Less dull steel roa...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Less dull steel road bike.....

66 Posts
39 Users
0 Reactions
373 Views
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hello,

I've got a Kaffenback II which while OK for the purpose, commuting, fitness etc it is really uninspiring and dull for a steel frame.
Been looking around for a alternative with a bit more clearance.... I've had a quick look so far and the Cotic Roadrat/Escapde are looking good options.

Are they good options? is there anything out similar price? Reynolds tubing would be nice but might be a bit of of the price bracket, I don't think I'm careful enough to have a carbon frame.....

Thanks in advance

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 12507
Free Member
 

Charge plug 5 frame on ebay?

Tange prestige


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Budget?

http://www.tritoncycles.co.uk/road-bikes-c5/road-c37/kona-roadhouse-road-bike-2016-p17219

and go via a cashback site for another ~70 quid off.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.freeborn.co.uk/genesis-2016-croix-de-fer-10-bike ]Genesis Croix de fer?[/url]


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:55 pm
Posts: 7884
Free Member
 

I found my Escapade very dull.

In general wide tyred frames are built to take offroad abuse so they have to be tough and hence are a bit dead.

If you want something sprightly then go for something slim and lightweight and flexy.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Charge plug 5 frame

Nice one but there is not that much space up rear. 38c at a push with next to nothing clearance.

Realistically bald rubber up to 38c will fit but without any slack for mudguard or sth like that.

I like my Plug very much, but someone that was designing placement of top and bottom bridge in rear triangle should be dragged naked on the snowy streets of most northern part of north...

Cheers!
I.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:01 pm
Posts: 12467
Full Member
 

If you want something sprightly then go for something slim and lightweight and flexy.

Like a 30-year old Raleigh! 😀


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:22 pm
Posts: 262
Full Member
 

My 853 genisis fugio is probably the least "dull" bike I own, not sure whether that's down to the material or geometry though as its a cross bike. Rode a Escapade when looking at bikes last year and didn't like it, not sure I'd describe it as dull, more just a bit "meh"


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:34 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

I've said this before but the Genesis Equilibrium 20 disc 2016 version might still be available, c£900 down from £1550. Google first then ask your local stockist to check with their rep.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:36 pm
Posts: 13330
Full Member
 

As a fellow owner of a Kaff, anything will be more lively and interesting than it. Saying that, I have ridden a mates Escapade and wasn't that impressed, it was better than the Kaff but not by much and certainly enough to warrant a new purchase.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://fairlightcycles.com/faran/ ]Fairlight Faran frameset[/url] and swap over as much as you can?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for the Genesis Equilibrium (non disc in my case). Prefer the ride over my previous Pegoretti Marcelo but that’s mainly because the Pegi likes to be ridden hard and I’m not strong enough to do that any more. Maybe the OP should state their size and likely riding style to help tailor some of the responses?

Anybody interested in a 58cm used Pegoretti frame and fork?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:58 pm
Posts: 9763
Full Member
 

When I was looking at bikes I thought these looked fab

http://konaworld.com/rove_st.cfm

[img] [/img]

I ended up with an Aluminium bike with carbon fork. As at my price point the Al didn't seem any better or worse than steel


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:30 pm
Posts: 1725
Free Member
 

My other half has a Kona Rove and it really should not be considered a 'road bike'. It is one heavy beast of a bike. Performs well offroad, but is very slow on road. If you want a less dull steel road bike, you are going to have to spend proper money in my opinion to get a proper road bike, not a gravel / commuting type bike


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:59 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 


Fairlight Faran frameset and swap over as much as you can?

Yea should of said I was looking frame only.....Salsa Marrakesh looks a good option but I'm not keen on the colour...

thanks for the link.

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 6:00 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

You don't need to spend loads to get a 'springy' steel frame.

One of the nicest frames I've ever ridden was a British Eagle gas pipe job.

Don't forget you can get custom built steel for way less than many off the peg/'Taiwanese with a fashionable name' frames.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 6:06 pm
Posts: 1013
Free Member
 

Don't be so harsh on the Kaffenback - it's not so harsh on you (literally). It might be dull but it's sturdy and reassuring (insert daft similie to taste). It could do with a bit more clearance and the toe overlap takes some getting used to.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 7:24 pm
Posts: 17209
Full Member
 

It's geometry that makes the bike feel dull, that and weight. Steel will always be heavier, but decent road geometry with a little small diameter tube flex makes for a great ride

Look for 73 degree head and seat tube angles. The kaffenback has slack touring geometry. What you want is more racey. Kona Haole was perfect as is the paddy wagon if you don't want gears. Any off the peg 525 frame from a good builder will suffice if the geometry is right.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not a croix de fer! Well not a 2015 croix de fer 10. Mine although is a good commuter and light tourer. On the road it is a lifeless lump compared to my Ritchey Logic Road bike.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 12:18 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

You don't need to spend loads to get a 'springy' steel frame...

...One of the nicest frames I've ever ridden was a British Eagle gas pipe job.
.

Funny, I was thinking of my old British Eagle [i]Touristique[/i] (Reynolds 531). Lovely bike, very comfortable. But I ended up with a modern Genesis offroad tourer/monstercross thingy*. Would have both if I could.

*Frame is seamless Double-Butted Chromoly Fork is unicrown Double-Butted Cr-Mo. Although not exactly lightweight I feel it's plenty lively. ymmv


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 6:22 am
Posts: 10539
Full Member
 

I've had both a Genesis Day One 853 and a Croix de Fer 725. Both felt dull to ride. Now have a Niner RLT (Aluminium) and a Kinesis Tripster (Titanium). Much better.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 6:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I love the look of steel but find aluminium a better material for bikes.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 7:08 am
Posts: 13601
Free Member
 

Surly Pacer

http://surlybikes.com/bikes/pacer/geometry


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 7:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

136mm headtube and flat top bar..not for me or many others looking at the owners posting pics with steerer extenders.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 7:44 am
Posts: 9306
Free Member
 

really uninspiring and dull for a steel frame.

Is 'dull' a slacker more stable geometry or a stiffer tubeset? I think that gets confused or the terms get used for 2 separate characteristics of a frame.

eg, the Escapade doesn't use particularly stiff-looking tube ODs and is unlikely to be very thick-wall tubing, but it does have a relaxed geometry. Some here might call it dull, others springy and 'real steel feel'.

eg again, for me the more flexible steel tubes don't always mix so well with a stable geometry but others like that combo. Some like relatively stiff steel frames that only spring under pressure - smaller or less powerful riders could find them 'dead'. Some like steel frames that 'plane' or flex under pedalling, stronger riders may find that means negative flex under harder handling.
The thing is not to think a frame has a characteristic that is fixed, it's more of a subjective impression and a case of finding a frame with flex levels that suit you.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 10:38 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

The thing is not to think a frame has a characteristic that is fixed, it's more of a subjective impression and a case of finding a frame with flex levels that suit you.

This rings true. (Goes to tap fingernail on tubesets 😉 )


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 10:49 am
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think I find it a tad stiff, I had a Cannondale caad8 Saeco back in 2006 and that was a dreadful bone shaker, I didn't keep it long and put me off aluminium until I rode the Cannondale MTB I bought last year, but I still need a steel bike of some sorts.....
Maybe I should try fitting wider tyres and carbon forks...

I did want to get a Ragley Rodwell (Alu I know) before I bought the Kaffenback but couldn't find one 🙁

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 11:35 am
Posts: 781
Free Member
 

one of Dom's Bokehs ? yes i know it's aluminium but if it's anything
like the definition i have it rides superbly.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 12:01 pm
Posts: 19
Full Member
 

resolution from Dom is steel...


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 12:07 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

And about 3x what I want to spend.....

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fairlight Strael :

http://fairlightcycles.com/strael/?v=79cba1185463

Charlie has a sale on ritchey swiss cross frame, not quite road specific though.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 nerd
Posts: 433
Free Member
 

I suggest that you get on eBay and LFGSS forum to try to find an older steel bike.

I have a Merckx Corsa Extra that has standard diameter tubing (25mm top tube, 28mm seat tube and down tube) which has a spritely ride, with a bit of flex, and also stable geometry (relatively long wheel base). Very comfy bike to ride all day. Weighs 2.1kg for the frame and 700g for the fork.

I also have a Colnago Superissimo Brain which has oversize tubing - oversize as defined in the early 90s. This has a 28mm top tube, 32mm downtube and 28mm seattube. This is a very lively bike with shorter chainstays and wheel base when compared to the Merckx. Still comfy to ride but a bit more "direct" - not quite as straightforward to ride when tired. Weighs 1.8kg for the frame and 650g for the fork, so pretty light despite being essentially lugged, oversize double butted cro-mo.

The problem (in my opinion) with modern steel frames is that they have to pass the CEN test and manufacturers are trying to match the stiffness of carbon frames. This leads to dull and heavy frames.

For a British builder look out for Rourkes. These are all custom, though, so not quite as easy to pick out one or two models.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 4:25 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

I prefer fatter tyres these days, but if I was looking for a a decent steel bike, the [url= http://www.pashley.co.uk/bikes/bicycles/pathfinder-trail.php ]Pashley Pathfinder[/url] would get my attention.

[img] [/img]

Proper Reynolds 531/631, lugged frame, but with modern accoutrements, and from a British company.

What's not to like?

Otherwise I'd be looking at a [url= http://www.shandcycles.com ]Shand Stoater [/url]

[img] [/img]

Singulars are always very nice too.

The comments suggesting looking at a quality second-hand frame should be considered. It doesn't cost a fortune to get them refinished with a new paint job, and they're as good as new. The only problem is you can't use a lot of modern components.

Basically they don't deteriorate if looked after, and the ride is very nice. I have a 40 year old Flying Scot and a 50 year Andre Bertin both lugged frames built with good Reynolds 531 or 531C and they ride and track beautifully.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 6:40 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

What makes the bike ride well is not just the frame but overall weight, tyres and pressure.

I doubt one 5lb road framed bike will differ from another until you lighten the build.

As above any 531 or similar will ride nicer but you may not notice until the build is lighter. See comparison to Sunday beat Ritxhey Logic above.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 6:55 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

cynic-al - Member
What makes the bike ride well is not just the frame but overall weight, tyres and pressure.

I doubt one 5lb road framed bike will differ from another until you lighten the build...

There are subtle differences IMO. I love my Pompino, it's a great bike, but it's not as sweet to ride as my older lugged frame bikes.

I do suspect it's got an awful lot to do with the fore and aft compliance of the front fork though. 🙂

A light build is always nice though - working on the principle of nothing heavier than it needs to be rather than ultimate weight weenie.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 11:18 pm
Posts: 11333
Full Member
 

Are they good options? is there anything out similar price? Reynolds tubing would be nice but might be a bit of of the price bracket, I don't think I'm careful enough to have a carbon frame.....

Soma Double Cross is nice. I went from one of those to a carbon Dirty Disco and - touch wood - haven't broken it so far. I dinged the top tune of the Soma though. Carbon is tougher than you think. And repairable. Mate of mine broke the seat-stay on a Scott, repaired it himself with a DIY kit and race the 3 Peaks next weekend without any problems.


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 8:04 am
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the ideas! Will keep it all in mind.
I do like the Cotic Escapade as I can get it local but would mean a new front wheel as far as I can tell.

Whatever I do it needs to be disc specific, and around the 3-500 mark, the Genesis Equilibrium does look tempting.

The other option is to stick with what I got and try some carbon forks, though carbon forks with 1/8th straight steerer and disc mounts seem hard to come by?


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 10:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I upgraded from a disc kaffenback to an escapade. It's a different ride and I prefer it. Especially as it'll take 40mm tyres for more off-road fun. It's ok to ride on the road but it's not the most exciting bike to ride on road.

Buts that's not really what it's for...


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 11:40 am
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I upgraded from a disc kaffenback to an escapade. It's a different ride and I prefer it. Especially as it'll take 40mm tyres for more off-road fun. It's ok to ride on the road but it's not the most exciting bike to ride on road.

Buts that's not really what it's for...

Thanks for that insight.

I don't ride road that ofter...mainly as a commute and if don't want to load the car up to go off proper road somewhere and just go around back roads a bit.

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anybody got an opinion (this is stw after all !) between a kaff2 and an equilibrium disc?

Worth upgrading to or too similar?


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 1:21 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anybody got an opinion (this is stw after all !) between a kaff2 and an equilibrium disc?

Worth upgrading to or too similar?

Good question, the things that are drawing me are carbon forks with tapered headset, a bit more tyre clearance and that Reynolds badge (725).

I think the Croix or Tour de Fer would be too similar.

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 1:32 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

jerrys - Member
Anybody got an opinion (this is stw after all !) between a kaff2 and an equilibrium disc?...

If you stick a carbon fork on a Pompino (the better looking brother of the Kaff) it's a completely different ride.

If you're on a budget, a decent fork makes the bike feel much better, and saves the expense of a new bike. On the other hand, who doesn't love a new bike... 🙂


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 4:30 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Does PX quote frame and forks weight or just frame? Just wondering as a Medium Kaff is quoted at circa 2.2kg and a Medium Equilibrium disc with Carbon forks is quoted at 2.94kg.


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 5:04 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

Reads as frame not frameset but that's just how I read it.


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 5:13 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Anybody got an opinion (this is stw after all !) between a kaff2 and an equilibrium disc?

I had a pompetamine which i think is v close to a Kaffenbak, and an Equilibrium disc, which was 100gm lighter. Don't think they rode much different at all.


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 6:07 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I had a pompetamine which i think is v close to a Kaffenbak, and an Equilibrium disc, which was 100gm lighter. Don't think they rode much different at all.

Was that the Reynolds one with Carbon forks? Might not be worth the change then.....

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 6:13 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

It was the first year they did it, can't remember the forks, they were carbon tho


 
Posted : 22/01/2017 7:37 pm
Posts: 6513
Full Member
 

though carbon forks with 1/8th straight steerer and disc mounts seem hard to come by?

http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/lynskey-endurance-disc-carbon-road-fork-2016/rp-prod89254

straight 1 1/8" alu steerer, carbon legs. Keep meaning to buy some for my Norco Search (steel version)


 
Posted : 23/01/2017 10:14 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

I have a mint Cotic X for sale in the classifieds if it fits...


 
Posted : 23/01/2017 10:21 pm
Posts: 384
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for the options given, oxym0r0n would be nice but something has come up in my other hobby and that sort of takes priority....
Decided to try some fatter tyres, picked up some Spesh Trigger 700x33's to give them a go, fitted a new BB the same time, just need to switch out the gear cable and we are ready to try it on the Gnarmac once more.

[url= https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/344/32428889341_3591c65487_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/344/32428889341_3591c65487_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/RpCwZK ]16177771_10154294022093225_1219705071484904626_o[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/2strokesteve/ ]Stephen Williams[/url], on Flickr

Might try a double wrap on the tape as well...not sure yet...

Cheers, Steve


 
Posted : 27/01/2017 12:49 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I don't ride it as often as I'd like and have other more 'fashionable' bikes but I don't plan on selling the Cross Check. Springy and infinitely versatile. Otherwise I'd go second hand and prioritise a nice steel frame if you're looking value for money. Slightly leftfield but there's a nice Singular Gryphon on ebay, works well shod for the roads.


 
Posted : 27/01/2017 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Haha. Good choice.........


 
Posted : 27/01/2017 1:13 pm
Posts: 1899
Free Member
 

I like my Plug very much, but someone that was designing placement of top and bottom bridge in rear triangle should be dragged naked on the snowy streets of most northern part of north...

Cut them off then. Chain stay and seat stay bridges serve no purpose beyond mudguard and kickstand mounting.

I have tested several frames....the exact same frames...with and without a chainstay bridge. Whether cast into the shell or not, there is no (zero) difference in stiffness in a typical race frame, whether it has a bridge or not. On the frames I have tested to date, deflection measurements under a given load have been essentially the same with or without a bridge in nearly every case. Again, I am talking about a road/race style frame with the typical 408 to 415mm rear end. There is a slight difference when dealing with a very long rear end, like a touring bike with 460mm or etc. stay lengths, but only if the bridge is located rearward of the bb shell quite a distance, but even then, the difference is small and would not be perceptible IMO.

http://www.velocipedesalon.com/forum/f10/chainstay-bridge-27065.html


 
Posted : 27/01/2017 3:09 pm
Posts: 17366
Full Member
 

I was looking at a Genesis Croix de Fer today. Has anyone tried a 2" tyre in there.

Looks like clearance to me if you used a tyre without lugs like a Schwalbe Big Apple.


 
Posted : 27/01/2017 4:00 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Some well-priced Equilibriums on Winstanleys at the mo


 
Posted : 27/01/2017 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you are still looking for an amazing steel road frame I have a Ritchey Road Logic up for sale. It's a 55cm.
I'm not a roadie by any means but this frame really got me extending my commute and wanting to ride more and more. Such a pleasure to ride but I need to get it moved on as I'm scrabbling around to get my house deposit up together! The ride quality is superb and with the full carbon fork it's super light.
I can send pics etc if needed.


 
Posted : 20/02/2017 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fairlight Strael :

I rather like the look of that. Nice that they offer a short and tall geo too.


 
Posted : 20/02/2017 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Me too - I'm thinking of getting a disc winter bike and am considering one of those, has a lot going for it.


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is quite tricky to find something that'll feel quite racey, not tall and short, with discs, mounts for guards, and that doesn't come in at custom prices. If it had nice routing for Di2 without the cable stops I'd be even more tempted.


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, right now I'm thinking that, Bowman Pilgrims (or maybe Layhams disc which is on the cards) or Kinesis 4S. Maybe a Mason.

Don't have the cash right now, but hoping to get sorted pre-next winter.


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Palace is nice but no guard mounts and reckon clearance might be an issue. Ideally would want something that has proper provision for guards. New 4S looks ok, but would need quite a long stem and is maybe just a little bit boring. Layhams is nice but silly money and currently not disc.

Shand Stooshie is tempting via the custom sizing route to make it longer and lower. But that's more than 1600 quid which is proper custom money.

Mason's looks ok but are far too short for what I want. Price isn't too bad though for the Definition.


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep did quick edit - meant Pilgrims, not Palace!


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Agreed on 4S, agreed on Layhams but disc version on the way may well be the route I go for - see this:

And agreed about Shand!


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pilgrim would fit the bill if I didn't need about a 200mm stem to get the position I want 😕


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

See what you mean about money for Layhams, though - hadn't realised it was that much!


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 10:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If I was going to spend that sort of cash I think I'd just go custom. Something like this maybe...

http://road.cc/content/review/182711-saffron-frameworks-frame

Some alternatives here...

http://road.cc/content/buyers-guide/194720-15-best-steel-road-bikes-and-frames


 
Posted : 22/02/2017 11:11 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!