 You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
After a rather heated discussion and a party I've just been to. What s harder on the human body, top level / elite 24h MTB racing or top level / elite ironman.
My reckoning is, as you're racing for 24 hrs and the splits between podium and not often come down to monkies if not seconds that a top level 24hr MTB racer will exert more energy and take longer to recover than a top level iron man. My counterfoils argument is that MTB is easier than iron due to the fact you get to freewheel down hill. Discuss
Doing something for 24 hours is definitely harder than doing it for however long it takes to complete an ironman
They're different sports. There have been people who have majored in both who've made the crossover and done well.
For the non elite I'd say riding a bike for 24 hours is much easier.
splits between podium and not often come down to monkies
Doesn't sound fair tbh.
Have you ever run a marathon? The thought of running one after a long, frantic swim then riding over a century fills me with more pain and dread than the thought of being in a bike race for a day.
Don't underestimate how difficult changing disciplines in a race is.
Depends how good you are. I work with a guy who does Ironmans like you or I would do a trail centre weekend. No bother at all.
Triprongs have massive skills though.
the physical exertion is dependant on who you are racing against surely
24hr MTB racing doesn't have a world record for furthest unlike Ironman where there is a total time record so you can't compare in that respect
Ironman doesn't have the sleep deprivation factor, this is the biggest difference - both are hardcore nevertheless
Ironman. Am considering both and am much less concerned about the 24 as you can just take a break/get some proper food on board and manage your pace.Running the marathon is the bit that scares me about the ironman
I asked my Iron Colleague if he fancied 24h MTB and he said no, it'd be too hard and not interesting enough.
Both the same. Your still going too your limits.
Ironman. Am considering both and am much less concerned about the 24 as you can just take a break/get some proper food on board and manage your pace.Running the marathon is the bit that scares me about the ironman
But you're not looking to win. Moot point.
Agree that for an average chipper a 24 is easier, elite level I don't think they're comparable. A 24 will take a greater toll on the body, but that doesn't necessarily make it 'harder' per se.
I've done both (though nowhere near where the OP is touting level wise) IMO Ironman is harder. Apples and pears though and hard to compare.