La Pierre sizing
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] La Pierre sizing

14 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
57 Views
Posts: 1
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I like the look of the zesty and wondered how they came up re: size. I'm 6' 3" but ride a large santa cruz so am thinking of going for a 50cm la pierre. Anyone give me some advice?
cheers


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:19 am
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Test ride i would say - you are border line 54cm.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:24 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

I am a similar size and I've got a large, the XL is massive.

Defiantly worth trying though, you may prefer the extra size.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

I'm 6' and ride a 46cm x-control. Its spot on for me, but given the choice I prefer frames on the small size. If I was your hieght it would be a 50cm for sure. But deff at least have a sit on both. a proper ride would be better.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 11:53 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
Topic starter
 

cheers, going to have a go on a 50 cm 514.
Any thoughts on best model - worth the extra for the carbon frames?


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm 6ft 1in and ride an XL. The L felt too short, but I have arms like a baboon and legs up to my armpits so maybe my oddball shape had an effect. Go try one for size. Fab bike, BTW.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 12:47 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Any thoughts on best model - worth the extra for the carbon frames?

514 is nice and light (enough) I'd say. Not tried the full carbon ones but they must be really feathery.

Lower models bit heavy. I've got a 214 and wish I'd got a better frame.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 1:06 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

There isn't a massive difference in the weight of the aluminum and carbon frames, the difference comes mostly from the components.

I went for a 314, as I wanted to spec it myself, I think the only bits remaining are the frame and rear shock. It worked out considerably cheaper doing it that way.

And the paint job on the 514 is awful this year!


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

Hob Nob +1. I went down the same route with my X-Control
http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/new-bike-lapierre-x-control-310

Ended up with a lighter better specced bike than the next model up the chain for less money.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 4:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IME the carbon frames are not all they're cracked up to be!!!


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 4:59 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

I went for a 314, as I wanted to spec it myself, I think the only bits remaining are the frame and rear shock. It worked out considerably cheaper doing it that way.

I got a reduced 214 and did the same. XT and SLX mix, light wheels, carbon bars and seatpost.

Came out noticeably heavier than the 514 I demoed.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 6:00 pm
Posts: 339
Full Member
 

Im 6ft 2 and a 50cm suits me really well. Keeps it chuckable.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Came out noticeably heavier than the 514 I demoed.

why do think that was?


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 7:40 pm
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

why do think that was?

The point I was trying to make is just that the alu frame seems quite a bit heavier than the alu/carbon one.

Perhaps the rear is particularly heavy because of the reverse taper design?


 
Posted : 13/12/2010 1:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd probably go for a large. I sold a Large to a 6'3" guy and he would not have wanted any bigger. However, you really need to try them out, as pointed out earlier.


 
Posted : 13/12/2010 1:40 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!