Seat post for steel...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Seat post for steel hardtail, Thomson or carbon? Or....

22 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
139 Views
Posts: 20675
Topic starter
 

Well, which is betterer? 27.2 dia btw


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 10:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Im happy with my Thompson, Have one in a Surly 1X1, a Soul and my SS road bike. All steel and all 27.2

Jon


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 11:08 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Have tried a Easton EA30, a RaceFace Deus, an Easton EA70 and a Thomson.

The Thomson is much, much stiffer than the others.

Partner has a frame the same as mine but in alloy. Mine is steel.
The seatpost makes more of a noticable difference to the ride than the frame material (Rock Lobster 853 & Tig Team SL, in case you're interested).


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 11:14 pm
Posts: 20675
Topic starter
 

This will be for an inbred, with a steel railed bel air sat atop it, if it makes a difference.


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 11:22 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Dunno, never tried carbon, all the above I've tried are alloy.

Just saying that the Thomsons are stiff.
Really, really stiff. 🙂
And that there are massive differences in stiffness of posts made of the same material.

Sorry I can't be of more help - I'm sure someone else with a bit more direct experience of the two materials will be along shortly.


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 11:27 pm
Posts: 20675
Topic starter
 

I've had both carbon and Thomson in the past, though always on 160mm fs bikes, so any nuances from the posts were kind of tuned out. Won't have that on this frame that's for sure! Not sure I want ultimate stiffness, so might give carbon a go first.


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I have a titanium one in my old steel hardtail, love it, does seem to 'flex' and smooth out the trails more than I have noticed with aluminium ones.


 
Posted : 01/04/2013 11:45 pm
Posts: 20675
Topic starter
 

Sic nick, you may have just made my decision! Use sumo ti on wiggle for £100, any reason I shouldn't? Other than that its £100 for a tube....


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 12:47 am
Posts: 17209
Full Member
 

Carbon. I rode my SS with an Easton EC70 and it flexed appreciably fore and aft, if that's your thing. Much more comfortable than alloy. That post is now on a road bike, and I'll be sourcing another for my current bike.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 6:19 am
Posts: 13942
Full Member
 

Gravity Dropper.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would never use a carbon seat post after I saw one shatter at a race at Lee Quarry ,looked like it could have done some serious mischief to the old dangle-hamptons


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 9:40 am
Posts: 97
Full Member
 

I tried a Gravity Dropper on my SIR.9 & found it made the ride quite harsh compared to the Thomson I usually use. Have tried a Sumo carbon aslo, but was too flexy on the Niner, but many years ago I had one on a really harsh Pace 303 hardtail & it made it just about bearable.
Saddle is a Ti railed Spoon, which (to me) is noticably comfier than the steel railed version.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 9:52 am
Posts: 291
Free Member
 

Carbon.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 10:05 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Ti - I used a van nic one on my Inbred and it was really good at adding a bit of spring on loner rides - better than carbon.

[spam]

If you want a layback Van Nic 27.2 Ti post I have one available. email in profile.

[/spam]


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 10:08 am
Posts: 1218
Full Member
 

27.2 USE Sumo Carbon on my steel Hummingbird. 31.6 Thomson on my alloy 29er Scandal. The Sumo's more comfy, and hasn't given up the ghost yet. I pull it every now and then to check for damage. I weigh 75kg and haven't noticed any appreciable flex, but it does seem to damp vibration quite well. The Scandal is comfy too - although I've not ridden it for similar distances.

Bear in mind the whole enchilada, too - tyres and wheels will also affect comfort. A Thomson with nice big tyres might well be more comfy than a carbon post with skinny-ass XC race tyres.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 10:16 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

Thomson if you want stiff.

I prefer ti.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 10:17 am
 Kuco
Posts: 7181
Free Member
 

I used a Thomson on an Inbred and 456 without issues currently got one on the Ti hardtail.


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 10:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my 90kg of lard has spent the last few years blobbing around on the Bontrager Race carbon post that came on my (now previous) frame.
It has not died, yet....
More comfortable a ride than any other material? My only comparison the the bike before that, trek alu hard tail, with scaffold post alu seat tube combination now, that was truly brutal combination.!


 
Posted : 02/04/2013 10:38 am
Posts: 291
Free Member
 

Nowt wrong with a Thomson post at all

I have an Easton EC70 on my Whyte 19

And have just bought a Crank Brothers Cobalt 11 post for my new build. £70 = bargain 😕
(New off one of those ebayers)


 
Posted : 03/04/2013 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thomson on all 3 of mine..


 
Posted : 03/04/2013 8:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 97
Free Member
 

Carbon IBeam on my Solaris seems to be quite comfortable

IBeam Bel Air seems to flex a little more than conventional railed version


 
Posted : 06/04/2013 8:41 am
Posts: 34376
Full Member
 

I agree with Frankers, I use the I beam and the saddles do flex more, with regards to seatposts is that I really haven't ever noticed a difference between carbon or Ti or Alu posts


 
Posted : 06/04/2013 9:28 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!