Show us your sub 25...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Show us your sub 25lb bikes!

96 Posts
53 Users
0 Reactions
414 Views
Posts: 859
Free Member
Topic starter
 

OK, I'm sick of hauling my 30.75lb rig around the trails.

Give me some inspiration - I'm hankering after a 24-25lb bike again!


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

22.5lb


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 6:04 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3258
Free Member
 

this one is about 25lbs
[IMG] [/IMG]

This one is about 24lbs
[IMG] [/IMG]

Kev


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I built this uber light 22lbs but it rode like a wooden horse so beefed it up as trailish bike and probably weighs less than 24lbs? 3.6lbs frame.

Personally I could be the one that needs to lose weight not the bike!

So what if your bike weighs more-how does it ride?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 6:21 pm
 dyls
Posts: 326
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 6:24 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

dyls, with reflectors and pedal platforms, please tell me that was taken when you picked the bike up from the shop!


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 124
Free Member
 

[img] ?t=1246217947[/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 7:39 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

Feel free to recoil in horror, but you can ride trails on it, and without the rack and guards it weighs a fair bit less than 25 lb. 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 7:46 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I am fairly rad on it to when i get the chance

[img] http://www.strawberrychildrenstoys.co.uk/images/early%20rider%20bike.jp g" target="_blank">http://www.strawberrychildrenstoys.co.uk/images/early%20rider%20bike.jp g"/> [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 7:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why does your new bike have to be so heavy?

[img] [/img]

Currently 20.7lbs


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 7:51 pm
 dyls
Posts: 326
Free Member
 

'dyls, with reflectors and pedal platforms, please tell me that was taken when you picked the bike up from the shop!'

haha, if I'm honest it took me quite a while to figure out how to remove the platforms.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?v=0[/img]

[img] ?v=0[/img]

[img] ?v=0[/img]

[img] ?v=0[/img]

Heres a few of mine.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

sheldona, that top one would be lighter without that stupid extra tube

😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And the third one would be considerably lighter without the retard on board 😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yawns, spins around and walks off...........................

😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OK...any excuse... 8)
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

FoxyChick, I always like looking at your frame

😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:26 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

[img] ?v=0[/img]

can't remeber the weight exactly.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Feel free to recoil in horror, but you can ride trails on it

I think your confusing 'trails' with canal toepaths there! 😆


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CFH...thank goodness for the edit feature!
For a moment I thought I must have inadvertently shown you my fram!! 8)

You have to know me at leat 3 yrs before that happens!!! 😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

2006 Fisher Zigguratt....
weight, dunno for sure, folk i ride with (when I do get out...) do the old 'pick it up' test and describe the result as 'cheating'...... 😀


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:49 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

FoxyChick - Member
CFH...thank goodness for the edit feature!
For a moment I thought I must have inadvertently shown you my fram!!

You have to know me at leat 3 yrs before that happens!!!

I blame Ruddles.

Give me time, though! 😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]
21.5lbs (without the seatpack, but including pedals and computer).


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

25 and a half pounds and on ebay tonight,lighter still with air forks or a lefty
[url=Photobucket]null


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wheres all the bling full sus sub 25's. i know there out there, come on show the mojo's and sl's


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 9:45 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

How does that On-one weigh 22.5lbs pinches? I'm suspicious.... BTW you have a curious saddle angle!

Just been building this up today - weighed in at 23.4lbs without bottle cages; tyres are well over 600g each so could save a bit there. BTW, the zip-ties are helping the chain protector stick properly....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 9:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

20.57lbs. And that's with risers, not the silly flat bars in the picture.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

No silly german stuff. Nothing with a weight limit.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No silly german stuff.

Silly tyres though!


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:04 pm
Posts: 511
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

21.8lbs


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:13 pm
 Sam
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Singular Pegasus, ~18lbs as shown

[img] ?v=0[/img]

about to lose >1lb with a new fork and these wheels...
[img] ?v=0[/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not an MTB but 22lbs and deliberately not built superlight coz I ain't superlight either

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=y0yee6&outx=800&quality=70 [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Silly tyres though!

2.1 Ignitor on the front and a Crossmark on the back? Silly by 'not a downhill tyre' standards maybe. Don't believe in paper bag tyres, Maxxis 285/310 Schwalbe Rocket Ron etc.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:18 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Around 22lbs.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair enough - from what I could see they looked like 285/310s which is what MSC seem to come specced with!

What's the frame weight and other spec on that - curious how you've got it almost a lb lighter than mine with no particularly obvious lighter bits.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Holy crap, that green Cannondale is gopping!


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The MSC FS frames are stupidly light, (just over 3lbs without shock, so sub 3.5lbs with a DT Carbon) it'll be interesting to see how they last!

Their WCR hardtail seems flexy, a bit fragile, not that light and stupidly expensive, but the Carbon Koncept appears to be spot on. I really want to try one.

21lbs, weight limit on the seatpost, but nothing crazy and German 😉

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yw8ui9&outx=800&quality=70 [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The MSC frames are stupidly light, (just over 3lbs without shock, so sub 3.5lbs with a DT Carbon)

Ah, there's the lb right there. Just crazy and Spanish then!

Does a F99 stem or Tune hubs count as crazy and German? If so guilty as charged. No weight limits though.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Only the Superscharf or Prince/Princess hubs are crazy, normal King & Kongs are good.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Frame is 1600g bang on with a Fox Float RP23. Medium, whatever that is in real measurements. How long will it last? Doubt I'll get to find out, as I'm only 59kg and will likely receive a 2010 one for next season. Has been very reliable so far though, about 40hr racing and 100 or so riding without anything going wrong.

Is pretty much as light as I'm comfortable taking it. F99 stem or Pace/DT forks are both items I've owned and disliked due to the lack of confidence they inspire, so I'm not willing to go down the route of weight for the sake of it again.


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 11:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 11:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How does that On-one weigh 22.5lbs pinches? I'm suspicious.... BTW you have a curious saddle angle!

you either believe it or you don't. at the end of the day, its sub 25lb as per the requirement of this thread, curious seat angle also known as "perspective" is actually almost flat


 
Posted : 28/06/2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 7:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?t=1246261933[/img]

25lbs

Sorry just joining in with the hopelessly optimistic weight-weenying in this thread. 😛


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 7:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

grumm, i reckon you would come in under 25lb if it were not for the adjustable seatpost


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 7:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry just joining in with the hopelessly optimistic weight-weenying in this thread.

Was wondering how long it would take for one of the usual cynics who can't understand the concept of a light bike to appear.


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I understand that your bike would ride like a dog on anything vaguely interesting. 😛


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:16 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

you either believe it or you don't. at the end of the day, its sub 25lb as per the requirement of this thread, curious seat angle also known as "perspective" is actually almost flat

Well I was hoping for a bit of justification as I can't see anything on your bike being lighter than on mine except the tyres and possibly the fork as I can't see what that is. Obviously if my scales turn out to be inaccurate, and my bike actually lighter than I think, then that's great! BTW, the saddle looks wrong compared to the window sill so thought I'd taken any possible perspective issues into account.


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:18 am
Posts: 126
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Still a bit of room for weightloss, though I'm keeping it XT


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 10:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well under the requirement, bathroom scales say 22lb but that could be a big fat lie.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 10:59 am
Posts: 39449
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

22.1 lbs


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 11:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[URL= http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7673/p1010939d.jp g" target="_blank">http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7673/p1010939d.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

Currently 23lb


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 11:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

removed due to fotopic failing me!!!


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 11:19 am
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

Sam - Member
Singular Pegasus, ~18lbs as shown

Not fair. Can't buy. Me want.

Hurry up!

🙂


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Not Sure exactly, but well under 25lbs


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

24lbs:
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:31 pm
 P20
Posts: 4153
Full Member
 

About 22lbs

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:48 pm
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

crap pic but about 24lbs (including pedals, not weighed on the moon)

[IMG] [/IMG]

pinches you should stop borrowing vanessa felts scales to weigh your bike on


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 30
Free Member
 

my old scale.

[img] [/img]

20.54 lbs, now on a spark, at 22 and a bit.

spark to be replaced now, with either a moots rigor mootis. or something else, maybe a msc, i (at 20kg heavier than doug) could give it more of a testing 😀


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both Sub 25lbs

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

7907g so well sub 18lb. Could easily loose another lb if I wanted a bike that I never fancied actually riding.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?t=1246311120[/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lynskey, like buses....


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:35 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

22.75lbs
[img] ?t=1246311862[/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:45 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Yes Dougal I wasn't being facetious, it was a genuine query, in order to have made the frames that light there must be a compromise, I wonder if it's longevity. Like you I've not kept an MTB longer than a year for a long time now, so I'm not that fussed! I'm very tempted by one next year, as long as they ride nicely!


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 150
Free Member
 

Anthony - Member
7907g so well sub 18lb. Could easily loose another lb if I wanted a bike that I never fancied actually riding.

I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, but my tripple butted pipedream Ti frame with pace RC31's, Ti BB, 350g tyres & Ibeam carbon post & FX saddle, also SS, weighed in at about 20/21lbs, ho hmmm.


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 10:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Like you I've not kept an MTB longer than a year for a long time now

Mine's almost 3, and not getting replaced any time soon, so my attitude is slightly different - have to admit I'd be tempted by an MCS if I had the money spare, but then it's not all about weight, and I still really like the way the Genius rides (and the remote shock adjust).


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 10:16 pm
Posts: 30
Free Member
 

being bigger, and heavier and harder on a bike than dougal, i'm tempted by the carbon santa cruz blur xc. still under 2 kg's. but said to be stupid strong/stiff...

but think it'll be a ti ht instead!


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, but my tripple butted pipedream Ti frame with pace RC31's, Ti BB, 350g tyres & Ibeam carbon post & FX saddle, also SS, weighed in at about 20/21lbs, ho hmmm.

I was wondering what wheel/tyre combo he's using to get it to that weight - is it a 29er too? does seem unnaturally light.

Edit: sorry i was actually looking at Sam's bike - not the lynsky.


 
Posted : 29/06/2009 11:56 pm
Posts: 5153
Free Member
 

in order to have made the frames that light there must be a compromise, I wonder if it's longevity

I think the compromise is price. Strong light cheap, etc etc.


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 12:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are certainly quite a few candidates for my "Gaudy anodizing" thread of last week. At least I dont feel so alone now.


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 8:09 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Mine's almost 3, and not getting replaced any time soon, so my attitude is slightly different

Do you pay retail for it? That's the difference!

Kramer: yes the MSC is expensive, but not outrageously so, and yet it is outrageously light. I'm in between Oli and Dougal weight wise, so perhaps the three of us ought to try one for a comparison!

It's all personal, I would never buy a Spark because I just don't ever use remote lockouts and in my opinion they ride horribly if you don't use it a lot. I like the Epic because you just don't have to think about it. I imagine the MSC with an RP23 does ride quite nicely, and the lack of a remote lockout certainly isn't a disadvantage as far as I'm concerned!


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do you pay retail for it?

Full retail no, but I don't get free bikes.


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 4213
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Crack on 24lb, and properly thrashable with it.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well I was hoping for a bit of justification as I can't see anything on your bike being lighter than on mine except the tyres and possibly the fork as I can't see what that is. Obviously if my scales turn out to be inaccurate, and my bike actually lighter than I think, then that's great! BTW, the saddle looks wrong compared to the window sill so thought I'd taken any possible perspective issues into account.

Window is a large mirror! i've looked at a few photos of the same bike in the same room and the saddle looks the same, regardless of it actually being straight!

Not sure how you would like me to justify the weight really? i weighed literally every component as i built the bike originally apart from the wheels, regardless of which at worst i can still only get it to come out at 22.8lb even now! the tyres are nearly 200g lighter a pop at 440g, flyweight tubes 105g, i dont know what wheel build or fork is on yours to compare.


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
ti altitude sub 25lbs and the io sub 20lbs


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 10:34 pm
 Sam
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

sorry i was actually looking at Sam's bike - not the lynsky.

DT Hubs, CXRay spokes, Stans 355 rims, tubeless, Karma rear, RRalph front. Lots of other light bits and pieces. Having no gears and no suspension really allows you to save quite a bit of weight 🙂 This was really as a show bike for people to pick up and go 'oooh, isn't it light' Just because a lot of people have the preconception 29ers can't be light fast bikes. As I normally ride it it's probably around 19-20.


 
Posted : 30/06/2009 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/07/2009 6:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i weighed literally every component as i built the bike originally apart from the wheels

So weight is based on adding together all these part weights? A notoriously inaccurate method of weighing a bike.


 
Posted : 01/07/2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

DT Hubs, CXRay spokes, Stans 355 rims, tubeless, Karma rear, RRalph front. Lots of other light bits and pieces

None of which are [i]that [/i]light, except for the spokes, you can go a fair bit lighter on everything else, particularly if it's just for people to pick it up and go 'ooo'!


 
Posted : 01/07/2009 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ti spokes too for a showbike, Nick


 
Posted : 01/07/2009 4:19 pm
Page 1 / 2

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!