Lightweight carbon ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Lightweight carbon full sus? is sub 24lb possable?

65 Posts
33 Users
0 Reactions
605 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I currently have an all mountain bike which is great but heavy and its getting on a bit. I am looking to get a lightweight carbon full suspension try and get the build weight below 24lb if that’s possible also not fussed about massive travel thinking 140 or less?

Anyone got any frame suggestions/experience


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 6:09 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Yes it's possible, but they will be short travel (e.g. CF Canyon Lux or top end Giant Anthem), and expensive.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 6:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes but it will cost you.

My Ripley with 140mm Rev's up front came in at around 25 1/2lb

Spec -
Hope Hoops with Crest rims
XT rear mech/cassette with Hope 40tRex. XTR Shifter
No front mech
Deore cranks with Hope 32t ring.
Basic SPD peddles, 520's i think.
Thomson Stem. Orange alloy bars, now replaced with Renthal Carbon
Raceface seat post with SDG Falcon saddle
Hope X2 Evo brakes with floating rotors.

The reason the bike is a bit of a mix is I built it up using parts off my Clockwork. As and when funds allow it will be treated to upgrades. But even as it stands there it will set you back a lot!

It now has a Reverb fitted so a bit heavier.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 6:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

short travel is not a problem as it will be more XC trail centre orientated its just getting the correct frame. I like the look of the Spesh stumpy carbon I had a stumpy years ago so got a bit of a soft spot for them.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:04 am
Posts: 2740
Free Member
 

njee's old Top Fuel was more like 22lb so yes, it is feasible. In fact, my old ASR SL was only 24.4lb and that was the alloy main frame version - only 100mm travel (newer ones are 120mm) but I could have gone lighter with a few bits.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:11 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it might be a challenge getting a current Stumpjumper FSR below 24lbs without some fairly expensive exotic parts. Nice bike though.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Anthem X carbon 26er is around 24lbs running 1X10 and tubeless.

[URL= http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z344/dom_derbyshire/Mobile%20Uploads/20140816_121719.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1185.photobucket.com/albums/z344/dom_derbyshire/Mobile%20Uploads/20140816_121719.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Anthem X carbon 26er is around 24lbs running 1X10 and tubeless.

Always a little sceptical when people say "around". I guess it could just about creep under 25 but would be surprised seeing it with Nics, an XT chainset and those heavy bar end plugs.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:26 am
 Rik
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That Ibis is a long way from 25.5lb - it's the STW magic scales of make believe at work again.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I sold a frame a while ago that would have been perfect. Pronghorn PR6 XC Carbon frame
I am currently selling a Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon can run it with 140mm forks upfront & could be built up pretty light


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:37 am
Posts: 17728
Full Member
 

Well, this:

http://singletrackmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/introducing-the-yeti-as-rc/

is supposedly 23.1lbs (presumably without pedals) in it's cheapest guise so it is possible. Depends how much you want to spend.
What are you hoping to achieve with a lightweight build though?

I've got a Stumpjumper FSR carbon that I got after the alloy frame was warrantied. It weighs about 28.5lbs and none of the bits are massively light on it. But it's fine and rides really well. Not sure it would benefit from losing masses of weight.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a stumpy fsr carbon which is pretty well specced and it came in at about 27.5 lb with specialized storm tyres set up tubeless on it. It does have a reverb though.
Can't see how you could knock another 4lb off.
You might be better off looking at an epic, I know someone who has one sub 23lb but that wasn't without spending an absolute fortune on it.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just weighed the Anthem: 23.98lbs. I'm quite please with that! 🙂


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 7:50 am
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

Santa Cruz TallboyC in a Medium - with some heavy for a xc bike parts

ENVE AM Front Rim
XTR Trail SPD's
Tubes - Although weight with Tubeless RaRa would be about the same as tubes/Burts
Could get lighter bars/seatpost easily, plus seat collar is the "heavy" Santa Cruz one,
Rear QR could be lighter,
Heavier X9 Stages Crank Arm
203mm Saint Rotor

could shave 1.5lbs off no issues i reckon

[URL= http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/y394/dansipods2/IMG_1903_zps41e45f33.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/y394/dansipods2/IMG_1903_zps41e45f33.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
[URL= http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/y394/dansipods2/IMG_1904_zps9453db38.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/y394/dansipods2/IMG_1904_zps9453db38.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 8:17 am
Posts: 5688
Free Member
 

Ah another make believe bike weights thread! Always amazes me some of the claimed weights!

As far as I remember njee's top fuel was sub 20lbs at it's lightest.....that one was genuine though!

OP I think you'll struggle. Are you going to be going for a 29er? Those specialized bikes are all 29 inch now aren't they? A year back wasn't Yaroslav Kulhavey's EPIC just over 22lbs? If the factory specialized team get a bike to that weight, I'd suggest it'll be a big struggle to get a stumpy within a couple of pounds of that.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 8:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My intentions are to use it for a few XC marathons etc also for blasts and good xc days out, just goes to show there are some nice light builds out there which if your building yourself and can afford the bits then why not. Other debate now is to move with the times and go 650b was never a fan of 29, not enough in my leg length.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 8:57 am
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

Should be doable for a 100mm bike with some light and sensible bits. Not sure about anything longer travel though. Talking about 26" bikes is irelavent though as the wheels alone are 10% lighter, and the frame shorter and doesnt need to be as beefy as a result, etc.

Shouldnt even be that expensive compared to a more normal build if youre happy buying carbon rims and bitex or novatec hubs from the east, carbon post instead of a dropper etc.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 8:57 am
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

Someone on mtbr has a 22lb Santa Cruz Solo C so anything is possible, it even has a dropper post!


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 9:12 am
Posts: 4132
Full Member
 

my mate's tallboy LTC with carbon rims is 26.5lbs (genuine weight) with a dropper and pikes.

Should be easily doable IF you've got the money


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 9:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Have built a few set of wheels in the past with my lightest set being stans crests on king hubs, lovely with a bit of bling to add in the mix. The dropper is mighty convienient but yep agreed about the weight issue.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 9:18 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

njee's old Top Fuel was more like 22lb so yes, it is feasible

Wash your mouth out with soap sir!

[img] [/img]

That was with some 1240g wheels and a few other bits of questionable durability, but I never had a problem with any of it!

Have built a few set of wheels in the past with my lightest set being stans crests on king hubs, lovely with a bit of bling to add in the mix

Nice wheels, but not particularly light.

As said though, it can easily be done, you just need to:

a) be prepared to spend money on it
b) know what you're spending money on

More expensive isn't always lighter.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 9:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wow this is getting interesting what were the wheels? 1240g nice. Agreed minimalist is pricey.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wash your mouth out with soap sir!
Bloody hell, that's only about 300g heavier than my full carbon rigid. You're a weight weenie god sir!


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:35 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Wow this is getting interesting what were the wheels? 1240g nice. Agreed minimalist is pricey.

A2Z hubs, Podium MMX rims, Revolution spokes. 1246g with yellow tape and valves.

You can go lighter - Sapim Superspoke drops you below 1200, and Pillar Xtra Lite Ti would be more like 1150, Extralite hubs get you down to about 1080g. Trouble is you're then at a £1k wheelset, with alu rims! And so it goes on... 😉

Some chap on Weight Weenies had some 980g clincher wheels - Innolite XCC250 rims on Extralite hubs with Pillar spokes. You can't get the rims anymore, so it's a bit of a moot point, but it can be done.

Mcfk finishing kit too - 90g seatposts, 70g stems etc. Not cheap, but very doable.

Bloody hell, that's only about 300g heavier than my full carbon rigid. You're a weight weenie god sir!

Haha, cheers! I used it completely in that guise too, and never actually broke anything, which is a test for me - I've got to be able to use the bike as I want, not back off because 'x component may break'.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Whyte 109CS lists @ 12.2 Kg with the carbon wheels and 2x10. Bit of XTR and swapping out bars, stem etc should get it under? Last years model, didn't weigh it, but it certainly had the 'wow thats light' factor picking it up stock.

This is one battle 26" could win though?


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:45 am
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Sub 24lb is certainly doable but depends on lots of things which may or may not detract from the overall ride you are looking for.

For example, working from a Scalpel frame (1621g including BB, headset, shock, seatclamp, etc), using 26 inch wheels (1261g for ~£400), cheating slightly with Thunder Burts (720g), XX1, Lefty XLR Carbon (1260g) and some parts that wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea like a Speedneedle I was sub 18lbs (its on Weightweenies if you want to check)

The hardtail I'm riding now is just under 19.5lbs but in all honesty a much better ride. If you wanted you could be [url= http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=864381 ]around 6.8kg for the same 26 Scalpel frame[/url] and the [url= http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=122929 ]SWorks Epic World Cup[/url] is supposedly just over 21lbs out of the box but getting [url= http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=121932 ]sub 20 on a 29er full sus [/url] is an even more massive expenditure!

Using all that as a guide I'd imagine you can work up to 24lbs for the combo of parts that suit you more- getting it at the price you can live with most likely needs attention to detail and some patience hunting parts


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mmm thanks njee the worlds my oyster assuming i got deep pockets.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:45 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Yep! That said, that's what I was alluding to with knowing where to spend money.

New Ultimate do an aluminium seatpost that's 130g and c£80, Mt Zoom do loads of really nice lightweight finishing kit that's reasonably priced - I'm using their 710mm 116g flat bars, as well as some other bits like a 6g seat clamp, 25g ti bottle cage etc. When I had QRs I used their skewers, and they were excellent. Alu bolts are fine in non load-bearing places, weigh half what ti bolts weigh, and cost pence. Quaxar cable outer is half the weight of SP41.

You can make some big gains with intelligent choices of parts, rather than going mental.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:50 am
Posts: 2740
Free Member
 

Wash your mouth out with soap sir!

Sorry, my bad 🙁


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 10:58 am
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

You can make some big gains with intelligent choices of parts, rather than going mental.

So true. BBB Ultraspace headset spacers, Bontrager X-Lite grips, AB spiderless chainrings, 1x10/11, KCNC brake adapters, Hope Tech X2 Race rotors, KCNC stem, Mt Zoom bar, KCNC skewers/ axles, XC Racer Ti bolts, Chinese 130g seatpost (£50!), Xpedo XMF08TT pedals... just some examples of very durable and robust parts that function the same as things twice as expensive and/ or twice as heavy. There are lots of great performing, light and great gems out there if you look around a bit


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 11:01 am
 adsh
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

6lb short travel 29er alloy frame (eg spearfish) will take considerable work and money (XX1 or XTR 1x10 and LB wheels plus light finishing kit and lighter tyres) to get to a true 24lb with pedals. The more travel the harder (money) it gets especialy if you are going to match strength. There's not much point in having a 140mm frame and forks and putting race Golds on it.

The half pound from 24 to 24.5lb takes quite a lot off effort and cash.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 11:11 am
 br
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also there can be a fair bit extra in a 'proper' sized frame as opposed to one's built for pygmies..., eh Nick?

But, it really depends on where/how you use it. My HT has been as low as 22lbs, but now 26lbs as I've slowly destroyed all the lightweight components that were perfectly adequate in the South East, now I live in the Scottish Borders - plus added stuff like a dropper etc, better suited to the riding we have.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chinese 130g seatpost (£50!)

Yours hasn't cracked or developed any play or creaking yet then?!


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 12:33 pm
 DanW
Posts: 1062
Free Member
 

Yours hasn't cracked or developed any play or creaking yet then?!

Nope. Have 2 on 2 bikes and they've been great. I don't ride your miles 10 hours a week most weeks. The Caveats are that the seatpost is advertised for £70 and took some bartering with the seller to get them for £50 and that the brand is "Climax" and the 27.2 one I needed took some searching to get one without the graphics (30.9 and upwards easy to find "nude")


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That Ripley looks fantastic.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:21 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Also there can be a fair bit extra in a 'proper' sized frame as opposed to one's built for pygmies..., eh Nick?

No, there isn't, that's a red herring, sorry Bruce! You're perhaps giving away half a pound between an XL and a medium, but that can come out in the wash in variations on other parts. At the end of the day the differences are in the frame, steerer and cables, that's about it! That doesn't add 2lbs or anything, despite what anyone who posts on a 'what does your bike weigh' thread wants to think! Some years back I weighed several Stumpjumpers at the shop, same model, a couple of mediums, a couple of large. The heaviest one was a medium...

The only thing is that someone riding an XL bike will weigh more than a shorter person of equivalent build, and thus perhaps need stronger components.

6lb short travel 29er alloy frame (eg spearfish) will take considerable work and money (XX1 or XTR 1x10 and LB wheels plus light finishing kit and lighter tyres) to get to a true 24lb with pedals.

See, you're falling into the trap! LB rims aren't really any lighter than Crests, you don't [i]need [/i]to spend that lots of money to get a light wheelset (not that LB rims are hugely expensive obviously!). Sub 1400g would be doable on 29" Crests for <£400 I reckon. XX1 is light, but actually an XT/XTR 1x10 mix (with a T-Rex if you want) and a Next SL chainset would weigh less and cost less than a full XX1 or XTR groupset, if that was primary motivation. Obviously XX1 with a Next SL would be even lighter!


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

You'll struggle to get a Stumpjumper FSR 29er below 25lbs if you want to use it properly. Mine is the carbon EVO frame with Pikes and dropper-post, XX1 and ENVE wheels, and comes in at 26.5lbs.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:26 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

You'll struggle to get a Stumpjumper FSR 29er below 25lbs if you want to use it properly

1) define properly
2) no you won't, but it'll cost money and be about component choice (ie not Enves!)


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tony: Though it may sound excessively geeky, I would recommend a simple spreadsheet to plug all this stuff into. It will give you a really good idea of where weight and wonga are being spent. You'll also find out where you draw your own line between cost, functionality, comfort and performance...At some point, though (different for each rider) weight-saving crosses the weenie-ism line between simply trying to get a nice light bike that rides well and a disproportionately expensive stat based sport of abstract numbers...


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On the FSR, what is the frame and shock weight? I've been looking at 29er FS's (mainly Scalpels and Canyon Lux) and the carbon frames with shock seem to come in at around 2100g - that's only 1KG / 2lb over a very light HT frame....even if you add a drooper it ought to come in under 25 easy enough...


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:36 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Well... it's 1kg over a fairly light hardtail frame, it's 1.2kg over a very light hardtail frame... That half a pound costs a lot to save elsewhere! And 1kg = 2.2 pounds, 1.2kg = 2.64lbs, so suddenly you've added 2/3 of a pound over your "it's about 2lbs heavier than a hardtail".

Makes a difference if you're chasing a light build.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope. Have 2 on 2 bikes and they've been great.

They are good and I love the comfort/flex.
On the HT, which has the most use on it, the holes cut through the carbon post have ovalised and creak.

I'm happy with the strength, but maybe that sections needs an aluminium insert.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Njee: That's relevant if you just want a light bike for posting on forums but not much good if what you want is some rear bounce 😀

My point is a 22lb hardtail is quite easy to build so, with a 2-3lb weight gain for an FS frame, a 25lb FS shouldn't be any harder (albeit a bit more expensive).


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 2:02 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Njee: That's relevant if you just want a light bike for posting on forums but not much good if what you want is some rear bounce

Firstly I use my bike plenty thanks! Secondly, you're missing my point. Nothing wrong with having bouncy bits, you said:


carbon frames with shock seem to come in at around 2100g - that's only 1KG / 2lb over a very light HT frame

All I said was that you're not "only" giving away 2lbs over a "very light HT", it's actually 2.64lbs. It wasn't a specific comment on the type of bike, just a bit of an observation about the devil being in the detail if you want a light build.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 2:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Njee: Looking back to the title of the thread, I'm reminded that the OP is looking for a lightweight FS rather than a display of bike shop pendantry. 😀


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 2:20 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Well the answer to the OP's question is, of course, "yes".

Anything after that is wholly pointless.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 2:20 pm
Posts: 966
Free Member
 

my 650b cannondale scalpel carbon is pretty much bang on 20lbs with pedals (and it's also for sale... lol)

[URL= http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x406/alexgrabau/20140529_125818-1_zpsed6163b7.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x406/alexgrabau/20140529_125818-1_zpsed6163b7.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

my brand new Radon Slide 160mm 650b carbon trail monster is supposed to be circa 27lbs out of the box, but with a bit of tweaking, I reckon I could (and will) take another 2lbs out of that which brings me down to 25lbs complete with pikes, reverb and bombproof dt swiss ex1501 spline wheels

[URL= http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x406/alexgrabau/20140819_123404_zpsec44c20c.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x406/alexgrabau/20140819_123404_zpsec44c20c.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

I seem to remember that the Titus FTM Carbon I build up around Christmas time came in at around 24lbs all up (inc pedals). Those frames are crazy light. The bike was set up with Fox Talas 140 forks, 1x10, reverb, and Stans Arch EX / hope wheels.

[URL= http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x406/alexgrabau/20140102_155011_zpsfcfc068e.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x406/alexgrabau/20140102_155011_zpsfcfc068e.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Large Stumpy Epic Marathon, only changes to stock are going tubeless, 1x10 XT gears and a Thomson elite layback post, 24 lbs on the nose with 2 cages and XT pedals.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 3:54 pm
 adsh
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

NJee - I take your point but at 72kg I need the stiffer rim to go lighter on spokes if the wheel isn't to get too flexy.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 5:26 pm
 Rik
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I seem to remember that the Titus FTM Carbon I build up around Christmas time came in at around 24lbs all up (inc pedals). Those frames are crazy light. The bike was set up with Fox Talas 140 forks, 1x10, reverb, and Stans Arch EX / hope wheels.

Haha!! As if, stw scales of make believe at it again. Prob between 18-270 times today, these scales are popular. Where can I buy them.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 6:22 pm
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

^^^^ as above,

even the scalpel, one-up, xt, ali rail saddle, x9 crank arms, ali lefty with ali steerer?

the above has said, the devil, really is in the detail

i had this a while back,

paint was stripped off and clear lacquered - saved weight
MCFK Post and Lefty Steerer
Fred - Cheating

cannot remember if it was sub 18 or sub 19, was silly light though could have shaved loads off it without Di2, flat pedals, EDGE/ENVE rims, Bar and Stem

[URL= http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/y394/dansipods2/332ed8b4-1_zpscbb8a924.jp g" target="_blank">http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/y394/dansipods2/332ed8b4-1_zpscbb8a924.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 6:51 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Pedals aside, that's a great looking bike.


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 8:20 pm
Posts: 966
Free Member
 

Yup. 20lbs for the scalpel... X9 cranks but with Wolftooth direct mount chainring. Very light wheels. Schwalbe thunder Burts running tubeless, egg eaters, use carbon bits, ultralight brake discs, esi grips etc etc


 
Posted : 21/08/2014 8:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are plenty of ~23lb and less Czars on MTBR

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 12:01 am
Posts: 6257
Full Member
 

I've got one of these:
[img] [/img]
22 lbs

It's for sale too, for the right price.


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 12:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why do people always dispute others claims. Oh it's a web forum.... 😀

Anyway actual weight of my Ripley was 25.8lbs.

It is now over 26lb because of the Reverb. The simple fact is if you start with a really light frame and wheels you can start to built a light bike. The frame and rear shock on a Ripley weight 5.2lb which by any standard is pretty light and the forks are under 4lb.

I don't expect mine to go down much in weight but my next upgrades are to bring the rest of the components in line with the quality of the frame, forks and wheels etc.

Thank you Timb34 for the sensible comment.


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 10:53 am
 br
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]No, there isn't, that's a red herring, sorry Bruce! You're perhaps giving away half a pound between an XL and a medium, but that can come out in the wash in variations on other parts[/i]

But Nick as you point out, the devil is in the detail and if there is 1/2lb extra due to sizing, then that is another 1/2lb.

And not all us folk that need large frames are porkers 🙂


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 11:42 am
 adsh
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And is all non rotating weight equal. Leaving aside old chestnuts such as no fluid/taking a dump I could starve a kilo off (and it would be starve) - does that have the same effect on climbing as 1kg of non wheel weight on the bike?


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 11:51 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

But Nick as you point out, the devil is in the detail and if there is 1/2lb extra due to sizing, then that is another 1/2lb.

I said "perhaps", because it can vary, and may in fact be virtually nothing, or indeed nothing! I also didn't say that everyone who rides an XL bike is a porker, merely that you're heavier than someone of an identical build who's shorter - I chose my words carefully 😉


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Given that the new Yeti ASRc is under 24lbs out the box it's definitely do-able.

[url= http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/gear/category/bikes/mountain-bikes/full-suspension/product/review-yeti-asrc-48741/ ]As built, our ASRc test bike weighs in at 10.23kg (22.56lb). Yeti’s published weight for this complete bike is 10.47kg (23.1lb) maybe we didn’t have enough sealant in our tires, or maybe the company is being conservative with its estimates, in either case, it’s an light bike without the need to resort to exotic (read exorbitantly expensive) component upgrades. [/url]

I think Njee has it right though. The devil really is in the detail. Not everything weights (or gives the savings) what you think it might, and expensive isn't always lighter. A lot of research and careful component selection is what's needed.


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 12:20 pm
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

Easily done I agree.i built an xl tallboy to 22.8pounds on training wheels.

Never weighed it with tubs on but would assume another pound off that. Nothing delicate about the build other than 100g saddle and syntace finishing kit. Group set was xx1.


 
Posted : 22/08/2014 3:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a Trek Superfly 100 sl elite.

Its sub 25lbs with a Stealth dropper.

its for sale if interested?

Could be made lighter by going 1x10/11,as its running 2x10 at the moment.
Fitting a standard seatpost and 1x11 should see 23.5-24 lbs easily and thats for a large frame


 
Posted : 23/08/2014 8:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Turner Czar is exactly 22lbs, with an XTR double groupset and fox forks, sub 23lb would be easy without spending silly money


 
Posted : 04/09/2014 6:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wow just tucked back into this thread (lucky me sat by the pool on hols in Majorca) it's all interesting reading and looking at them Scalpel pics has now got me looking into Cannondales more so as I had one 10 years ago and was very impressed with the finish, gonna take a look at their Scalpels


 
Posted : 14/09/2014 3:33 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

And a great contribution to resurrect it 😉


 
Posted : 14/09/2014 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oops sorry


 
Posted : 14/09/2014 3:42 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!