Indexing road gears...
 

[Closed] Indexing road gears frustration

53 Posts
21 Users
0 Reactions
175 Views
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As above, I’m fine at setting up an mtb drivetrain with 1x and have done recently (both lots sram gx but also done sram x9 with sunrace cassettes etc too).

I had a massive fight with internal cable routing on this setup but it doesn’t seem to have any stiction through the frame.

I’ve got a Cannondale Caad12 disc - it has a 36/52 double on the front and just fitted a new 11-32 cassette with a longer cage Shimano 105 r7000 rear mech. I can’t get the rear properly indexed right now.

I’ve set the low and high screws and had it shifting by hand but I can’t get it perfect. Either it’s ssjusted so it’ll go up he block smoothly or down but not at the same time.

I’m assuming it’s either b screw, cable routing or chain length to blame. The front mech seems broadly ok.

Just also to check - are 11 speed joining links different between sram mtb and Shimano road? I haven’t used one here as it had a press in joining pin but I’d like to potentially use powerlinks here in future.

Thoughts?

Pictures below:

Rear cable loop

[IMG] [/IMG]

B screw gap

[IMG] [/IMG]

Chain big/ big - 2x photos - 1 to show its not highly tight but has some slack if you move the mech by hand

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

Chain small / small - doesn’t rub against itself

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:23 pm
Posts: 6905
Full Member
 

My moneys on that horrid cable bend into the derailleur

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 5004
Full Member
 

That rear cable loop looks way too tight to me & you can see it trying to push out of the mech at an angle. That can't be helping.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:27 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Yep, cable bend looks horrific.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:30 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

Have you used the correct super flexible bit of outer cable for the rear mech?

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:31 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes I’ve used the bit of cable that came with the mech. It was way too long so I chopped it down a bit. Maybe it needs chopping further so it’s just a short bend at less of an angle?

Also just realised it’s a directional chain and I might have joined it the wrong way round.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:36 pm
Posts: 17674
Full Member
 

+1 on the cable bend being my first port of call.....

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:37 pm
Posts: 835
Free Member
 

Cable bend too tight. The outer loop should be longer, needs to be a sweeping bend. You shouldn’t have cut it down.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:45 pm
Posts: 6905
Full Member
 

I'm not sure going shorter is really going to help, worth a shot though as my next idea was to go back to a normal mech instead of shadow

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:46 pm
Posts: 6769
Full Member
 

Think you're going to need something like a cable roller to cope with the severity of that cable bend. I'm presuming that it shifts OK going up the cassette - it's excessive cable friction that stops it the other way. Wouldn't worry about the chain direction and should be OK to use any 11 speed link.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 4:46 pm
Posts: 778
Free Member
 

outer cable length - Shimano mech are quite "fussy" about the curve ....

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 5:02 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mmmmn, tried cutting it down shorter so it has a less extreme bend and it’s a bit better - flies up to bigger cogs but a bit hesitant on the way down. In the middle of the block here’s a bit where it takes 2 shifts to make it go up.

I think I’m going to flip the chain so it is going in what I think is the right direction and try a longer / bigger loop of outer cable - I’ve got loads of new spare stuff lurking around. This Shimano bit doesn’t seem anymore flexible than anything else.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 5:10 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

I can't see longer cable helping, unless you routed it Millenium Falcon style (270 deg not 90) which might also be crap and would certainly look odd (sort of thing I'd try tho).

I'd go with a roller.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 5:22 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What kind of roller / where would you get one from? I’ve tried looking online and people seem to be running similar mechs on this bike without a roller. But the cable still looks wrong however it’s done!

Think I’m going to flip the chain just to fully rule that out.

Can anyone comment on the chain length - does that look ok - just to rule that out before I play with rollers /
Different length outer space?

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 5:30 pm
Posts: 24255
Full Member
 

cable too long, if you have routed through the frame check front mech cable isn't wrapped under or over the rear one, this will affect tension on rear & front incidentally. easy to do. shift the rear with a hand on exposed front cable and check for movement

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 5:33 pm
 pdw
Posts: 2206
Free Member
 

Might be worth trying a 5800 rear mech which has the cable coming in from the rear rather than the top, which is probably what the frame was designed for.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 6:24 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The 5800 was what I had on there before but it wouldn’t reach the 32t biggest cog on the new cassette!

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 6:45 pm
 pdw
Posts: 2206
Free Member
 

But presumably a 5800 SS (short cage)? You need a 5800 GS (medium cage) for a 32T.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:27 pm
Posts: 17145
Full Member
 

That's a Di2 frame if ever I saw one. Rear cable loop needs to exit about three inches further down the chainstay to work properly. Even when you've set it up with a longer loop, I'd still expect it to shift poorly with dirt ingress and friction.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:31 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You’re right it was short cage. The 2019 caad12 105 is running the same mech as I’ve bought though, so it must be possible to make it work....

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:32 pm
Posts: 6769
Full Member
 

What kind of roller / where would you get one from? I’ve tried looking online and people seem to be running similar mechs on this bike without a roller. But the cable still looks wrong however it’s done!

Jtek shift mate

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:38 pm
Posts: 17145
Full Member
 

Shifting will be very sensitive to the angle of the cable. Have you used plastic ferrules? These can kink, and whilst looking fine externally, add some of that all important extra friction. How you cut the cable outer will also be important, I cut when bent into the angle needed - the outer run along the inner, so the top will be longer than the bottom.

I'm sure it will work, but this little cable outer is almost always the reason for poor road shifting in my experience. I'd go with a roller too based on that angle.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:40 pm
 pdw
Posts: 2206
Free Member
 

That’s a Di2 frame if ever I saw one.

Possibly, but that sort of cable routing works fine with older derailleurs.

The 2019 caad12 105 is running the same mech as I’ve bought though, so it must be possible to make it work

You'd think, but I suspect it would be very sensitive to dirt and cable wear. It wouldn't be the first time that internal cable routing was fatally flawed. The original rear brake cable routing on my wife's Cube simply didn't work. It was so sensitive to cable length that you couldn't adjust for pad wear (see https://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/brake-cable-routing-problem/)

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 8:33 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I’d love Di2 or eTap given the budget 😝

I’ve just redone the cable with metal ferrules on the end instead of plastic ones to see if that makes a difference.

The internal routing seems to just leave the cable loose in the downtube - it has a cable stop for outer by the headtube, and then at the underneath of the BB there is a guide there for the front mech / rear mech / rear hydro disc hose. I wonder if I’ve messed up as there was a little white plastic pipe floating around and I assumed the cable went through that in the Guide - but wondering if it was meant to just sit round the cable in the chainstay. Could be causing extra friction. Such a **** design!

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 8:42 pm
Posts: 835
Free Member
 

I have the same routing on my Supersix and have just rewired it and fitted a new R8000 rear mech. I didn’t cut down the rear outer supplied with the mech. It’s working really nicely with the long loop slow bend.

I would run a new cable and a longer rear mech final outer loop if I were you.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 8:46 pm
Posts: 835
Free Member
 

PS there is a straw under the spindle at the BB. Take the cranks off and you will see it. That saves the cable getting worn against the spindle.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 8:49 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I could see that straw up the downtube but can see how I can get the cable through it from the port at the top.

I’ve got it sort of acceptable shifting for now with the last few changes.

I need to invest in the tools for the cranks / BB, plus get a new super flexible rear pipe (and not cut it down this time) and have another go to try and get it perfect. Or pay Mud Dock to do it 😝

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 9:49 pm
Posts: 835
Free Member
 

I’d easy sort it for you if your near Aberdeen

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 10:16 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Unfortunately I can’t get much further away from Aberdeen whilst in the U.K. down in Bristol 🙁

But appreciate the offer!

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 10:21 pm
Posts: 1663
Free Member
 

On internally routed frames I always drill out the cable stops for the rear mech & run full outer from shifter to mech. I've had Ultegra 6800 & now R8050 on my winter bike & I think the shifting is slicker than Di2 on the summer bike.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:45 am
Posts: 11658
Full Member
 

Top jockey wheel looks miles away from the cassette. I'm not sure you need that goat link alike bit.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 7:17 am
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The instructions do say you can remove that extra link for direct mount frames and go straight into the mech hanger. When looking online it looks like the link has been kept on the 2019 caad12’s though.

I think it could make the cable routing even worse if I remove it!

In terms of running full outer I don’t think I can bring myself to take a drill to my Cannondale 😱

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 7:26 am
Posts: 43561
Full Member
 

Why would you need to take a drill to it to run a full length outer? Just run it and cable tie to frame.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 7:59 am
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Have you got eyes though? Can’t do that to my beautiful Cannondale......

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 8:06 am
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Not too bad on the 8.5 mile commute this morning. Ironically I think the front mech is setup worse than the rear as I had to loosen the cable when getting the rear internal cabling routed. Not good at front mech setup!

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 10:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The root cuause of the issue seem sto be the fact Shmano have turned the part where the cable enters the mech through 90 degrees making the approach angle for the cable loop all wrong which is why it works on the older style mech in the lower photo...i have no idea why shimano did this it seems a bit of a daft design. That pulley wheel widget seems to me to be what you need to resolve the issue...bit like the pulley wheel SRAM have included on their MTB mechs.

Another option is, of course, to ditch the new style mech and go with an older style mech...they're cheap and work just as well.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 10:22 am
Posts: 6905
Full Member
 

i have no idea why shimano did this it seems a bit of a daft design.

It's a copy and paste from mtb Shadow mechs, where i've never heard of it being an issue. The only time I could ever see it being an issue is when the cable comes horizontally out of the chainstay.....which is unfortunately what's going on here. It' also just made me put the idea of getting an Ultegra RX mech on the back burner as my bike has very similar routing

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 11:14 am
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As it’s a new mech I’m determined to try everything to make it work properly - I don’t want to take a loss selling it and buy yet another rear mech!

I’m going to get a new flexy length of rear outer and have a play with it all on the weekend. Might have another look at the routing through the Bb area and check that’s not causing loads of drag.

Makes me crave di2 or eTap - but it would be much cheaper just to take it to my lbs and pay them to fix it!

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 11:33 am
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I went out at lunchtime to the lbs to see how they’re caad12’s are setup with the same mech as mine. They have a cable outer run a bit longer than my chopped down one but shorter than my original run pictured above. Probably about a 9” degree bend.

The lbs person also wasn’t aware the outer that comes on their bikes / with rear mechs is any different to normal cable - so I’m going to have another go this weekend with a longer piece of cable and see if that makes any different. I’m hoping I can get away with the existing inner otherwise it’s a fight with internal routing again which I don’t relish!

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 5:08 pm
Posts: 863
Full Member
 

Don't go for a longer bit of outer cable, make it shorter. On that design of rear mech, the point the cable outer stops doesn't move relative to the frame (well, not very much, there _is_ a pivot there). So a big length of outer will just add more friction.

It should look more like this:

[img] [/img]

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 5:41 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hi Pierre, your picture isn’t showing up, could you try posting it again please? The one in the bike shop was a lot shorter than the one I posted at the top but longer than what I have now chopped down.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:03 pm
Posts: 423
Free Member
 

Couple of things.....in last photo the direct mount is practically vertical whereas OP has it pointing rearwards, could be part of the issue. Also, are you sure that the inner cable is routed to the correct side of the clamp on the derailleur this is often a simple source of horrendous shifting issues. Finally , I realise that you mention cost and loss but, older simple mechs are much less fickle and are generally tolerant of very wide and variable shifts counter to what the salesmen would have us believe.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:03 pm
Posts: 423
Free Member
 

PS , with regard to 'power links', use Clarks, they are directional but their big advantage is that they are re-usable AND splittable by hand once you have the knack.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:08 pm
Posts: 1132
Free Member
 

My Supersix came with a weirdly long cable on the R8000 rear mech, and wouldn't shift down very well. I shortened the cable so it looks like the image Pierre posted, and it works much better.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:18 pm
Posts: 863
Full Member
 

Sorry, I'll try that again:

[img] [/img]Link is:

[url] [/url]

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:19 pm
Posts: 863
Full Member
 

It's not my photo, btw, I just googled "Shimano RD-R8000 cable outer" image search and found it on the 4th post on this page:

https://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13083407

... which looks about right to me.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:22 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think my mech is the same angle as the one played by Pierre. It’s fixed by the tabs on the mech againstes the tab on the mech hanger on the frame. I checked against the ones in the shop and it looks the same. I think an adjustment of the cable length to just a touch longer will get that to as good as possible. If that doesn’t get it perfect then I think the under bb routing needs some attention.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:34 pm
Posts: 863
Full Member
 

On most traditional (i.e. non-Shadow) rear mechs, a nice long cable loop is a good thing because it reduces the friction between the inner and outer cable that you'd get in a tight curve. The rear mech cable entry point pivots forwards and backwards as you change gears, so a big loop allows this to happen without causing extra friction.

On a Shadow-style rear mech like yours, joebristol, the design of the rear mech is different (it's been used on mountain bike rear mechs for years) and the cable entry point doesn't move as the derailleur pivots. So any cable route that minimises friction is good. If you've only got a short distance between the two cable stops, a section of cable outer that provides as near as possible to a smooth 90 degree curve would probably be best... or a big loop-the-loop that does 270 degrees!

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 6:47 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Probably need a couple of cm longer rear outer in that case.

 
Posted : 26/03/2019 8:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@joebristol

Did you ever resolve this?

I am having issues on my CAAD12 with rear shifting. New cables, new outers but where the ferrule enters the right hand side of the frame the cable catches (have tried running just cable through and still happens).

 
Posted : 02/06/2020 9:10 am
Posts: 1132
Free Member
 

Is it a CAAD12 with a shadow style mech? I have to use a really small loop on mine (like a 5cm length) to get it to shift smoothly. And with the really soft shimano outer

 
Posted : 02/06/2020 9:17 am
 igm
Posts: 11793
Full Member
 

Roller plus 1

I regularly move my old Avid Rollamajigs onto new bikes. NOS if you’re lucky or that JTEK further up.

 
Posted : 02/06/2020 12:30 pm
 igm
Posts: 11793
Full Member
 

NOS Rollamajig still on eBay.

Half the price of the JTEK.

 
Posted : 02/06/2020 12:37 pm
Posts: 10213
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I got it working acceptably in the end - with cable length like Pierre’s photo above. Where you say rubbing do you mean it’s not sitting straight in the end of the frame?

I’ve actually gone to Ultegra Di2 now which wasn’t without some initial setup/ teething problems but it’s absolutely brilliant now.

 
Posted : 02/06/2020 12:45 pm