SGS vs GS Performan...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

SGS vs GS Performance on the smaller 10-45t cassette

3 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
436 Views
Posts: 3002
Full Member
Topic starter
 

12 Speed Xt on both my bikes. Ultra common (normal!) 10-51 on the trail bike. But on my hardtail I've got the 'racers choice' 10-45 casette as frankly who needs more on a lightweight bike.

I've always run the SGS mech on both, never really paid any attention to the cage length. However the performance has never been great on the smaller casette (not hangers or tuning etc)

Now bent a mech and need to replace - reckon cage length is so critical? I think it puts the guide pulley into a slightly different position too. Perhaps this is the key to the difference in shifting quality between the two casette sizes.

Everyone uses these....

sgs

But you rarely see these...

gs

Any first hand experience, Obviously its clear what Shimano say, but its nice to have cross compatability between bikes where I can.


 
Posted : 08/04/2024 11:23 am
Posts: 826
Full Member
 

I've run both on a 10-45 and can't say I noticed any difference, so I'd go with the long cage one.


 
Posted : 08/04/2024 11:29 am
Posts: 2571
Free Member
 

Always ran the short cage on 10-45, never used the long cage. Liked the greater ground clearance offered.

Thinking about it, if you set the chain length in the 10t, so its just off its stop, then the upper pulley wheel will be in the same position. If you set it on the 45t, with the long cage, the upper pulley wheel would be further away, so would need less B tension.


 
Posted : 08/04/2024 11:49 am
Posts: 3757
Full Member
 

The GS is specifically for 10-45


 
Posted : 08/04/2024 11:50 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!