[Closed] Mini review - Transition Smuggler

Thread Hijack : my Smuggler frame is for sale..
Black, Large, brand new.

I wanted to transfer all parts from my Banshee Phantom, but can't be bothered now.
(how's that for 1st World Problems 😀 )

GavinB does it still feel balanced with 140 up front? Not compromised at all?

gemini29 - tried mailing you but it keeps bouncing back!

sorry for that.. fixed now 😳

I am running 140mm 2016 Fox 34s, feels spot on. Mimics next years slightly higher BB and I run a pretty slammed stem anyway, all feels good.

If anyone is still looking for one we still have one last large Teal frame. Not sure why as if it had arrived two weeks earlier it could have sold 4x over! Its now on the cheap cos we have run out of storage space..

[url= http://pedalsbikecare.co.uk/shop/2015-transition-smuggler-frame-large-teal/ ]Smuggler Large Teal Sale[/url]

If anyone is still looking for one we still have one last large Teal frame. Not sure why as if it had arrived two weeks earlier it could have sold 4x over

Who'd be a bike shop owner eh? Dealing with fickle moutain bikers must be enough to drive a fellow mad. Hope you find a buyer for it soon.

michaelmcc
GavinB does it still feel balanced with 140 up front? Not compromised at all?

It feels fine to me. I'm running it with a 40mm stem, with 10mm of spacers underneath) so I guess if I've raised the front end 10mm, and was finding it lifting up on climbs all the time, I could get rid of the spacers and see how it feels, or more drastically stick a slightly longer stem on (even flip it). I've not felt the need to though, and am finding it climbs fine. The bars are only 10mm rise, so the front end is pretty low (but could be lower still, if I felt it needed it).

I do understand though that this is a very personal thing though, so what might work for me, might not feel right to someone else. I left the steerer long enough that I could play around with things, to an extent, before settling on a set up I really liked. I had factored in that if I needed/wanted to drop the travel down to 130 then that would require a new air spring, so a few ££. Having ridden it for a few months now, I'm not sure it would be worth it.

Interesting thread! Thanks.

I've narrowed my next bike choice down to a 2016 Smuggler 2 or a Cannondale Habit SE. I'm just trying to find somewhere in the South West that might have both of them to do a side by side comparison.

Another happy Smuggler owner here:
[url= https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5693/21635545762_e674a1763c.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5693/21635545762_e674a1763c.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/yXRPZ5 ]IMG_3125[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/9655603@N08/ ]weewillywinky[/url], on Flickr

Great pic!!

This in on my wish list, given it a lot of thought between this and a scout, but think this is a better fit to me.

Are the Stock wheels/hubs good??

Wookster mine is a 'custom' build so I'm not sure on the stock wheels. I have not heard any complaints about them though!

Ah ok thanks mate!! The LbS say they are good and no issues so really looking fed to pushing the button on one of these!!

If anyone hears of any XL for sale then please give me a shout.

How did that happen? I was all set to buy an Orange Segment. I like Orange bikes. I like the way they ride and the simplicity appeals. I'd even had a demo on one and enjoyed it. But I wasn't in any hurry. Having just put chubby wheels on my Solaris I was enjoying that. Then Richard at [url= http://www.cyclehighlands.com/ ]cyclehighlands[/url] dropped me an email to say that the Smuggler frame I'd asked him about a while back was in stock and, well, here it is, all built up and ready for me to get it muddy over the weekend.

[img] [/img]

I can't blame Richard though. Him (and the rest of the folk at cyclehighlands) were great and very patient with my endless questions and prevarication. They are an Orange dealer too, so would have been just as happy to sell me the Segment I'm sure. But I've fancied a Smuggler ever since they were released and it was only really the colour that put me off buying one last year. Each to their own and all that, I just like orange (and green) bikes.

Anyway, I've not done any more than ride it up the track so far, It feels quite sprightly, but time will tell.

Looks goof roverpig! Where are you at?

Can't wait to hear how you get on with the Smuggler, All I have heard is good things about them, and the a smuggler is definitely on my shortlist for when I replace my current frame!!

Roverpig, what size is yours?

It's a large and I'm based over Aberdeen way.

The frame was really well prepared. I think it may be the first frame I've had (out of too many) where I could put the BB in by hand first time.

I'm giving one of these some thought to fit my B+ wheels in.
Must get a test ride on one after I've tried the Spech 6Fattie thing.

Hopefully will have a Demo bike from my LBS in a week or so......Can't wait!! Really like the Bike had a Sit on one the Shop but it's the first ride on a 29er for me, so just want to check it feels right?

Plus not sure if I need an L or XL. My 26" five was XL plus my Epic was too.... Always felt right in those sizes. Demos a Large so I'll get a good idea soon if it's too short.

Really nice bike RP. That is a bike I'd be tempted by if I return to FS at some point.

Enjoy it!

Looks exactly that the 15 Patrol. Which is an awesome thing!

Great - thats about 4 Smugglers in Aberdeen/Shire!

Wookster - I'm 6ft2 ish on a Large if that's any help...

If anyone hears of any XL for sale then please give me a shout.

Our first stock has arrived, including an XL frameset in stealth black...

Plus not sure if I need an L or XL.

I'm 6'2" and our demo (Large) is a good fit for me (total coincidence, of course...) with wide bars and a short stem.

Plus not sure if I need an L or XL. My 26" five was XL plus my Epic was too.... Always felt right in those sizes. Demos a Large so I'll get a good idea soon if it's too short.

It's worth bearing in mind that the seat tube on these is pretty steep. Although, on paper, the ETT on this large is very similar to my large Mk1 Solaris, the reach from the saddle (at full height) to the bars is noticeably less. I think it will work OK for me at 6' but if you do a lot of seated climbing (e.g. long fire-road slogs) then, at 6'2", you might want to look at the XL.

Really nice bike RP. That is a bike I'd be tempted by if I return to FS at some point.

Thanks. As you know, my other bike is a Solaris, which now sports chubby wheels. I've been amazed at how good those chubby wheels feel on the Solaris and, to be honest, if I hadn't already committed to the Smuggler before I got them I'd probably have held off buying anything else for a while. On the plus side, I do have the option of trying the chubbies on the Smuggler 🙂 But first things first; I'm going to test it with "normal" wheels first.

Thanks RP. Yep I'm looking forward to having a go on the Demo, but I do think the XLis the way to go. Tough call when I can't try one ( an XL) though!!

Our first stock has arrived, including an XL frameset in stealth black

Oh dear. My colour too. Has anyone tried if other brand shocks fit in the smuggler? I never got on with Monarchs. Not sure if it's my weight but never got them to feel right despite much trial and error with pressure and vol spacers.

OK, first ride done, so time for the traditional enthusiastic write up. Except it's a bit more complicated than that.

First, I should point out that I'm looking for something a bit different to the supposed target market for this bike. While Gavin is chucking his down the Fort Bill WC downhill track, I'm more likely to be pottering along a land rover track, startling the wildlife and admiring the view. These reviews which talk about the Smuggler being a bike for aggressive trail riders were more of a deterrent than an incentive for me, as I'm anything but.

So, why did I go for it? Well I like to ride up and down mountains (Transition's tag line for these bikes). I like to do it on my own and I don't like having to walk sections. I've also reached the age where I tend to shatter rather than bounce and I want a bike that wont leave me broken by the trailside miles from anywhere. Basically I want all the skill compensation I can get. The problem is that I also enjoy climbing just as much as descending and a lot of the time I'm on pretty tame trails, so it needs to be fun on those too, which rules out a big bouncy beast. When I heard about these "nu-skool" 29ers (long, low slack, but short travel) I thought they sounded ideal. Big wheels and a slack head angle to keep me out of trouble, but short travel for climbing efficiency.

Anyway, enough preamble. For the first ride I chose a route that would be a good test (of me and the bike). A total of 27 miles with over four thousand feet of climbing. Some hike-a-bike up steep slopes and through a large section of heather (where the path disappears). Some fast rocky descents (but nothing too technical) and even a few miles of climbing on the road at the end. Around four and a half hours of riding, plus some time to admire the view!

So, how did it do? Well it's fast. Out of 7 Strava segments I set 6 personal records (up and down), some by quite a bit. You've got to allow for some new-bike enthusiasm, especially on the climbs. The descents were more of a surprise though. They felt very controlled and composed and I felt that I was scrubbing more speed of in sections than I needed too. Basically I felt I was being a bit too cautious, so was surprised to see that I'd smashed some previous records.

Not that speed is that important to me really. The other pleasant surprise was how agile and fun it felt. My bike handling skills are somewhat limited, but it seemed just as easy to throw around and pop off things as my old Five. The big wheels and slack head angle just didn't seem to be an issue. Maybe a touch harder to get it round tight corners. I felt I was slowing more than I'm used to on some turns. But Strava tells me that, if I did, I more than made up for it elsewhere.

So, what about the negatives? Well, by any objective measure, I'd have to say that it is a better bike than my old Five, but it lacks something of the character. By which I think I just mean that there is less feedback. It doesn't tell you off if you jam the anchors on during a descent. It doesn't grumble on the climbs or chatter on the flats and there isn't that vigorous debate between the front and back wheels over which way to go. It just quietly gets on with the job of making the trail a bit smoother and leaves you to enjoy the ride, which is what a good bike should do, I guess. But when I'm on my own for hours I miss that chat.

I also like low gears. I have the Smuggler set up with a 28T NW chainring as a 42 tooth sprocket on the back, which is about as low as I can go without going 11 speed. I could still have done with one easier gear though. I knocked 30 seconds off my best time up a longish (17 minute) climb, but if I'd had a lower gear I'd have used it and gone a bit slower.

But all in all it was a pretty successful first outing. Despite my opening line I tend to try and avoid the over-enthusiastic review. It's just a bike at the end of the day. They are pretty much all fantastic these days. Most of what I've said would probably apply to any of the new breed of trail 29ers. It's easy to get sucked into obsessing about the minor details, when really you are better off just buying something you like the look of and riding it lots.

If you've got this far you deserve a reward, so here is a shot of it in the wild 🙂

[img] [/img]

Lush picture mate! Thanks for the write up too!

Nice write up RP, sounds like you've bought a great bike for all the right reasons. Enjoy riding it lots more!

Has anyone tried if other brand shocks fit in the smuggler?

We've not tried swapping any, but in principle there'd be no reason why something from Fox, Cane Creek, or whoever, wouldn't work. But, I'd encourage you to give the Monarch RT3 a go first - it's what the bike has been designed around and the suspension really does work well. It's extremely progressive, so compliant over small bumps but incredibly capable when things get more serious.

Can you say what specifically you've found lacking with previous Monarchs? What versions of the shock have you been using?

I thought the Monarch felt fantastic in the open position. It also felt good fully locked out on the road section (where the stiffness of the bike in general was really welcome). I'm not so sure about the pedal position just yet though. I left it open for the first short (5 minute) climb and smashed my previous best (from 9 attempts), but that could have just been new-bike excitement 🙂 I felt I'd probably need some platform for the next longer (16 minute) and steeper climb though. It has some sections that are really borderline for me (I've ended up pushing more than once), so needed all the efficiency I could get. But I felt the platform kind of got in the way of the smoothness. It's not bad (it was still a PR), but maybe it is just a bit too firm. Or maybe it would be better to just leave it open. I'll need to experiment with it more I guess.

I am using a 2016 Fox DPS. Mainly to match the forks (tart!) and cos it's wot Lars n Bars has but it is a very good shock. The fact you have three settings in the open position means you can run it with a little more compression but not as much as Monarch 'trail'is nice. The lockout is a full lockout which in my opinion makes it useless, if you try and ride anything rougher than a smooth road on it the bumping and jarring wastes way more energy and momentum than if you just left it wide open.

My shock is also a stock medium tune vs the light tune on the Monarch, so isn't really a direct comparison but I like it. Was planning to get it tuned to match but after riding for a while think it's pretty spot on.

If they have sorted the reliability issues then a Cane Creek Inline would be fantastic if you have the time to tune well, best shock I have ridden by a long way, but it did blow up. Later ones seem fine, mine was from the first batch in the UK.

Well that was unexpected RP Enjoy

Thanks. Will do 🙂

Thanks for the update and a great photo. The Smuggler is the Covert (which I have) replacement right ?

I'll just leave this here:

[img] [/img]

A bit of Sunday afternoon silliness; a Smuggler with B+ wheels (nicked from my Solaris).

I've not ridden it on any trails and am not sure I will. I was getting a few pedal strikes with the standard setup and I'm not sure dropping the BB by another 7mm is going to work. Mind you, the BB on these Mk2 bikes is supposedly 5mm higher than the Mk1, so I guess I'm just back to where a lot of Smuggler riders were last year anyway. Maybe with 170mm cranks. No, that way madness lies. Looks good though, don't you think 🙂

ps. I finally got round to weighing it. If you can believe my bathroom scales the all up weight (including pedals, dropper post) of this size Large was 30.5 lb with the 29er wheels and 31.5 lb with the B+ wheels. Slightly lighter than my 26" Orange Five which came in at 32 lb but heavier than the Solaris in 29er guise, which was 29 lb (both on the same scales).

I was just about to start a thread askiing if other Smuggler owners were getting lots of pedal strikes….I'm on the older version than you btw.

That orange looks almost fluro there!

Yes, sorry, I think I must have had a funny setting on the phone or I clicked something in photobucket.

Anyway, I guess pedal strikes are a price you have to pay for a low BB. Still pretty annoying though. I used to have a lot on an old 26" Giant Trance and I can't say I missed them when I moved to the Five. I've got a feeling that if you buy a full bike from Transition now they come with 170mm cranks, so that may be worth considering.

Looks good in + format

I do get a lot of pedal strikes but I'm on 175 cranks. It's not a bad problem, just something to be aware of. I ride flat and imagine that doesn't help compared to spds or something.

Yeah I am looking for 170m cranks and some thin profile flat pedals to try an minimise it but as you say that is the price you pay for the low BB.

Interesting reviews, and comments re pedal strikes.

I'm about to click 'order' but have a test booked on a Smuggler with the LBS next week. Pedal strikes are one thing concerning me as i've only had one full sus before, but that was a long time ago. I hope they're not too annoying and i can learn to ride around them as all the positives seem to outweigh the frustration.

Can anyone with a stock 2016 model comment on pedal strikes please? I wondered if Transition had raised the BB by 5mm and specced the crank 5mm shorter for this reason.

I guess mine is (or at least was) close to stock when it had the 29er wheels on (Pike at 130mm). Pedal strikes were noticeable but generally not too annoying.

The BB height on the latest version of the Smuggler is not any lower than similar bikes though. It is quoted as 335mm, compared with an Orange Segment at 330mm and the Evil Following, which is 326mm in the low setting. But they are all static measurements. I think the pedal strikes with the Smuggler come from running 33% sag in the rear shock. If you ran a more "normal" 25% I'm sure that would reduce pedal strikes quite a bit, so may be worth considering if you ride a lot in rocky areas.

I guess another thing to think about with pedal strikes is the amount of rebound damping you run. I noticed when cleaning the bikes after my last ride that I had loads of rebound damping. Setting the rebound a bit faster may help to keep the pedals away from the rocks a bit more. Just a thought.

Is everyone going with 33% sag as recommended?

I started at 33ish on my scout but now more like 28 as I found myself just leaving it in trail mode a lot even on dh stuff when I should have it in party mode (Open).

Regarding pedal strikes you really do adapt. Your feet seem to take on their own ESP.

I've also reached the age where I tend to shatter rather than bounce

lol, made my day

lol, made my day

Thanks. Sadly it's true though and I have the x-rays to prove it 🙂

As for sag, yes, I've started with the recommended 33% (seated) sag. I wouldn't want to overplay the pedal strike issue though. First it isn't that much of an issue (at least on my MK2) and second, I've only done two rides so far! On the first ride, in over 4 hours of riding, I only hit the pedals when trying to ride in a deep tyre track, which may have happened whatever I was riding. On the second ride (on more familiar trails) I was getting more pedal strikes that I'm used to, but after the ride I noticed the rebound was set to pretty much fully slow.

I'm going to try dropping the sag to 30% and speed up the rebound for the next ride and see how I get on. I'm also contemplating changing the 2.25 Racing Ralph tyre to a 2.35 Rock Razor, which should fit just fine.

Merlin have some small frames at 960.

Probably a good thing that they don't have any medium ones.

Running mine at anywhere between 35% to almost 40% sag (i'm not a heavy chap) and leave it in the open mode pretty much all of the time. It's bottomed out once or twice but not in a harsh way. I get the occasional pedal strike when climbing but only due to my own clumsiness, I'm using 170mm cranks but I also run a 140mm fox fork to heighten the bb slightly. Had mine for 3 month now and I love it, one of the best bikes i've owned.

Thanks guys. Rover pig, I'll be interested to hear how you get on with your sag/rebound experiments.

Thanks guys. Rover pig, I'll be interested to hear how you get on with your sag/rebound experiments

No problem, I'll keep you posted, but it might be a while before I get to do any extensive testing as I tend to ride the (now chubby) HT when the trails are wet. Initial tests suggest that the pedal strikes were mainly a setup issue though (or more accurately, user error).

I'd read about the large negative air can on the Monarch and the need to cycle it, but didn't really do it carefully enough. So, what I thought was 33% sag turned out to be around 40% once it had taken a few hits. Then, to compound matters further, I forgot to put the rebound back after messing around with it and was riding with it pretty much fully closed (i.e. very slow rebound). With 20psi more in the shock (still 33% sag) and rebound set at 6 clicks from fully closed it seems a lot better. But I've only had a short ride on it so far, so it's a bit early to tell.

Makes sense, no worries from my point of view, just good to hear from people who have a longer term experience of the bike to go with my thoughts when I get my test ride sorted out.

What rear tyre are you folks using? Particularly those with 2015 frames?

I'm getting lots of rub with a 2.3 Hans Damp and with an Ardent so I'll have to experiment with something smaller….

I'm running a wtb trailboss, plenty of room either side and there's a 5mm or so gap between the tyre and that brace on the seatstay.

Thanks bunglalistic - what width is the trail boss? No rubbing at all?

groundskeeperwilly - you have pre-empted the question I was about to ask as I'm after a tyre with a bit more edge for the winter.

I'm running a 2.25 Ardent at the moment on WTB Frequency i23 rims and have had no problems with it rubbing at all but figured this was a fairly small tyre.
Local Spesh store had some of their tyres going cheap a while back but when I looked at them on the stock bikes in the store the tyres looked very tall.
I may just settle for old faithful an get a Minion 2.3 for the rear or another HR2.

Specialized purgatory fits fine anyway.

I use a WTB Vigilante which does rub when new, and fires stones out at high speed when they get dragged through. I bought another as they were stupidly cheap on crc, and I'm skint. The brace has worn down a bit now but still not much clearance!

Just waiting for my smuggler frame to arrive in a couple of weeks hopefully. Have you guys got any picks of the rear wheel bridge clearances ? Got a couple of rear tyres to choose from either a 2.25 maxxis beaver or minion 2.3 DHR. I'm using a set of mavic crossmax st wheel set.

kdmckenzie here's a 2.35 Hans Dampf:
[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/621/22201732190_cbe2c3e7fd.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/621/22201732190_cbe2c3e7fd.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/zPTFu3 ]IMG_3242[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/9655603@N08/ ]weewillywinky[/url], on Flickr

And a 2.25 Trail Boss:
[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/659/22201988128_1be1ec7005.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/659/22201988128_1be1ec7005.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/zPUZyL ]IMG_3250[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/9655603@N08/ ]weewillywinky[/url], on Flickr

The wheels are Easton ARC 27….

Hasn't the 2016 frame got more clearence on the seat stay bridge?

Cheers fellas. how does the trail boss hold up in wet/mud conditions ? I think I'll be running the beaver through the winter which worked really well last year on my trans AM 29er. I'll get some picks posted of my build once the frame arrives (Noverber some time)

Mine is a 2015 frame FWIW.

Haven't got much to say about the Trail Boss in wet/mud as it's been unusually dry here! I was actually thinking if it didn't perform in the mud then a Beaver would be my next choice for the back with a Shorty on front.

I've read somewhere that the mark 2 frame has got a little more room at the rear and a higher BB than the mark 1. I use a shorty F/R on my my bronson. super tyre for the winter

I'm running a 2.25 Nobby Nic in my 2016 Smuggler, so I can't say for sure, but there looks to be plenty of room in there. Easily enough for a 2.35 I'd have thought.

Anything under 2.3 is what Transition recommend for either 2015 or 2016 frames as far as I am aware. The 2016 Mk2 definitely has more room!

cheers thanks for the info

I thought I'd give a quick update on my progress with the Smuggler.

It's been an interesting "honeymoon" period. Certainly not love at first sight, as it was when I first built up my Five and I'm still wondering whether I should have gone with the Segment instead. Of course we're splitting hairs here. They are two pretty similar bikes (long, low, slack short-travel 29ers). The main difference is that the Smuggler has a much stiffer (and shorter) rear end. On the way up that stiffness can really help and it's easy to move the front (and rear) around but it seems to be a bit less forgiving on the way down and not quite as magic-carpet like when trundling along.

Actually maybe forgiving isn't the right way of putting it as it will get through pretty much anything if you just commit, but it seems as though you do need to commit. Ride a section with confidence and really push the bike into stuff and it's amazing. I've smashed personal records on sections that I've ridden loads of times before without even feeling that I've come close to what it could do. But get nervous and tentative and it all seems to get a bit unforgiving.

Fair enough, I guess. It is marketed as a 29er for aggressive trail riders and that's what it is. Ride it aggressively and you'll be amazed at what it can do, but don't expect to be able to just sit there and let the bike do all the work.

I like the honesty of your bike write-ups Roverpig.

Did anyone here grab that large frame off eBay last night for £850?

I had a cheeky low-ish punt but there was a late flurry of bids.

I find the rear very magic carpet-like on general trail chatter until it gets a bit bigger, there just isn't the travel for the full magic carpet smooth-over-anything mince tank experience, after sag there is only about 75mm of fairly progressive travel so it isn't going to eat everything in its path.

Depends what you are used to and what you want from it, but I like it. I find the bike most fun on fast singletrack with lots of nice corners to throw it round, the bike comes alive with some speed and aggression when you lean it into nice fast corners, the back end is nice and firm to push against and there is just bags of grip.

I like the honesty of your bike write-ups Roverpig.

Thanks, but having read the Stooge thread, I guess I'd better be careful 🙂

Of course, it's all just my opinion and I'm not really being negative. It's not that I don't like the bike. In many ways I think it's fantastic and it may be that I end up loving it. It's just taking a bit longer to get the hang of it.

I find the bike most fun on fast singletrack with lots of nice corners to throw it round

No argument there. It's fantastic in those situations and they are the bits of trail that I most enjoy as well.

the bike comes alive with some speed and aggression when you lean it into nice fast corners

I think we are saying the same thing here. It's great at speed and when ridden aggressively, but it seems to need that to come alive.

It's funny though; quite a few times I've ridden a section and thought "that was crap, I could have gone much faster there" only to get home, load the ride into Strava and find that I'd smashed my previous best (sometimes by over 20%). So obviously it's not crap and if I can get the hang of it I reckon it could be brilliant. On the other hand, if you feel like it's crap at the time then it is crap, by definition.

It's all just a bit of fun though.

I know I've asked before but am I still the only one having problems with the rear end if my smuggler? Loads of tyre rub even with skinny 2.2's!

Anyone think it has a flexy back end at all?

I know I've asked before but am I still the only one having problems with the rear end if my smuggler? Loads of tyre rub even with skinny 2.2's!

Anyone think it has a flexy back end at all?

Not having any Tyre rubbing problems and running spec purgatory.
Are you sure its not your wheel?

Ive done a full on weekend in Wales (Afan and BPW) without any problems and didnt feel under biked at all.

The only tyre rub I get is very big tyres like the vigilante rubbing the seat stay bridge. Loads of clearance elsewhere. If you are getting rub elsewhere I'd guess your wheel is flexing or something. Have you checked your spoke tension and torque of pivot bolts. My rear end is tight and stiff, oosh.

No evidence of rubbing on mine with 2.25 Nobby Nic tyres. Is it just one side or both? If it's just one side then you might just need to get the wsheel re-dished a bit. If the latter it could be wheel flex. If it's the bike then I guess it would be flex in the pivots/bearings which you should be able to feel.

Thanks folks - The rubbing is on both sides. I can't detect anything wrong with the wheel myself but maybe I'll ask the shop who supplied them to look them over.

I'd like to rule out frame flex/issues as-well. So hard for me to tell what is actually going on back there when I am riding.

I know they made some changes to the 2016 model, but I think it was just that seat stay bridge at the top, so clearance on the sides should be the same. If that's the case I can't see how you can be rubbing the seat and chainstays on both sides with a 2.2 tyre as I seem to have plenty of space.

Maybe you are a mega aggressive rider and are putting loads through the wheels that the rest of us can't imagine. Well it's a nice thought 🙂

It could be wheel flex, but they aren't exactly budget wheels that you've got. If they flexed that much then surely there would be more reports from other users. The stays on the Smuggler aren't really any tighter than lots of other modern 29ers.

It could just be a "bad" build i.e. low spoke tension, which should be easy to fix.

I don't think the stays themselves can flex much at all, but it could still be play in the pivots. You could take out the wheel, remove the shock and just give he back end a good wiggle to see if you can detect any lateral play.

This is turning into a rather unusual review. The normal pattern is that you buy a new bike and immediately think it's the best thing since the wheel. Or, at least, the best thing since somebody thought of tying two wheels together. So you go online and tell everyone how great it is. Then you start to notice the faults or just get bored with it and stop posting. So, all we have are the positive comments.

This review is kind of the opposite. For the first few rides I really wasn't sure about the bike and thought I might have made a mistake. But, the more I ride it, the happier I am with it. I've slowed the rebound damping down (at both ends) so it's now about a third from fully closed (rather than a third from fully open as it was before) and that seems to have eliminated the feeling of being pinged from rock to rock. In fact it seems to flow over the trail very nicely now. It's still the case that it feels better the faster you go, but I'm starting to really like that. It's silly to talk about a bike making you a better rider, but it certainly encourages a more aggressive riding style, which brings benefits of its own.

well ive been told my smuggler wont be comming in November and may not even arrive before xmas. ordered it in september totally gutted.

Glad to hear you're bonding with it Roverpig, but you know where I am if you do decide it's not for you.

😉

Well it's good to have a plan B I guess. I wouldn't hold your breath though 🙂

kdmckenzie, that's pretty crap. Have you tried phoning around to see if anybody else has any in stock? I think Merlin have a Large orange frame in stock, for example (along with some small 2015 frames with tasty discounts).