Short, high and.. s...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Short, high and.. steep?

12 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
57 Views
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Every so often I get the urge to take my Patriot out on single-track, I never bothered to sell it and it just got old without me noticing it.

The HA is 65 or so and it's not particularly tall really since I run quite a lot of slack, but I just measured the reach and it's 390mm!

Going by current trends that should be unrideable but it's still good fun and dare I say quite manoeuvrable.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 3:42 pm
Posts: 3488
Free Member
 

Anyone going to post a picture of a T-Rex attempting to masturbate.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 3:46 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Actually my bike might fit a smaller therapod of some kind quite well.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 3:51 pm
Posts: 3488
Free Member
 

I can ride bikes down to about 410-420 reach before it feels really cramped. Even then I couldn't use the shortest stems and the seat would be pushed back on the rails.

Depends what you're used to and how long your arms and upper torso are I suppose.

65 HA isn't bad so would help it feel a bit less terrifying when steep.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 4:00 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It steers much better with a 35mm stem on it but that's just too short.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 4:11 pm
Posts: 3488
Free Member
 

Put a 50 or 60 on it.

It won't completely **** it up!


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 4:24 pm
Posts: 13942
Full Member
 

“Going by current trends that should be unrideable but it’s still good fun and dare I say quite manoeuvrable.”

Conversely it’s only 4” shorter in reach than a long bike, so how big a deal is it? Also a 65 deg HA isn’t steep, it’s just normal for now.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 5:29 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It's got 50 on it now. 60 makes it just too floppy.

Thinking about it, I tend to hold my body in the right position but after a while descending my back gets really tired - I think it'd be much easier if my feet were 10cm further back as on a modern bike, so I could support my body more with my legs. That's basically it.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 6:44 pm
Posts: 3488
Free Member
 

Nobody likes 10mm of floppy Johnson.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 7:05 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

The advantage of a short reach is you can push your CoG much further back on the bike, which is good because it moves you further from the potential crash site. 🙂


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 7:12 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Going by current trends that should be unrideable but it’s still good fun and dare I say quite manoeuvrable.

Shocked

Going by trends my Mk2 Trailstar shouldn't have made it round the Naughty Northumbrian last year. It did, easily. The climbs were crap but the downs were fine.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 7:14 pm
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

Newer better stuff doesn't make old stuff work any less well. I had a blast in Wales last year on my 224 evo. I mean, I've somewhat moderned it- I ride a bigger size than my last one, stuck a headset reducer in it... But it's still a 2007 bike, and it's still ace.


 
Posted : 17/05/2020 7:58 pm
Posts: 91000
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmm. Moved the shock mount back 10mm (the default position) and the reach is now 410mm - a whopping 20mm increase!

I wonder if short bikes will make a comeback in a few years' time? 🙂


 
Posted : 21/05/2020 3:12 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!