[i]obviously with the provision that should they get into serious trouble they can contact the emergency services and let them know where they are…. Think of it as a training environment perhaps…[/i]

I think we have enough to do and stretched as it is thanks.

Constantly keen to belittle those who’s mountain craft, and survival skills aren’t up to their own high standard

Thankfully I don't fall into that category as I doubt I'd survive a night on the hills on my tod let alone get myself safe after an accident. High standard? Erm...if common sense is classed as a standard then I've reach that one...the outdoors is dangerous - herein lies the attraction to almost every MTBer - trail centres reduce that danger but it doesn't make them completely foolproof and safe - they do have dangers...but common sense generally gets me out of any problems. The times I've had to deal with issues I've managed (tree through arm; snapped frame; folded wheels).

The issue (as I see it) is this - if you provide all this gizmology and technology people are going to get less reliant on common sense and their own ability and more reliant on someone else being there for them. At the end of the day, you pedal your own bike and you decide where it goes so you have ultimate responsibility as to what happens to you - if you get into an accident then either be equipped to deal with it or make sure you are with someone who can (even if that is to get to a road to flag down an ambulance)...putting more stuff in this trail networks is just going to make more people do stupid things (and also cause a whole headache of extra cost and no doubt litigation).

The idea is good, but the suggested practical solution isn't...I've said it on previous posts in this topic - the idea is good, making it work is the hard bit...

:lol:SO WHY COULSNT THE RECUE PEOPLE FIND THAT DUDE IN THE FOREST THEN ? tHATS WHY HE STRUGGLED WITH BROKEN BONES TO GET HIMSELF TO THE ROAD..
his mobile signal wasnt strong enuff apparently so he dragged himself out..
erm who ever said the outdoor life isnt for me ive been cycling for 2 years solid with no mishaps or broken bones.... ive climbed high cliffs with no broken bones and im also use to do CAVING myself and in still alive in one piece...so i think i am very much an outdoor person....just making a few pointers thats all...... sorry for speaking ahem..... i wont be helping any of you lot next time your struggling either ! lol

I think you're making a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. For the one in a million case where someone struggles to get help for themselves in a country practically blanketed by mobile coverage and people. So you might have to drag yourself to somewhere with a broken limb - personally unless it was a broken thigh/spine I'd consider it the LEAST I could do to drag myself back to the carpark before calling an ambulance, people are far too reliant on the emergency services these days.

DickB well put.

It was me Elaine. It was meant in humour you earlier posts have made me laugh of being uber cautious and now pampering trails even more. Good for you not being injured but that's the point self responsibilty would have helped not a marker post saying you are here.

Caving...on your own...have you not seen The Descent...bigger Kahoonas than I've got!!!

Mountains aren't dangerous. Bad decisions or hero behaviour can be.

[i]Caving...on your own...have you not seen The Descent.[/i]

Hot chicks disappearing into the woods together, damn monsters got them before anything good happened though.

i have seen the Decent !!!! and not ruddy been in a cave since that film !!!! hahahhha... actually wheni have been caving i have never and will never be in a cave on my own.... i cant stress enough that you must always be in a group, so if accidebts happen then someone can rub out to get some kind of help...these cave especially the ones in the yorkshire Dales can flood to the ceilings in a matter a minuites...
ok im with you all on the 'nanny state' thing... but who ever said we 'rely on the emergency services too much'...thats like saying "oh its ok if i have a 'heart attack' and die', or if i fall half way down a cliff cos me runners unclipped themselves -no need to dial 999 ... nope no-one will care anyway ? im just another statistic eh.... :

ok im with you all on the 'nanny state' thing... but who ever said we 'rely on the emergency services too much'...thats like saying "oh its ok if i have a 'heart attack' and die', or if i fall half way down a cliff cos me runners unclipped themselves -no need to dial 999 ... nope no-one will care anyway ? im just another statistic eh.... :

Coffeeking said that a [i]mobile[/i] casualty should move themselves to a point from whcih they could be more easily rescued instead of expecting emergency services to come and find them away from the road. Why is that anything like either of your examples?

Speaking from personal experience.. it's not THAT hard to drag your sorry broken arse a couple of kilometres.. even with a broken thigh amongst numerous other things.. it just takes a bit of spit and grit..

Why on earth do people keep saying mountain biking is dangerous - some said more so that rock climbing. it is not at all. Its a very safe pastime. 30 folk a year die on the scottish hills mountaineering. I know of no MTB deaths

The problem is is too many folk have no idea of risk assessment and of mountaincraft. They rely on a mobile phone to get them out of trouble.

Get real - get trained if you need it. Ride within the limits of your skills - both mountaincraft and bike handling.

Just think how we did this pre mobiles. We told someone where we were going and when we were due back. We carry what is needed to survive until rescue can get there but the main thing is we were self reliant.

I am perfectly happy to go for multiday treks into remote parts with no mobile . I am confident in my skills and in 40 yrs I have never once called the emergency services

i too have never contacted the emergency services, and never seriously been hurt in rock climbing... one minor brake of the thumb but that was indoor rock climbing ! lol.
i always ride within my limits but i think most of us like a challenge at some point do we not....

"bit oh yorkshire slang now.so lighten up yee whipper snappers.... "eeh wen i were a lad, thee didnt have mobiles in them days -it were in bed by 9 oclock or ya had the slipper off ya father n sent t bed wi no scotch eggs for tea, maybe a glass oh milk and if ya were lucky ya had a hot waterbottle to cuddle up to whilst fighting off them big scary spiders crawling down ya damp wallpaper... then ya ruddy older brother wud come strolling in drunk at 10.30pm wi ya dad at back of him wit big wooden stick shouting ya no gud drunken lout, get them sodden clothes off scruff of yer neck, no supper for theee...BED NOW ! sorry no- im not drunk just tipsey ! lol n if that werent enuff ruddy Arthur Scargill "got hit ont back at head wit riot shield" well bugger me.... 😆

Can I sum it up?

[b]Its a sh*te idea[/b]

[i]"oh its ok if i have a 'heart attack' and die', or if i fall half way down a cliff cos me runners unclipped themselves -no need to dial 999 ... nope no-one will care anyway ? im just another statistic eh.... :[/i]

Not the same at all genuine emergencies are one thing, dialing 999 for minor injuries another.

We're talking self responsibility here making the outdoors more and more like a softplay just encourages people not to take responsibility. "It'll be alright we can always ask for help"

I think it is a great idea for trail centres but it doesn't go nearly far enough.

What we need is a system of ropes and safety harnesses so that when a potentially dangerous section is reached, riders can hook onto the rope and if they fall they could be saved from a nasty injury. It would enable entire families to go down 'blacks'. Dad or indeed Mum, can show how rad they are by descending 'unhooked' safe in the knowledge that their offspring can follow in total safety. Less confident riders could also try a dodgy section fearlessly, safe in the knowledge that the worst that can happen is bruised genitalia from an improperly positioned harness.

Alternatively, why not save money on those expensive mtb's and simply tour the theme parks for a thrill. You will get plenty exercise walking from ride to ride and have none of those creepy crawlies to deal with or be surprised by a rock which someone thoughlessly forgot to remove from the trail when it was carved over the last few centuries. You will also be able to graze on a variety of 'proper' food from the many fast food establishments dotted around thus negating the need to carry cumbersome backpacks.

There, all sorted 😉