[Closed] Orange Five - WTF makes it so special?

I'm not a fan of them at all. But only way you'll find out what you think is to try one.

Many people like simple bikes. Less to go wrong.

There aren't many bikes around that are

a) true single pivot
AND
b) have as sorted geometry as the Five

Heckler is a good solid bike, but lacks the versatile geometry of the Five.

it is fugly but it is superb downhill.
VPP is good if you want no bob but it does compromise absorption a tad [uphill mainly] IMHO [ got a spider and a 5 FWIW].
I doubt you will be disappointed with either I assume Intense have sorted out the tyre clearance issue as mine was rubbish in mud and only takes a 2.1 tyre. Once I could not even push it through mud without the back wheel clogging up and jamming
Ornage 5 is better suited to Uk conditions [mud and the like] and has fewer bearings to change and is much easier to do - specialist tool required for the spider IME and given greater number = a higher cost.
Very few bad reviews from mags or owners so there must be a point to the 5 IMHO
Take your pick you want looks you wont pick a 5

hype.

I think when that are that many people riding them, and loving them, it's more than just hype!

hype and marketing then.

Nothing ever blew me away on my five, predictable and decent geometry but i felt i really needed a 17" which doesn't exist but if it fits you and you want dependable then go for it. It's not a game changer of a bike it just gets the job done. There are better riding bikes around of the same travel but many find the simplicity and a decade of refinement to be appealing.
No experience of Intense but i wouldn't consider one due to the lottery which is quality control, if its not either out of allignment or cracked your doing well from an Intense from what i gather from the forums (not much real world apart from a bike mechanic mate who used to work at an intense dealer and a former tazer owner of which cracked).
I'd add a Zesty into the options, possibly a saracen ariel too.

yes the ride is dreadfull some Halfords bikes handle better just Orange market and hype those beautifull smooth lines of the Looker that is an Orange 5
FACT all bikes that anyone says are good are in fact crap
Podge more bitte rtrolling please and anyway they are all out riding them down the canal towpath say what you like

My friends and I didn't like the one we demoed (a 2009 Pro, with all the Hope stuff). The main appeal was that it was 90% British made. But we just didn't get on with it. It was a shame.

If it was a new bike then hype and marketing maybe, but i thas been around years and people still like it 😀
Depends where you ride surely.. we ride mostly rocky lake stuff which the 5 excels on so it suits me fine but that doesn't mean other bikes wouldn't suit me too in fact my P7 loves it all just as much 😀

I must be doing well then stevede. 🙄

it would be a troll if I'd never ridden one but I have. I like suspension to work all the time, including while braking. as for simple, how many times have you heard someones ride was spoiled by bearing failure. I fail to see how anyone would spend over a grand on a frame and factor in saving a couple of quid on a new set of bearings every 6 / 12 / 18 months.

as mentioned above, they are welded by someone British which is a huge selling point. to many, more important than the design.

its evolved because it had to, to meet market demands.

its an ok frame but not brilliant

Didn't mean to offend but my mate did work at quite a large intense dealer so not just a one off experience,enough to put me off considering one (that and the price). Each to their own though, i'm sure they ride nicely.

I like suspension to work all the time, including while braking

I test rode one back to back with a Blur LT2 and 575 when I was looking to upgrade my Klein Palomino a fee years ago and just didn't get on with it at all, neither did a mate who was looking to change his Ransom. I ended up with a Maverick. They are too popular to just all be hype, but just wasn't for me.

The main drawback with owning an O5 is that you've nothing to talk about on MTB forums about your latest "upgrade" anymore... 😉

They are the mountain biking equivalent of a short wheelbase Landrover, which, as an O5 owner, I can say is not a bad thing at all. 🙂

I had a five, it was a very average ride, went up and down well but nothing special. Doesnt work brilliantly with the stock RP23 shock, bobs a lot and has horrific brake jack.

I then got a 2009 tracer which blew the five away. Climbs just as well but is a much better ride down the hill, really confidence inspiring and a lot more stable than the five. Put a CCDB on it and its a real weapon. Yes there have been some issues with tracer frames cracking but these were the 2009 frames. Post 09 frames have the updated rear triangle and have no problems with breaking apparently

It's because it's from Yorkshire, God's own county.

I know someone who had a cracked orange 5 frame, so am I missing something?

I doubt you will be disappointed with either I assume Intense have sorted out the tyre clearance issue as mine was rubbish in mud and only takes a 2.1 tyre. Once I could not even push it through mud without the back wheel clogging up and jamming

Ive had a tracer for 2 and a half years and ridden it in all sorts of gloopy mud with maxxis minions 2.35, plenty clearance and never had a wheel jamb on me to date...

Get a tracer you want be disappointed there awesome... but make sure you get one with the mk2 rear chainstay.....

After years on an Orange, I bought a 2nd hand Spider last year. Overall, the Intense rides better. It's stiffer, climbs better, is loads more comfortable and doesn't have brake jack. Quality is fine and bearings are dead-easy to do, though not as simple as just the 2.
However, the Orange did have a kind-of aggro feel to it which I used to love and I reckon it was a tad faster downhill. It also made such a racket at speed, it was great to see people panic as you caught them up.

It's just a bl@@dy good ride!

It's one of the best FS I've ridden. However I'm am sure there are many other excellent bikes out there. I thought the Remedy was equally as nice, but will have more complex linkages etc.

Almost every other bike at Hamsterley this morning seemed to be an Orange Five so they must be doing something right.

(The other 50% seemed to be Giant Trance's)

marketing is very good at the mo aint it 🙂

i like the new geometry of the 5,not keen or never have of the back end,but that's just my preference

i have a Heckler at the moment,which i prefer the rear end of.

but also the 5's head angle feels better for me,

could do with a blend of both.

Reasonably light, low maintenance, looks good

I had one, couldn't get on with the swinger shock it came with or the downhill braking performance

They're excellent bikes all told. They don't look particularly great but they perform brilliantly, certainly on my list when it comes to replacing my current bike. They do suffer from the BMW 3 series effect but meh. To quote some bloke I was chatting to about his bike "there are two types of biker; those who have a five, and those who wish they had a five" - seems pretty apt

Here's a genuine attempt to offer an explanation:

The geometry of the Five is pretty sorted. It's been a good deal lower in the BB and slacker in the HA than most bikes until just recently. The low BB in particular mean is flies along and down.

It's got just the right amount of suspension for UK riding (and hasn't ever had too much or too little even when a lot of mainstream trail bikes were heading up to 160mm) and crucially that's meant you've been able to run it with a 140mm 32mm stanchion fork which keeps the weight down to a reasonable c.28lbs.

It is simple in design and it's British.

It's bigger travel stablemate, the 223/224 has had enormous success on the race scene, especially in the hands of everyone's hero Steve Peat.

A lot of very (very) good riders like it and eulogise about it because they get all the benefits of its design (slack HA, low BB, simplicity of design, goes down hill real fast) without any of the major issues of the design, i.e. the rear doesn't work when you use the brake.

The better the rider, the less this issue of the rear jacking under braking is an issue; really good riders don't tend to brake as much as us average joes.

I also think a big part of it is marketing; the marketing is very clever though. It doesn't matter how good or bad you are on a bike, no one ever took the piss out of you for riding an Orange Five. You could be really joe average or 'god on a bike' and if you're on an Orange Five it's absolutely fine. It's a bike for all people.

Whereas if you're on something like an Intense, Santa Cruz, Yeti or other exotic, semi-exotic bike, especially if it's a longer travel model, then you better be pretty good otherwise everyone's going to point at you and say 'all the gear.......' I think that puts off a lot of people.

Felt like a really comfy armchair of a bike when I test rode one. Nothing wrong with comfy armchairs, I just wanted something a little tauter that made me want to ride faster on the flatter stuff.

Mildly contentious - I "think" the 5 is a pretty good bike when ridden downhill on the edge of ridable for a 5" bike by skilled riders compared to a lot of other 5" bikes - that's why they don't need a lot of tweaking to turn it into an Alpine. However I don't see many of them ridden that close the edge like that - just as nice comfy and relatively sat up and slow skill compensators by middle aged chaps on quite mellow trails.

a rigid Kona has had huge amounts of success under Steve Peat.

Convert I think you could be right about many of the riders - but it is great riding and seeing people riding them on the edge 😀

This is me - on the edge - of a lake ;-D

[img] [/img]

I think geetee1972 is pretty much spot-on with all of that.

They are just too damned heavy for me. I prefer my five inch travel bikes to be sub-25lbs 😉

First bike in years I haven't wanted to change after 6 months. To me, the perfect mix of DH capability and still rideable up and along.

There are plenty of lighter bikes, burlier bikes, etc but this is the first one I've found that is so capable everywhere.

I've got one.

And I honestly don't know what people are talking about this brake jack thing. The rear end does not pack down under braking, it can't be cause the wheel and the brake are fixed to the same bit of metal. If anything, a LACK of brake jack makes it pitch forwards more than some other bikes and causes the rear end to go light which might make you feel like the suspension wasn't working.

I bought mine because the LBS had them in and it had a good rep. It's not as sophisticated suspension as some (but then again it's MTBing not motorway driving!) but it has sorted geometry and is stiff.

I'm sure it's not the best bike in the world, I'm sure no bike is.

I'm sure it's not the best bike in the world, I'm sure no bike is.

+1

Podge +1.

I've had two sub5s and an 04 Patriot as a trail bike. I thought they were great until I rode an 05 5spot. Now they just feel clunky and unrefined and they fold in the middle. Platform shocks have saved the design IMO.

Just thought I'd add though, I've had the same set of bearings in mine for 5 years. My mate has had to change the bearings in many of his multi-pivot bikes (all 12 of them) every 6 months.

Platform shocks have saved the design IMO.

Not just in your opinion... that's a fact.
However, Steve Wade had the foresight to realise this and decided, on balance, to stick with a simple design. In other words, if platform shocks hadn't been coming out, he'd have changed the suspension design.

Had a 5 for a year and hated it.Bought it because of all the hype and really regretted not test riding one.Downhill in a straight line it was good but anything else and it felt dead.Paint finish was pretty awful as well and the stickers peeled off at the first sign of rain.
Sold it at a big loss as i preferred to ride my £300 hardtail.
My Giant full suss does everything better for me,especially climbing.
I think the marketing by Orange is spot on as i know people who have bought a 5 that have never ridden a mountain bike in their lives but it looks good to own one.

He has included new designs though, hasn't he? ST4? Nice that they continue to make the old ones though for the advantages they bring.

Sold it at a big loss as i preferred to ride my £300 hardtail

Did you spend any time fiddling with the setup? This is crucial for any bike. Mine has both annoyed the hell out of me AND put a huge grin on my face, often with only a small but significant change.

I've had the same set of bearings in mine for 5 years. My mate has had to change the bearings in many of his multi-pivot bikes (all 12 of them) every 6 months.

Love this comment.

It's not the best performing bike I've ridden (brake jack, pedal bob and sub-par square edge handling) but it is fun to ride. Can see why people love it.

molgrips - Member
Did you spend any time fiddling with the setup? This is crucial for any bike. Mine has both annoyed the hell out of me AND put a huge grin on my face, often with only a small but significant change.

Not so IMVHO, my Maestro bike rides well even with poor setup. Pedal bob and brake jack are handled by the design of the linkages, so you don't rely on having the setup exactly perfect for it to work well. Horst link seems to be this way too.

This thread is making me doubt/ change my mind on getting a 2011 5 as frame only 😕

Well it shouldn't.

THey just work well. Bearings don't fall out after 2 weeks, I couldn't give a flying **** what it looks like so long as it rides well.

And they do. I tried a Turner 5-Splat next to an Orange and the Turner was awful. Just goes to show, dunnit? Different folks have different taste. Doesn't mean one is wrong.

aye different folks different tastes...

i will change mi heckler one day,but for what i dunno,but it wont be another heckler or a 5.

I've had one for 18 months , never noticed brake jack, didn't on my Heckler,its a good bike that does most things well, taper head tube and maxle back end make for a really stiff frame, that tracks well, Heckler was very Flexi in comparison, mine is around 31-32lb a bit on the heavy side should be 28lb if you believe all the weight claims , all my bikes have been around 32lb Heckler , Nomad and now the Orange 5.
It really shines on the down hill slacker and lower works well, but this shows on the climbs , its a steady plod gets there in the end, although it does do the odd unexpected , 4 of my mates hit a technical climb/ obstacle and all failed and they are awesome riders compared to me and I had a go and the old 5 made it clean, I nearly fell off with shock 😀 , A Heckler with taper head tube , 67 deg head angle and maxle rear would look prettier ,
The fuglyness of the 5 grows on you and doesn't matter really, its better looking than me 😯
I'm one of the people who needs a 17" 5 with a 23" TT damn funny shaped body. 😀

scotchegg, if bearings fell out of any bike after 2 weeks it would have nothing to do with the the fact it wasn't a 5. less daily mail headlines please

Blower I changed my Heckler for a Nomad , Nomads rock awesome bikes quickest bike I've ridden, but over the top for most trails and my ability,
Orange 5 is how the Heckler should have evolved into, 😀

I reckon its the advertising budget spent in UK mags that makes the orange 5 'so special'. I hear its not rated highly outside the UK mags. Its an old design now and seems over priced to me. Still, I've never riden one! if you like it and have loads of cash, then get it. I'd test ride though after reading some of these posts.

Knowing what you're capable of whilst riding is the key here, if we're talking performance? Is it a looker? All in the eye of the beholder obviously.

Can you ride hard enough to need 5 inches?

O5 will handle most things in the UK but can you? Buy buy buy if you can.

The suspension design is simple & works, period. Low maintenance too. Buy an Orange & watch them all turn green. 😀

Nothing makes the Five special beyond repeated discussions like this. It's just a bike.

You can dissect axle paths, pivot placements, shock rates or whatever else on the internet all day, or you can just give one a ride and buy it if you like it, or don't if you don't.

Form your own considered opinion by borrowing or test riding one; not by listening to the bizarrely extreme views that shape the average internet forum discussion. This being a thread on Orange Fives means it's probably mere posts away from becoming a flame war focussed initially on BMW's Paralever, then switching briefly to CO2 emissions, then racism and the misappropriation of the Union Flag by football hooligans, before settling finally and firmly on Thatcher and someone getting a two day ban for circumventing the swear filter.

For what it's worth, two of my mates' mates' uncle's dogwalker's boss' brother's mates have Orange Fives. One rode straight out of the showroom and instantly won every single bicycle race in the world ever and is now crowned King of All Biking, and the other one was simply unloading his from the car when it brake jacked him into a low orbit, his every limb torn spectacularly and irreparably asunder.

Jeffus. you sure your not getting them mixed up the wrong way round with rear end stiffness?

nomad too much indeed agree.
the 5 has the right amount of travel,for riding n messing here.

(Mr MC posting)

as Ive said on other threads I sold a Nomad for an Alpine (bigger version of the 5). I DID get frustrated with the idea of having to shell out 90 quid and spend a couple of hours replacing the bearings every year, dosnt instill faith in the bike. I assume the VPP2 on the Tracer is a radical improvement from the original VPP which climbed like a dog in the granny ring.

Not really a balanced comparison to rate a 5 with an Fox RP and then comment on how a CCDB improved a Tracer. My alpine came with a CCDB so it may ride far better than a standard shocked Orange-it has the adjustment to tune out any suspension quirks. VPP bikes were known for needing lots of midstroke support and blowing thru their mid travel, I eventually managed to tune this out with the fitted (and much derided for just this problem) DHX5 Air, so choice of shock and set up has a large impact on sus performance.

The 5 is special in that there are no longer many true single pivot designs around these days (for good reason some may argue!).

However, i've just re-discovered the joys of true single pivots having just built up a 2011 Heckler. I really regretted getting rid of my 2007 Orange 5 (with the steeper HA) and after a few linkage bikes i came across the Heckler again via a customer at work and decided to get one. The Heckler is pretty much identical in geometry to that 2007 Orange 5, which i thought was a fantastic allrounder.

I bought a 2009 Orange 5 after that first one and hated it! The new slacker HA just didn't suit me at all and only in the Alps did it start to make sense....so not really relevant to riding at home then!

True single pivots are fantastic fun, not perfect by any means but no suspension design is. You either like the simplicity and just get on and ride or you don't.

EDIT: Jeffus....think you're confused. I've been riding a Nicolai Helius for last few months, by far the stiffest bike i have ever ridden. In comparison the Heckler isn't that far of in lateral stiffness terms. The Heckler is certainly stiffer than either 5 i owned.

TBF, i had a blast around a car park on one, and they felt quite good under the pedals, and soaked up the bumps well-ish, but (Perhaps the same for all air shocks) you either set the rear shock up for hard hits so not to bottom out all the time, or to soak up the small hits, but will bottom lots.

And who gives a rats arse about maintenance. All bikes need a fettle every now and then, and know what, fettling with bikes is good fun! Seconded to riding (And sex!).

EDIT: Jeffus....think you're confused. I've been riding a Nicolai Helius for last few months, by far the stiffest bike i have ever ridden. In comparison the Heckler isn't that far of in lateral stiffness terms. The Heckler is certainly stiffer than either 5 i owned.

yep.
just wish the Heckler for me had the 5's head angle.

For what it's worth, two of my mates' mates' uncle's dogwalker's boss' brother's mates have Orange Fives. One rode straight out of the showroom and instantly won every single bicycle race in the world ever and is now crowned King of All Biking, and the other one was simply unloading his from the car when it brake jacked him into a low orbit, his every limb torn spectacularly and irreparably asunder.

Jackthedog - A perfect synopsis of how utterly facile STW generally is, pretty much. I thank you, sir.. 8)

Offset shock bushes would give the Heckler slacker angles. I may try that for my 3 week Alps road trip this summer! As they are though i feel they're perfect for the riding i do in this country. It was the slacker angles that took away the 5's great all-round abilities IMO.

my 'expert' opinion on the five is,,,,

i havnt been lucky enough to own a nicholi, santa cruise, intense etcetcetc BUT,,,,

have owned a number of FS bikes over the years since 2004, i change my frame every 2 years (unless they are shoite) try to buy frame only as i spec my bikes the way i feel is best for my locals and how i ride (heavy and plough like,,,,,FWIW i have a minor disability)

BUT, through choice, i keep coming back to the five as its just so versatile.

im lucky/stupid enough to own several different sets of forks/shocks/componants etc (proper fettler me 😀 ) and can honestly say that the 5 frame can cover most of my terrain with out issues and with the right spec i have entered xc races (never won but thats not the point is it) and have tackled fort bill DH with a set of 36s and a coil on and i did 'OK' time wise (not 100% but think rowen sorrel did the mega on a five and did really well)

i love the 5 frame as its just so easy to clean, service and seems to have an auto pilot button when you point it DH,,,, dont really care about uphill speed as if its to steep im not to posh to push. thing i like about the five frame is it seems to let me get away with silly mistakes when choosing lines as it does seems to have that auto pilot function. the brake jack (yes it does jack) has never been an issue for me as i brake before hitting anything that may disrupt my line (isnt that what your supposed to do :?)

feel i must add that have i have just taken my new 2011 out today (2nd ride but bigger terrain, first one was down to a quick 'just built' XC exuberance) and found it climbed better than my 2008 (might be down to first ride excitment/adrenalin but it did) i also have been lucky enough to bang a CCBD on it and,,, even though it did, i havnt really found P-BOB an issue,,,,, infact i beat a pals commencal (sp?) 6 inch thingy and another pals marin wolfridge to the top and it also seemed to climb better than my winter bike 2009 456, this may not be a claim to fame but i found it a bonus.

i love my new five frame, the maxle has made a big difference on the ice cream run (for those ITK) and the slacker HA is always something i wanted when i had a 140mm fork plugged in to my 2008.

over priced, over hyped and everybodys got one,,,,, BUT,who cares,,,,, it suits my locals better than any other frame ive tried.

ONLY issue i have with them is they seem to loose the chain more than other frames ive had BUT a stinger soon sorts that out.

jealous unbelievers say it looks ugly, i think its simplisity is handsome.

MADE IN ENGLAND.

If it was that good a bike, they'd be as popular in the US and Europe as they are here. Take the "Made in England" bit away and sales would plummet. Think Rover.

I tried a few different frames before buying a five. To be honest I never liked the look of them, I had a commencal before which was great until it cracked.

I purchased my 2010 five frame at the end of 2009 and since owning I have not looked at anything else. I ride just about everything on it, it's pretty confidence inspiring and basically it's fun to ride!

The made in Britain thing did appeal to me as did the one set of bearings, it just works and i enjoy riding it! 😀

Sorry guys but my 2007 Heckler was a Flexi old thing I changed to a Hope Bolt in hub and that helped, I've a maxle back end on my 5 and that is super stiff, but I am fat 😀 Nomad back end was also solid, I'm a real Santa Cruz fan and went the 5 route to see what all the fuss was about.
I did like my Heckler it was a very good bike at giving confidence just like a 5, she was very pretty.
[img] [/img]

FWIW, i take an annual lake gada bike holiday with a local/guide i met who owns a hotel (mates rates 😉 ),,,, cracking bloke who has made comment recently on the FACT that a lot more fives have been seen in the area (think german, spanish and italian riders) since the patriot has bit the dust.

druidh..

US is a different market.....

and in europe (for example france,germany) oranges are extremly expensive...prices are much higher than in england !!

Pedal bob and brake jack are handled by the design of the linkages, so you don't rely on having the setup exactly perfect for it to work well. Horst link seems to be this way too

Yep, no questions that the 5 is not as plush as some bikes but so what? Hardtails are much less plush and people still enjoy those 🙂

I still think most of you don't know what brake jack is. It's NOT the feeling of the rear wheel smacking into things as you brake.

But yes the US and Europe are very different markets and types of riding.

molgrips - Member
But yes the US and Europe are very different markets and types of riding.

They are different markets, doesn't mean there's no overlap!

If it was that good a bike, they'd be as popular in the US and Europe as they are here.

Absolutely, nothing to do with dealer networks or exchange rates or anything like that 🙄

GGGGGGRRRRRR, must add,

the way i look at it, the 5 was designed and made etcetc 30 miles away from my house and so for my local terrain (the reason i bought my first 5).

the way i see it, it has been designed with my local english northern terrain with the option for a bit of alpine holiday (or is that what the alpine is designedetc for ?), NOT bone dry american terrain (spits on floor) and although not strictly a european alpine frame it can easily be built for so.

cheers orange for ticking all my boxes.

podge - I have run Spesh FSR's that have needed new bearings every 3 months. That's what happens when you ride them.

Changed the bearings on my 5 a couple of weeks back £7 and 20 minutes excellent, 😀

Never had a problem with brake jack ( And yes, coming from a motor cross background i know what rake jack is )Also never had a porblem with pedal bob either. I run my RP23 BV wide open for everything except long fire road climbs which is when i flick the propedal on.

Wot a load of cack "a five dont climb well" i beat most folks on long climbs on my five. I suggest fitness may be the reason for not climbing fast & not the bike.

Is the 5 the best bike?? probably not, but it works and works well. Its tough overall build, simple pivot maintance make it ideal as a solid all round UK bike.

Living in Wales and riding at least 3 times a week on my MTB (avg 40-50miles a week on the MTB) i want a bike built to take the hits and last me years. The five ticks all the boxes for me, and yes being British built and handmade also has added value to me. Also along with the way Orange allow you to build the five up to how you want it with upgrades etc when ordering new adds to a bit of individuality you dont get with most manufactors.

Oh yeah, 5s do climb well. Perhaps not in 32lb FR guise but mine's 27lbs and has no problems. I quite like the pedal feedback when climbing, but I can see how some wouldn't.

Different strokes and all that. I own a 2010 Five, I demo'd a lot of others including Blur LT, 5-Spot, 575. It came down to the Blur LT and the Five, the Five was a better fit and made in the UK so that's what I bought.

I love it to pieces, but no doubt if i'd bought the Blur I'd say the same about that. As someone else mentioned it has a bit of the hooligan about it that makes it so enjoyable to ride. It doesn't go uphill as quick as some/most, but then neither do I.

Whatever you do don't buy a bike without demo'ing it (and others), just look at the amount of conflicting opinions on here.

+1 molgrips - I prefer to get feedback through the bike. The more complicated multi-pivot bikes I demo'd I didn't really like as they felt too plush (for me).

Scotchegg, keep up the back hand insults, it really adds to your argument.

depth junkie, hand made is a selling point for you is it? well that should narrow it down a bit, what with pretty much every frame ever being by hand.

and oreetmon, I'm from even closer to orange than you, location has little if anything to do with it. and it rains on America, oddly enough.

My 5 is about 31.5lb I must be building with the wrong gear,

Talas 150 RL 32 fork taper steerer.
Hope Hoops Stans Flows with tubless conversion,
2.25 Advantage, 2,25 Ardent rear,
Hope Tech 4 brakes , floating rotors , Ti bolts
CK taper head set and CK BB
XTR 970 cranks running 34tooth + e-13 srs running 1 x 10
XT mid cage , xt shifter 11-36 XT cassette and xt chain
Float RP23 shock
KS I900 seatpost with remote, SDG saddle Ti rails
Hope Clamp
V12 pedals Ti axles
Sunline V1 bar and 50mm stem
even have carbon spacers under my stem.

it was weighed at my local bike shop

[url= http://dirt.mpora.com/dirt-100/orange-5-se.html ]These[/url] [url= http://dirt.mpora.com/zfeatured-box/dirt-100-2010-orange.html ]guys[/url] seem to [url= http://dirt.mpora.com/news/dirt-100-2011-orange-pro.html ]really like it[/url]