Height of > Rubb...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Height of > Rubber_Queen & Mountain_King 2.4 UST

18 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
41 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Rubber Queen & Mountain King [b]UST 2.4[/b]

Anyone tell me the height of these 2
(Vis-a-vis BlurLt rear clearance issue - seat stay support strut)

thanks in advance


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 2:32 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I have a RQ on the front of my Enduro and it's a BIG tyre. Height will be dependent on your rims though, as they will define the sort of profile the tyre takes on to a certain extent.


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 2:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thanks CptF
I have Mavic x819, so not especially broad.


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 2:45 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

I've got the 2.2 UST RQ's and even they are a big/tall tyre - have clearance issues on my Motolite; if wet or muddy I can just grind to a halt with mud, leaves, twigs, etc.!


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hh and CF, any chance of a pic of the tyre in the frame. I'm thinking about one and would like to know how big the 2.2 and 2.4 UST come up.

What compound is it and how are you finding it, the black chilli compound anything like supertacky?


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:04 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Sorry, no pics of the tyre online. Just had a measure and mine stands appx 2 1/4" tall off a DT 420sl.

Just the ordinary compound, as I wanted something pretty hardwearing (fit and forget tyre!). Very impressed with it so far. Seems pretty light for the size, clears mud well and seems to track brilliantly! OK so the triple clamps, direct mount stem and 25mm bolt through axle will all help on that, but it's a massive improvement over the Eskars the bike came with!


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

---> CptFl & Hh
Do the RQs run fast or drag up hill ?


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:12 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

The tyre's great uphill, the rider less so!


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

--> CptF
I take it they're 2.4 RQs ?


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:15 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Yep, 2.4


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

The tyre's great uphill, the rider less so!

Ditto! And the gibbon holding the bars being the limiting factor on the way down. No photos of a RQ in the frame but, if it helps, I did take a photo of one lined up next to a 2.1" UST Maxxis Advantage - I was doing a long XC ride and wanted something lighter:

[img] [/img]

I will say that it's a very confidence inspiring tyre.


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks CptFl
Looks like the 2.4 is too big for my clearance, maybe 2-3mm spare !

2.2 for me in RQs


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the photo too, Hh
(Forum so much more helpful than . . .)

think the 2.2RQ is 850g


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 3:30 pm
 Rex
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do the 2.2 RQs only come in UST flavour at the moment? -ta.


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cheers, does look like a good sized tyre.


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does the UST 2.2 RQ come with a soft compound?


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

got the 2.2 RQ ust and they are huge. i took them off after a couple of rides because of the mud clogging up on the forks and rear triangle. i ride a Soul with Bonty Rhythm elite wheels and revelations. will be saving them for summer and going to the alps.
2.2 ust are a harder compound to 2.4 but still a black chilly compound. I have some 2.4 mountain kings and RQ 2.2 are bigger! the 2.4 must be massive..


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 8:06 pm
Posts: 4686
Full Member
 

2.2 ust are a harder compound to 2.4 but still a black chilly compound.

No, the UST's aren't the Black Chilli compound - sadly! Have checked this with Continental themselves, as have others. There was a lengthy thread on this a few weeks ago [url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/how-fast-are-rubber-queens ]here![/url]


 
Posted : 07/04/2009 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

right well thanks for that, i knew MK ust weren't BC but thought web site said different fo RQ ust.
very confusing.


 
Posted : 08/04/2009 6:11 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!