Rockshox Upside Dow...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Rockshox Upside Down Carbon Rigid Teaser Pic?

287 Posts
105 Users
0 Reactions
656 Views
Posts: 6409
Free Member
Topic starter
 

RAC's didn't come with stanchion guards


 
Posted : 24/03/2014 11:10 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Weren't light either, although that was the original plan! If these are a SID replacement we'll be right away!


 
Posted : 24/03/2014 11:17 pm
Posts: 4643
Full Member
 

Video just been posted on the RS youtube channel (wagon wheel content):


 
Posted : 27/03/2014 1:28 pm
Posts: 609
Full Member
 

Marzocchi RAC?

Ha ha ha. Old hat.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/03/2014 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Video just been posted on the RS youtube channel (wagon wheel content):

www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsbjxE_YUZE

In reality its aimed at the recreational couple then ?


 
Posted : 27/03/2014 5:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Doesn't look like it moves much!


 
Posted : 27/03/2014 7:55 pm
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

It didn't need to.


 
Posted : 27/03/2014 9:23 pm
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 


 
Posted : 05/04/2014 10:06 pm
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

loads of info, only 1,800 dollars ;~)

The fork is only being produced in 29? format, available with SoloAir spring, three travel options (80/100/120mm) and a tapered carbon chassis and steerer. Despite a phenomenally light weight of 1.666 grams (3.67lbs) RockShox claims the RS-1 to be stiff, precise and overall a great performer. Only about 50 grams heavier than a SID XX World Cup

http://enduro-mtb.com/en/first-ride-rockshox-rs-1-inverted-suspension-fork-2015/


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 2:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So you have to use SRAM hubs this feels to me like an attempt by SRAM to get people to buy their wheels...

11 Speed need x-drive hub
RS-1 fork need SRAM front hub


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 2:42 pm
 Dave
Posts: 112
Free Member
 

The hub design has been licenced to DT Swiss too so far...
http://singletrackmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/at-last-heres-the-news-about-rockshox-rs-1/


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 2:46 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I'm out personally, heavier and more expensive than a SID World Cup, plus requires a proprietary hub.

If they'd managed lighter and stiffer maybe, but seems weird to market it as an XC race fork when it's USP is the stiffness, seems adding 20mm to the stantions and the travel and crossing into 'trail' territory would have been more prudent!

Edit: 1572g claimed for a SID WC with Maxle-Lite, so it's nearly 100g heavier, plus the hub. Don't hear many XC racers complaining about stiffness


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 2:54 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

Despite a phenomenally light weight of 1.666 grams (3.67lbs)

That's not very phenomenal! Adequately or moderately would have been better terms. Don't get me wrong it is light, but it's not [i]phenomenally [/i]light.


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 2:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think njee20 is right if it is stiff then they should have made it 120mm for the 29er Trail/light AM bikes such as the Whyte T-129....


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 3:12 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Seems odd as all the bikes it's been photographed on seem of that ilk - I've yet to see it on an XC race bike! Spesh Camber, Trek Rumblefish etc.

Odd indeed!


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 3:32 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

The fork is only being produced in 29? format

Oh dear.

That shark has already jumped...!


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 4:51 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

[b]if[/b] it is stiff

The thing is, rock shox seem to be using statements like "stiff enough" so they aren't even heralding the stiffness of the fork, which suggests it is no better for stiffness either.

It is starting to look like it actually offers no advantage at all.


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 5:00 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's starting to look a lot like the Marzocchi RAC which was similar in intention (XC race, upside down) but ended up being heavy, just like this... So it died.


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 6:07 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

My thoughts exactly!


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No emails sent as too busy unpacking boxes..?


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 6:39 pm
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

If you ignore the price, it's a fork for the riding that nearly everyone does for fun, rather than a XC race fork, no?


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 7:12 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Looks like all the disadvantages that people normally discount Leftys for (high price, new hub, "unique" looks) but without the advantages such the low weight and I'd be incredibly surprised if it was as stiff as a Lefty.... which is just ridiculously stiff. Pinkbike seemed positive about the fork but noted the small bump sensitivity was poor yet didn't feel this was much of a negative. Odd for an USD fork wwhere small bump performance is usually one of the theoretical gains. That is of course besides the other isseues already mentioned here. Doesn't grab me in the slightest! If anyone can sell this fork with good marketing over the reality of the thing, it is SRAM...


 
Posted : 08/04/2014 8:08 pm
Posts: 8612
Full Member
 

The thing I thought was most interesting about the RS-1 press release was the 32mm bottomless tokens, which it was stated will fit Rebas/SIDs/Revs. Whether that's [i]2015[/i] forks, of course...

Anyone know if the air top cap on the above has an internal thread?


 
Posted : 09/04/2014 1:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks like the [url= http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/photos/tech-gallery-a-trip-through-the-cairns-mountain-bike-world-cup-pits/302858 ]RS-1 was at least in the pits at Cairns[/url]. Was it actually raced?


 
Posted : 29/04/2014 3:49 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
Topic starter
 

email of tftuned - can preorder at £1199 - expect sub £1000 from zee Germans


 
Posted : 01/05/2014 8:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dirtyrider - Member

email of tftuned - can preorder at £1199 - expect sub £1000 from zee Germans

That's £280 more than the top of the range SIDs isn't it? 😯

Seems a lot considering the lack of worthwhile benefits.


 
Posted : 01/05/2014 8:28 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

they do seem determined not to fit stanchion guards.


 
Posted : 01/05/2014 8:32 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

That's £280 more than the top of the range SIDs isn't it?

Yep, about that, for a fork that's heavier (and then requires a heavier hub). Where do I sign up...


 
Posted : 01/05/2014 8:38 am
Posts: 8612
Full Member
 

[url= http://www.bikerumor.com/2014/05/08/dt-swiss-adds-rockshox-rs-1-compatible-predictive-steering-hubs-wheels/ ]DT launching 240s RS-1 hub[/url]


 
Posted : 08/05/2014 8:01 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

How much will the proprietary tool to remove/service the damper cost on top of that? And the hub/wheel of course.


 
Posted : 08/05/2014 9:15 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
Topic starter
 

in stock at zee german shops, around £1100


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:06 pm
Posts: 121
Free Member
 

Looks amazing, would look even better on the front of my Camber but that is HUGE money.

Does it come with a hub or would I need to factor in a whole new front wheel?

Its just so nice.


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

RS clearly did great with the Pike but I really see the point of this fork.


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its just so nice.

And that I expect is why they'll sell even if they're not functionally better.


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:14 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
Topic starter
 

hubs separate


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:14 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Due into the UK middle of next month at £1415 RRP, can supply if anybody wants them, almost ordered myself a set but needed forks quick so ended up with Rev RCT3 lowered to 110mm 😉


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:16 pm
Posts: 121
Free Member
 

Has it been confirmed by anyone who has ridden one that its 'not functionally better'

Or are we guessing?

The only real world facts are the price.

If they would hurry up an release an offical 120mm Pike I would be happy with that!


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All I can see is that they are expensive but somehow too heavy for an XC race bike. That leaves a pimp 120mm 29er trail bike but will it actually be stiff enough?


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:26 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We've converted a number of Pikes to 120mm too 😉

I have found sids a bit flexy, at 14 stone and 6'3" but not 'bad' flex, just prefer the stiffer revs setup properly


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 3:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

jmatlock - Member
Has it been confirmed by anyone who has ridden one that its 'not functionally better'

I'm sure the people that line up to pay £1,400 will assure you that they're better


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 4:13 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😆


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 4:15 pm
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

If I was rich, I'd buy one.


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 5:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seen them on a fairly small number of race bikes at the last XC WC round.


 
Posted : 25/06/2014 5:36 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
Posts: 6409
Free Member
Topic starter
 

can the 120mm be dropped to 100mm and vice versa or is it an airshaft job?


 
Posted : 03/07/2014 9:19 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Just don't get it. 😕


 
Posted : 03/07/2014 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why the **** would you want one.... If you want a Rockshox XC Race fork buy SID if you want a RS trail fork buy a Pike.


 
Posted : 03/07/2014 11:32 pm
Posts: 10340
Full Member
 

They look very pretty on carbon race bikes.

I thought the weight sounded high (as everyone was saying so in this thread and others), but after a brief look, it's only giving up about 90g to other 29er 100mm forks (including the SID XX once you include the maxle), so as long as there are stiffness advantages (or damping advantages), then it seems ok to me.


 
Posted : 04/07/2014 7:41 am
Page 4 / 4

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!