[Closed] Singlespeed...

It's mostly swearing....continuously....at high volume.

Oi bigblackshed...me, page 2, honestly, you can't read nor write, but you can pedal a bike 🙂

@rorschach, that's tourettes your thinking of. Like single speeding, but less beard

Folly to say that SS is faster. Everyone knows it's not.

I'm faster around Whinlatter on my SS. Gears make [s]you[/s] me soft.

As a training tool SS does have benefits but you could get the same effect on a multiple geared bike by just selecting one gear and not bothering to shift.

I had a rigid bike for a year or so before I remembered that you don't have to sit and spin on rigid bikes so I started standing up and heaving on the bars at low cadence like the old days. This is very satisfying and enjoyable - however whilst I choose a higher gear than I would if I were spinning, I still select the right one.

Thing is, sometimes I need to keep the intensity down, when base training, so I need gears for that. In the spring, I'll be changing up a few cogs and hurting myself. My main goal is a 5 minute (or hopefully 4m30) climb that I'm fairly sure would be far harder on SS, and I'd set a slower time. The rigid bike is definitely slower than the FS.

SS is faster given the right course as theres no losses in the transmission. Iirc rear derailleur costs ~6W.
There's a strange feeling of efficiency when you first ride a SS, and efficiency is speed.

Doesn't take much stop/start, steep climbs or pedally descents to swing the balance in favour of gears though.

@molgrips - Until I get the Spearfish frame built up both my MTBs (Cotic Solaris and Singular Puffin) are rigid so I'm used to being out of the saddle and giving it some welly 😉

Doing zone 1 or zone 2 rides is always pleasant at this time of year.

When all the local trails are slow sloppy mess the full suss geared bike becomes much less fun. You just basically sit and grind away waiting for the ride to be over. Single speed comes out and it is fun again.

Strange thing, folk.

They buy a bike and want to go fast and get the sensations of speed.

Then they want to go faster so they get gears and suspension, but now they have to go even faster to get the same sensations.

The bike costs more, and needs expensive maintenance, but it's still just the sensation of speed they are chasing, but they have to be faster to get it.

So they get dissatisfied with their trails, and start adding artificial features to them until they end up with a skinny hardened bumpy road with 'flow', berms, and wooden bits.

And all the time they're riding their thumbs are flittering about like a demented speed typist's as they operate all the wee levers on their bars and clatter their way through the scenery.

And that's the nice thing about a rigid singlespeed, you ride it, not operate it. Anytime you want to enjoy the sensation of speed, you don't need a specially groomed playground, you just find a bumpy track.

The other nice thing is a top rate SS bike costs about the same as a top rate front fork, and so you have more money to spend on beer.

The money that would have got wasted on maintaining gears and suspension instead gets spent on going to events like the SSUK, SSEC, etc and more beer.

What's not to like about singlespeed?

Gears and suspension are for the prematurely old and frail. 🙂

I choose a higher gear than I would if I were spinning, I still select the right one

There is no 'being in the right gear'. You will either put in the effort required for the gear you select (mandatory with SS), or select a gear to match the effort you want to put in (much more potential to vary with gears).

Well given the limit in available leg power, the limit in cadence, the compromises that come with adding more torque and the different training effect, I'd say there is a range of 'right' gears for the circumstances.

The money that would have got wasted on maintaining gears and suspension instead gets spent on going to events like the SSUK, SSEC, etc and more beer.

What the hell do you think gears are made of? Gold?

I'm running 10 year old mechs and shifters, I've maybe changed cables once or twice in that time. So I change a chain and cassette every so often. That's about ooh, £100 a year absolute maximum? Oh, I also changed two sets of jockey wheels on separate bikes in that 10 year period.

Oh and my rigid bike is geared.

Then they want to go faster so they get gears and suspension, but now they have to go even faster to get the same sensations.

The fact that you write that demonstrates you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about or (more likely) are trolling. The sensation of oofing down a rocky trail on a rigid bike at 10mph is absolutely nothing like the sensation of carving it up at 20mph. Not remotely the same sensation or even the same skill set.

Speaking as someone who owns a rigid bike, an XC FS and a long travel FS. I like the benefits of each type of bike.

Anytime you want to enjoy the sensation of speed, you don't need a specially groomed playground, you just find a bumpy track.

Again total bollocks spouted by the kind of person who likes teasing others on the internet. Which is a bit crap. I've been there on bumpy trails on rigid bikes, been doing this for long enough; I still own a rigid bike. I know what it's like to ride both.

The other nice thing is a top rate SS bike costs about the same as a top rate front fork

Eh? A top rate SS would be what, Shand Bahookie? £1300 frame only - there aren't many suspension forks for that price, and nice ones abound for half that. And that's before you've added 'top rate' wheels and those ****ing £350 Jones bars.

Troll.

Doing zone 1 or zone 2 rides is always pleasant at this time of year.

Put your willy away - Z1 on a SS is entirely terrain dependent.

When all the local trails are slow sloppy mess the full suss geared bike becomes much less fun. You just basically sit and grind away waiting for the ride to be over. Single speed comes out and it is fun again.

It's all in your head. Just as you like SSing, I am quite able to have a fun ride in the mud on a FS. In fact, owning both rigid and FS, I don't think there's much difference on muddy trails. Where rigid is good is on the long rides with road and big climbs on tracks.

When did this become an argument about FS versus rigid?

Why are half of SSers such annoying bell-ends?

Molly old dear.We get it.Now fekk off.

Epicyclo doesn't.

So I'll stay til he does 🙂

.
Top bloke, singlespeed legend, now retired. I'm in the video too 🙂

molgrips - Member
Epicyclo doesn't.

So I'll stay til he does

I've bought one of those Sturmey-Archer 3 speed things so I'll soon be experiencing all that flow and gnarr I've been missing..

But hey, this is a thread about single speeds. Surely you didn't expect anything but absolute bollocks on here?

Because the reality is single speeds are total bollocks and cannot be justified except with some heavy-duty rationalisation by their deluded owners.

But they're a damn sight more fun. (Owners and bikes)

And I hate maintenance. 🙂

I'll happily take 50% of single speeders being "annoying bellends" over 100% molgimps being a whining little princess in need of a safe space, or preferably a quick shovel to the windpipe before burying him in a shallow roadside grave. 🙂

Mind you to keep posting in a thread about single speeds about how crap they are and how much you hate single speeders for not having fun in the molgrips prescribed manner and then to moan about it on other threads as well.....? Either being a dull little trolgrips or just totally lacking in self awareness. Either way, you've been about as useful and pleasant an experience as sucking on a week old cum sponge from a sexytime club

Tit

Molly old dear.We get it.Now fekk off.

+1. Why so keen on telling us what you think is wrong with single speeds ?

You are wasting you breath with me as I gave up gears 17 years ago and have no intention of using them ago.

My zone 1 & 2 comment was about geared bikes not singlespeeds but given the way I wrote it I can see how you came to that conclusion.

As for riding it to the exclusion of geared bikes. Looking at my Strava stats for this year, I've ridden just shy of 10,000Km of which 770Km have been on the singlespeed. My geared bikes must be feeling so left out and lonely and unloved.

What the hell do you think gears are made of? Gold?.... That's about ooh, £100 a year absolute maximum?

Use them dont its your choice. Mine comes out for SSUK and then gets used till I take the FS out in spring time

You are the biggest zealot on here and that is some crown you just claimed considering the disciples of the one gear are all here 😉

tazzymtb - Member
I'll happily take 50% of single speeders being "annoying bellends" over 100% molgimps being a whining little princess in need of a safe space, or preferably a quick shovel to the windpipe before burying him in a shallow roadside grave.

Mind you to keep posting in a thread about single speeds about how crap they are and how much you hate single speeders for not having fun in the molgrips prescribed manner and then to moan about it on other threads as well.....?

If we're allowed to talk bollocks about single speed, then the same applies to Molgrips.

Once he masters the art, who knows? He may be ready to make the next move and get a proper bike*.

The beauty about riding singlespeed is it's fun, and fun is not something to take seriously.
.
.
.
*for the benefit of bollocks deficient gearies, that statement is bollocks too. 🙂

I was always very sceptical of SS riding but I thought I would give it a go. I had been getting bored of Glentress having been a few times in a short time so for variation I thought I would build myself up a single speed for a change. I really rather enjoyed it and I was no slower on the climbs. What I ended up doing was attacking the hills hard ( cos I needed the cadence to get enough power) until I ran out of puff then walking the rest. Turns out this is about the same speed (compared to the mates I was riding with) as my usual technique of sitting and spinning away in a low gear at a pace I can complete the entire climb. Coming back down again the silence of lack of chainslap was nice and not having a tall gear meant conserving momentum and pumping the track which helps develop my meagre skills. I don't actually have an SS MTB now - the bike got its alfine back for commuting on but I do have an SS road bike which I also enjoy for its lighter weight and completely silent running. I once took it out and back ride in a really strong wind. Its geared low so at 70ish rpm I am doing 15 ish mph. I actually hit 35 mph coming back downwind at a totally silly cadence. It amused me.

Its all just messing about on bikes and I was surprised that I enjoyed riding the SS on and off road as much as I did. I wouldn't do it for "natural" rides or touring as then I really do want a low gear for the big climbs but for "dicking about" it was surprisingly fun

I think a lot of it is dependent on the local terrain - I cannot imagine taking mine to the lake district for example - though I did but only for SSUK [ and I did take my FS geared with me anyway .......shhhh i got away with it

FWIW i was slower up Garburn on it than I was on the SS but i cleared everything.

You are the biggest zealot on here and that is some crown you just claimed considering the disciples of the one gear are all here

Single speeders- putting the Fun into fundamentalism.

Molgripes is more Church of england though, sort of desperately trying to convert people to his beliefs, whilst being all beige and dull. He'll break out a guitar soon and start with the happy clappy songs about idle thumbs being the work of the devil and how a 9spd jesus saves our souls

There's a bit of confusion in this thread. Singlespeeds don't have to be austerity mobiles- my bike's not, it's got big brakes and nice forks and a dropper on it, but just the one gear. It's fun and works for most of the stuff around here. It's more difficult to wheelie with the one gear though 😕

@kayla1 oh gods no, definitely not, my ss fleet is worth the economy of a small island republic. But you can still have an amazeballs time on an old 26" surly 1x1 if you want and no ss rider will sneer at your out of fashion bike. But that's because single speedy folk are a much nicer tribe than "mountain bikers" who are dicks 🙂

tazzymtb - Member
@kayla1 oh gods no, definitely not, my ss fleet is worth the economy of a small island republic. But you can still have an amazeballs time on an old 26" surly 1x1 if you want and no ss rider will sneer at your out of fashion bike. But that's because single speedy folk are a much nicer tribe than "mountain bikers" who are dicks

To be fair, we'd probably assume the 1x1 rider was being deliberately niche with with their little wheels and funny brakes.

Right - let's just clear something up.

I have nothing against singlespeeding. I've seriously considered it myself, for quite a while, but I just don't think it'd fit for me and my riding. If I lived somewhere else then yeah maybe I would.

What I object to is SSers with a superiority complex talking bollocks about the rest of us. Epicyclo's post suggesting that going slower on a rigid bike (nothing to do with SS mind) is the same as going faster on a FS, for example. Or suggesting that geared FS riders are miserably grinding along because they are victims of fashion where SSers are having a great time - that's just shite.

And yes I know it was probably a wind up.

And saying 'yer but suchandsuch an event was won on an SS and I regularly pass people on my SS so that means they're faster' well, no it doesn't. That's crap reasoning of the highest order.

But that's because single speedy folk are a much nicer tribe than "mountain bikers" who are dicks

Isn't this thread full of SSers doing the sneering?

I'm going to spend all winter riding a single speed. Two reasons:

1. maintenance
2. I'm hoping it will make me faster on my geared bikes.

No snobbery here

I found riding the fixie on the roads and hills was a great training aid...I MUST get out more on that heap of junk...

DrP

I'm going to buy one today just to freak Molly out when i tell him the trails come alive at 5mph slower 🙂

It's as much something different for me. It suits some rides/routes but not others.

Would I have a singlespeed as my only bike? No way! Too many steep hills round here.

I've found that I'm faster than some people but slower than others regardless of whether either party is on SS or geared.

I'm going to ride mine tonight because it's awesome (and I'm bidding on a fixie on ebay).

The problem with geared bikes is they have n-1 wrong gears, where n is the number of gears SRAM/Shimano have decided is optimum this year.

Isn't this thread full of SSers doing the sneering?

Sneering? No, that's just the funny face we make when our knees have exploded and we've prolapsed on that impossibly steep climb we just cleared. (Whilst overtaking the miserable gearies)

😉

Sneering? No, that's just the funny face we make when our knees have exploded and we've prolapsed on that impossibly steep climb we just cleared. (Whilst overtaking the miserable gearies)

The best bit it pretending to not be out of breath/prolapsing and casually offering a jelly baby.

I didn't mean to start a sneery thread, I was just excited about getting out on a bike again after ours were nicked. I could just as easily have started a 'Aren't steel hardtails brilliant?' thread or, more broadly, a 'aren't bikes ace?' thread!

So then, pissing about on bikes in the dirt eh? Ace or what?

The best bit it pretending to not be out of breath/prolapsing and casually offering a jelly baby.

😆 My other half, yesterday, as he breezed up to me after gearing up a hill-

"You ok love?"

Me-

"<wheeze> I'm fine. Smashing. Never better in fact. You? </wheeze>"

I love riding my 26" rigid steel singlespeed, and I love riding my 27.5" 2x10 carbon hardtail and my 29er 1x11 carbon FS. I even love riding my 700c carbon road bike. They are all bikes, and bikes are great.

But if I was forced to keep only one of those bikes, it would be the SS.

There's a 17% climb on the local road loop I've found from Swindon. I can do it at a reasonable cadence out of the saddle if I smash it in 34/28, or I can do it at about 40rpm if I try to take it easy. I think I will go round this time. 17% hills aren't really base training.

I'd be walking that on an SS no question. I reckon SS makes even less sense (to me) on road.

[url= https://cyclinguphill.com/combe-gibbet/ ]Coombe Gibbet[/url] hits 16%. Get up that fixed no problem.

Well not exactly no problem, but i got up it 😉

you should try it molly; you'll be amazed what you can get you can get up.

17% is about the limit on the road SS for me (39:16 ratio) but it does depend on the length of the climb, how far into the ride it is, road surface, day of the week, phase of the moon and a myriad other factors. 20% is definitely too much though, I'm off and walking.

No sneering at all, its what happens when folks all have shared passion, you get a whole load of tongue in cheek (even better if it's in someone else's) comments. Some folks would find offence at anything and to be fair you did come stomping in like a giant fun vacuum to tell everyone how wrong they were and pulled the "oh no, everyone is mean and stinky and didn't agree with me" routine.

Just chill old bean ,there is plenty of stuff out there in the real world to get all angsty at. The paucity of gears of some folks bikes really isn't one of them xx

Actually having read molgripes posts, I suppose its a bit like tattoos. Folks without them are desperate to tell how much they don't like them and what they think of you and how stupid you are for doing it etc... Folks with tattoos could give a flying toss about the un-inked and just carry on happily existing.

But then Mrgrips does keep coming to a thread he doesn't like with people he doesn't agree with, to shout into a void, so actually with that high a tolerance for pain, repetitive humiliation and boredom, singlespeeding would be perfect for him 🙂

I have nothing against singlespeeding. I've seriously considered it myself, for quite a while, but I just don't think it'd fit for me and my riding.

Don't consider it - just do it! Then you'll know. It's not a logic problem you can apply your brain to - it's actually fairly irrational, but it can be mighty good fun.

You'd be surprised what you can make yourself climb when the alternative is the walk of shame

Ok, to move the thread in different direction, what would people consider a light SS build? What's the lightest steel build that you have?

Think the talk of going up that 17% hill kind of sums up peoples fears over singlespeed, the though you won't be able to make it up it without stopping. If you do not make it up so what, try to get up further than you did next time and you might just do it some day.

I was put off for ages getting a ss mtb though I wanted one, for fear of not getting up hills, my local trails at the time were up the top of a 700 feet road climb and even after I bought a cheap one off this forum the first 8 - 10 times I used it I just farted about a few local bits and pieces before I plucked up the courage to go up the road hill to my proper trails.
Was delighted with myself when I go to the top of the road climb and have loved my ss mtb ever since.

ps, don't think I could get up a 17% hill but I would give it a go.

I like having two different MTBs for different purposes

Rigid SS for local stuff. Makes tame stuff more interesting and also makes my local, very flat area a bit more fun. It's used for local rides with the dog and it is completely maintenance free

Geared hardtail is used for everything else

I took my rigid SS for a ride with a mate as I had the wrong tyres (at the time) on my gear bike, it didn't necessarily feel quicker or slower, just different. And I walked a couple of bits that were too steep or slow (clay like mud and couldn't turn the pedals). Still good. No washing afterwards!

The problem was that I couldn't slowly spin up the climbs chatting, if it was either stand and pedal or walk

what would people consider a light SS build

Under 8kg is a good target.

Lightest ss I've had was a 16lb scandium and carbon 29er. Climbed like it had a rocket strapped to it. Was a bit "flighty" in the peak district as it was well outside its design, but still great fun.

Lightest steel I've had was just under 20lbs. Depends very much on the bike though as something like a singular will always be a lighter starting point than a surly or on one

Well, about the only thing that I’m looking forward to, when I get back from Greece in about ten days, is getting out on my Ti Hummingbird. I’m certainly not looking forward to the cold and wet, that’s for certain.
My singlespeed is about the only thing that I miss when I’m here.

Right - let's just clear something up.

I have nothing against singlespeeding

The amount and length of your posts suggests you are spending quite a bit of time having nothing against them.

federalski - Member

Think the talk of going up that 17% hill kind of sums up peoples fears over singlespeed, the though you won't be able to make it up it without stopping. If you do not make it up so what, try to get up further than you did next time and you might just do it some day.

There's 17% and there's 17%. An isolated 50-100 metres of 17% isn't that bad especially if you can carry some momentum into it but several hundred metres of 17% or a ramp at the end of a long gradual climb and it's a different matter.

The surface matters too: really easy to put too much power down and have the back wheel spin out and you head for an OTB moment - uphill!

I find I brake a lot less as well as carrying momentum becomes much more important especially on rolling terrain, trying to kick on a short steep ramp is just hard work!

Weight wise my SS is embarrassing! It's an old On-One Pompetamine steel frame and it's in the 10.8Kg range.

This one's short:

I have nothing against singlespeeding.

Don't consider it - just do it! Then you'll know.

A more on-topic and constructive post:

My rides are lots of steep tricky rocky climbs, and/or lots of road. A gear low enough to get up the steep bits would leave me spinning like a lunatic going nowhere on road. I like to put the hammers down on road flats, surely this isn't possible in 32:16? You lazy SSers must all be taking a rest on the flats unlike us hard working geared riders 😉

^^ winky smiley

you ride as far as you can at a higher speed than on a geared bike then get off and walk the rest.

Yeah fair enough, but I come out to ride not walk. Especially on road, when I am wearing road shoes. I hate pushing my bike. Personal preference, of course.

When I did Trans Cambrian way with a much fitter rider I was glad when he got off to walk, cos that meant I did too (even though often I didn't actually need to). Gave me a breather.

Moly - I had my road SS on 40/17 gearing at over 35 mph once. spinning like a tory PR flack tho

I like to put the hammers down on road flats, surely this isn't possible in 32:16? You lazy SSers must all be taking a rest on the flats unlike us hard working geared riders

Just try it.

People borrow them and seem surprised that the pedals actually turn, it's as if they expect them to be 44:11 or something. Or that there'll be some sort of back to the future moment as their legs disappear into trails of flames when they hit 120rpm on the road and find that actually it's not much harder to maintain than 60-90.

You'll be amazed how quickly your legs will spin and how slowly they can push when there isn't a little button under your finger screaming 'push me'.

Just try it.

Why? Why spend the money?

I have SSed the El Mar on a ride when I broke my mech hanger. Yes, I was surprised that I got up some stuff, but I did have to walk, and I did find it slow on the downs. What I (re)learned was that standing up to pedal hard at low cadence is fun, and I do that much more now on the road and rigid bike, but I still use gears to do it.

I can ride it like an SS but I can change between 32:16, 32:18 or 32:14 on the fly 🙂

People talk bollocks about SS because it is bollocks. Gears should be faster - cadence, effort, watts, efficiency, etc.

Most people who come to SS as a "why not?" whim after riding a "normal" bike. They expect what you should rationally expect: that it's going to be all sorts of work and no types of fun, but find the opposite, the work parts are fun and the fun parts are also fun. Most stick with it or at least keep coming back to it.

Then they come up with all sorts of reasons why it's fun, from the sublime to the ridiculous, mostly bollocks, or rationalised bollocks at a push. It's just more "bikes!" than a ride with gears. There's always the comeback of "But it's not as efficient." to which a perfectly valid response is two fingers and a "Thhhhppppbb!!".

[img] [/img]

Your mate on the TCW [b]was[/b] Ian Barrington though! There's some nasty climbs on that towards the end - let's avoid this ridge and drop into the valley then back up again.

My SS is just making use of an old unused frame, it's not a statement or anything fancy. It cost £10 for the singlespeed kit; £7 for the chain and £9 for some new brake cabling and outers as the old cables had seized. £26 for something to play about on isn't bad.

bugger. I really miss my SS now 🙁

Anyone got an 18" / large frame either set up for ss (got chaintugs and kit already) or ss-able with a tensioner that Molgrips has convinced them they don't need now? Not fancy, just functional......

This thread has inspired me to dust off my old rigid 29er Inbred SS that has been sat in the shed unused since SSUK 2015 in Yorkshire.

Swapped brakes to some old SLX ones that have found their way in to the parts bin in the last two years. Have ordered a 27.2 dropper as I can do without gears and suspension, but can't imagine riding without a dropper these days.

Hopefully will be sorted for a night ride this week.

Bring on the slop.

Cheers Molgrips and Tazzy!

I found riding the fixie on the roads and hills was a great training aid...I MUST get out more on that heap of junk...

DrP

I'm riding a hill regularly on my SS to see if I can hit the PB I got on my geared bike. Still off but getting closer. When I do then I'll go ride it on my geared bike to see what the difference is.

Well that has been an entertaining time whilst enjoying my soup at work! thought i would put my point in as well!
my name is chalky and i am a singlespeeder! so what no one really cares! i was signed up with a coach last year sticking to training plans and now after 12months off the bike i am getting back out there and do you know what matters now is just the fact i am outside and on my bike, i may be wheezing and putting my lungs back in at the top of climbs but who cares! i don't care if you are on the most expensive all carbon FS or on a cheap secondhand hand me down, if you are on a bike then that ultimately makes the world a better place! to quote “Whenever I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the human race.”. HG Wells.

Your mate on the TCW was Ian Barrington though!

Yep and even he walked 🙂 Foel Fadian IIRC.

theotherjonv - Member
bugger. I really miss my SS now

Anyone got an 18" / large frame either set up for ss (got chaintugs and kit already) or ss-able with a tensioner that Molgrips has convinced them they don't need now? Not fancy, just functional......

Actually!

I've got my Sanderson Soloist that's about to be put up for sale. Frame is an 18", ecentric BB, will include the Hope headset. Also a set of straight steerer Rockshox Revs, dual air, set at 120mm, 20mm axle with a long steerer tube. The frame has paint chips, the fork is still in good nick.

EDIT: Also a set of Hope Pro2 hubbed SS wheels to fit the F&F, if the price is right. 20mm front, SS / Trials rear, both with Sun Singletrack rims.

Hills and singlespeeds:

I'm old, bald, tending to a potbelly, but I have ridden my singlespeed Pompino up the Bealach na Bah. I admit to walking in the same places the geared folk were walking (it was the first Bealach sportive - about 90 miles).

I have ridden a 1935 upright gents rod braked roadster (4 to the ton) on a day ride round Wester Ross (Dingwall, Ullapool, Ledmore, up the Struie), a total of just under 125 miles.

If I can do it, any of you young guys should have no problem. Take 2 weeks to get used to a singlespeed and then It's really all about the attitude of don't stop until it's time to walk. *

Plus you get to talk bollocks about geared bikes. 🙂
.
.
.
*Guideline: once it's below walking pace.

How do you know you have it right? Engage the gearie puffing away up the hill beside you in an interesting technical discussion about the differences between tooth profiles on his cassette.

If he can't talk in coherent sentences as you amble up alongside him, you have it right. 🙂

Some of those weights seem incredible! My Ti road bike weighs more than 8kg. How hard would it be to get a Singular Swift (large) down to about 20lbs? I guess it would have to have some carbon on there, which is of course another controversial topic where sides are taken, and weapons are drawn. I'm not worried though, as the carbon weapons will just shatter into tiny splinters and the steel weapons will prevail, despite their heft! Discuss.

Oh, and hills, I said it before and it's scientific fact as my FIL is a trained scientist and I've got a physics A-level, that it takes the same energy to move the mass of bike up the same slope, irrespective of what gear you are in. Conservation of energy and all that. Yes, the human body maybe works more efficiently in certain circumstances, but standing up and using more muscles to offload the energy requirement of the legs balances it out.

bbs - thanks but that'll be a 26er, won't it? I'm all tolled and rubbered up for bigboy wheels I'm afraid.

If I can do it, any of you young guys should have no problem.

Age has nothing to do with it - it's about fitness. Not all young people are fit.

It's really all about the attitude of don't stop until it's time to walk

Seriously though - why can't a geared rider have that attitude?

I've got a physics A-level, that it takes the same energy to move the mass of bike up the same slope, irrespective of what gear you are in.

Shame you haven't got a corresponding A-level in biology. Try standing still holding a bag of cement under each arm. Total work done will be zero, but see what happens to your arms after a while 🙂 If it made no difference it wouldn't matter what gear SSers used would it?

but standing up and using more muscles to offload the energy requirement of the legs balances it out.

Yes but [i]you can still do that on a geared bike[/i].

Cement under arm is quite a lot of work done - gravity is a constant force. Quite strong too.

I wasn't really comparing it with geared bikes, as of course the same physics apply, just commenting on the hills posts really. I often get the same thing, where I think I can't get up a hill, and it just disappears after a bit of grimacing. I could do it if I changed down on a geared, or just blasted up - same energy used, just over a different time frame and using different technique. I like the geared fat bike as it can do that spinny, crawl up vertical cliff face thing, but really enjoy the rip-it-up nature of SS!

Once things get past a certain gradient it's easier to stand up than sit and spin. Alpine style climbs that are a constant 8% or so are, for me, sit and spin but hit the steep stuff in the Dales and it's time to stand. This is regardless of how the bike's geared. There's no way I could sit and spin up Park Rash or Fleet Moss for example.

Anyway this is STW, when folk on here get to a hill they just call out the uplift company 😆

If I had room for [s]one more[/s] two more bikes, one would definitely be a singlespeed for local winter slop low-maintenance purposes.

Rode my 29er hardtail as singlespeed for a couple of weeks and loved it, but now converted back to 1 x 10 as I didn't fancy taking it anywhere with proper hills - my skateboarding-destroyed 44-year old knees really did feel like they were going to pop out of their sockets!

Cement under arm is quite a lot of work done

Work done = force x distance moved. Force is constant, distance moved is zero, work done is zero. So how come your arms get tired?

If you leave the bags of cement on a table for 100 years, how much work does the table have to do to hold them up? Where would the energy come from?

Once things get past a certain gradient it's easier to stand up than sit and spin.

To an extent. I've read before that standing up delivers more power but is less biomechanically efficient. However I've discovered that it uses somewhat different muscles, so I sometimes like to stand up and mash a big gear for a while then shift down three or four gears and sit and spin for a bit, whilst going at constant speed. The change seems to help keep going for longer.

molgrips - Member
'If I can do it, any of you young guys should have no problem.'
Age has nothing to do with it - it's about fitness. Not all young people are fit.

'It's really all about the attitude of don't stop until it's time to walk'
Seriously though - why can't a geared rider have that attitude?

When are you getting your singlespeed? We can't keep meeting like this... 🙂

Ok, so "work done" is to do with distance, but I did use the term "energy" in my post. It might not be mechanical energy to hold the bags, but chemical energy is used to stop them falling to the ground due to gravity - it's not free. It's still energy being used and it hurts. Jeez, why am I arguing about something I studied 25 years ago, and I never, ever, ever ride with bags of concrete under my arms - that would be mad.

Its fun, I like it. 9.81m/s2 is great on geared or SS. Wish was a little less sometimes though, but then we'd get giant insects!

I got a strava KOM at mountain mayhem this year on my singlespeed 😀

Don't think Princess Anne will be beating it!

OK, stealth advert time…..

no, wait, it's not stealthy at all!!

I've got a nice Pace 104 853 bike for sale in the classifieds at the moment, with a SS build option - it's got slidey dropouts and the SS kit includes a v nice Boone Ti cog to make it even more niche….. 😀

I'm selling it to fund an even more niche build!!!

(I wish I hadn't sold my Curtis 29er singlespeed last year BTW - it was a very high-end sub 19lb build and absolutely beautiful - I've already tried to buy it back but the new owner won't budge!)

I've wondered about that Pace myself but its a bit not a 29er for me.

A gear low enough to get up the steep bits would leave me spinning like a lunatic going nowhere on road

The road sections when running a 32:16 on 26" wheels are a complete drag which led me to just ride as few road sections as possible which turns out a positive.
Moved back to fixed gear a few years ago and running a higher gear than I would a single speed but still low enough for off road hills and it is much less frustrating on the road sections but still not fast.
Having one gear is clearly a compromise and if you don't want to make the compromise then don't ride single speed...

It's still energy being used and it hurts.

The point I am trying to make is that you can't say it makes no difference what gear you're in because the energy output is constant. The way your body works has a massive effect - as demonstrated by the bags of cement thought experiment.

Wish was a little less sometimes though, but then we'd get giant insects!

No, insect size is limited by how much oxygen they can get into their bodies which is dependent on oxygen concentration in the air. Because they don't have blood.

That's usually enough for a regular cyclist to get the basics sorted unless they are morbidly obese or have other problems.

I'll take some photos of my local trails. There's no way anyone other than an absolute hero is clearing them on an SS. And I'm not that hero. Maybe I'll try leaving my bike in 32:18 and see how I get on.

Incidentally, since you can choose different gears on an SS in the workshop, does it matter what ratio you choose? Do you have more fun in 32:16 than 32:18?

Seriously though - why can't a geared rider have that attitude?

They can, but the temptation to just change down a gear is always there and they take it. I would probably be the same myself if I ever rode gears.