Rubber Queens
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Rubber Queens

10 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
84 Views
Posts: 3806
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No, not a dodgy club or film but boring tyres!

Looking to replace 2.2 Conti Gravity rear with something else.
Was recommended RQ, but was going to go 2.4, as my 2.2 comes up quite skinny.
Read in a few places the RQ 2.4s are 'mahoosive' amongst other words ie BIG! Is this the case and is it that much of an issue - going on a Commencal Meta with loads of clearance.
Also, is it worth going for the Black Chilli versions over a standard £15 wire jobbie?

Your responses, as ever, will be gratefully received 😉


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 9:38 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10234
Full Member
 

loving the black chilli


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 9:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have had the 2.4 and the 2.2. The 2.4 does come out big, but it gives you so much confidence because it is just huge. Personally, i would run a 2.4 BC on the front and a 2.2 BC.

And, yes, the BC compound is amazing!


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 9:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My cynicism about BC compound has been firmly quashed. Spendy tho.


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 9:58 pm
Posts: 3806
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Very spendy!

Decided on 2.2 as I don't want a tractor wheel on the bike,then looked at cost.
I'm not usually a tightarse but £40+ on one tyre is mental when the wire non-BC can be bought for £13 in some places. Will it really be that much worse than the BC?

Might have to go back to High Rollers after all!


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Loving my Black Chilli Rubber Queen 2.2. Expensive but very hard wearing so worth it IMHO.

Size - being a bit of a sad git I've gauged mine - 55.0 mm across the carcass (the widest part on this tyre) on a 24 mm rim and 56.3 mm on a new Flow Ex rim. Also, they're 5 mm 'taller' than a Mountain King Mk II 2.2 Protection if that helps. So spot on 2.2" wide on a narrower rim but very slightly wider on the Flow Ex, and 5 mm taller than a 'normal' tyre.

Fits in my Reba fork but not on the back of my current hardtail - but will fit on the back of my new Soul when the frame arrives....... 😀


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 10:15 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12533
Free Member
 

2.4" Rubber Queens are bigger than 2.5" Maxxis, probably closer to a 2.7" Minion or High Roller in size. Seriously!

2.2" Rubber Queens are bloody big for their size, quite a bit bigger than a 2.35" Maxxis High Roller or Minion, probably close to a 2.5" Maxxis in size.

Black Chili really is as good as everyone says it is. I know that spending that much on a bike tyre really invokes the need for a reality check and a loud exlamaition of "ow mooch?". BUT... Buy a pair, save the extra £40 you've spent on them over another set of tyres elsewhere on the bike (SLX bits instead of XT next time etc.) cos they really are that good!


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You can get them for around £31 from German sites usually.


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wish there was a 2.3 for the back of hardtails, the 2.4 is huge and won't fit most, but the 2.2 isn't as voluminous as I've come to like.


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 10:31 pm
Posts: 6603
Free Member
 

The mk2 mountainkings are nice as another option. Not got the black chilli thing myself, can't tell the difference. But then I put them on last spring so it has just been mud mud and more mud so far.


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run a 2.2 on my Yeti 575. Can't get a 2.4 in the rear so be careful. They are massive!


 
Posted : 14/01/2013 11:02 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!